“The US has shown its teeth…” Isn't it time for Moscow and Beijing to thin them out?


The previous day was marked by a number of events that our transatlantic "sworn friends", alas, with good reason can write down as an asset of their own victories and achievements. Yes, the fact that another US-inspired crisis around Taiwan did not result in the beginning of the hot phase of the Third World War is certainly encouraging. However, Washington managed to once again prove to the whole world that it has no intention of giving up the status of "world hegemon" and is ready, if necessary, to confirm its claims to this status by force of arms. US interference in the internal affairs of sovereign states will continue in the future - despite any protests from them.


On the Russian-American front, things happened that were certainly incomparable with the large-scale provocation carried out with the support of the AUG and fighter squadrons by Nancy Pelosi, Speaker of the House of Representatives of the US Congress, but they left an extremely unpleasant and painful aftertaste. Again, loud statements and warnings about some kind of “consequences” that, as practice shows, do not lead to anything concrete. And therefore, absolutely not touching the star-striped "rulers of the world" and completely ignored by them. What else needs to happen in order for both Beijing and Moscow to finally understand: one should deal with this public in a completely different style?!

Last chinese warning


The visit of a high-ranking Washington lady to the territory of Taiwan, which is not recognized by almost anyone (including the United States) as a “sovereign state”, initially looked like a slap in the face to Beijing. All the talk that this is supposedly a "private trip" that has nothing to do with the official policies The United States, which "completely adheres to the principle of one China," was not worth, of course, even a broken penny. This, by the way, was fully confirmed by the very first minutes of the grandmother-traveler’s stay in Taipei, where she first stated that since “China is a threat to Taiwan and world democracy as a whole”, then the United States, of course, cannot “stay aside” can not. And then she expressed her intention to meet with the local head of the unrecognized "state" as soon as possible. And by the way, Grandpa Joe has already blabbed that he really "respects" Grandma Nancy's decision to go to Taiwan. And this despite the fact that this reckless act almost provoked a most dangerous armed clash. However, he did not provoke it - contrary to everyone's expectations and a great many forecasts that this time "Beijing will not endure". Endured.

All the military preparations of the PLA turned out to be just a demonstrative "flexing of muscles", and some of them are completely bewildering. For example, defile of armored vehicles on the beaches of Fujian, from where the valiant Chinese tank crews could not swim through the sea strait to Taiwan, located on its opposite shore. Yes, the planes flew - including entering the Taiwanese air defense zone, sirens howled and training missile launches thundered, but all this was nothing more than a show. The Americans "did not fall for him", although they brought their forces to a state of combat readiness. Pelosi's landing in Taipei was not hindered at all.

But on the eve of the Chinese English-language publication Global Times, which is unequivocally a “mouthpiece” for communication with the “collective West”, quite openly declared “army intervention” in the event of an attempt by an overseas speaker to set foot on Taiwanese soil. They even outlined a specific scenario for this: they say that Pelosi's plane would be "intercepted" and "expelled" from Chinese airspace - with the corresponding "escort" of the PLA Air Force. However, nothing similar actually happened. After all, the board of the intruder was heading for Taipei under the cover of Taiwanese Mirages, and a quite solid “support group” of a considerable number of fighters and tanker aircraft had already been raised from American military bases in Japan.

Alas, all the menacing statements made by Beijing until the last moment, as they say, “went off the whistle” like a steam of an overheated kettle. It is not surprising that words were subsequently heard from Washington that they “would not allow China to intimidate themselves with belligerent rhetoric and threats.” At the same time, the Americans quite calmly remarked that they "expect China to continue to take measures in response to Pelosi's trip to Taiwan in the long term." Between the lines it reads: "and they wanted to spit on them." The words of the official representative of the White House that "the United States does not want a crisis in relations with China and does not intend to saber-rattling" sound completely mockery. Well, yes - the advance to Taiwan of the AUG, led by the aircraft carrier Ronald Reagan, is no rattling, of course. As well as bringing all the military bases of the Pentagon in the Indo-Pacific region to full combat readiness, which became known the day before. Thus, the Chinese comrades once again confirmed the thesis about the notorious "last Chinese warning", which no one is afraid of, since it is never carried out.

"Fix and take into account ..."


The fact that threats and warnings have weight and meaning only if those to whom they are addressed reasonably fear their implementation, I have recently written more than once. “Strikes on decision-making centers”, “suppression of arms supplies to the Kyiv regime”… What else was there – from the same series? This, however, does not matter. The trouble is that every single one of these "messages", as they say, hung in the air, And, quite expectedly, led to a completely opposite effect. That the Ukronazis, that the “collective West” that nurtures and guides them, have clearly learned that all the notorious red lines, crossing which one can bitterly regret, are drawn only in words, “for beauty”. In reality, there is no retribution - neither for attacks on residential areas of Donetsk, Kherson or Nova Kakhovka, nor for shelling of Russian border territories. In the same way, NATO countries get away with supplying the Armed Forces of Ukraine with ever more long-range and lethal weapons. And not only this…

The day before, a particularly dumb-headed Ukronazi, a representative of the Main Intelligence Directorate of the Ministry of Defense of Ukraine, Vadym Skibitsky, let slip that each specific strike of the HIMARS MLRS is not just corrected and directed using “real-time information received”, the source of which can only be reconnaissance satellites and aircraft of the North Atlantic alliance, but also directly agreed with the Americans. They have a "veto power" in relation to literally any target chosen by the UAF for attack, in the event that it causes them "dissatisfaction". Sorry, but this is not even the supply of weapons, not the dispatch of mercenaries, not the training of thugs from the Armed Forces of Ukraine, this is direct and direct participation in hostilities, and specifically in the commission of war crimes, which are strikes against civilians!

