The Ministry of Defense revealed the details of the landing operation of the Armed Forces of Ukraine to capture the Zaporozhye nuclear power plant

1 September 2022 61

On September 1, Ukrainian troops attempted to capture the Zaporozhye nuclear power plant by crossing the Dnieper River. The details of the landing operation of the Armed Forces of Ukraine were revealed by the Russian Ministry of Defense, outlining what is happening.

The agency reported that at about 06:00 Moscow time, 2 Ukrainian DRGs of up to 60 military personnel, using 7 boats, landed on the southern coast of the Kakhovka reservoir (under the control of the RF Armed Forces), approximately 3 km northeast of the ZNPP, and tried to move towards energy object. The RF Armed Forces took actions to neutralize the saboteurs and destroy them, even using army aviation (helicopters). Now the saboteurs are blocked by the fighters of the National Guard guarding the ZNPP.

In turn, representatives of the Russian authorities in the Zaporozhye region informed the public that at the same time the Armed Forces of Ukraine began another shelling of the city of Energodar, where the ZNPP is located. Residential houses and administrative buildings were damaged, there is a hit in a kindergarten. According to preliminary data, there are dead and wounded, their number is being specified, the shelling continues.

In addition, at about 07.00:XNUMX Moscow time, units of the RF Armed Forces prevented an attempt to land a tactical landing of the Armed Forces of Ukraine on two self-propelled barges that left Nikopol near the Zaporizhzhya NPP, near the village of Vodiane. As a result of the fire impact, the Ukrainian floating craft were sunk.

At the same time, the Ukrainian company Energoatom stated that the 5th power unit was switched off due to morning shelling at the ZNPP. The emergency protection was triggered after damage to the backup power line for auxiliary power at ZNPP-330 kV.

As for the IAEA mission, which plans to visit ZNPP, according to Reuters, it has already moved out of Zaporozhye towards Energodar, despite reports of heavy shelling. Moreover, the Russian media reported on the shelling of the meeting place of the IAEA mission with specialists from Russia in the area of the village of Vasilyevka, Zaporozhye region.

Thus, the Armed Forces of Ukraine have taken certain actions on the path of a possible follow-up of the IAEA mission, which recently arrived to Ukraine. Moreover, the caring European Union allocated more than 5 million tablets of potassium iodide to Kyiv to protect against radiation.

The Ukrainian Navy

Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

VK Zen Telegram

Information

Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.

prior

0

1 September 2022 10: 55

It's time for Russia to shell the Khmelnitsky and Rivne stations.
Shoot so that the reactors remain intact, and energy production is reduced to zero.
Maybe then the shelling of Zaporozhye will stop.
Maybe then Europe will understand that a peaceful atom in every European family is real.
1. Krilion
  
  +9
  
  1 September 2022 11: 28
  
  it was necessary from the very beginning to destroy the entire government quarter in Kyiv, including the president, the general staff of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, IEDs, etc., where not a single shell has yet fallen and where operations are planned and where orders come from ...
  1. k7k8
    
    -2
    
    1 September 2022 11: 57
    
    Quote: Krilion
    it was necessary from the very beginning to destroy the entire government quarter in Kyiv, including the president, the general staff of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, SVU
    
    Do you, without hesitation, think that with the beginning of the SVO there is at least someone in a position higher than a cleaner or a checkpoint controller? In this case, you are a naive representative of one of the peoples of the Far North.
    1. Marciz
      
      0
      
      2 September 2022 05: 13
      
      The poor peoples of the North consider them "naive" in their own country
  2. Rust1981
    
