The war for strategic depth: how and when will NWO end


On August 18 of this year, a certain event took place, which many military analysts and political observers didn't even fully understand, and most of you, under the heap of events that have fallen on us lately, did not even notice it. And what happened on this day? Yes, like nothing special. Russia has once again deployed hypersonic weapons in the heart of Europe. On August 18, three MiG-31K long-range interceptors with hypersonic Kinzhal ARKs were urgently deployed to the Kaliningrad region. Behind them, BCs were also delivered to them by a separate cargo board. Carriers of "Daggers" will be based at the military airfield "Chkalovsk" (military unit 30866), located 9 km north-west of Kaliningrad. Their combat duty will be organized there. Each MiG-31K is equipped with one 9-A-7660 Kinzhal (Kh-47M2 Kinzhal) missile.


The Russian Defense Ministry has already informed the public that the redeployment from the mainland of the Russian Federation to the Russian semi-exclave was carried out as part of additional strategic deterrence measures. The agency clarified that during the flight over the Baltic Sea, the MiG-31K worked out issues of interaction with fighters of the 6th Army of the Air Force and Air Defense, as well as aircraft of the MA BF (naval aviation of the Baltic Fleet).

For those who have forgotten, I will remind you that for the first time our famous air-launched hypersonic missiles, along with their carriers, ended up in Kaliningrad on February 8 this year. Then two MiG-31K units with Kinzhal missiles stayed in the Russian semi-exclave for 5 days, after which they were withdrawn back to the Soltsy airbase in the Novgorod region, when NATO activity near the borders of the Russian Federation decreased. And just 10 days later, on February 24, the Kremlin began the NWO in Ukraine.

For the average layman, all these events seem to be a heap of facts that are in no way connected with each other. This happens only because they each contemplate the picture of the world from their own trench, conveniently equipped near their favorite refrigerator, starting exclusively from messages in a zombie box, from which they are fed information by military correspondents and full-time propagandists, whose trenches are located a little higher. They also assess the situation on earth in a real time perspective, with a time lag of no more than a week, what is happening in the General Staff they do not know, he does not share his plans with anyone. And in order to understand what is really happening now and, most importantly, how and when it will end, you need to climb into the macroeconomic jungle of geopolitics, and there, without half a liter, the devil himself will break his leg. So we live, divided into those who curse Putin, and those who defend him. But both believe that Putin is not Putin enough. For some, he is not tough enough, for others he is not soft enough, but Putin did not please either one or the other. Sometimes I want to say - don’t meddle in the Kremlin, deal with at least your neighbors in the stairwell or in the dacha, you still don’t understand the true reasons for what is happening. This text is intended to remove the veil of secrecy from the actions of the Kremlin and to explain in simple and accessible language what is happening and how it will all end for us (and most importantly, when?).

Wars for strategic depth. Depth is everything!


Epigraph: "We are not going to fight with anyone, we are trying to create conditions so that no one would try to fight with us!" (V.V. Putin)

For everyone who believes that Putin invaded Ukraine on February 24 completely in vain, which doomed them to torment and suffering (and these people are now on both sides of the line of contact), I want to say that Putin did not start this! The United States forced him to do this, he was only responding to challenges, the threats from which called into question the very existence of the Russian Federation within its current borders. He simply had no other choice, the situation through the efforts of the United States had already gone too far. The US wanted this war, and they got it.

But do not rush to blame the evil Uncle Sam for this, he doesn’t give a damn about Russia at all (I’m not even talking about Ukraine - it’s not even a piece, it’s just dust on this chessboard). Uncle Sam is the director of America, and it is precisely its interests that he defends (here I mean, not grandfather Joe who fell into insanity, but the collective Biden, i.e. all those who are behind this wretched figure). And the interests of these people lie far from Europe. They don't care about Europe! (I see that for someone it was a discovery!). Think for yourself, where is America and where is Europe? America has always lived beyond the Big Puddle and has only benefited from it. Remember the First World War, then President Wilson remained neutral for three years, collecting all the goodies from this, and got into the war only when it was necessary to fix the profit. Which he did. Who was America before WWI? Regional ordinary power. And who did you become at the end of it? You may not answer.

And what have we had since World War II? When did the United States join it? That's right - December 7, 1941, after the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor. For 2 years now, since the war was going on in Europe, half a year since Hitler invaded the Soviet Union, and America didn’t care, she remained neutral, this war did not concern her until Japan encroached on her zone of interests. President Roosevelt on December 8 in his televised address to the nation said that for the United States, December 7 became a day of national shame and Japan will answer for this. Roosevelt did not care about national disgrace, Japan was punished only because it dared to encroach on the holy of holies, the zone of vital US interests - its Pacific area, thus depriving the United States of their strategic depth and all the advantages associated with it.

