Military expert explained the meaninglessness of the use of tactical nuclear weapons in Ukraine


For almost six months, Ukrainian and Western media have been actively discussing the topic of "the possible use of tactical nuclear weapons by the Russian Federation in Ukraine." Such reasoning, sometimes turning into hysteria and intimidation of all mankind and which will not stop until the end of the NWO, is an element of the information-psychological war against Russia.


Another clear manifestation of this activity is a recent interview with the British BBC by the former head of the British Joint Forces Command, General Richard Barrons. He stated that "the protracted nature of the conflict on Ukrainian territory increases the risk of a Russian tactical nuclear strike."
The general believes that the West should prevent such a development of events, but not at the cost of concessions to the Kremlin.

This was noticed by a Russian military observer, retired colonel Mikhail Khodarenok, who commented on the situation in his Telegram channel. The expert explained that tactical nuclear weapons, which should not be confused with strategic nuclear forces, are designed to destroy large targets and areas where a large number of enemy forces and assets are concentrated at the front and in its immediate rear areas. Therefore, talking about Ukraine in this context, given what is happening on the line of contact, is simply pointless.

The Armed Forces of Ukraine have no large concentrations of forces left in principle. Two enclaves in the Donbass - Kramatorsk and Slavyansk - can be cleared by the RF Armed Forces even without the use of nuclear weapons, even of low power

- pointed out the expert.

He emphasized that the use of tactical nuclear weapons by Russia in Ukraine is meaningless and does not meet the long-term interests and plans of Moscow (military, political, economic and social). Ukrainian cities are inhabited by people whose lives are important for the Russian Federation.

For the British, the US and other countries with nuclear weapons, human lives are worth nothing. Therefore, citizens “with the right faces” argue within the framework of other categories

He summed up.

We remind you that the West has also repeatedly offered to transfer tactical nuclear weapons to equip the Armed Forces of Ukraine, "so that Kyiv has something to answer in case of emergency."
16 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. prior Offline prior
    prior (Vlad) 23 August 2022 11: 06
    +2
    And I would apply.
    I would shy away from the Lvov tunnel through which Europe is dragging its weapons to Ukraine.
    It's all about slacking off here.
    And Lvov did not rest against us for nothing.
    And the supply of weapons will be reduced.
    And Europe will line up for diapers.
    And the zone of infection will turn out where it is necessary.
    And the shelling of nuclear power plants will immediately stop.
    And how many lives of our soldiers and citizens will we save. After all, it was precisely this that the Americans justified the nuclear bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki.
    The big question is whether Zelensky, after such a hint, wants to engage in terrorist activities or immediately shoot himself.
    I do not think that having started the NWO, Putin did not foresee the possibility of starting a world war. Anything can be expected from America.
    So, from a tactical nuclear strike on such a target, I see only solid goodies.
  2. Sydor Kovpak Offline Sydor Kovpak
    Sydor Kovpak 23 August 2022 11: 06
    +4
    I read and remembered that the Americans in Japan bombed not troop concentrations, but cities with children and the elderly. And this bombing did not give anything except destruction and death. We were rather scared
  3. k7k8 Offline k7k8
    k7k8 (vic) 23 August 2022 11: 43
    +1
    For almost six months, Ukrainian and Western media have been actively discussing the topic of “the possible use of tactical nuclear weapons by the Russian Federation in Ukraine”

    They haven’t read the gifted here yet
    1. Vox_Populi Offline Vox_Populi
      Vox_Populi (vox populi) 23 August 2022 14: 01
      0
      Yeah, you know ... winked
  4. gorenina91 Offline gorenina91
    gorenina91 (Irina) 23 August 2022 12: 18
    -1
    Military expert explained the meaninglessness of the use of tactical nuclear weapons in Ukraine

    - Unfortunately, it is very unprofitable for Russia to use tactical nuclear weapons in Ukraine - there is little sense from this - but there is a lot of harm for Russia itself (and fraternal Belarus will suffer)!
    - And here are the strikes with "Caliber", "Iskanders"; and even "Sarmatians" in the strategic nodes of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, fortified areas, means of communication, in organizational centers - they are simply necessary - yesterday and today !!!
    1. Peace Peace. Offline Peace Peace.
      Peace Peace. (Tumar Tumar) 23 August 2022 12: 24
      +3
      Honey in your mouth. Kill all bridges, railway junctions and substations in western Ukraine. I think 50 percent for NWO would be support.
      1. Jacques sekavar Offline Jacques sekavar
        Jacques sekavar (Jacques Sekavar) 23 August 2022 12: 40
        +3
        Also "petals" to sow the whole of Galicia, as they do in the DPR-LPR, and the whole world is watching and silent.
    2. Nike Offline Nike
      Nike (Nikolai) 23 August 2022 12: 55
      +1
      It may not be profitable, but it’s categorically to say that it’s not applicable "great stupidity, I would say that we don’t see the point yet, but if necessary, we can apply it, it’s easy. Or at least kept silent
    3. k7k8 Offline k7k8
      k7k8 (vic) 23 August 2022 13: 30
      +2
      Quote: gorenina91
      and even "Sarmatians"