    0
    
    2 September 2022 10: 09
    
    What for? Well, it will be different. Just another unknown, dark horse. And here is understandable. It is convenient for the Kremlin. Former stand-up comedian, kvnschik, drug history. Well, let's bomb it. Make a martyr. They canonize him as Bandera. Is it necessary?
    And so the man himself leads everyone into the abyss. What is not an action is a mistake (he knew about the war and did not say, an attack on Kherson, contrary to the opinion of the military), the price of which is human lives. He harms more than he does good.
    Choice: either he will remain in history as a martyr, or as a man who has passed the country .... With a team in which there were outstanding personalities like Klitschko (I have a head I eat in it), arrestovich (artist of large and small theaters) and others.
2. k7k8
  
  +2
  
  1 September 2022 11: 53
  
  Quote: prior
  It's time for Russia to shell the Khmelnitsky and Rivne stations.
  Shoot so that the reactors remain intact, and energy production is reduced to zero.
  
  To do this, it is not at all necessary to shoot specifically at nuclear power plants. It is enough to destroy the output high-voltage lines and not touch the input lines, on which the operation of the station's security systems directly depends. Under these conditions, power engineers will be forced to reduce the generated power to almost zero. And the restoration of power lines is not a matter of one day and, moreover, it is environmentally safe.
Griffith

+4

1 September 2022 11: 02

The meaning of the operation, as I see it, was the following. Ukrainians before the arrival of the mission capture the station. And they pretend that they were there all the time of the NWO. The mission, under pressure from Europe and the United States, officially says that the Russians have been purposefully shooting at the ZNPP all this time and Ukraine was right in its statements. This statement becomes the basis: 1. To declare Russia a terrorist state under the auspices of the UN. 2. Official permission for the entry of NATO troops. 3. Attacks by NATO forces on the deployment of Russians.
1. Bakht
  
  +2
  
  1 September 2022 12: 43
  
  Can 60 paratroopers take control of the ZNPP?
  1. k7k8
    
    -1
    
    1 September 2022 14: 04
    
    Quote: Bakht
    Can 60 paratroopers take control of the ZNPP?
    
    There were not 60 people in the landing. When will we learn to read everything, and not just what we want, and not just headlines? Even in this article it is clearly written that 60 paratroopers are only for capturing a bridgehead. The main forces left an hour later on self-propelled barges, they were supposed to land on the occupied bridgehead and develop actions to seize the nuclear power plant. And do not laugh from the barges. Their presence suggests that the main forces of the landing force were quite numerous and included lightly armored vehicles, artillery and substantial ammunition.
    1. Bakht
      
      +1
      
      1 September 2022 20: 50
      
      Again. For those who can read. 60 paratroopers landed and tried to advance towards the station. Judging by the new details, their task was precisely to capture, at a minimum, power units. And to the maximum, the entire station.
      If you look at the map that has already been presented, it turns out that the landing site of the first wave of troops and reinforcements from barges are widely spaced across the terrain.
      
      Personally for you. Could 60 paratroopers capture the station?
      1. k7k8
        
        -2
        
        1 September 2022 22: 16
        
        Judging by the technique of execution of the highly artistic canvas, which you cited as the ultimate truth, its author is Yuri Podolyaka aka yurasumy. I don’t know about you, but for me it’s not an authority at all. From the word "absolutely".
        Z.Y. And yes, you can’t even imagine what two platoons of superbly trained, highly motivated and well-armed detachments, which in all countries (including Russia) are special forces, paratroopers and marines, are capable of if they are not stopped in time and hard.
        
        Bakht
        
        0
        
        1 September 2022 22: 29
        
        Authority or not authority, but the place of the sinking of the barges remained unchanged. And the fact that the landing party did not prepare the landing site, but advanced to the ZNPP, is also a fact.
        You, as always, hid behind details, and switched to the personality of the author. By the way, the drawing is not his. He also took it from the net.
        
        I'm not a specialist in the protection of critical facilities. How many people should guard a nuclear power plant? There is information on the Internet that in peacetime, almost a battalion. Whether this is true or not, I cannot say. Surprise factor, wartime, 60 special forces. All this is possible, but the security there is not according to peacetime standards.
        
