The project of the Russian orbital station is presented

16

The State Corporation "Roscosmos" during the International Military-Technical Forum "Army-2022" on August 15 for the first time demonstrated the project of the Russian orbital station.

The Energia Rocket and Space Corporation, which is part of Rosmosmos, is developing a draft design of the station. According to the corporation's plans, the deployment of the station is envisaged in two stages. On the first of them, the orbital object will include four modules: scientific and energy, gateway, base and nodal, which will provide a pressurized volume of about 228 cubic meters. The cosmonaut team will consist of two people.



In the second phase of deployment, the national station will be supplemented with a service platform, as well as target and production modules. The number of cosmonauts can grow to four people, and the total hermetic volume of the object will increase to 667 cubic meters, 49 of which will be occupied by scientific equipment.


According to sources, the first stage of deployment is scheduled for 2025-2030, the second is planned to be implemented from 2030 to 2035.

The main features of the Russian station will include the unification of modules, the ability to perform a large number of targeted tasks, various modes of operation and interaction with promising constellations of satellites.
  • Roskosmos
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

VK Zen Telegram
16 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Vladimir Tuzakov
    Vladimir Tuzakov
    0
    15 August 2022 13: 55
    It is not time to move from the "scientific" work of the station to completely mundane practical matters .. For a long time, under "science" an elementary cut of funds has been made for decades. And supervision and effectiveness must be indispensable, because from the time of the USSR on the space theme, huge funds were stolen ...
    1. zenion
      zenion
      0
      15 August 2022 15: 00
      Not everyone had enough money for dachas, palaces, boats and other trifles. In addition, you need to withdraw funds for a rainy day somewhere overseas, in a lousy case even overseas. Now, when they are fully equipped, then it will be possible to think about ... and about the children, again everything from beginning to end. It's not for nothing that they changed power. Some people want to live as the CPSU promised life under communism, as in the United States.
    2. faiver
      faiver
      +2
      15 August 2022 15: 12
      to completely mundane practical affairs.

      - like what?
    3. Alemax
      Alemax
      0
      15 August 2022 15: 25
      For your information, Cosmos has always been unprofitable. Though for the national economy, even the military. So it was originally, so it will be another 200-300 years. The commercialization of space is complete nonsense. For the cost of such events is a priori higher than the financial benefits that can be obtained.
      Another thing is scientific and technological progress in itself. Technology can be adapted to life on earth. Again, not all, but only a certain part of them. Pure science and business are incompatible concepts.
      1. goncharov.62
        goncharov.62
        +2
        15 August 2022 20: 26
        For some reason, it's profitable in America... Probably, something is wrong in the conservatory either... And what about a socially-oriented business? Grow your own - patriotic New Komsomol?! All you need is an Idea, upbringing and a Leader. And nothing is impossible here.
        1. Alemax
          Alemax
          0
          25 August 2022 14: 18
          Where is it profitable? At the stage of cutting taxes and fees of honest citizens?
          Yes, very profitable.
    4. Fizik13
      Fizik13
      +1
      15 August 2022 18: 29
      Quote: Vladimir Tuzakov
      It is not time to move from the "scientific" work of the station to completely mundane practical matters.

      Without theoretical research, there are no practical results, except for very rare cases when there is a result, and then the theory is adjusted for several years or decades. Take at least mathematics, we are happy with the Fourier - dregs and horror tell YOU. And here it is not. they are used in radar (air defense, missile defense, aviation, geolocation ...), digital oscilloscopes, etc. etc.
      1. goncharov.62
        goncharov.62
        0
        15 August 2022 20: 30
        Laplace transformations...:))) (I don't remember what it is, but my wife is a math teacher)...
      2. Vladimir Tuzakov
        Vladimir Tuzakov
        +1
        15 August 2022 21: 11
        Applied sciences, not about them. (Fourier series, oscillatory damped function and it is very often used almost everywhere). He had in mind such experiments as the behavior of Drosophila flies in weightlessness and their reproduction. And what, they were going to breed flies in space, or write dissertations and cut money ... Distinguish where necessary with real benefit ....
  2. Fizik13
    Fizik13
    +2
    15 August 2022 19: 31
    Quote from Alex
    For your information, Cosmos has always been unprofitable. Though for the national economy, even the military.