It is clear that such "revelations" (from which the Pentagon and the White House probably grabbed their heads) could not but cause a reaction in Moscow. The Russian Ministry of Defense made a statement in which they directly laid "responsibility for the mass death of residents of Donbass" directly on the "Joe Biden administration." What's next? The Ministry of Defense said that the statements of the Ukrainian side on the coordination with Washington of each goal for HIMARS "are recorded and will be taken into account." What, sorry, to take into account? What exactly will this “accounting” be expressed in? And what kind of accounting term is this, which is completely inappropriate in this case? The senile Biden again deeply spat on some kind of “responsibility” for the Donetsk children killed by the Ukronazis. Washington from her, sorry, neither hot nor cold. As well as from the statements of another Russian department - the Ministry of Foreign Affairs. They deigned to warn the United States about the "possible severance of diplomatic relations" - in the event that they still recognize Russia as a country sponsoring terrorism. This, according to the Russian Foreign Ministry, "will be the final crossing of the point of no return with all the ensuing consequences."

Yes, with what exactly the consequences, damn it?! How long can one pour out such words, turning from their utter emptiness into dust? The idea of ​​labeling Moscow as a “terrorist” is now being rushed by figures from the US Senate and Congress, scribbling appeals, adopting resolutions and “developing criteria”. And they will do it - you can be sure! True, the State Department is already reassuring in advance (either itself or the Kremlin) about the fact that such a decision "will have little effect on anything", all the same, "the strongest sanctions have already been introduced." Well, that's okay - they'll come up with new ones! And, in the end, how long can you endure slaps in the face, powerlessly threatening "points of no return" and consequences?!

Frankly speaking, the “point of no return” in Russia’s relations with the “collective West” was passed not even on February 24 this year, but in 2014, after the annexation of Crimea. Everything that is happening now became absolutely inevitable even then. And this confrontation, which has almost turned into an open war, will continue until the complete victory of one of the parties. Ukraine, Taiwan, Serbia, the Middle East are just different fronts of this war. It was not for nothing that Nancy Pelosi was greeted in Taipei by a crowd of crazy people in yellow-black masks. And Pavel Klimkin, former Foreign Minister of the “independent” country, with great pathos, painted his “vision” of this lady’s voyage as a conscious show of force on the part of the United States:

The United States showed its teeth twice: it eliminated the leader of Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia) and made a visit by the speaker of the US Congress to Taiwan. These teeth were well seen in the Kremlin. The signal is very simple: we are not afraid of anyone and will destroy everyone who threatens the security of the United States ...

Klimkin, of course, is completely inadequate, but in this case, alas, he is completely and completely right. I don’t know what about the terrorists from the East – the Americans themselves create them, and then “eliminate” them themselves, but otherwise their actions are really an extremely impudent and cynical demonstration: “We will do it! Because we can and we won’t get anything for it!” And yes - they will destroy ... Sooner or later, but they will try to kill everyone who is considered a "threat" from the world. It is time for Moscow and Beijing to finally understand that this will inevitably happen, unless after the next “showing of teeth” these same teeth are not fairly thinned out. And better - completely knocked out.
86 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Expert_Analyst_Forecaster 3 August 2022 09: 12
    -5
    However, he did not provoke it - contrary to everyone's expectations and a great many forecasts that this time "Beijing will not endure".

    It's nice that I'm not one of these all and this set. Yes Yes. I will boldly demonstrate my intellectual superiority.
    Minuses? Read above.
    1. Bakht Offline Bakht
      Bakht (Bakhtiyar) 3 August 2022 09: 36
      -1
      The inferiority complex is incurable.
  2. Expert_Analyst_Forecaster 3 August 2022 09: 19
    +2
    Yes, with what exactly the consequences, damn it?! How long can one pour out such words, turning from their utter emptiness into dust?

    Well, we are allies with China. They say many different words. And ours are not far behind.
    But still there is a huge difference. We started NWO, and China is chewing snot.
    We continue NWO, and China continues to chew snot.
    But, I agree with the author - you should not take an example from China and talk too much.
    1. k7k8 Offline k7k8
      k7k8 (vic) 3 August 2022 10: 45
      +3
      Quote: Expert_Analyst_Forecaster
      Well, we are allies with China

      Moscow may be considering Beijing as an ally. Did you ask Beijing? We must not forget the main thing - China has no allies, they recognize only partnership interstate relations that are beneficial at this time.
  3. Expert_Analyst_Forecaster 3 August 2022 09: 27
    +3
    It is time for Moscow and Beijing to finally understand that this will inevitably happen, unless after the next “showing of teeth” these same teeth are not fairly thinned out.