Here, many probably do not understand what kind of outlandish term is this - "strategic depth"? What does it influence and what is it responsible for? Some kind of another nonsense, invented by high-browed idlers who have read smart books and justify their comfortable existence with such words, wiping their pants somewhere in the rarefied space between the General Staff and the VPR (top political leadership). In order not to clog your brains much, I will just give two banal examples from recent history, and you will understand everything yourself. Why did Stalin get into the winter war of 1939-40? That's right - to move the Finnish border away from Leningrad. Pushed back. Why, two months before that, according to the “Treaty of Friendship and Border” with Nazi Germany, better known as the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact, he annexed the territories of Western Ukraine and Belarus from Poland, a little later adding three Baltic republics to them, ending all this Northern Bukovina and Bessarabia, taken from Romania in 1940? That's right - all for the same, to create a buffer between him and the imperialist West in the face of the same fascist Germany, with which he had already measured his strength on the fields of republican Spain. Realizing that a war between the USSR and the Third Reich was inevitable, Stalin created strategic depth, the very buffer that prevented Hitler from reaching Moscow during the summer campaign of 1941. This led to the fact that the wonderful plan of the lightning war "Barbarossa", developed by the best minds of the Wehrmacht, failed, the blitzkrieg did not take place, the troops of the Army Group "Center", having lost strength in Belarus, bogged down near Moscow, and the entire Nazi grouping of troops, stretched along the vast length of the front from the Baltic to the Black Sea, met the harsh winter of 1941 in summer uniforms, as a result of which the USSR resisted. How it all ended, you know without me.

How it all ended for the ally of fascist Germany, militaristic Japan, which tried to deprive the United States of strategic depth in the Pacific theater of operations, you also know. Now you see that strategic depth matters, these things are no joke. It is a guarantee of the territorial security of countries that claim to pursue an independent and independent policy. How can Russia threaten the existence of the United States? None! We don't threaten anyone. Live as you wish, just don't threaten us and don't meddle in our garden. Until now, we have not climbed into the soft underbelly of the United States, and our Pacific Fleet could not create any competition with the American Navy. What can not be said about China. In economic terms, China has already bypassed the United States, and in military terms it could bypass them in 7 years. At least in the Pacific and the Asia-Pacific region, which is vital for both countries, China and its fleet already posed a real threat to the United States. And then the scythe found a stone - both countries defended their strategic depth and the war between them, like 81 years ago between the USSR and the Third Reich, became inevitable. As a result, the coming war has become no longer a factor of place (the place was determined by geography - the Pacific region), but a factor of time, i.e. The question is no longer where, but when! And Washington, in order to maintain respect among its regional puppets and vassals (such as Japan, the Philippines, South Korea, Taiwan and Singapore), did not wait for China to mature and gain strength and strike first.

Nancy Pelosi's recent visit to Taiwan is the first act of this play. Now move for Beijing. But the main task of Biden or whoever is behind him was to take Russia out of this game. Realizing that it would no longer be possible to drag her to his side, Biden tried to tie her hands in Ukraine with a preemptive strike so that the Kremlin was no longer up to helping China. To do this, Grandpa Joe was not afraid even to violate the Kissinger Doctrine, the main principle of which is that in the US-RF-PRC triangle, relations between the USA and the other two sides of this triangle should be better than their relations with each other. Grandpa Joe doesn't care about Kissinger, he's already 99 years old, what does he understand about modern politics? Grandpa Joe writes his story. In his concept, if you connect the two sides of this triangle with regional conflicts in which the United States participates indirectly, by proxy, then let them be friends for health - they will no longer care about the United States.

And I must say that before our eyes, this concept was brilliantly implemented. Russia is already bogged down to the very tonsils in Ukraine, and China will soon, in order to save the face of comrade. Xi will get involved in a war with Taipei, behind whose back the ears of Grandpa Joe will again stick out. I still don’t know how Chairman Xi will react to the demarche of Washington and the speaker of his Congress, but he simply cannot help but react - his Mian Tzu is at stake (you will find out what it is and what it is eaten with if you go to link). In the US military doctrine adopted recently, Russia is designated as a direct and obvious threat to the US, but at the same time, China is listed as the main strategic rival. And in order to take Russia as a military threat out of the game, Washington, through its disenfranchised but trained over these 8 years Ukrainian satellite, tried to deprive it of the strategic depth that it had until today. Strategic depth should be understood as a security zone.

