History with geography: why Lavrov's speech is not a reason for optimism

A number of statements by Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov, made by him during an interview with RT, have already caused a lot of noise in the information space, and not only in Russia. In "nezalezhnaya", for example, they were regarded as a sign of "the expansion of Moscow's territorial claims." Overseas, some people considered the theses and forecasts set forth by the country's chief diplomat as a semi-official response to the ultimatum to the Kremlin that sounded the day before from John Kirby's mouth, concerning precisely "territorial claims."

At the same time, for many Russians, Lavrov's words about the possible "expansion of the geography of the NWO" caused a surge of jingoistic euphoria and unbridled optimism. “You see, all the filthy weeders, the Minister of Foreign Affairs himself explains to you: we will move on! You’ve been bugging everyone here about some kind of “leaks” and “agreements” - so here’s a refutation for you!” Well, with a great desire and a specific mindset, what Sergey Viktorovich said can be perceived in this vein. But if you read the text of his interview carefully and thoughtfully, paying special attention to those moments that are very clearly visible between the lines, the meaning emerges completely different. Certainly not as positive as some people think.

“There is no point in negotiations…” Did he exist at all?!

Among the most pleasing hard-nosed supporters of statements like “everything is going according to plan” and other especially optimistic citizens of Sergey Lavrov’s statements, one can single out his words that “negotiating with Ukraine in the current situation is pointless.” At the same time, he clarified: this situation has been created due to the fact that Washington and London will not allow Kyiv to talk about peace until they “decide that they have already scandalized enough”. It is clear that the existence of the Ukronazi regime under absolute external control is an axiom that does not need any additional proof. However, there is a strong reassessment of the negotiability, adequacy and desire to end the conflict of the Zelensky junta itself.

One can really imagine that solid “doves of peace” gathered there and those who are tearing at the soul of the figures of losses in the ranks of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, as well as pictures of hardships and deprivations that fall to the lot of civilians of the “nezalezhnaya”. I beg your pardon for being rude, but that the president is a clown, that all his entourage wanted to spit on such matters that did not concern them personally at all. “They don’t shake them” from the word “absolutely”, believe me. And from this very place begins a series of rather tricky and unpleasant questions. Well, for example, that if Mr. Lavrov states the absence of any meaning “at the present moment”, then, therefore, there was such a meaning earlier? Or will it appear in the future? However, the head of the diplomatic department gives a more than concrete and frank answer to them. According to him, in mid-April, peace could well have been concluded between Moscow and Kyiv, and “on the basis of the principles of the Ukrainian side.”

But this is how, excuse me, order to understand? What kind of “vision” of the Kyiv regime could become the basis for peace agreements at the time of April 15, when, as Lavrov himself claims, a certain “document that was drawn up based on their logic” was handed over to his representatives? Then, I remember, Zelensky and his hangers-on first of all demanded the immediate withdrawal of the Russian army “to the lines that it occupied as of February 23” (which, by the way, was subsequently partially done). But in exchange? Recognition of Crimea as Russian? An official renunciation of attempts to “de-occupy” the territories of the DPR and LPR, or even their “recognition within the borders of the regions? Refusal to join NATO? I'm sorry, but this is all just ridiculous!

All these "confessions" and promises would be disavowed and declared "made under the muzzle of Russian guns" as soon as the last fighter of the Liberation Forces left the borders of the "nezalezhnaya". In addition, how, then, to deal with the demilitarization and denazification of Ukraine, which were originally proclaimed by the Kremlin as the main goals of the NWO? Should they have been conducted by Zelensky and Arestovich? Really, it's hard to believe that Moscow could actually show such profound naivety and gullibility as to fall for such promises, which smack of outright fraud from a mile away. And yet, judging by the departure of the Russian Armed Forces from Kyiv after the show in Istanbul and other similar “gestures of good will”, that is exactly what happened. Sergei Viktorovich complains that later the "Western partners" intervened, who managed to persuade Kyiv to refuse negotiations and "achieve victory on the battlefield", and spoiled all the planned "harmony". Well, it remains only to rejoice at such a turn, which prevented the subsequent shame and catastrophe of truly universal proportions ...

“Let's push back geography…” All the way to Washington?