    There is no hope for Beijing. At all. Therefore, you have to do everything yourself.
    But not all at the same time. First, we will decide on the territory and population of the former Ukraine.
    Let's tolerate both Europe and the USA. It would be better to be silent. Gritting his teeth in anger.
    The time will come to settle accounts with both NATO and Japan. We won't even forget the snarky mutt Lithuania.
    1. Vladimir Tuzakov (Vladimir Tuzakov) 3 August 2022 09: 44
      +4
      (To the expert) Try to put your thoughts in one post, otherwise you look like a troll. On the merits of the article, well done author, directly points to the toothlessness of the policy of the Russian Federation and China. Provocations must be answered in kind, without empty horror stories and maneuvers. For example, with high-precision weapons, destroy the empty plane of Pelosi's arrival in the parking lot, it is better at night, when there is no one on board. As an option, DRG with ATGMs to burn the plane. It’s a trifle, but it’s nice, it’s not so comfortable to fly back, with the concept of a hint that they will shoot down next time ... Yes, and somehow answered to a slap in the face ...
      1. Expert_Analyst_Forecaster 3 August 2022 10: 06
        -1
        Try to put your thoughts in one post, otherwise you look like a troll.

        It is more convenient to arrange different thoughts in separate comments. More convenient for me and, I hope, for commentators. As for the troll... I don't care how I look. I don't like it - let them complain - there is a special button. They will ban me - it will be easier for offended people to live.
        In two weeks we will start a new cycle)).
      2. nikanikolich Offline nikanikolich
        nikanikolich (nikola) 3 August 2022 18: 05
        0
        my friend, have pity on us, with such radicalism you can get through. A long-range unmarked drone with an experienced operator is enough on the route of the aircraft and voila, there was no attack, and the route was changed.
    2. Alexey Davydov Offline Alexey Davydov
      Alexey Davydov (Alexey) 3 August 2022 13: 13
      -1
      Quote Expert_Analyst _Forecaster:
      First, we will decide on the territory and population of the former Ukraine.
      Let's tolerate both Europe and the USA. It would be better to be silent. Gritting his teeth in anger.

      Here you, _Analyst, are going to endure. Did you ask the States? Are they willing to give us time for this patience? Be patient with us. If they do not agree - this is your proposal - at best, a "dummy".
      At worst - complicity in the surrender of Russia to the enemy
      1. Expert_Analyst_Forecaster 3 August 2022 13: 21
        0
        Will give. For a simple reason. We are not building aircraft carriers, but missiles. Because we have time. I do not know how much, but there are 4-5 years.
        And about aiding the enemy, you again said nonsense.
        1. The comment was deleted.
        2. Alexey Davydov Offline Alexey Davydov
          Alexey Davydov (Alexey) 3 August 2022 15: 29
          -1
          Of course it's nice to think that we have another 4-5 years.
          However, 4-5 years - what? Wars with NATO in Europe? Peace with the Hegemon on his terms?
          If there is no second one, the Hegemon will arrange the first one for us (Poland is at a low start)
          Since the first option gives the Hegemon much more than the second - the conditions of the second, if the Hegemon agrees to it, will be simply wild
          1. Expert_Analyst_Forecaster 3 August 2022 17: 32
            0
            Within 4-5 years, we are guaranteed to inflict unacceptable losses on NATO.
            If there is a war with NATO, it will be very short, because it will be nuclear.
            What conditions are you talking about if a nuclear war could start at any moment?
            There will be some temporary agreements, temporary alliances, temporary solutions.
            Until then, the world will not come to a new equilibrium. Through war or without - it is useless to guess.
            1. Alexey Davydov Offline Alexey Davydov
              Alexey Davydov (Alexey) 3 August 2022 17: 46
              0
              Unacceptable NATO losses? Unacceptable - for whom? NATO, with its giblets, is in the hands of the Hegemon. Especially in wartime conditions.
              The number of armed forces (actual) in the Russian Federation for 2018 is 794 thousand people.
              The NATO countries have from 3,5 to 5 million people.
              Probably the opening of a second front against us in the Far East - with Japan, which has another 250 thousand people. It will take away some of our strength. from the European theater
              Such a war will bleed and weaken us, and yet the Hegemon has not even entered into it yet.
              What are the real mobilization opportunities and returns from our flawed industry and human potential?
              The use of tactical nuclear weapons will also not bring us victory, because. the main enemy is safe overseas and is counting the profits.
              The main result is complete exhaustion without contact with the main enemy.
              You need to spend energy and take risks in confronting him himself, using the only weapon that he is afraid of. So, as the USSR did in 1962, without using nuclear weapons
              1. Expert_Analyst_Forecaster 3 August 2022 18: 30
                0
                What front? A quick exchange of nuclear strikes and that's it!
                With Japan, only rosy optimists offer to fight with fleets or armies.
                Read the concept of using nuclear weapons.
                And who blew into your ears that the United States will remain safe and sound?
                Or did you come up with it yourself?
                1. Alexey Davydov Offline Alexey Davydov
                  Alexey Davydov (Alexey) 3 August 2022 19: 11
                  0
                  Here you and I find ourselves in a banal situation, when the freedom of modeling in the mind of a person (you in this case) takes him away from reality, this freedom does not have
                  1. Expert_Analyst_Forecaster 3 August 2022 19: 21
                    0
                    Wait and see. I do not insist on my model of the world. I'm just introducing you.
  4. Chukchi farm worker (Chukchi farm worker) 3 August 2022 09: 37
    0
    Still, wisdom is a virtue. The PRC has acted wisely at the moment. The war has not started. This is already a victory for China. Well, the fact that American teeth need to be knocked out is, of course, correct. But first you need to have something with which to knock them out. This is the first. Second, you only need to knock out the teeth, and not tear off the head. Or, nevertheless, to tear off? Here it is necessary to decide. Nobody in the world wants to fight. Except, apparently, the United States. And, most likely, their insane and rotten leaders. It is unlikely that the people in the United States want to burn out from Chinese (Russian, North Korean and other other) missiles. Probably most don't want to. What is Biden, what is this stupid Pelosi, most likely, they have already lost the ability to control their consciousness and pumped up with stem cell drugs are simply not able to act reasonably and independently. For them, it's "cartoons". Therefore, rightly they begin to speak around the world - the United States is a country that is controlled by no one knows who and no one knows how. The whole world is under threat. But, the whole world cannot destroy the United States, not because it is not able, but because it is not united. And all that the world can do is only to understand and express (and even then not all) its contempt and fear. And the old American fools are therefore not afraid of anything, maybe even most likely, they are sure that they are doing the right thing! Revolution or coup in the USA? Trump Go! They ruined everything there! No, well, really, well, do not burn the whole of America in an atomic flame because of these old fools!
    1. Bakht Offline Bakht
      Bakht (Bakhtiyar) 3 August 2022 09: 44
      +4
      The war has not started. This is already a victory for China.