After all, all attempts by Ukraine, enshrined even in its Constitution, to join NATO, moved the borders of the alliance close to the borders of the Russian Federation, which created an existential threat to its existence. And now it becomes clear to you that Putin’s December ultimatums with demands to move NATO’s borders to the 1997 borders are not an empty whim of a Kremlin old man who has lost his mind and lost touch with reality, but a cruel necessity that Washington has placed him in front of. These things are no joke! And Putin was not joking, and Biden knew this and did everything to ensure that Putin moved from warnings to actions. He needed a war in Ukraine, which was supposed to take Russia out of his game with China, and he achieved it. Now you understand how Biden knew that Putin would attack the 404th? He did not know only the exact time, but Ukraine was ready for war, it was equipped for this journey all these 8 years. So that you understand that I am not lying, I will give only one most primitive example that surprised me all this time - in the Ukrainian army of Petya Poroshenko’s model, which was intensively trained according to the NATO model, there was no everyday uniform. Those who served in the army will understand what I'm talking about. For privates, sergeants and cadets, it was replaced by a field uniform. The officers also had a front door, and the rest flaunted only in the field, both in winter and in summer! And rightly so - why spend money also on everyday uniforms, if the task of this cannon fodder is war.

Now, I hope you will not ask me questions, where will the Russian tanks stop? And how far will Putin go in his westward expansion? Russian tanks will only stop at the 1997 NATO borders. Otherwise, it was not worth starting this war! We just have no other way, we were left with no choice. Here in Ukraine we are fighting for our strategic depth, so that from now on all the tame mongrels of Washington, such as presumptuous psheks and troebalts, are even afraid to open their black mouth in our direction. If it is necessary to use our hypersonic weapons for this, we will use them without a second's hesitation. Now you understand why I started my story with heavy fighter-interceptors carrying these weapons, transferred to Kaliningrad? We are not joking at all, if necessary, we will use our nuclear weapons, tactical ones to begin with. All units belonging to the Nuclear Deterrence Forces (SNF) were transferred to a special mode of service by Putin's order of February 27.

For those who don't know what it is, I'll explain. The strategic nuclear forces have forces of constant combat readiness serving on combat duty, the so-called SNS (strategic offensive forces), which include land-based and sea-based ICBMs, as well as long-range strategic aviation, and there are SOS forces (strategic defense forces), which include Aerospace forces and missile defense forces, which can use warheads both in conventional design and in non-conventional nuclear equipment - while non-conventional nuclear warheads are stored separately. So, a special mode of service means that a nuclear warhead is delivered from warehouses to carriers. This is the penultimate level of readiness. The last one is high readiness, followed by the command to use. If someone in Europe, I mean very greyhound Poles and Balts, is very itching to taste Russian goodies, then, I hope, they have already stocked up on toilet paper. At the same time, it is not necessary to write a will, because there will be no one to enter into ownership rights, and there will be nothing, in fact. Only the simplest bacteria will survive. But I'm sure it won't come to that. Already on the example of the Ukrainian banderlogs, everything will become clear to everyone - Putin does not intend to joke! The jokes ended on February 27th. I was not mistaken - it was the 27th, not the 24th. On August 18, Putin raised the stakes in this game even higher.

Indo-Pacific is the main goal of the USA. Europe is a secondary distraction


So that you do not think that there are fools in the States who do not understand at all what they are doing and what they are risking, I will give the opinion of only one of their analytical tanks. The name of this analyst, closely collaborating with the Pentagon, George Friedman, he outlined his vision of what is happening on August 16 on his website, which is modestly called Geopolitical Futures.

For the Russian Federation, the problem is that the Ukrainian border is less than 300 miles from Moscow, and Russia has survived numerous invasions only because of Moscow's remoteness from the invaders. The collapse of the Soviet Union created the current problem. Russia's obsession with Ukraine is intended to correct this problem. China's geographic problem is that it has become an export hub and therefore dependent on its access to the Pacific Ocean and adjacent waters. The United States has viewed China's free access to the Pacific as a potential threat to its own strategic interests since the end of World War II. China's access to the Pacific Ocean is blocked by a number of island states - Japan, Taiwan, the Philippines and Indonesia.

Why all these states that are in conflict with China are actually US dominions is a rhetorical question, you can not ask it. Whose interests are being defended is also clear. Friedman continues:

China plans to protect its own strategic depth by capturing and controlling it. Russia is also trying to regain its depth, and she went for it, knowing full well what economic consequences this would lead to. In other words, Moscow is ready to suffer financial damage in exchange for strategic security, which has not yet been achieved as a result of the conflict. Thus, America's goal in Ukraine is to deprive Russia of the strategic depth it wants. With China, its goal is to maintain American strategic depth, and prevent the PRC from threatening the US or gaining global reach.