    If space is so unprofitable then why are so many countries trying to buy space for their satellite(s) and space tourists for their ass.?
    Okay GPS GLONAS and others - first of all military, and then civilians
    (just like in the song - first of all. first of all we will ruin the planes, but the girls, and the girls later).
    Why corporations are investing huge amounts of money in geolocation satellites is because it is faster and less costly to search for mineral deposits. No need to climb taiga, jungles and deserts for months and years, and after all this, process data for months. And satellites for the Internet - a twisted bet or fiber optics is connected to the modem and that's enough, but why doesn't it matter to me, YES?
    And weather satellites, without them you can’t fly and you don’t go to sea. Etc. etc.
    If at the dawn of the space age, space was 100% unprofitable, but now, in many respects, the invested funds are more than paid off.
    P.C. Space has always been and will be the prerogative of the state. All other corporations and billionaires are either contractors or co-investors in some projects. True, there are such startups in which people are trying to launch a brick on their own, sorry, a satellite similar to a brick in terms of weight and dimensions, 80-120 kilometers above their heads.
    True, there is one dude, sorry, an eccentric who launched his personal electric car to the forefathers, sorry, to distant stars.
    1. goncharov.62
      goncharov.62
      0
      15 August 2022 20: 32
      Before that, the earthlings launched a golden disk with information... There were times, right, fizyo?! (so in TPI Tomsk they called FTF) ...
  3. sat2004
    sat2004
    0
    16 August 2022 09: 19
    It is not necessary to invest in green energy, but in science.
    Not so long ago, in 1847, we learned about Boolean algebra, now it is present in every telephone, something like this.
  4. ont65
    ont65
    +1
    16 August 2022 10: 13
    The inclination of the station is chosen such that most of the satellite constellation falls out of service. The case in terms of satellite queuing is new, for it, and in addition to the station, a lot of things will be required that no one has yet, but this is a logical expansion of the human presence in space. - Some kind of economic activity, for the implementation of which an outpost is required.
  5. dub0vitsky
    dub0vitsky
    0
    11 September 2022 20: 51
    Quote: Vladimir Tuzakov
    It is not time to move from the "scientific" work of the station to completely mundane practical matters .. For a long time, under "science" an elementary cut of funds has been made for decades. And supervision and effectiveness must be indispensable, because from the time of the USSR on the space theme, huge funds were stolen ...

    Practical cases are millions of tons. Work in the interests of the national economy. No crew can cope with such a volume. The simplest satellites, sent into orbit by the hundreds a year, will also be able to photograph the fields for farmers. A single plan for the work of this entire economy, the exchange of information, if for money (and who will work for free?), then not for space, so that it can be afforded by a normal production worker. As for geological observations, you will not get any information. And in general, what is filmed THERE should be filtered, and in the fastest way, filtered and not secret, to the masses.
  6. dub0vitsky
    dub0vitsky
    0
    11 September 2022 20: 57
    Quote from Fizik13
    True, there is one dude, sorry, an eccentric who launched his personal electric car to the forefathers, sorry, to distant stars.

    This eccentric, late with the launch to Mars, during the days of the Great Confrontation, when Mars is closest to us, out of annoyance, in order to somehow regain PR, fired a programmed rocket into the AREA of Mars. Having loaded, for baldezh and envy, his rattletrap. Change the program into a flight task, polish it for a long time, for a flight with a different task, and feel spitting on your back. Musk didn't do that. WALK, SO, WALK ..... One more thing: Who said that the Mask's car is there - completely complete? He, of course, was adjusted to the mass of what they wanted to launch to Mars. Otherwise, a rocket with a different mass of cargo could fly wrong. And who will check it?
  7. BoBot Robot - Free Thinking Machine
    BoBot Robot - Free Thinking Machine
    +1
    24 September 2022 08: 21
    We need to plan orbital bombers, and not indulge in "scientific" stations!