      Definitely a defeat for China. Suppose that in February Russia would not have started NWO in Ukraine. Would that also be a victory for Russia?
      Everything else may or may not be correct. But there's no point in taking it apart.
      1. Chukchi farm worker (Chukchi farm worker) 3 August 2022 09: 55
        -5
        What are you talking about? Decide what you want to say, otherwise you will confuse cold with sour. And of course, with this approach, you should not disassemble what is right and what is not.
        Once again - the meaning is that the war did not start. And this is definitely a victory for Chinese diplomacy and the Chinese leadership.
        1. Bakht Offline Bakht
          Bakht (Bakhtiyar) 3 August 2022 10: 01
          +1
          The war has not started - this is good according to your logic. Let's make an analogy. The war in Ukraine has begun - this is bad.
          I don't confuse anything. Your sense is limping on both legs.
          This is a clear defeat for the Chinese leadership.
          1. Expert_Analyst_Forecaster 3 August 2022 10: 20
            +1
            When a great idea about the world is brought to the absolute by the words "at any cost" - good turns into evil.
            1. Bakht Offline Bakht
              Bakht (Bakhtiyar) 3 August 2022 10: 27
              -3
              And that means we need one Victory,
              We at a price will not stand!
              1. Expert_Analyst_Forecaster 3 August 2022 10: 49
                +1
                Peace and victory are not synonyms. Peace we could get by surrender.
                1. Bakht Offline Bakht
                  Bakht (Bakhtiyar) 3 August 2022 10: 59
                  -2
                  Yes Yes. That's right. The French gained peace by capitulation in 1940. Saved Paris. The USSR did not surrender. He received the destroyed Stalingrad and almost a thousand and a half destroyed cities. And got the world through Victory.

                  The slogan "we can repeat" is often repeated. Reading you and others like you, I clearly understand "we will NOT be able to repeat."

                  Returning to the topic. China gained peace by capitulation. But not victory.
              2. k7k8 Offline k7k8
                k7k8 (vic) 3 August 2022 10: 53
                -1
                You do not see the difference between the concepts of peace and victory? Sorry.
                1. Bakht Offline Bakht
                  Bakht (Bakhtiyar) 3 August 2022 10: 56
                  -2
                  There is no peace without victory. Sympathize with yourself. You wrote an absolutely impossible thing. It’s necessary to come up with this: - pass off the retreat as Victory ....
                  1. k7k8 Offline k7k8
                    k7k8 (vic) 3 August 2022 12: 31
                    -1
                    Quote: Bakht
                    There is no peace without victory

                    Now I don’t sympathize, but I ask you not to indulge in heavy (yes, by the way, light ones too) substances.
          2. Chukchi farm worker (Chukchi farm worker) 3 August 2022 10: 25
            -3
            And what about Ukraine? It's about China. There is no need to make an analogy here. Although for you, apparently, everything is the same. Just to say something.
            The meaning is not mine. The point is that the war did not start.
            This is definitely a victory for Chinese diplomacy and the Chinese leadership.
            1. Bakht Offline Bakht
              Bakht (Bakhtiyar) 3 August 2022 10: 26
              -1
              An analogy should always be made. I understand your position. And she is absolutely wrong. If anything, the general consensus is that China has suffered a geopolitical defeat. But not victory.
              1. Chukchi farm worker (Chukchi farm worker) 3 August 2022 10: 46
                -1
                I'm sure the whole world is with you!
                1. Bakht Offline Bakht
                  Bakht (Bakhtiyar) 3 August 2022 10: 53
                  -2
                  Nothing more to say?
                  I'm not good at music. There is no sound, no voice. That's why I usually look at the lyrics. This is the fight club anthem
                  https://reproduktor.net/louna/bojcovskij-klub/

                  Don't step back, clench your fist and hit.
                  Understand that this hell is not worth the tears from the eyes of your children,
                  No more waiting, clench your fist and hit
                  We have nothing to lose but our chains, bars and chains
                  Don't step back! Clench your fist and BAY!


                  1. Chukchi farm worker (Chukchi farm worker) 3 August 2022 11: 15
                    0
                    Apparently you are not only not strong in music.

