The blockade of Svalbard could cost Norway the Barents Sea


Another point of confrontation between Russia and the NATO bloc has appeared on the geopolitical map of the world. It was the Norwegian archipelago of Svalbard, which is the most convenient "gateway to the Arctic" for the collective West. How should our country respond to this challenge?


According to media reports, Norway has suspended the transit of goods through its territory needed to supply the Russian village of Barentsburg, which is located on the island of Western Svalbard. Its population is small, about 500 people, who are mainly employed in coal mining by the FGUP GT Arktikugol company. Also on the archipelago there are two more mothballed Russian settlements - "Pyramid" and "Grumant". Since they are completely dependent on supplies from the mainland, the Oslo decision calls into question their very existence and the preservation of the Russian presence in Svalbard. It's time to ask yourself, how did these settlements end up and function on Norwegian territory?

Disputed lands?


The Svalbard archipelago is located in the Arctic Ocean, rich in natural resources and potentially of great military importance, since it allows you to control the western "gateway to the Arctic". However, at the same time, it has the status of a demilitarized zone, and the only country that actually conducts economic activity on Norwegian territory, besides Norway itself, is the Russian Federation.

Historically, the first settlers in this barren land were both the Scandinavian Vikings and our Pomors. In the archipelago, they actively hunted whales, seals and walruses, until this fishery fell into decline and the islands were considered terra nullius (no man's land). At the beginning of the XNUMXth century economic the importance of Svalbard increased dramatically, as it became possible to mine coal for steam ships, and many applicants appeared for the "no man's land". In 1920, a compromise was reached in the collective West, according to which the archipelago went to Norway, and all other countries received the right to develop natural resources on it.

So famously the fate of Svalbard was determined in Paris without another main contender, Russia, which in 1920 had no time for disputed territories in the Far North. The USSR joined the Treaty only in 1935, starting coal mining and fishing. In negotiations with Oslo, Moscow periodically raised the issue of sharing the archipelago for military purposes, but was always refused. The Norwegians themselves in every possible way abused their exclusive right, negotiated at a time when Russia was not able to protect its national interests.

In particular, the kingdom unilaterally established a 200-mile so-called fish protection zone, which is not provided for by either the 1920 Paris Treaty or the 1982 UN Convention on the Law of the Sea. Oslo arbitrarily establishes "protected areas" in the archipelago, hindering the economic activities of the Russian coal mining company, as well as archaeological research on the settlements of Russian Pomors, which could confirm the historical rights of our country to Svalbard. The current naval blockade is another step towards squeezing Russia out of Svalbard. Norway is not a member of the European Union and is not obliged to comply with anti-Russian sanctions, but joined them with great pleasure.

The question is what to do now? How can Russia defend its rights to Svalbard?

Disputed waters?


If you look at the domestic press on this topic and comments on it, then all the proposed recipes can be systematized according to their degree of adequacy. The craziest one, which some unfortunate “experts” quite seriously propose, is to subject Norway (Japan, Great Britain, USA, Poland - substitute any other country of your choice) to nuclear bombardment. It is not worth explaining what an attack, especially a nuclear one, on a country that is a member of the NATO bloc will lead to.

The second, less harsh, but also forceful scenario involves sending an expeditionary force to Svalbard and claiming Russia's historical rights to the archipelago. The option is working, but it requires the availability of a combat-ready navy and the readiness to really start fighting the North Atlantic Alliance, at first by conventional means, since Article 5 of the NATO Charter will immediately come into force. It would be nice to first deal with Ukraine, reaching the Polish border, and then seriously think about the annexation of the territory, which is officially part of the Kingdom of Norway, and its subsequent supply.

The third option is to complain about Oslo to the countries of the collective West, saying that Norway violates not only Russian rights, but also all other High Contracting Parties to the Treaty. Perhaps six months ago this could have had an effect, but today it is hardly so.

Alas, Russia has no simple and safe scenarios for resolving the Svalbard issue. However, one weighty argument, if you think about it, is still there.