      1. Madam, in addition to the maximum range, intercontinental ballistic missiles also have a minimum possible range. For "Sarmat" - this is about 5000 km. Give you a compass and a globe?
      2. The "Sarmat" does not have warheads of non-special execution.
      1. gorenina91 Offline gorenina91
        gorenina91 (Irina) 23 August 2022 15: 19
        -2
        intercontinental ballistic missiles, in addition to the maximum range, also have the minimum possible. For "Sarmat" - this is about 5000 km. Give you a compass and a globe?
        2. The "Sarmat" does not have warheads of non-special execution.

        - They wanted to be smart - well, so the flag is in your hands!
        - As for the Sarmat, you can easily shoot them, like Caliber! - Yes, "Sarmat" has a "target" range of destruction of about 18 thousand km; but this does not exclude the fact that they can hit objects and targets at closer distances - 500 km, 800 km, 1000 km, etc.!
        - Initially, it is believed that Sarmat has three steps; but this does not mean that there may be fewer of them (you can easily remove the "extra steps" to strike at closer targets)!
        - Hence the conclusions! - Sarmat can be used on the fortifications of the Armed Forces of Ukraine in the Donetsk areas of hostilities - on these fortified areas of the Armed Forces of Ukraine; strike at objects and accumulations of imported military equipment that arrived in the western regions of Ukraine - in the Lviv region, at sites on the border of Ukraine and Poland; areas of Transnistria (when the Armed Forces of Ukraine try to attack in this area); apply near Odessa and near Nikolaev (during the liberation of these cities), and even in Kyiv itself (in the centers, from where all criminal orders are given and the leadership of the Armed Forces of Ukraine is conducted)!
        - And for this it will not be necessary to destroy bridges, hundreds of railway stations, extended communications, numerous storage and sorting centers where "non-military cargo" is formed. - This is not needed - because. all military equipment, personnel of the Armed Forces of Ukraine and all logistics of the Armed Forces of Ukraine - will simply be paralyzed!
        - And the use of "Sarmat" is not the use of tactical nuclear weapons - for the use of this tactical nuclear weapons - the whole world will immediately rear up against Russia !!!

        Give you a compass and a globe?

        - Yes, it's better - to give it to you - a toy owl (you already have a globe)!
        1. k7k8 Offline k7k8
          k7k8 (vic) 23 August 2022 15: 55
          0
          Madam, are you not the Commander-in-Chief of the Strategic Missile Forces yet? Weird
    4. Sydor Kovpak Offline Sydor Kovpak
      Sydor Kovpak 23 August 2022 15: 39
      -2
      You definitely need to hustle. Do not incinerate and not gigaton, it will be too much, but nada. And many know where nada!
  5. Peace Peace. Offline Peace Peace.
    Peace Peace. (Tumar Tumar) 23 August 2022 12: 26
    0
    Why are there no flight tests of Sarmat with training Vanguards, Poseidon on some island, near the British Zircons?
  6. Jacques sekavar Offline Jacques sekavar
    Jacques sekavar (Jacques Sekavar) 23 August 2022 12: 33
    +1
    For Ukraine, the shelling of the ZNPP makes sense - the Russian Federation is occupied, the Russian Federation is responsible for it.
    The TNR makes sense in view of the impossibility of denazifying and demilitarizing Ukraine in any other way, reducing the combat losses of the Russian Federation and ending the war, if not with victory, then with defeat.
  7. Colonel Kudasov Offline Colonel Kudasov
    Colonel Kudasov (Boris) 23 August 2022 12: 43
    0
    TNW may make sense to create a "dead zone" around the perimeter of Novorossiya. Something like a natural border. Well, that's a last resort, of course.
    1. k7k8 Offline k7k8
      k7k8 (vic) 23 August 2022 17: 05
      +2
      Quote: Colonel Kudasov
      TNW may make sense to create a "dead zone" around the perimeter of Novorossia

      And on the border of this dead zone you and your family will live.