I didn’t really understand what he meant by the term “global coverage” (let’s write it off as translation difficulties), but from what he said, one can clearly understand that for Washington, the “China issue” is much more important than the “Russia issue”. For the victory of Russia in Ukraine can only change the borders, but in fact it will not increase the real risks for the United States. China's success will mark the emergence of a new global power that has challenged the US and its allies and won a defiant victory over them.

Friedman concludes by pointing out that the United States, by initiating conflicts with China and Russia, is costing itself quite a bit in this confrontation. Therefore, both Moscow and Beijing, in his opinion, will try to play on raising rates, forcing the US to pay in full in this game of survival.

How right the American expert is, we will see in the near future. Moscow has already raised its stakes. Queuing for Beijing. That's all for me. I hope I have removed some of the questions for you. All peace and goodness. Your Mr X.
44 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Vladimir Tuzakov (Vladimir Tuzakov) 21 August 2022 18: 42
    -2
    The last question remains for the author, because at higher rates, the beneficiary will face a "Pyrrhic victory", that is, the United States will receive its territories in cargo from used nuclear weapons, and they, together with the Russian Federation and China, are not at all small .... Then, sequentially, who is the main beneficiary of today's military-political hands of the United States, not a handful of well-known banking and financial clans and are adjacent to the military-industrial complex with their own interests? They had WWII and WWII, where the same Shifts and others played the main roles (remaining in the shadows) in those events, but then the US was out of reach, today it is already within reach.
  2. qtfreet Offline qtfreet
    qtfreet (Stephen Hawkins) 21 August 2022 20: 26
    0
    The hallmark of the success of a new world order based on mutual respect for sovereign states, the very one that Russia and China are building together, I personally consider Only the Complete Withdrawal of All American Forces from the Korean Peninsula. Not earlier.
    1. Avarron Offline Avarron
      Avarron (Sergei) 22 August 2022 13: 01
      +2
      And from Europe? Nobody will let Russia live and develop in peace while the US military is present in Europe.
      1. 3danimal Offline 3danimal
        3danimal 22 August 2022 21: 23
        -1
        Nobody will let Russia live and develop in peace while the US military is present in Europe