        Yes, Podolyaka has a version and assumptions about this operation. He thinks the idea was brilliant. And I agree with him. But here Onufrieko (apparently, also not an authority for you) calls this operation "courage without reason." And it's hard to argue with him.
        
        That's why I asked question "can 60 tough paratroopers take a nuclear power plant"?
        
        PS Just for information. After all, I also do not consider all those present here to be an authority.
        
        Corsair
        
        +2
        
        3 September 2022 10: 24
        
        Quote: Bakht
        asked the question "can 60 tough paratroopers take a nuclear power plant"?
        
        According to the British advisers / instructors who prepared the drugs involved in the landing, they could.
        
        But this is according to British scientists / military (underline as appropriate) ...
      2. Marciz
        
        0
        
        2 September 2022 05: 26
        
        They did not have to capture the entire station, it was enough to gain a foothold in a secondary room and take up defense.
        
        Bakht
        
        -1
        
        2 September 2022 07: 19
        
        Podolyaka's version is the most plausible.
        1. Shelling of the station and the requirement to remove heavy equipment and military formations from the territory.
        2. The station was guarded only by the National Guard.
        3. Delay of the IAEA mission by Kyiv.
        4. Barges could not land on an unequipped shore. They needed a berth.
        5. 60 paratroopers could not land on a guarded pier. Therefore, they landed on an unguarded area and began moving towards the station.
        6. Their task was to seize the berth at the power units and ensure the landing of troops (GUR special forces battalion) with light weapons.
        7. Timing is as follows. The first wave landed at 05:00. Shelling by Ukrainian artillery of posts of the National Guard at 05:20. At 06:00, advance towards the berths and attack the posts of the Russian Guard. At the same time, barges with the main landing force leave. Estimated time of arrival at 07:30. But at 07:00 they were sunk. At 08:00, the estimated time of arrival of the IAEA mission. That is, the landing party had to hold out for only half an hour or an hour.
        
        Why does Podolyaka consider the operation beautiful? If it succeeds, and under the cover of the IAEA mission, the station comes under the control of Kyiv, is declared a demilitarized eon, and this is the defeat of Russia on the entire southern flank. What then to do with it is completely incomprehensible. Russia will be forced to withdraw from Energodar.
        But what happened happened. The station remained under Russian control. Grossi said there would be a permanent IAEA post. The statement was made in the expectation that the station would be Ukrainian. Everything is in flight.
        
        A small addition. Some are not at all friends with logic and do not look at any facts. "What can two platoons of special forces, well-trained, motivated" do, and so on and so forth ... Have you seen enough films? 60 commandos were unable to overcome the post of the National Guard. It is a fact. The post held out until the attack helicopters approached, and the fate of these superheroes was sealed.
        
        k7k8
        
        0
        
        2 September 2022 08: 15
        
        What you have stated here has long been clear to most of those present here. To see this, just look at the time of publication of the posts. You didn’t say anything in your opus that could refute this. As, by the way, you have not refuted my answer to you at all. And the opinion of Podolyaka and a certain Onufrienko did not play any role here.
        
        Bakht
        
        -1
        
        2 September 2022 09: 16
        
        What was written here did not always correspond to the real course of events. What you wrote has not been confirmed. Quote
        
        And yes, you can’t even imagine what two platoons of superbly trained, highly motivated and well-armed detachments, which in all countries (including Russia) are special forces, paratroopers and marines, are capable of if they are not stopped in time and hard.
        
        I don’t know how hard they were stopped, but
        
        two platoons of highly trained, highly motivated and well-armed brutes,
        
        liquidly-liquidly managed, having met with the checkpoint of the Russian Guard.
        
