NYT: There is nothing left for the West but to intervene directly in the conflict in Ukraine

33

The anti-Russian coalition is in a fever. In the United States, President Joe Biden, who is losing the remnants of his capacity, is unable to cope with the crisis and inflation. In the UK, a crisis of power in general and its main institutions of governance has matured. There are also certain serious problems for German Chancellor Olaf Scholz. Against the backdrop of these News The West, through the mouths of its leaders, constantly assures of the inviolability of Ukraine's support against Russia, promises to finance it and arm it as much as necessary. However, the American newspaper The New York Times is sure that the ability of the coalition to continue to support Kyiv is very overestimated and doubtful.

From the behavior, or rather, the haste of the West, it is obvious that the bet is made on the militarypolitical blitzkrieg of Ukraine. The Kyiv regime, therefore, will not have a second chance. The EU and the US are in a hurry because they want to make some progress here and now, as forces and supplies are severely depleted.



The long-term prospect of assistance to Ukraine is not guaranteed. At the moment, it is not clear what else Washington and Brussels can do for Kyiv, other than directly intervene in the conflict.

- writes the American edition.

According to experts, not a single official in the center of decision-making in the West will say how long the military and economic support for Ukraine. Now she is at the peak of her abilities and intensity. Most likely, the limit of abilities will be reached, followed by a decrease and cessation.

The leadership of the US and the EU recognize that stockpiles of weapons are at the limit. The allocated 54 billion dollars of aid will not be enough even for a year. What will happen next, no one knows. The second "check" may no longer be

NYT warned.

Therefore, the reason for the rush and desire of the West to finish everything as soon as possible, moreover, of course, in its favor, becomes clear. The huge budget of funds allocated by Washington specifically for Ukraine is designed for a period up to and including the second quarter of 2023. As expected, this should be the point of "victory" of the coalition. But so far, the real state of affairs at the front suggests otherwise.

Another problem, besides running out of supplies, is electoral war fatigue. In light of the crisis in the US and EU authorities, the opinion of the people can play a key role. And what the people of Europe and America are thinking about is very obvious: about their problems, which are increasingly associated with extreme support for Kyiv. In such a situation, the leadership of the allies will not be able to ignore the opinion of citizens for a long time for the sake of the ephemeral goal of an unattainable victory over Russia.
  • nato.int
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

33 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +7
    10 July 2022 09: 05
    At the moment, it is not clear what else Washington and Brussels can do for Kyiv, other than directly intervene in the conflict.

    Well, that's it.
    And here some write that Russia needs to forget about nuclear weapons. Fleets build or buy them in China. Naive Chukchi undergrowths.
    1. +5
      10 July 2022 09: 28
      Quote: Expert_Analyst_Forecaster
      may... intervene

      Or they may not interfere. It's like in a joke about a blonde, a dinosaur and the likelihood of meeting it on the street. And do they need it?
      1. -4
        10 July 2022 09: 37
        Well, well, well, in more detail about the blonde and the dinosaur you described ...., and in general, I’m already tired of tapping here that we can’t do without nuclear weapons, so far tactical, we can’t do it - we don’t have the scale of human resources and weapons in comparison with EuroUSA.
        1. +2
          10 July 2022 09: 44
          Quote: Valentine
          Well, well, well, in more detail about the blonde you described and the dinosaur

          To the question "What is the probability of meeting a dinosaur on the street?" the blonde answered: "50%. You can meet, but you can not meet."
          This is a classic!
          Z.Y. And what is tactical nuclear weapons?
          1. +1
            10 July 2022 10: 41
            Tactical nuclear weapons are a weapon that cannot in any way threaten the Hegemon, who has driven us into the "corridor of what is permitted", and is now leading us and Europe to a big war and mutual defeat. The hegemon is not going to take risks - he will be safe to reap the fruits of his actions.
            China will be next
            1. 0
              10 July 2022 10: 58
              Quote: Alexey Davydov
              Tactical nuclear weapons are a weapon that can NEVER threaten the Hegemon

              Nafig is it necessary in this case?

              Quote: Alexey Davydov
              The Hegemon... will be safe to harvest the fruits of his actions.