        Look: before 1991, there were over 200 US troops in Europe.
        The USSR lived, slowly developed and heavily armed.
        After 91, the Russian Federation disarmed significantly, and the United States reduced the number of its troops to 15 thousand people (this was BEFORE 24.02.22/XNUMX/XNUMX). And no one prevented us from living and developing.
        Now, given the circumstances, the number of GIs in the EU will steadily increase.
  3. Tsarev Offline Tsarev
    Tsarev (Maxim Tsarev) 21 August 2022 20: 26
    0
    This happens only because they each contemplate the picture of the world from their own trench, conveniently equipped near their favorite refrigerator, starting exclusively from messages in a zombie box, from which they are fed information by military correspondents and full-time propagandists, whose trenches are located a little higher.
    1. passing by Offline passing by
      passing by (passing by) 21 August 2022 20: 59
      +1
      the standard for civilians is 20 to 1. it is still far from it. and most of them are not interested. hi Are the "correct" Ukrainians demanding to drop something heavier on the cuys or lions interested in civilian casualties? no. they, like their Svidomo relatives, demanded to inflict maximum damage on the Donbass. in short - to the last Ukrainian laughing
      1. The comment was deleted.
        1. The comment was deleted.
    2. The comment was deleted.
  4. Tasia Offline Tasia
    Tasia (Tasya) 21 August 2022 21: 22
    0
    Author, do you have your own channel? Every day I look for your articles here, I have to scroll through each article of the channel to the end to see the signature. I find yours, go back to the beginning and only then start reading).
    1. Volkonsky Online Volkonsky
      Volkonsky (Vladimir) 21 August 2022 21: 46
      -2
      and what, Marzhetsky and non-crop write the right things too, I just can’t write so much, how to find me here - I’ll tell you in a personal
      1. Tasia Offline Tasia
        Tasia (Tasya) 22 August 2022 04: 50
        +1
        Yes, many have the right things, but your articles are fire, so there are probably so many comments and readings. Good luck to you!!!
  5. The comment was deleted.
    1. The comment was deleted.
  6. NikolayN Offline NikolayN
    NikolayN (Nikolai) 21 August 2022 22: 13
    +1
    Wars are trade and liberation. This war is trade and liberation. It can end quite suddenly, as soon as the States feel a real threat to the dominance of the dollar on our planet. Is it achievable? It is achievable if we combine our efforts with those of China and India. Those. they must want to scare the States. Is it good for them? You can fart. really put an end to the buck probably not. But, it can happen spontaneously if they start. I mean the threat of bucks. Negotiations will begin immediately. As long as there is no such threat, we will have to roll out Ukraine.
    1. Volkonsky Online Volkonsky
      Volkonsky (Vladimir) 21 August 2022 22: 29
      0
      dear Nikolai, the dollar is already over, and it became clear after the arrest of our gold reserves, the whole point is that the whole bodya was started by the United States just to delay its end at least for a short time, 30 trillion US national debt is pulling to the bottom of the dollar, which can never be repaid , and right now it has become expensive to even serve. The process has already begun, it is irreversible! Soon the States themselves will bang it and go digital (in five or six years)
    2. Nikolay Volkov Offline Nikolay Volkov
      Nikolay Volkov (Nikolai Volkov) 22 August 2022 06: 21
      0
      only not trade, but imperialist. in my opinion, it is impossible to fully consider this war as imperialist for Russia. since the territory of Ukraine has been part of our state for centuries
  7. Jacques sekavar Offline Jacques sekavar
    Jacques sekavar (Jacques Sekavar) 22 August 2022 00: 01
    0
    how and when the NWO will end - with the accession of part of Ukraine to the Russian Federation based on the results of the referendum, and the rest will be accepted into NATO
    1. Nikolay Volkov Offline Nikolay Volkov
      Nikolay Volkov (Nikolai Volkov) 22 August 2022 06: 19
      +2
      I would like this part not to be limited to Melitopol. Kherson and a stump of the Kharkov region ... Ukrainian land is ours. and there is nothing to do there for all Americans and Germans
    2. Monster_Fat Offline Monster_Fat
      Monster_Fat (What's the difference) 22 August 2022 06: 28
      -4
      Reading and crying. A typical stretching of an owl on a globe. Always said false or erroneous initial attitudes will not allow you to correctly assess the situation and choose the right ways to accomplish and complete it.
      Lies are especially dangerous. A person who lied or joined the false interpretation of the event, realizing that there is no turning back, will defend this lie to the end so as not to "lose face". Based on propaganda slogans, it is impossible to understand the reasons or the course of the flow, and even more so the options for completing this event in Ukraine ..
      1. Volkonsky Online Volkonsky
        Volkonsky (Vladimir) 22 August 2022 13: 18
        +3
        well, tell us the truth, let's laugh together
        1. Monster_Fat Offline Monster_Fat
          Monster_Fat (What's the difference) 22 August 2022 15: 59
          -2
          The truth? So you don't want to listen to it. You don’t need the truth, you need confirmation of the propaganda slogans that you believed in, or you want to believe it and nothing more. If they tell you the truth, you won’t accept it, you’ll immediately say, fu, this is not from “official sources”, this is “not confirmed information” and in general this is “someone else's propaganda, that's when Putin himself or Patrushev, or Lavrov, will tell me this then I'll believe." laughing That's why it's useless to say now. Although, in fact, you yourself voiced the "truth" (more precisely, part of it) in your article in one paragraph. wink
          And the truth is, everyone has their own. It depends on many factors, for example, an educated person has one truth, a cannibal has another. Truth is not the truth. No wonder they say: everyone has their own truth, and the truth is one. yes Therefore, when analyzing the situation in a professional environment, they discard the "truth" as an ideological stamp, and operate only with facts. Facts! That's when you start building a chain of "non-ideologically" colored "truth" facts, that's when you can figure out what is happening. hi
          1. Volkonsky Online Volkonsky
            Volkonsky (Vladimir) 22 August 2022 18: 52
            +2
            Long story short, I didn't get a clear answer.
            1. Monster_Fat Offline Monster_Fat
              Monster_Fat (What's the difference) 23 August 2022 07: 55
              -1
              And why do you need a "clear answer"? You have already chosen the "truth" that you need, the phrase "let's laugh together" is just about this, so that the interlocutor does not tell you, this is a priori not important for you. Although, I repeat, you yourself expressed the "truth" in one paragraph. Only you don’t like it, and therefore they decided to pull an owl on the globe here in order to justify the “truth” that suits and suits you. hi
              1. zenion Offline zenion
                zenion (zinovy) 23 August 2022 14: 27
                -1
                I agree with you. But stop pulling the owl on the globe hurts both. Don't be a child. If the article comes from the government, it will be the most correct for this government, all other truths will be wrong and false. How could Goebbels write the truth if he believed in it, but she opposed his choice. Instead of a retreat, the front was being leveled, instead of the fact that the Red Army was already in Berlin, it was necessary to strain and do with it what the Soviets did with the Wehrmacht army in Stalingrad. Hitler told his generals that we were deceived again. Who cheated - not a word.
          2. Vladimir1155 Offline Vladimir1155
            Vladimir1155 (Vladimir) 27 August 2022 09: 42
            0
            you are deeply mistaken, the facts themselves are also analyzed by the internal setting by subjective stereotypes of consciousness for embedding them into the internal paradigm of the subject and in themselves, therefore, they are not the truth and rarely explain the situation, unless, of course, they destroyed the erroneous paradigm of consciousness by their objective existence, .... therefore, that truth is the truth that coincided with the only objective truth, thus there are no two different truths and there are no many truths, but there is one truth = truth and many errors! in this way monotheists will always defeat you pagans with all your "truths" = delusions ... and here you cast a fog, but did not even explain your positions, for whoever thinks clearly, clearly states, .... I will explain to you your position, you like it acquire a false stereotype from the voice of America and bulk, as well as from the fact that sitting in a dirty kitchen you realize that you will never become a general or president and you are envious and offended for this, you are offended by Putin that he has achieved, but you don’t, this stereotype, about the fact that "our government is always lying", and you are trying to bring everything you hear under your idol dogma, which the enemies imposed on you because of the weakness of your pagan consciousness and you bought into their flattery and manipulation, you cannot bring reality under your idol dogma, so you start ranting noisily here ... or maybe the fact is that your stereotype is initially false? and contradicts the objective truth that our authorities and we have a lot of common interests, including an interest in strategic depth, which was written about by a respected author
            1. Vladimir1155 Offline Vladimir1155
              Vladimir1155 (Vladimir) 27 August 2022 10: 13
              0