Recall that in 2010, President Medvedev famously cut the Gordian knot by signing an agreement on the delimitation of the Barents Sea with Norway. At the same time, he objectively violated the national interests of the Russian Federation, in fact "giving" Oslo a part of the Barents Sea the size of two Moscow regions. A few years later, it turned out that its continental shelf is rich in oil and gas, the reserves of which are estimated at 2 billion barrels of oil equivalent. The fact that Dmitry Anatolyevich's decision was a huge and unforgivable mistake was much said then, and it is even more obvious now.

So, today, ex-president Medvedev is the deputy head of the Security Council of the Russian Federation and all of himself is such a “hawk”, who fiercely hates the collective West and threatens it with a “nuclear baton”. So why then should Dmitry Anatolyevich not pass the “lice test”, publicly acknowledging his decision of 2010 to give Norway a huge part of the Barents Sea as a mistake, and Vladimir Vladimirovich not withdraw his signature under this agreement? At the same time, Mr. Medvedev will prove that he is no longer "like a liberal."

If the Norwegians unilaterally revise international agreements to the detriment of Russia, then why should Moscow, to its detriment, comply with the treaties with Oslo that openly violate our national interests?
39 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Expert_Analyst_Forecaster 30 June 2022 11: 37
    0
    So why then should Dmitry Anatolyevich not pass the “lice test”, publicly acknowledging his decision of 2010 to give Norway a huge part of the Barents Sea as a mistake, and Vladimir Vladimirovich not withdraw his signature under this agreement?

    Revoked the signature. Norwegians spat on it. What's next?
    Everyone laughs and writes that Russia has once again lost.
    And they will be right - because Russian impotence will be publicly demonstrated.
    Some provocative advice is published.
    1. Sapsan136 Offline Sapsan136
      Sapsan136 (Alexander) 1 July 2022 09: 16
      +2
      Now the withdrawal of the signature may not give anything, but after the Russian fleet ends in Ukraine, the Norwegian fishermen will be cut off from the fish, let them suck their fingers, and the embargo on trade with Norway can and should be introduced today ... let them calculate the losses ..
      1. Expert_Analyst_Forecaster 1 July 2022 09: 31
        +2
        after the Russian fleet ends in Ukraine, the Norwegian fishermen will be cut off from the fish

        And now the Russian fleet is directly taking an active part in the hostilities on the b. Ukraine? Without the Baltic and Northern Fleets, it definitely won’t be able to cope there?

        an embargo on trade with Norway can and should be introduced today

        Will this help deliver the goods to our people?
        1. Sapsan136 Offline Sapsan136
          Sapsan136 (Alexander) 1 July 2022 10: 11
          +2
          This will help undermine the economy of Norway, which will affect the well-being of its population and the ability to arm its army and navy ... The fleet is good, but the lion's share of it now sticks out in the Mediterranean Sea, and the actions of the fleet will need to be supported by both aviation and marines and tanks ... A war on two fronts of the Russian Federation is not profitable
  2. Expert_Analyst_Forecaster 30 June 2022 11: 54
    +5
    The author is thinking too narrowly. In the meantime, a system is being created. The first move is Lithuania, the second is Norway, and there will probably be further similar steps.

    Crazy Americans were ready to unleash a nuclear war when the USSR wanted to blockade West Berlin.
    However, only those who studied history know about this. Therefore, I cite this case as a precedent.
    By the way, the USSR then retreated.

    To break the system, you need to take some action. Papers, signatures, slogans and wishes will not change anything.
    No need to reinvent the wheel. It is time to officially announce that preventing the delivery of goods to the island will be considered by Russia as a declaration of war.
    Let Norway and NATO think whether they need a war or not. We have no other way to protect our rights. Of course you can complain to someone.

    Since only a nuclear war with NATO is possible, if our ships are not allowed on the island, diplomatic relations with Norway will be broken and the main military facilities of this country will be destroyed by tactical nuclear weapons.
    I am sure that NATO countries will appreciate Norway's contribution to world peace.