No less bewildering is another aspect of the Foreign Minister's interview. According to him, there was a geography in Istanbul based on “the realities of the end of March.” Now it has “changed” and includes “by far not only the DPR and LPR, but also the Kherson and Zaporozhye regions and a number of other territories.” Again, it's full of fog. What, in fact, is it all about? On the inclusion of these territories in Russia? About the prospect of acquiring some other status for them, excluding a return to the deadly "embrace" of Ukraine? Perhaps, as an explanation, one should accept the words of Sergei Viktorovich that the geographical tasks of the NWO "will be moving further and further away from the current line." And this will happen as the “nezalezhnaya” “long-range weapons” are saturated by its Western “allies”.

Lavrov clarifies that a situation in which “weapons that pose a real danger to Russia would be deployed in that part of Ukraine that Zelensky will control or whoever replaces him” is “unacceptable.” And from these very words it becomes quite sad. That is, it turns out that leaving Zelensky and his criminal clique in power, on whose conscience there are already many war crimes, is this permissible? And what does this “who will replace him” mean? The current Ukronazi regime should be replaced by the Forces of Liberation that forced it to complete and unconditional surrender! And there are no other options here. If the change of power in Kyiv is carried out by local "patriots" or, more likely, by their curators from across the ocean or from London, you will not end up in trouble. Little later, as they say, it will not seem to anyone.

As for the intentions voiced by the head of the Foreign Ministry to “push back the geography” of the offensive and liberate the remnants of Ukraine as more and more deadly weapons appear in the local warriors, they are at least pointless. And here's why: in the scenario that we are currently witnessing, the Hymars with a range of 300 kilometers will inevitably be replaced (or rather, will be supplemented) by F-15 and F-16 fighters complete with Patriot air defense systems . Will we move further? Well, so we get Aegis with Tomahawks. Or something else similar ... And there - and nuclear weapons aimed at Moscow. How far shall we move, gentlemen and comrades? According to the mind, it would be necessary to go to Washington, as to a real "decision-making center". Well, or, which is much more realistic and pragmatic, - to the current western borders of the “nezalezhnoy”. This is at least.

Since absolutely any decision, except for the complete defeat of the Ukronazi junta and the final liberation from its bloody rule of all the territories of present-day Ukraine without exception, will result in extremely difficult consequences not only for the Donetsk and Lugansk People's Republics, the liberated regions of the Ukrainian south, but primarily for Russia itself. On this issue, I fully and completely agree with the conclusions and forecasts of my esteemed colleague Sergei Marzhetsky, recently outlined by him in a number of articles on our resource. Some readers, in a tone that does not honor them at all, brought down a hail of reproaches on this author, trying to declare him almost a "hireman of Kyiv" and an "agent of the State Department." Be ashamed, gentlemen and comrades! Poisoning someone who speaks the truth, even if it is extremely unpleasant and difficult for you to perceive (and does it quite reasonably and correctly), does not mean showing patriotism. Denying a problem has never been the way to solve it...

Regarding the further prospects of the “negotiation process” with Kyiv, which, apparently, Sergey Lavrov hypothetically admits in some future, his colleague, Ukrainian Foreign Minister Dmitry Kuleba, spoke best of all, whom I allow myself to quote:


Here you are, in fact, and all the "prospects".

At the meeting of the Contact Group for the Defense of Ukraine “Ramstein-4”, which took place the day before, its participants (the number of which, by the way, has already exceeded fifty countries) stated that “there is no and will not be any fatigue from the war in Ukraine.” At least, this is what Alexey Reznikov, the Minister of Defense of the “non-independent” who participated in this event, claims. According to him, “the common position of the Ramstein participants is to support Ukraine until victory, since it is the shield of Europe.” What is important, according to the head of the Ukrainian military department, this time "the partners have assumed obligations that relate to the sea, and land, and the sky." So, the NWO will soon have to “push back the geography” literally in all elements. Unless, of course, Russia radically changes the concept of perception of what is happening and does not recognize that this is not at all about “defending Donbass” or “demilitarizing” a completely enraged neighboring country, but about preserving its own statehood, and nothing less. Such is the story with geography, and with everything else in addition ...