              you see, even a man doesn’t always lie to a woman, but do you think that they ALWAYS lie to you? .... or maybe you always lie to yourself? especially if you deny objective truth referring to many subjective truths, because you realize that your inner "truth" = delusion contradicts objective reality, so get out of your head all the blue dreams of pink ponies planted there by Western propagandists and go down to the land where you objectively live, to the respected Patrushev defending our state, to the President of Russia VV Putin taking care of the country, to our soldiers and officers defending it at the risk of their lives, and do not break away from the people on your couch brainwashed by Western propaganda and vain confidence in your "special" mind and (formally higher) "education"
    3. guest Offline guest
      guest 27 August 2022 01: 06
      +3
      NATO should not get a mm of the land of the former Ukraine.
  8. Nikolay Volkov Offline Nikolay Volkov
    Nikolay Volkov (Nikolai Volkov) 22 August 2022 06: 18
    +1
    you can transfer at least 1000 aircraft there, but until there is a determination to strike at "decision-making centers" - these are all fairy tales for the internal user ... and NATO is much more afraid of other weapons of the Russian Federation, which will ensure our security. and these are not three airplanes with one racket on each
    1. Monster_Fat Offline Monster_Fat
      Monster_Fat (What's the difference) 22 August 2022 07: 59
      -2
      The propaganda slogan about the dangerous approach of NATO to the borders of Russia, as the cause of the NWO, looks funny. And then Estonia is not in NATO? And the Kaliningrad region is not surrounded by NATO? What about Finland's accession to NATO? By the way, about Finland, even "himself" spoke in the vein that this type does not bother him. Funny. It is funny and sad that so many people believed and continue to believe in propaganda nonsense. And of course it's ridiculous to think that three airplanes with "daggers" will intimidate all of NATO. I do not understand at what level of perception such "intimidation" is designed. Unless, for a "tick" - at least something like "oppose" and excite the turbo-patriots in Russia itself, they say, something is being done in opposition.
      1. Vladimir Tuzakov (Vladimir Tuzakov) 22 August 2022 12: 10
        +2
        Replica. Estonia and the entire Tribaltic with Sweden and Denmark are not formidable to the Russian Federation, but Ukraine, with its potential, is very formidable, especially that it was armed and PREPARED for war with the Russian Federation. (Surrender of Crimea by the West, like the "Casus Belli" laid down for the war with the Russian Federation, not to mention the Donbass) .. You already distinguish "cutlets from flies".
      2. Vladimir1155 Offline Vladimir1155
        Vladimir1155 (Vladimir) 27 August 2022 10: 03
        0
        from the Baltic states to Moscow is TWO times farther than from Chernigov, although the Baltic states also need to be returned ... after the outskirts
  9. Expert_Analyst_Forecaster 22 August 2022 08: 06
    0
    Well written, upbeat and fun.
    As for ideas, it's more difficult.
    Perhaps there is such a strategic goal -

    push NATO borders back to 1997 lines

    More difficult with opportunities. There is little that depends on us.
    We will only be able to move the borders in one case - a big, long war between China and the United States.
    As long as there is no such war, we are left with only one former Ukraine. Which, however, is a very good step in achieving independence and self-sufficiency.