    I understand that those who like to substitute (crossed out by censorship) the right cheek when they hit you on the left will be against it.
  3. Mikhalych Offline Mikhalych
    Mikhalych 30 June 2022 12: 00
    +1
    The craziest one, which some unfortunate “experts” quite seriously propose, is to subject Norway (Japan, Great Britain, USA, Poland - substitute any other country of your choice) to nuclear bombardment. It is not worth explaining what an attack, especially a nuclear one, on a member country of the NATO bloc will lead to.

    They will just die.

    So why then doesn’t Dmitry Anatolyevich pass a “check for lice”

    Yes, few of her bosses who will pass.
    1. Vox Populi Offline Vox Populi
      Vox Populi (vox populi) 30 June 2022 14: 54
      +1
      And what will happen to us?
      1. Denis Chernov Offline Denis Chernov
        Denis Chernov (Denis) 4 July 2022 17: 53
        0
        And we will go to heaven.
  4. maiman61 Offline maiman61
    maiman61 (Yuri) 30 June 2022 12: 02
    +7
    This is the result of a soplezhuy policy! Who only does not wipe his feet about us! We must IMMEDIATELY hit in the face, so that the teeth would fly out, then we will be AFRAID! It is better to be afraid than to be impudent.
    1. Gadley Offline Gadley
      Gadley 30 June 2022 16: 34
      +2
      before you hit you have to stand on your feet well. And we are still trying to stand firmly on our feet.
      1. maiman61 Offline maiman61
        maiman61 (Yuri) 2 July 2022 11: 44
        0
        In order to stand firmly on our feet, it was necessary to INDUSTRIALIZE the country, and not drive ALL the money offshore, even the state government. companies, including Gazprom and Rosneft! And now, who believes in the nonsense about "import substitution"? There are no such fools! I live in Siberia and for decades they have been screaming and squealing about the gasification of Russia, but in reality, even the hell hasn’t moved!
        1. Piramidon Offline Piramidon
          Piramidon (Stepan) 2 July 2022 16: 13
          0
          Quote: maiman61
          it was necessary to carry out the INDUSTRIALIZATION of the country

          The question is not about what "should have been", but what to do NOW. In hindsight, we are all smart and after a while we can say exactly how it was necessary and how not to.
          1. maiman61 Offline maiman61
            maiman61 (Yuri) 4 July 2022 15: 29
            0
            The last schoolboy knows that it was necessary to carry out industrialization! Economists and politicians have been screaming for DECADES, only ONE person could not understand it.
    2. Alexander Dutov Offline Alexander Dutov
      Alexander Dutov (Alexander Dutov) 2 July 2022 22: 59
      +2
      Like, for example, Israel, when Egypt blocked its access to the Red Sea .. In general, an escort to Grumant is needed with an announcement that any attack on it is an act of war ...
  5. InanRom Offline InanRom
    InanRom (Ivan) 30 June 2022 13: 14
    +2
    What else to expect from Western "colleagues and partners." But why did it turn out the way it did? Is it because someone, having violated the Constitution (this is not a "mistake", as the author writes, but a crime - state treason), violated the territorial integrity of Russia, giving the shelves with the waters of Norway, and the islands and the channel to China ?! So there is nothing "to blame the mirror if the face is crooked." So far, no one in the country has answered either for this, or for the destroyed production and destroyed industry, or for the predatory privatization, or for the collapse of education and science, or for decades of "flirting" with NATO, etc. etc. - therefore, no one will revise, and nothing threatens the "partners", from the word in general.
    for they clearly follow their goal - to destroy Russia:

    00.40 UK Prime Minister Boris Johnson's office:
    Ukraine will receive British integrated air defense systems, unmanned aerial vehicles, innovative electronic warfare equipment totaling $1,2 billion to "transform its defense" and ensure that Russia "is defeated in Ukraine."

    11.00 British Foreign Secretary Liz Truss:
    NATO should ignore "Russian rhetoric" about retaliating against alliance expansion and arms supplies to Ukraine and continue to provide military support to Kyiv.