        It's nothing. I'm used to. The main thing for my opponent is to look beautiful in their own eyes. I had to retell the opinion of Podolyaka, which you do not recognize, in order for you to understand that Podolyaka's opinion was correct. And besides him, no one has said anything about it yet.
        
        k7k8
        
        0
        
        2 September 2022 10: 35
        
        Quote: Bakht
        liquid-liquid crap, meeting with the checkpoint of the Russian Guard
        
        Again. Firstly, I would look at you when army aviation in the form of "Alligators" and "Night Hunters" is working on you from all trunks. Well, and secondly, there are still no reports of the complete destruction of the landing force in the press.
        Funny you turbopatriots.
        
        Bakht
        
        -1
        
        2 September 2022 11: 29
        
        So it was you who said that 60 paratroopers are a force that can take a nuclear power plant. Who looks funny is clear to me.
        
        k7k8
        
        0
        
        2 September 2022 14: 22
        
        No, it is you, with a tenacity worthy of a better use, that you continue to ignore the fact that the landing force included many more than 300 people. Yes, after the sinking of barges with 280 paratroopers and lightly armored vehicles and the impossibility of delivering another 50 people to the landing sites, only 60 people remained from the landing, which it was not difficult for army aviation to put their faces into the ground. But it is very stupid to say that according to the plan of Kyiv, there were only 60 people in the landing force, and that they had to solve all the problems. Or are you, in a blue eye, sure that the task of those who were part of the main forces was to heroically drown along with the ships?
        
        Bakht
        
        0
        
        2 September 2022 14: 38
        
        Twenty-five again. 60 landing troops (the first wave) were supposed to land on an unequipped coast, destroy the checkpoints of the Russian Guard and seize the pier to ensure the landing of the second echelon. That is, to capture the power units of the station. This pier is next to the power units.
        The task was not completed. Despite the fact that they were super Rimbaud.
        
        Your second mistake. Khazin argued that Kyiv would NOT allow the commission to come to the station. You stated that Khazin's version is correct. Doesn't fit with reality.
        
        It seems to me that the argument is useless. Moreover, your manner of arguing cannot be called cultural.
        
        Corsair
        
        +2
        
        3 September 2022 10: 43
        
        Quote: k7k8
        there are still no reports of the complete destruction of the landing force in the press.
        
        There is probably some truth in your post.
        especially with an eye to the newly discovered circumstances - the advancement of additional enemy forces to the landing site.
        
        Does this mean that he (the enemy) has not been destroyed, the landing force has not been dropped into the water, and the bridgehead is still behind the dill?
  2. Benjamin
    
    -1
    
    1 September 2022 14: 07
    
    Since the talking head of MO Konashenkov speaks, then maybe
    1. k7k8
      
      0
      
      1 September 2022 18: 29
      
      Giftedness can sometimes be turned off
  3. skeptic
    
    0
    
    2 September 2022 11: 44
    
    Quote: Bakht
    Can 60 paratroopers take control of the ZNPP?
    
    Ask those who were on self-propelled barges. Those who were in the third wave will tell later, in eleven years, if they survive.
Bulanov

0

1 September 2022 11: 05

The Armed Forces of Ukraine began another shelling of the city of Energodar, where the ZNPP is located.

And why doesn’t the Aerospace Forces suppress this artillery from the air? It seems like there are opportunities? Or no opportunities?
And the landing operation of the Armed Forces of Ukraine is similar to what happened with the landing on Snake Island.
1. aslanxnumx
  
  +4
  
  1 September 2022 11: 24
  
  And how the barges passed 5 km without being noticed. And you are talking about aviation. It can be seen beyond the front line does not fly.
  1. Victorio
    
    0
    
    1 September 2022 11: 32
    
    Quote: aslan642
    And how the barges passed 5 km without being noticed. And you are talking about aviation. It can be seen beyond the front line does not fly.
    
