Kyiv abandoned British offensive plan to justify heavy losses

17

According to one of the sources in the office of Volodymyr Zelensky, the plan for the Ukrainian offensive in the southern direction was developed by British military experts. However, for a number of reasons, it was not possible to implement it.

The idea of ​​the British was to cut the grouping of the RF Armed Forces into two parts, as well as to deliver distracting and main strikes. At the initial stage of the offensive, the Armed Forces of Ukraine advanced 10-15 km, occupying several settlements. On the other sectors of the front, Ukrainian units got bogged down in battles, which forced the command to transfer part of the reserves there.



The offensive began to collapse after the main forces of the Armed Forces of Ukraine fell into a fire bag. The British plan had to be abandoned, focusing on the capture of Vysokopolye to justify the heavy losses and the failure of the fighting strategy.

At the same time, as Russian military expert Mikhail Khodarenok noted, Kyiv gives information about the losses of the Armed Forces of Ukraine very carefully and dosed, while hinting that the attack on Kherson "will not lead to the liberation of the territories." Meanwhile, the failure of the Ukrainian troops in the southern direction is becoming more and more obvious.

In all previous directions, the enemy was either closed in a fire bag, or ground on the approaches ... And such results are everywhere - from Vysokopole and Olgino in the north of the Kherson region to Aleksandrovka in the southwest

- Khodarenok noted in his telegram channel.
    Our news channels

    Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

    17 comments
    Information
    Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
    1. +9
      5 September 2022 17: 41
      The British plan had to be abandoned, focusing on the capture of Vysokopolye to justify the heavy losses and the failure of the fighting strategy.

      I don’t understand anything what request No.

      How can abandoning a plan, no matter whose it is, justify big losses???
      1. -1
        5 September 2022 19: 27
        We sent all our forces to one sector of the front in order to achieve at least some results on it, thereby justifying the losses.
    2. -3
      5 September 2022 20: 48
      And, about "developed by British military experts" they write more than once ...
      Imagine that the operations of, say, the "Kantemirovskaya division" were developed by ... Cubans ...
      Funny.))))
      1. +2
        5 September 2022 21: 39
        What's so funny? For a long time, the Armed Forces of Ukraine have been led first by the United States, then by the World Bank. Not much funny here. And an attempt to capture the Zaporizhzhya NPP was put on them by small-shaven people. With the same result. They have no experience of military operations for a long time. Who does not know how to do it himself, teaches others ...
        1. +3
          6 September 2022 07: 27
          How strange it turns out. The Britons have no experience, crests are generally suckers and do not understand anything, and the SO has been slipping for five months.
          1. 0
            6 September 2022 13: 07
            The thing is different. We physically lack infantry for occupying (let's call a spade a spade) events. For a full-fledged offensive operation, superiority over the enemy should be at least 3x-5 times.
          2. +2
            6 September 2022 15: 37
            Quote: syndicalist
            How strange it turns out. The Britons have no experience, crests are generally suckers and do not understand anything, and the SO has been slipping for five months.

            No weirdness, everything is normal Yes . Otherwise it can not be.

            Politicians are sitting in the Kremlin who have imposed such a strategy of the army’s actions on the RF Armed Forces ...
      2. +1
        5 September 2022 21: 57
        Quote: Sergey Latyshev
        And, about "developed by British military experts" they write more than once ...

        This is practically the same as - "British scientists have proven" Yes
    3. +4
      5 September 2022 20: 50
      as Russian military expert Mikhail Khodarenok noted, Kyiv provides information about the losses of the Armed Forces of Ukraine very carefully and dosed,

      I watch the news on 24: Kyiv does not give out losses, Kyiv has classified the losses - And which of them has not been classified ????
      When the unfortunate expert puts pressure on the distortion of the figure, the question is brewing: -And from which side are these figures correct with regards to their side ???? Somehow it is not logical to blame the other side while having complete silence on the other. hi
      1. +1
        5 September 2022 21: 47
        Losses emerge in open sources. How many wounded were taken to the surrounding cities, queues of blood donors, etc. There were footage of an ambulance caravan from Nikolaev to Odessa in the networks. By the number of wounded, it is easy to calculate the dead, in such conflicts with the First World War, a ratio of 1/3 is taken. For 3 wounded, one was killed. Always respected. But now there may be more killed, the APU is grinding very hard in a fire bag. Yes, and in the forehead they are driven ruthlessly and thoughtlessly.
        Here, by the way, is an example of the result of the pursuit of taking territories at any cost.
      2. +1
        5 September 2022 23: 17
        in the Kherson direction, the Armed Forces of Ukraine have already won a convincing victory - their soldiers have captured all the morgues from Krivoy Rog to Odessa, there is nowhere else to store them, but the offensive continues
      3. -1
        6 September 2022 03: 36
        zloybond, Excuse me, can you make it clear? Do you understand what you are writing? Without ends, without rings, full of ... cucumbers ....
    4. 0
      5 September 2022 23: 02
      Obviously, the offensive failed, but it is necessary in any way to ensure the supply of food, ammunition and fresh troops to the front.
    5. +2
      6 September 2022 05: 39
      Quote: Sergey Latyshev
      Imagine that the operations of, say, the "Kantemirovskaya division" were developed by ... Cubans ...
      Funny.))))

      And what's funny? Or did Stalin have security from the British special forces like a cocaine addict?
    6. 0
      6 September 2022 05: 45
      The offensive began to collapse after the main forces of the Armed Forces of Ukraine fell into a fire bag. The British plan had to be abandoned, focusing on the capture of Vysokopolye to justify the heavy losses and the failure of the fighting strategy.

      hit, what is called, as "chickens in the pluck"
    7. +1
      6 September 2022 20: 42
      At the same time, as Russian military expert Mikhail Khodarenok noted, Kyiv gives information about the losses of the Armed Forces of Ukraine very carefully and dosed, while hinting that the attack on Kherson "will not lead to the liberation of the territories."

      It’s only with “them” that way, but with us, of course, it’s different ...
    8. 0
      10 September 2022 14: 16
      Quote: Sergey Kuzmin
      The offensive began to collapse after the main forces of the Armed Forces of Ukraine fell into a fire bag. The British plan had to be abandoned, focusing on the capture of Vysokopolye to justify the heavy losses and the failure of the fighting strategy.

      hit, what is called, as "chickens in the pluck"

      But nothing like that in the Kharkiv direction, the Ukrainians have more successes and there we may have to retreat so as not to be in a bag? What if Kherson has only a strong, but distracting maneuver? Here you have the "small-brits". We're losing the initiative.