                    What can I tell you. Judging by your cheerful tone, you seem to be the age of an American crazy grandmother? I do not want to offend you, but you behave in the same way. Thirst for blood in you as in a newly appeared vampire. This is very bad. Perhaps from all this and all your analogies are vicious, empty and absolutely abnormal. Don't under-hate people. Otherwise, someday, people will repay you in kind and possibly kill you.
                    All the best to you.
                    1. Bakht Offline Bakht
                      Bakht (Bakhtiyar) 3 August 2022 11: 19
                      -2
                      It seemed to you.
                      1. Chukchi farm worker (Chukchi farm worker) 3 August 2022 11: 34
                        -1
                        Don't lie to yourself.
                        Although why not?
                      2. Bakht Offline Bakht
                        Bakht (Bakhtiyar) 3 August 2022 12: 31
                        -2
                        Dear. You take on a lot. What you write is complete nonsense. Want to look smart? Will not work.
                        Do you consider this a victory for China? The flag in the hands and the wind in the hunchbacked back. This is an ABSOLUTE misunderstanding of the realities of geopolitics.
                        Be healthy.
                      3. Chukchi farm worker (Chukchi farm worker) 7 August 2022 02: 29
                        0
                        Rudeness and stupidity, all that you have. Good health to you and all the best grandfather.
          3. Ignatov Oleg Georgievich (Oleg) 3 August 2022 20: 10
            0
            The worker says correctly - The war did not start (perhaps the third world war, which was completely allowed in China) and ... This is definitely a victory for Chinese diplomacy and leadership!
            And you Bakht desperately need a war game that you can watch safely on the couch on TV. You are so far from real Big politics that it is simply ridiculous to read your analytical pearls!
            But, this does not mean at all that China will continue to look at America without doing anything. The leverage impact on America is through the roof and without the hot stage.
            1. Bakht Offline Bakht
              Bakht (Bakhtiyar) 3 August 2022 21: 09
              -1
              It's funny to read about the "victory of Chinese diplomacy."
              I don't need a war. If you read my statements, then I have always been against the war. And he believed that victory can be achieved by peaceful means. China lost because it threatened to stop Pelosi by military means and blew it.
              1. Ignatov Oleg Georgievich (Oleg) 4 August 2022 11: 05
                +1
                Oh how! You are against war, and it follows from your words that if China has threatened military means, then it is obliged (by your logic) to use them. Well, like - The kid said - the kid did! Urks and politicians are completely different strata of society, what do you think? Thank God we don't have people like you in politics! Otherwise they would have broken firewood and killed a lot of people.
                1. Bakht Offline Bakht
                  Bakht (Bakhtiyar) 7 August 2022 07: 19
                  -1
                  As usual, the opponent is credited with what he did not say.
                  Read the controversy carefully from the beginning.
                  China should not have raised the level of tension.
                  By raising the profile of this event, China has driven itself into a trap.
                  China has clearly lost in the political confrontation.
                  I have consistently opposed military action. This concerned Karabakh, Ukraine and Taiwan. But there are situations when military force must be used. Whoever does not understand this is an abstract pacifist.
                  In politics (real politics) it is people like me who are in the majority.
                2. Bakht Offline Bakht
                  Bakht (Bakhtiyar) 7 August 2022 08: 03
                  -1
                  Another victory for Chinese diplomacy
                  https://ria.ru/20220807/tayvan-1807808586.html

                  BEIJING, August 7 - RIA Novosti. A delegation from Lithuania headed by Lithuanian Deputy Minister of Transport and Communications Agne Vaiciukevichiute arrived in Taiwan for a five-day visit, the island's Foreign Ministry said.
              2. Chukchi farm worker (Chukchi farm worker) 7 August 2022 02: 32
                0
                You are simply old, so you don’t see much due to your age and personal qualities, or rather their absence. But you do not hold rudeness. Instead of a discussion - calm and thoughtful, you give out such rubbish that you are amazed and still accuse others of the lack of logic, throw around incomprehensible accusations for no reason and hang labels on people for nothing. And who are you after this grandfather?
                Are you not ashamed? You are the weakest link on this resource.
                An empty bucket makes the loudest noise).
                1. Bakht Offline Bakht
                  Bakht (Bakhtiyar) 7 August 2022 07: 22
                  -1
                  I answer rudeness for rudeness. You don't see the logs. Most often, I do not see the logic and thoughtful analysis of the situation on your part.
                  Who is the weakest link here is not up to you to decide. Your opinion does not interest me for the simple reason that this opinion is empty.
                  1. DV tam 25 Online DV tam 25
                    DV tam 25 (DV tam 25) Yesterday, 03: 47
                    0
                    Actually, you are being rude here. This is not the first time I see your rudeness and narrow-mindedness.

                    You do not answer, you are rude at first and rude later. Trying to hide their impotence and misunderstanding with swearing and banal rudeness. true expert).
            2. Bakht Offline Bakht
              Bakht (Bakhtiyar) 3 August 2022 21: 29
              -2
              Another "victory for Chinese diplomacy"

              The British House of Commons Foreign Affairs Committee plans to visit Taiwan later this year - possibly in November or early December - despite rising tensions in the region.

              The trip, which was originally scheduled for early this year but was delayed due to a member of the delegation testing positive for Covid, was meant to show Britain's support for a democratically governed island, sources say. which China considers its own.