    I think rubber boats are not detected by radar at all
    1. Accidentally
      
      0
      
      1 September 2022 15: 17
      
      But the engine is not detected by the radar ........ or the submarine rescope is not detected.
      1. Victorio
        
        0
        
        1 September 2022 16: 34
        
        Quote: Kazara
        And the engine is not detected by the radar
        
        for MTR issues of secrecy are a priority, it seems not a problem to develop such engines
  2. boriz
    
    0
    
    1 September 2022 13: 12
    
    Barges, just drowned. We waited until they reached the middle of the reservoir and - yeah ...
    140 drowned from each barge. And 50 were placed in the Nikopol area, which were being prepared for loading onto the next barge.
    And of those 60 people who are from rubber boats, you can take a couple of prisoners. To communicate with the media.
    1. boriz
      
      0
      
      1 September 2022 13: 38
      
      Well, three were taken prisoner. Two of them are in critical condition. Look, just a couple will remain.
    2. Victorio
      
      0
      
      1 September 2022 16: 20
      
      Quote: boriz
      Barges, just drowned. We waited until they reached the middle of the reservoir and - yeah ...
      140 drowned from each barge. And 50 were placed in the Nikopol area, which were being prepared for loading onto the next barge.
      And of those 60 people who are from rubber boats, you can take a couple of prisoners. To communicate with the media.
      
      info from the telegram channel?
      1. k7k8
        
        0
        
        1 September 2022 16: 26
        
        You're joking in vain. It was already in the official media
        
        Victorio
        
        0
        
        1 September 2022 16: 31
        
        Quote: k7k8
        You're joking in vain. It was already in the official media
        
        ? I ask about awareness, the numbers are already accurate
2. Nike
  
  0
  
  1 September 2022 11: 53
  
  No way! like there is a residential sector, civilians must be protected, but ...
3. Corsair
  
  +2
  
  3 September 2022 10: 46
  
  Quote: Bulanov
  And why doesn’t the Aerospace Forces suppress this artillery from the air? It seems like there are opportunities? Or no opportunities?
  
  In general, there are many, too many inexplicable "oddities" in NWO ...
Nike

0

1 September 2022 11: 55

Quote: Bulanov
The Armed Forces of Ukraine began another shelling of the city of Energodar, where the ZNPP is located.

And why doesn’t the Aerospace Forces suppress this artillery from the air? It seems like there are opportunities? Or no opportunities?
And the landing operation of the Armed Forces of Ukraine is similar to what happened with the landing on Snake Island.

No way! there is a residential area,
1. Bulanov
  
  +2
  
  1 September 2022 13: 19
  
  No way! there is a residential area,
  
  Well, yes, it’s better to let the Armed Forces of Ukraine shy away from the nuclear reactor, and then there won’t be a single residential sector left in the district of 100 km. Earnestly.
boriz

+3

1 September 2022 13: 15

In general, this landing so far fits well with Khazin's version. Someone really does not want the IAEA commission to get to the ZNPP.
1. The comment was deleted.
2. k7k8
  
  +3
  
  1 September 2022 14: 11
  
  Quote: boriz
  Someone really does not want the IAEA commission to get to the ZNPP
  
  And the three-hour detention (and, in fact, arrest) of the head of the mission, Rafael Grossi, at the Ukrainian checkpoint is also in good agreement with this version. Kyiv was clearly waiting for reports of the success of the landing.
3. Bakht
  
  0
  
  1 September 2022 22: 36
  
  The version is slightly different. Someone really wanted the IAEA mission to get to the station AFTER it was captured by the landing force. But the landing failed. And it is not clear what this commission should do now.
  
  It could cost Zelensky his head. Or at least the loss of a seat. It seems to me that with the loss of the chair, he may lose his head. These are related things.
  1. k7k8
    
    0
    
    2 September 2022 10: 43
    
    It's not good to plagiarize.
    