              So it was about you that the local forecaster said "naive Chukchi undergrowth"? laughing
            2. +1
              10 July 2022 15: 43
              And the hegemon will not do it, by any chance? Before ... or instead of ...
              1. 0
                10 July 2022 22: 05
                In the 2nd world did not do it. He raised Hitler in his financial incubator, set him on us, took part in the war against him, became one of the victorious countries, having lost a few people, made excellent money and rose in the war. Can. This cannot be taken away.
                A war in Europe, even a nuclear one, between Russia and NATO will allow him to nullify Europe and destroy us, taking our resources and not sharing with anyone. Then you can do China.
                The Americans dehumanize us in Ukraine and prepare us as consumables for the war in Europe, just as the Ukrainians were prepared for us
            3. +1
              10 July 2022 16: 09
              Quote: Alexey Davydov
              Tactical nuclear weapons are weapons that can NOT threaten the Hegemon in any way,

              But we will find out when we make a "nuclear iron curtain" with the help of tactical nuclear weapons along the entire length of the border with the European Union and Western Ukraine-Galicia from north to south about 600 km, after which Ukraine will stop receiving weapons and fuel for the needs of the Armed Forces of Ukraine , and will make European countries think about their future existence, and there will be no "answer" for us for this at 100%. this goes.
              1. +1
                10 July 2022 22: 13
                You forget that they also have tactical nuclear weapons. If not enough, the Americans will bring more.
                Difficulties will arise in this theater - the Americans will use Kaliningrad, St. Petersburg. The Japanese are already at the ready, and so on. We will have time to bleed 10 times before the Americans, being themselves in complete safety, exhaust all the prepared options, making money on each along the way.
                Perhaps it would be more correct to resolve the issue not in Ukraine, but directly with the Hegemon?
                How the USSR did it in 1962 - the threat of a nuclear war with it
                1. 0
                  11 July 2022 21: 04
                  I've been talking about this for a long time. Until the pndos themselves die, they wanted to spit on everyone else. Until war and death come to their land, they will not stop. To the last Ukrainian, to the last European, they are ready to keep the flames of war going.
                  Either a war in the United States, or a revolution followed by a civil war in the same place. Other than that, nothing will stop them.
          2. 0
            11 July 2022 02: 26
            Up to 25 kt at face value.
    2. +5
      10 July 2022 09: 40
      Quote: Expert_Analyst_Forecaster
      Naive Chukchi undergrowths.

      Well, what can you do with them, victims of the Unified State Examination and Grisha Yavlinsky.
      1. 0
        10 July 2022 09: 44
        Not only. There are also abortion victims.
        1. +1
          10 July 2022 11: 00
          There is also: - conceived on beet moonshine ... laughing
      2. +1
        10 July 2022 09: 47
        Quote: Valentine
        victims of the exam

        And admirers of Kashpirovsky and Chumak are the victims of what?
  2. -1
    10 July 2022 09: 24
    In the United States, incapacitated President Joe Biden