              This is happening against the background of the ongoing deterioration of relations between London and Beijing. Last week, Conservative leadership candidates Liz Truss and Rishi Sunak articulated their tough stance on China.

              Tom Tugendhat, who chairs a special committee on foreign affairs, is expected to head a delegation to Taiwan later this year.
      2. k7k8 Offline k7k8
        k7k8 (vic) 3 August 2022 10: 51
        +1
        Quote: Bakht
        The war in Ukraine has begun - it's bad

        Yes, it is bad, and very bad. But Moscow had a choice between bad and very bad. And Moscow chose very poorly. Why I think so, I will not explain 100500 times.
        1. Bakht Offline Bakht
          Bakht (Bakhtiyar) 3 August 2022 11: 05
          -3
          And what was the "bad" option?
        2. Smilodon terribilis nimis 4 August 2022 00: 20
          0
          Well, it would be very bad to do nothing.
      3. Ignatov Oleg Georgievich (Oleg) 4 August 2022 11: 41
        +1
        No, not that analogy! The war between Russia and America and NATO because of the war in Ukraine did not start, and that's good! This is not my logic, this is the logic of the expediency of not starting it at the moment!
  • Bakht Offline Bakht
    Bakht (Bakhtiyar) 3 August 2022 10: 25
    -1
    A small addition. Just remembered from history

    Still, wisdom is a virtue.

    One day, while watching a fleet exercise from the royal yacht, in which the Indomiteble participated, Admiral Fisher noticed an indecisive exit in a mock attack. And he ordered to stop the semaphore: "The flagship of the cruising training detachment. An excess of prudence often turns into cowardice".

    However, this phrase is attributed to Marshal Ney.
    1. Chukchi farm worker (Chukchi farm worker) 3 August 2022 10: 45
      0
      Yes Yes. And the flagship of the cruising training detachment rushed to the attack with a swift jack.
      Don't think. Be quiet. And don't forget to puff out your cheeks.
      1. Bakht Offline Bakht
        Bakht (Bakhtiyar) 3 August 2022 10: 53
        -2
        Yes, by the way, it was. Indomiteble went on the attack. In the evening presented the repair sheet.
        1. Chukchi farm worker (Chukchi farm worker) 3 August 2022 11: 23
          -1
          Hand-face three times.
  • Expert_Analyst_Forecaster 3 August 2022 09: 45
    -2
    Quote: Chukchi farm worker
    Still, wisdom is a virtue. The PRC has acted wisely at the moment. The war has not started. This is already a victory for China.

    You are right about wisdom. And the fact that the war did not start is excellent.
    But you can find some means to not look impotent?
    For example, to fire missiles at military facilities in Taiwan.
    I do not argue - this is stupidity. But stupidity is smart. Because the reputation of China as an ally, as someone who can snap back not only with chatter, would be non-zero.
    1. Chukchi farm worker (Chukchi farm worker) 3 August 2022 10: 11
      0
      The American grandma has not yet left the island, and you already want to shell it. It's probably too fast. Although everyone (ALL ALL ALL) wants to! China in the world of globalization is the world's factory. The whole world (here's the phrase ... this Ukraine completely fucked it up with its "the whole world is with us") is waiting for a cheap shmurdyak. What happens if the factory stops working? But this is exactly what everyone is used to seeing in China - an inexpensive and obedient labor force. The Americans, as already mentioned on the network, deprived Uncle Xi of his face. And they have made themselves an irreconcilable enemy. So take your time. The grandmother will fly away, but the fools will remain in Taiwan. As well as their evil and offended "brothers from the same people" on the continent. This is just the beginning.
      Those fools in Taiwan should have been told that a typhoon was coming there or there were no seats at the airport. Or burn the fucking airport down. Just to not accept this old fool. But, no ... apparently Ukrainians and Taiwanese are relatives, godfathers for sure!
      1. Ignatov Oleg Georgievich (Oleg) 3 August 2022 20: 24
        +1
        They seem to smoke the same contagion that deprives them of their minds.
  • Expert_Analyst_Forecaster 3 August 2022 09: 52
    -3
    Quote: Chukchi farm worker
    you only need to knock out the teeth, and not tear off the head. Or, nevertheless, to tear off? Here it is necessary to decide.

    Unfortunately, it can only be determined experimentally.
    It is more correct not to knock out teeth, but to thin them out.
    But how this will turn out in practice is unknown to modern science.
    Personally, I would like the US to become one of the world leaders.
    I would moderate my power ambitions. I would moderate my desire to receive tribute from all over the world.
    Neither China nor Russia can replace the US and the Anglo-Saxon world as a whole.
    I feel sorry for the Japanese. All 125 million people who will probably burn out in a collision with Russia.
    But I'm more sorry for my own, ours. With all their undoubted shortcomings.

    Well, do not burn the whole of America in an atomic flame because of these old fools!

    I cannot promise you this. I do not want to, but force majeure is possible.
    1. alexey alexeyev_2 (Alexey Alekseev) 3 August 2022 17: 04
      0
      At the age of 14-15, my nephew cut his teeth to a Ukrainian Reich.
  • "The USA showed their teeth ..."