    Quote: Bakht
    Someone really wanted the IAEA mission to get to the station AFTER it was captured by the landing
    
    You wrote this at 22.36 on 01.09.2022/XNUMX/XNUMX
    And here is my post on 14.11 of the same 01.09.2022/XNUMX/XNUMX
    
    Quote: k7k8
    And the three-hour detention (and, in fact, arrest) of the head of the mission, Rafael Grossi, at the Ukrainian checkpoint is also in good agreement with this version. Kyiv was clearly waiting for reports of the success of the landing
    
    I fully understand your desire to be smarter than everyone on this couch, but you also need to have a conscience.
    BYE
    1. Bakht
      
      -1
      
      2 September 2022 11: 33
      
      The fact of the matter is that you wrote this about Khazin's version. Who here is engaged in plagiarism, I advise you to think. Everything in the head quietly coexist two versions. Khazin and Podolyaki.
      You write that Kyiv did not want to allow a commission to the station. And then write that Kyiv was waiting to report the success of the landing.
      Split personality is studied in the section of psychiatry. Not here.
      1. k7k8
        
        0
        
        2 September 2022 13: 27
        
        Quote: Bakht
        You write that Kyiv did not want to allow a commission to the station.
        
        because
        
        Quote: Bakht
        Kyiv waited to report the success of the landing.
        
        And by the way, this is your version too.
        
        Bakht
        
        +1
        
        2 September 2022 13: 40
        
        "Smart" you are ours.
        Kyiv was sure that the landing would be successful and therefore delayed the departure of the commission. She was supposed to arrive at the station after the start of the operation. Russian troops will not fight in the presence of the commission.
        
        Since you are too "smart" (colloquially abstruse), I want to remind you. Khazin's version is that Kyiv does not want the presence of the commission for the reason that a "dirty bomb" was being prepared there. And you agreed with this.
        I painted the version of Podolyaki minute by minute and you wrote that in my "opus" (you could have chosen a different word for the sake of decency. But oh well, decency is not about you) everything is known. That is, Podolyaka (not an authority for you) claims that Kyiv wanted the commission to come, but by a certain time. Moreover, Podolyaka gave out his version long before such clever people like you came to this.
        
        Our whole discussion began with the fact that I questioned the possibility of 60 commandos to capture a huge station. You said it's quite possible. The facts did not support your statements. This is the most important water that I have done. You are clearly not friends with facts and logic.
        
        k7k8
        
        0
        
        2 September 2022 16: 16
        
        You are constantly trying to "throw the baby out." With all, at first glance, the differences between the versions of Khazin and Podolyaka, one common and it is the main provision can be distinguished in them - Kyiv urgently needed that at the time the IAEA officers appeared at the ZNPP, the station was in the hands of the Armed Forces of Ukraine. What for? This is not even the tenth question. And at least in order to sweep the territory and mow the weeds. And what? What is the purpose of the operation? That is why there was an actual three-hour arrest of the mission at the Ukrainian checkpoint, which is why the mission on August 31 was still in Kyiv under the strongest pressure from the Zeliboba administration, and did not move to Energodar, as required by the original plan. You are stuck in particular.
        Next
        
        Quote: Bakht
        Our whole discussion began with the fact that I questioned the ability of 60 commandos to capture a huge station
        
        So.
        But you, contrary to the facts, claimed that there were only 60 people in the landing and constantly refused to acknowledge the fact that the main forces of the Armed Forces of Ukraine were destroyed not even on the way to the landing site, which I constantly reminded you of. Of course, no one was going to capture the station with the forces of two platoons, but to say (like you) that these two platoons were the main and only strike force is nonsense.
        
        Bakht
        
        0
        
        2 September 2022 20: 15
        
        You still do not understand Khazin's hypothesis. And the fact that Khazin categorically stated that Kyiv would under no circumstances allow the commission to come to the station. This is not a "general position", but a fundamental difference between these hypotheses. Khazin believed that the commission would not be allowed at all. Podolyaka believes that the commission SHOULD come after a successful landing.
        
        On the second point. I never claimed that these 60 paratroopers were the only landing. I asked "can 60 paratroopers capture the station"? You answered
        
        And yes, you have no idea what two platoons of superbly trained, highly motivated and well-armed brutes are capable of.
        