    Gentlemen, how many of you can boast that you ride a bike at 80? As the saying goes, "don't look that I'm thin and coughing."
    1. +3
      10 July 2022 09: 33
      Cycling - as a criterion of mental capacity?
      Doctors that know, what so it is possible to make the diagnosis?
      Ride a bike - it means healthy, can govern the state.
      Presidential elections can be replaced by a bicycle race of candidates. Whoever came to the finish line first is the President of the United States. So what? New, fresh and economical.
      1. 0
        10 July 2022 09: 37
        Don't try to be dumber than you really are. Tov. The can still has quite a decent physical shape. And this is good for maintaining mental health. And doctors know about it.
        1. +2
          10 July 2022 15: 44
          But there is a lot wrong with your owner's mental health, and more than 64% of Americans talk about it.
          1. -1
            10 July 2022 19: 36
            Since when did the people begin to act as a doctor making a diagnosis? Read topcor.ru, so Putin's team is all completely half-witted, nifiga does not understand the issues of conducting a modern war. And all the generals and admirals are sitting buried in the screens of smart phones and laptops.
            Z.Y. And as for the owners - I never had them, unlike you. Based on the experience of previous generations, usually the owner is remembered by someone who himself will be from someone else. In my posts, you will not find this definition in any respect.
  3. +2
    10 July 2022 09: 27
    And Putin warned you that we have not seriously harnessed ourselves yet. But we can level everything to the ground right up to the Atlantic .... and further too ....
  4. +2
    10 July 2022 10: 03
    The true aims of the West are long overdue for clarification. This does not even require intelligence. It is enough, in response to military assistance to Ukraine, to recognize especially distinguished NATO members as a party to the conflict and break off diplomatic relations with them. If such an action does not sober anyone up, then there is nothing to understand - a fight is inevitable. And what do they do when a fight is inevitable? That's right - either surrender or hit first. And you can immediately, without any preamble, give first and go to heaven or give up and go to hell. Something like this.
  5. +1
    10 July 2022 14: 25
    yes, they can’t do anything ... well, except to worry about what face they will come out of the Ukrainian crisis, because everything that happens there is another crisis for the United States, in contrast to our understanding of events. For Russia, this is primarily a liberation war, and after that, a geopolitical confrontation and other reasons. Our president decided to deal with a package of problems in one fell swoop - so far everything is working out.
  6. +1
    10 July 2022 15: 57
    when the West attributed the economic crisis to the war in Ukraine, it thereby connected the end of the crisis with victory or the end of the conflict in Ukraine. Now the burghers in Europe think that the economic crisis will end if the war ends.
  7. +2
    10 July 2022 18: 31
    Direct intervention would mean third world war with the use of weapons of mass destruction. it will be impossible to contain the aggression of the West by conventional means, the potential of which is many times greater than the Russian one, and V.V. Putin warned about this.
  8. 0
    10 July 2022 21: 32
    And in my opinion, I may be wrong, there are two scenarios, not necessarily mutually exclusive:
    1. Holy Jerusalem (New Khazaria), who does not know, let him seek
    2. A new world order with depopulation along the way and the fall of the US and the West in general. It is not known how the fate of Russia and China will develop under such a scenario.
    An article titled The Empire of Lies Collapse Like Twin Towers 11/122376 is published in State of the Nation - https://stateofthenation.co/?p=122376#more-XNUMX. I encourage you to read
  9. +3
    10 July 2022 21: 41
    Quote from Remigius
    And in my opinion, I may be wrong, there are two scenarios, not necessarily mutually exclusive:
    1. Holy Jerusalem (New Khazaria), who does not know, let him seek
    2. A new world order with depopulation along the way and the fall of the US and the West in general. It is not known how the fate of Russia and China will develop under such a scenario.
    An article titled The Empire of Lies Collapse Like Twin Towers 11/122376 is published in State of the Nation - https://stateofthenation.co/?p=122376#more-XNUMX. I encourage you to read

    Everything that has happened in the world over the past twenty-seven months has been initiated and/or used by the ruling oligarchs to carry out their master plan to "rebuild for the better" after they burn the world to the ground.
  10. +1
    10 July 2022 23: 46
    Quote: k7k8
    Nafig is it necessary in this case?

    In order, and ONLY, so that it does not have to be applied.
    1. -2
      11 July 2022 08: 00
      Good. You know, sometimes the best operator pushes the wrong buttons.
    2. 0
      11 July 2022 08: 48
      Quote: Victor Du
      In order, and ONLY so that it does not have to be applied

      God bless! At least someone correctly assesses the role of nuclear weapons in the modern world.
  11. 0
    11 July 2022 11: 21
    Demagogy and nothing more. Who will fight then? Great Lithuania, yes Poland? True, Lithuania has already proved that Moscow is afraid of it. But after all, when Russia strikes at them, it is unlikely that at first there will be humanitarian considerations, and the weapons are more serious. And other countries will try to find reasons not to participate.
  12. 0
    12 July 2022 08: 56
    Quote: Igor Viktorovich Berdin
    And Putin warned you that we have not seriously harnessed ourselves yet. But we can level everything to the ground right up to the Atlantic .... and further too ....

    For some reason I'm not as optimistic as you are.
    We have not been able to equalize crests for 5 months. So far, all that has been achieved is a very small advance in the Donbass.
    Moscow was sunk, Donetsk is leveled with the ground, it arrives in Belgorod, air defense is not suppressed, crests have already taken out a dozen large artillery depots in the last week. They still have a lot of cannon fodder, but our 200-strong group is already clearly tired after 5 months of fighting and is asking for rotation. With cruise missiles, it is also not clear that the intensity of strikes on the deep rear of crests has significantly dried up recently, drones are critically lacking. T-62s are shining on the echelons, which are trying to describe this and that either with ersatz artillery, or with pillboxes. No one provides mobilized LDNR (old Ak and Soviet tin helmet). Well, and a lot of other things, something that is frustrating and something that cannot be understood and said that this is a pragmatic approach. Why are only one "gestures of good will."