    About the war between China and the United States. It's all very muddy here. In my opinion, China is not ready for war. But will the US allow China to be ready for war? Remembering Japan (and twice) - hardly. Again, how to assess the US readiness for war with China?
    1. zenion Offline zenion
      zenion (zinovy) 23 August 2022 14: 46
      0
      After all, no one thought that Hitler was heading for a world war. The British supported him. But the armament of Germany was weak in order to fight with the USSR. Then Germany was given away, almost all of Europe, and the rest of the countries were made allies of Germany. The British themselves left so many weapons for the Germans that this should have been enough for three months. Germany expected that after the first blow, which would be victorious, a revolution would begin in the USSR, in the European part, or something similar. Did not happen. They also thought, hoped that there would be a revolution in Ukraine, but it did not work out. Everything turned out as in 1941, only the dates and direction have changed. God forbid such an end.
    2. Vladimir1155 Offline Vladimir1155
      Vladimir1155 (Vladimir) 27 August 2022 09: 52
      0
      you underestimate the fact that Russia and China have a common border and common trade, and since the United States made a mistake by discarding Kissinger's idea, the unification of the Russian Federation with resources and China with industries will create such a strong association that Taiwan will not be in trouble, Mongolia will be included there and Central Asia, Iran, Saudi Arabia, all have common Eurasian borders and the United States will not be able to interfere with their trade, legally the United States will not be able to interfere with China's actions in Taiwan, just the wise Chinese are still thinking what to do ...
      if God wants to punish them, first of all, he will take away the mind, he took away the mind from Pelosi, the depravity in the minds of the Americans aroused the wrath of God, they have already merged Europe, and who is now for them? Australia and Japan?
  10. Sergey Latyshev Offline Sergey Latyshev
    Sergey Latyshev (Serge) 22 August 2022 08: 15
    0
    Peremoga ....
    Analysts did not understand, political observers did not understand, and the majority did not notice, and the author introduced a new word in explaining why everything turned out as it happened, and not as promised (one could get used to 30 years of capitalism) - "strategic depth".

    True, the term is still coined in Omerik ...
  11. Yuri V.A Offline Yuri V.A
    Yuri V.A (Yuri) 22 August 2022 09: 13
    +2
    What are the borders of the 97th year, when in half a year we cannot clean up the Donbass from the Bendera partisans
  12. boriz Offline boriz
    boriz (boriz) 22 August 2022 10: 07
    +2
    What he understands by the expression "global coverage", I did not really understand ...

    Monetary (military-economic) zones are being created in the world. Created right before our eyes.
    If anyone hasn't noticed, the Russian zone already includes Egypt, Turkey, Iran, KSA and other little things.
    China will also not sit still. He must show that he is able to "solve problems" within his future zone and, after that, begin to collect it.
    It may include some countries in Asia and parts of Central and South America (which the US has enchantingly missed in just the last 2 years). This region has come out of the influence of the United States, but there are no elites anywhere that are capable of leading this considerable territory. We'll have to share it and take control ...
    Take control at least for a while, so as not to slip under the United States again. But they have no particular desire to go under the United States again. Brazil is in the BRICS, Argentina has soaped up there too.
    And Russia and China have been taking root there for a long time.
    Here is your coverage. China and Russia in the US backyard. Plus China in the Pacific Islands. In this scenario, the logistics of the US-planned AUKUS zone become very vulnerable. WB, Australia and USA. At the same time, the Suez Canal in the Russian zone (not so long ago they already played with it), hypersonic anti-ship missiles will not give the US fleet in the Pacific Ocean any chance.
  13. andrey ivanov_2 Offline andrey ivanov_2
    andrey ivanov_2 (Andrey Ivanov) 22 August 2022 10: 15
    0
    I have a feeling that "Mr. X" is Mr. "Volkonsky" until February 2022......
    1. Bulanov Offline Bulanov
      Bulanov (Vladimir) 22 August 2022 13: 59
      0
      I have a feeling that "Mr. X" is Mr. "Volkonsky" until February 2022......

      And I was thinking about Yuri Podolyaka ...
  14. Avarron Offline Avarron
    Avarron (Sergei) 22 August 2022 12: 59
    +1
    For the United States, the issue of survival is an edge - both of their main rivals have found a regularly operating hypersonic weapon and the ability to shoot down US satellites. Russia also has missile defense systems that no one else has.
    Obviously, if Russia and China are given the opportunity to tightly saturate their troops with these missiles, they will launch a pre-emptive disarming strike against US nuclear forces for a start, and then how it goes.
    Therefore, the US has no choice but to create as many conflicts as possible on the periphery of its rivals in order to weaken them as much as possible until the US catches up with them in the arms race.
    And then, when the United States overtakes its rivals and gains the ability to deliver an unanswered disarming strike, they will do it without hesitation.
    Therefore, Russian tanks will not be allowed to stop on the Polish border, and Poland and the Baltic states will be thrown into the furnace of war, and with them the entire EU plus two hundred thousand American soldiers stationed in Europe.
    Russia and China need time and resources to deliver a comprehensive blow directly to the United States, this is obvious to anyone who is more or less following the situation in the world. And this blow will be delivered pretty soon with a probability of 90% in my opinion.
    Those who do not have a bunker with a supply of provisions for five years will face an unenviable fate. Unfortunately, I don't have it.
    1. Bulanov Offline Bulanov
      Bulanov (Vladimir) 22 August 2022 14: 04
      0
      both of their main rivals have acquired a fully functional hypersonic weapon and the ability to shoot down US satellites.