        The answer is incorrect. Everything else that you attributed to me has nothing to do with my words.
        
        Not the first time I notice. First, the opponent is credited with what he did not say, and then they are successfully refuted.
      2. k7k8
        
        0
        
        2 September 2022 13: 32
        
        Quote: Bakht
        Who is plagiarizing here, I advise you to think
        
        Plagiarism is somewhat different, you are our gifted.
        And yes, the versions of Khazin and Podolyaki from the vastness of my sofa do not seem mutually exclusive. The truth, as always, lies somewhere in between. But we will not be able to comprehend this because of the extreme dosage of information.
        
        Bakht
        
        -1
        
        2 September 2022 13: 46
        
        This is from your sofa. From my couch, they completely contradict each other.
4. Bakht
  
  -1
  
  2 September 2022 10: 24
  
  With all due respect, Boris.
  
  Khazin's version will NOT be confirmed. The IAEA report will not contain a word about the dirty bomb version.
  So far, it is clear that Kyiv really wanted the commission to come AFTER the success of the landing.
  But it turned out that the commission arrived when the station was in the hands of Russia.
  
  Grossi hastened to say that the IAEA would leave a permanent monitoring group. Now either it is necessary to cancel its decision or the monitoring group will be forced to confirm the shelling of the station by the Armed Forces of Ukraine. This is not the OSCE mission in Donbas. Europe is very sensitive to radioactive danger.
  
  I suppose that Kyiv will start insisting on the withdrawal of the monitoring group. Shelling the station when the IAEA commission is there is fraught with sideways. Even for such a fabulous idiot as Zelensky.
  So for now I see more arguments in favor of Podolyaki's version.
  1. k7k8
    
    0
    
    2 September 2022 10: 44
    
    Quote: Bakht
    fraught sideways
    
    How's that?
    1. Bakht
      
      -1
      
      2 September 2022 11: 34
      
      You are "smart". Think...
      1. k7k8
        
        0
        
        2 September 2022 13: 26
        
        Yes, I am smart (Mr. Marzhetsky taught me not to be ashamed of this). You are trying to combine two completely different expressions - "FRIGHTENING with consequences" and "it will come out sideways." That's why you were asked the question: "How is it?"
        
        Bakht
        
        -1
        
        2 September 2022 13: 29
        
        The inferiority complex is incurable. I highly doubt your self-esteem.
        
        Bakht
        
        -1
        
        2 September 2022 13: 43
        
        Are you still doing grammar correction? Are you learning Russian? Google the word "contamination". I knew this 40 years ago.
        
        k7k8
        
        0
        
        2 September 2022 15: 54
        
        Quote: Bakht
        Google the word "contamination".
        
        Googled it. Thank you. Now I will know another new word. But I dare to assure you that above the so-called. the neoplasm has nothing to do with contamination, it is not worth pulling the asio otus on the tesseract. And about your juggling with smart words, Shnurov from Leningrad rode very well.
        
        Bakht
        
        -1
        
        2 September 2022 20: 07
        
        This phrase just refers to the section of contamination. It means that some action will end badly. Included in the army humor. So do not juggle smart words. I dare to think that I know Russian as well as you.
        
        http://old.redstar.ru/2008/04/23_04/5_03.html
Valera75

+3

1 September 2022 13: 31

They write that 6-8 British officers were destroyed, but they still clarify the information. If this is so, then this is very good news
1. Bulanov
  
  0
  
  1 September 2022 15: 09
  
  They write that 6-8 British officers were destroyed,
  
  In response, the British can squeeze out money and real estate from 6-8 Russian oligarchs in London.
dimi

0

1 September 2022 13: 39

Quote: boriz
In general, this landing so far fits well with Khazin's version. Someone really does not want the IAEA commission to get to the ZNPP.

very well pointed out!!!!!!