  • Peace Peace. Offline Peace Peace.
    Peace Peace. (Tumar Tumar) 3 August 2022 10: 06
    +4
    Hmm, the United States nullified the Chinese army, moreover, in public and in a harsh manner. And even patted on the head, like "do not blame me."
  • Valera75 Offline Valera75
    Valera75 (Valery) 3 August 2022 10: 12
    +3
    Maybe in vain we are pulling pipes to China? The Anglo-Saxons will bend them, sooner or later, and the pipes will lie dead weight like sp-2. China will rub off like with a huawei, well, maybe it will ban something that does not hit the USA and China hard and on this everything will end. China is primarily hucksters and workaholics, but hucksters do not fight, they trade.
  • Sergey Latyshev Offline Sergey Latyshev
    Sergey Latyshev (Serge) 3 August 2022 10: 16
    -4
    And, as always, the authors want immediate blood. PR, however.
    My aunt flew into an unrecognized one, and let's throw nuclear sticks?

    But in real life, both here and there Russian .. sorry, the Chinese go to visit each other, and Beijing clearly does not want its demits ..., sorry, to kill. So far, slowly but steadily leading the game...
    1. Expert_Analyst_Forecaster 3 August 2022 10: 25
      0
      Both in the territory of the former Ukraine and in Taiwan, no one is going to use nuclear weapons. Precisely because there and there one people, separated and crippled by politics.
      And it is not possible to unite peacefully.
  • sat2004 Offline sat2004
    sat2004 3 August 2022 10: 56
    0
    From tomorrow, China closes the airspace, waiting for the grandmother to fly away, go home granny, scared America.
  • Sergei Pomidoroff (Sergei Pomidoroff) 3 August 2022 11: 10
    +1
    There is no union between Moscow and Beijing. There is us, Russia, and there is China, for which we are just a future trophy. All Chinese power is built on cooperation with the United States, nothing more.
    1. Smilodon terribilis nimis 4 August 2022 00: 23
      -1
      Rather, it is China - a trophy for us. Trophies are mined by warriors. But in China there are none.
  • opportunist Offline opportunist
    opportunist (dim) 3 August 2022 11: 32
    0
    Russia just needs to get rid of the mentality We are going to heaven They are going to hell. we must adopt a first strike strategy. Russia can declare to the UN that the US nuclear arsenal is an existential threat not only to Russia, but to the whole world. Suddenly we decide that all options have been exhausted and all that remains is to destroy the US nuclear arsenal, because it represents existential threat to our country before they use it against us. Russia will launch most ICBMs hitting US nuclear infrastructure, nuclear bomber bases in Missouri and Louisiana, and submarine missile bases in Georgia and Washington, two missiles will be fired at each infrastructure in the event one fails. a nuclear surprise attack, known as a first strike, will primarily target America's land-based nuclear arsenal. Montana and North Dakota will receive at least two missiles each. the first strike, known as a counterforce strike, will be concentrated in the distance from large settlements and industrial centers. such places, like New York, the San Francisco Bay Area, and entire regions of the United States would be spared. Such an attack would kill no more than eight million American citizens, it would leave all important US industrial and civilian infrastructure intact. Russia would convene the UN Security Council and announce that all the nuclear infrastructure of US nuclear weapons and land-based warheads has been destroyed, but the infrastructure of industrial zones and all US cities remain intact. Then Russia will invite Washington to the negotiating table, and any attempt to strike back with a few remaining small tactical nuclear warheads. This will also release the remnants of the Russian nuclear arsenal, this time destroying the industrial and political infrastructure, destroying the US as an economic and political entity..after such a scenario, the only a practically realistic option for the US would be to agree to a surrender pact and destroy US nuclear defenses, the decision to use their remaining tactical nuclear weapons would be unrealistic and lead to failure. All US intercontinental ballistic missiles and strategic bombers would be destroyed by the first strike.
    1. Ignatov Oleg Georgievich (Oleg) 3 August 2022 20: 36
      0
      Opportunist, did you happen to forget that this is an atomic weapon? After the application of which, there will be no one to agree on anything and convene something there!
  • Ivanovich_007 Offline Ivanovich_007
    Ivanovich_007 (Ivanych Iv) 3 August 2022 11: 52
    +2
    It's time to take real action
    and then again the last Chinese ...
  • Boris Nikolayevich (Boris Nikolaevich) 3 August 2022 13: 49
    +1
    You, Alexander Neukropny, seem to be very eager to get to paradise ahead of time ... So go and strangle yourself, and do not incite to send all the people to the next world!
  • kriten Offline kriten
    kriten (Vladimir) 3 August 2022 13: 52
    +2
    Whose hooves decided to laugh? Who to thin out: one is already bogged down in another war, and the second does not even know how to fight.
  • InanRom Offline InanRom
    InanRom (Ivan) 3 August 2022 14: 03
    0
    Meanwhile:

    Peskov on payment to Ukraine for the transit of Russian gas:
    “We continue to pay Ukrainians for transit through the only operating line. An aggressor is an aggressor, but [Ukrainians] accept money and payment goes through.”