      As I was informed yesterday, 21.08.2022/21/15 at XNUMX:XNUMX. a group of Starlink satellites flew over Simferopol in chains. (Starlink is a US global satellite system deployed by SpaceX).
      You still need to have the determination to shoot down these satellites, at least with a laser to begin with ...

      Those who do not have a bunker with a supply of provisions for five years will face an unenviable fate.

      To begin with, it is enough to have a supply of water and food for 30 days and try to walk less in the contaminated area - this is the half-life of the main toxic radio materials. Then it will be faster.
  15. kriten Offline kriten
    kriten (Vladimir) 22 August 2022 14: 14
    +2
    In fact, in the West, until today, they have seen in the NMD that Russia has shown that it almost fails to cope with the Armed Forces of Ukraine. And this gives them impudence and determination to help Kyiv in everything.
  16. 3danimal Offline 3danimal
    3danimal 22 August 2022 21: 18
    0
    Russia has once again deployed hypersonic weapons in the heart of Europe. On August 18, three MiG-31K long-range interceptors with hypersonic Kinzhal ARKs were urgently deployed to the Kaliningrad region.

    Unfolded and .. only 3 carriers?
    That is, these aircraft can take to the air and launch 3 aeroballistic missiles? Sounds intimidating for the entire NATO bloc.
    Yes, warheads can be nuclear.
    But where is the guarantee that an American SSBN with SLBMs modified for the use of tactical ammunition is not on duty in the Baltic Sea?
    In a threatening period, all their reconnaissance means (and there are many more of them) will follow the movements of our equipment to the maximum and it is unlikely that it will be possible to deliver a sudden blow to the adversary.
    About the "Dagger": it should be remembered that this is an air-launched OTR "Iskander". Most BRMDs develop speeds over Mach 5 by the time the fuel burns out (at the highest point of the trajectory).
    Such the first "hypersonic" missile was the "V-2".
    1. Alexey Lan Offline Alexey Lan
      Alexey Lan (Alexey Lantukh) 23 August 2022 15: 28
      0
      Deploy "Daggers" in the Kaliningrad region, which is covered with NATO tactical missiles up and down? An interesting solution....
  17. Semyon Sukhov Offline Semyon Sukhov
    Semyon Sukhov (Semyon Sukhov) 22 August 2022 22: 26
    0
    .... annexed the territories of Western Ukraine and Belarus from Poland ...

    The author should be more precise ... At the time the Soviet troops crossed the former Polish-Soviet border to protect the Belarusian and Ukrainian population, Poland as a state no longer existed. The government fled through Romania to London ... The note on permission sent to the Polish ambassador remained unanswered for more than 24 hours (silence is a sign of consent in accordance with the norms of diplomatic relations) ...
  18. Yuri Bryanskiy Offline Yuri Bryanskiy
    Yuri Bryanskiy (Yuri Bryansky) 23 August 2022 07: 05
    +2
    Everything is correct. But they won’t let them go to the borders of 1997, but the Russian Baltic must be reunited. To do this, you need to go to Chop. Remove the liberal from the Ministry of Finance. Comrade like Moiseev. The financial bloc is the main enemy inside Russia. And it's time for the men from the FSB to work more actively with liberal dishonesty.
  19. Spasatel Offline Spasatel
    Spasatel 23 August 2022 14: 21
    +1
    This text is intended to remove the veil of secrecy from the actions of the Kremlin and to explain in simple and accessible language what is happening and how it will all end for us...

    From the first words I recognized the author, and did not even read to the end. When such people consider only themselves smart, and the rest fools - in reality, everything is just the opposite ...
  20. Sergei Fonov Offline Sergei Fonov
    Sergei Fonov (sergey fonov) 23 August 2022 20: 06
    0
    The United States is an island state, nuclear submarines in the Pacific and Atlantic Oceans will not leave America time to decide whether a nuclear war between the United States and Russia or China is a road to nowhere, or to a cave.
  21. The comment was deleted.