    and someone is sponsoring the Bandera-Nazis, paying for transit ... let me remind you, for all the time, the NWO did not fly through the pipe from either side. To whom is war, to whom is business. Although, cut off the flow, stop paying and let the curators of the territory 404, together with the EU, rack their brains about how to drown, how to work with factories, etc. and "tilt" Banderstadt ... but no. Filling a fire with gasoline is very creative. And then weapons are bought with this money and flights to Russia and Donbass continue ...
    1. Ignatov Oleg Georgievich (Oleg) 3 August 2022 20: 41
      -1
      Ivan, why do you count only the payment for transit through Ukraine, and do not mention how many billions go to the Russian budget for gas from Europe? You must be objective in such matters.
  • steelmaker Offline steelmaker
    steelmaker 3 August 2022 14: 45
    0
    Feel the difference. The United States with all mouthpieces disowned Pelosi and recognized China as one. CBO - shouting "about the empire of evil" with all mouthpieces. And who supported Taiwan there? And who opposed Russia? Here is your attitude. And China, unlike Russia, will turn off the faucet of trade to Taiwan. For some reason I'm sure of it. So let's see how China is responsible for the words.
    And as for "sharpening the teeth", apart from nuclear deterrence, Russia's dressing room has not grown. Thanks to the communists, at least they didn’t rivet the “galoshes” - wear it out and wear it out !!!
    1. Smilodon terribilis nimis 4 August 2022 00: 24
      -1
      China, unlike Russia, is a plush panda.
  • cooper Offline cooper
    cooper (Alexander) 3 August 2022 16: 47
    +3
    Not with the current Russian government - they are cowardly. IMHO.
  • alexey alexeyev_2 (Alexey Alekseev) 3 August 2022 16: 58
    +1
    Yes, I beg you .. What teeth are Beijing. Russia is alone again ... Although the army and navy ...
  • akm8226 Offline akm8226
    akm8226 3 August 2022 17: 05
    +3
    I look at you, citizens, and wonder - how can one be so naive? NOBODY will help us in the confrontation with the West. Did you understand? This is what you get on your nose. No China will show anything, because it has just crap. For if you get into a fight, then to the end. And all our "allies" are sitting and waiting to see how it ends. The United States will win - they will join the United States. If we win, they will run to Putin and lick his boots with all their might. Here's the thing, kids. Therefore, the minister of the Russian Empire was right - Russia has only two allies - the army and the navy.
  • Kapany3 Offline Kapany3
    Kapany3 3 August 2022 18: 28
    +1
    I'm already starting to "pull" when another paper maraca considers himself smarter than those who manage it. Tell me, are you ready to take the gun yourself? After all, in the event of an adequate response (according to your version), you will have to ... Now China - who said that there would be no action? Or do you think that actions are just firing rockets?
    Of course, I want to impale them all on a stake yesterday, but sorry, it doesn’t happen that way, that’s all at once.
  • Ivanushka-555 Offline Ivanushka-555
    Ivanushka-555 (Ivan) 3 August 2022 18: 51
    +3
    It is one thing to kill oppositionists in the country, and quite another thing to respond like a man in the international arena. This is where congenital problems appear - cowardice and indecision.
    1. boriz Offline boriz
      boriz (boriz) 3 August 2022 20: 49
      -2
      Comparison of Putin's behavior in the Crimea and the beginning of the NWO with Xi's behavior in Taiwan clearly shows the delusional nature of your statement.
  • boriz Offline boriz
    boriz (boriz) 3 August 2022 20: 34
    -3
    Klimkin is the last person worth referring to.
    Immediately after the frostbitten old woman landed, the US leadership distanced itself from her voyage. It was said that this was entirely her initiative. Landing in Taiwan was not planned, she just "wanted to do something historic." So to speak, a demobilization chord before retirement. Interestingly, the 90 million dollars for the visit, which were calculated in the USA, are these personal expenses of the grandmother? From salary or future pension?
    If the United States were not afraid of anything, they would have said: yes, they decided to instruct her to make a visit and she made it.
    Instead, they begin to twist their asses completely frivolously, they say, this is all a senile old woman, and we cannot cope with her.
    The United States simply once again lowered its authority. The global hegemon is over.
  • Ivanovich 1960 Offline Ivanovich 1960
    Ivanovich 1960 3 August 2022 21: 42
    +1
    To whom and when did the Chinese cut their teeth? The last time in 1979 they tried to show something to Vietnam, so they went home with bloody snot.
    1. hello Offline hello
      hello (LEO St) 4 August 2022 06: 55
      0
      Say something that upsets you. After this war, the Vietnamese realized that China was the best. When China buys Drys, the Vietnamese will follow suit and want the same manufacturer as China to make the best Drys. The Vietnamese saw every move China made and copied it, from economic policy to defense procurement, confident that what the Chinese had was better for them. That's what I tell you about the real result after that war.
  • Igor Viktorovich Berdin 4 August 2022 16: 45
    0
    It's time. Something was waiting for the tests of Poseidon .... What kind of island is it not a pity ....
  • zenion Offline zenion
    zenion (zinovy) 8 August 2022 16: 28
    0
    No need to climb to their teeth, let them not let them sleep, let them hurt all the time. They showed one lion, with such a twisted muzzle horror. Turned out he had a toothache. He came to some village, lay down at the entrance and began to moan. They called in the animal experts. It turned out the tusk was broken and was already collapsing. They put him to sleep and treated him, put a canine and gave him antibiotics. They took him to the box and settled there. For three days he was fed by the whole village. Finally he got up and decided enough was enough. He was released and left. This village has become a taboo for predators. So they understand. Americans do not need to be treated. In one village, an aged man married a young one. Several weeks passed, he crawled out of their huts to bask in the sun. Then a dog ran into his yard and hid. People came running, did the dog run to you? Yes, I ran. Let's kill the bastard. What is this for? You know, he killed the rabbit. Don't kill him people! Marry him to a young bitch - he will die.