    10.45 am The Daily Telegraph edition
    Artillerymen of the Armed Forces of Ukraine are being trained in firing L119 field howitzers and MLRS multiple launch rocket systems at the Salisbury Plain training ground in the south of Great Britain.

    and Rogozin, instead of the promised 4-month strikes, posts "photos":

    02.00 Head of Roscosmos Dmitry Rogozin:
    “As for the so-called. decision-making centers on the territory of the temporarily not yet liberated territory of Ukraine, then they are being filmed, as I have already explained, in accordance with the decisions and rules adopted. Its results are put on the table for our decision-making centers.”

    instead of blows - shooting on the table ...
    the enemies are brazen:

    02.30 Member of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine Oleksiy Goncharenko about the conversation with President of Lithuania Gitanas Nauseda at the NATO summit in Madrid:
    "In more detail, we agreed on the following: Smolensk - Lithuania, Kuban - Ukraine, <...> Moscow - Poles"

    in response to another pathetic stupidity:

    09.00 Chairman of the State Duma Vyacheslav Volodin:
    “Jens Stoltenberg reports that Russia will get more NATO at its borders. Happy early. I didn't study geography at school. If Finland and Sweden join the NATO bloc, there will be more Russia at its borders.”

    In the meantime:

    11.40 Official statement of the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation on Snake Island:
    - On June 30, as a step of goodwill, the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation completed their assigned tasks on Zmeiny Island and withdrew the garrison stationed there;
    Endless shelling and the inability of the Black Sea Fleet forces to suppress the enemy’s coastal batteries dictate two decisions: leave the island itself and make it impossible for it to function as an enemy air defense and anti-ship missile base, that is, in fact, destroy everything that Ukraine sends to it and, if it is very lucky, land it on him.

    Is it because the heroic and effective actions of the Russian army on the island could not compensate for the lack of a normal fleet, planning, the bungling of officials and the hatred of those in power?!
    and all the "attacks" of various Western mongrels, from Lithuania to Norway, are the result of precisely the political actions of the authorities, politicians and officials over the past decades - "peeping into the mouth" of the West, the desire to be friends with it "in a hickey", friendship with NATO, and complete dependence of "ilitka" on Western "partners" and its "assets" abroad?!
    And, until the situation changes, until the perpetrators are punished, while the fifth column continues to live, while import substitution is just a change of sellers, while someone turns NWO into "business showdowns", while the army "takes out" miscalculations, mistakes, negligence (and possibly betrayal) of politicians and officials - Norway and others - there is nothing to be afraid of.

    Head of Chechnya Ramzan Kadyrov:
    “Oddly enough, the enemies have always lost sight of the obvious truth - the real power of Russia lies not in weapons and technology, it lies in its valiant and selfless sons, ready to defend their Fatherland to the last breath. Those fighters who at this moment are waging an uncompromising struggle against the Nazis, Bandera, shaitans and foreign mercenaries are the clearest proof of this.

    correct remark. but, let me remind you - the people and the army of the country - it is impossible to win, but you can betray.
    and bureaucratic irresponsibility and impunity, "photos" instead of blows, the policy of the Central Bank, the fifth column in power - from Gref to Nabiullina, and so on and so forth - true proof of this.
    1. InanRom Offline InanRom
      InanRom (Ivan) 30 June 2022 13: 39
      +2
      12.30 Chairman of the State Duma Vyacheslav Volodin:
      Russia exchanges only seriously wounded Azov fighters **, substantive investigative measures are being carried out for each member of the battalion.

      what difference does it make - a wounded Nazi non-human or a healthy one ?! These are nonhumans. and in the "nenka" they will make "heroes" of them. And the exchange fund and without "Azov" in abundance. Otherwise, this stimulates Bandera to new atrocities and crimes, because "they will exchange them anyway." Impunity gives rise to crimes. The thief should be in prison, and the place for the "Azov", "Aida" and others - in the grave!
      ps "Russia is exchanging" .... they committed atrocities in the Donbass, so let the DPR and LPR measure and carry out the death penalty for them! Enough games of humanity in relation to nonhumans!
      1. InanRom Offline InanRom
        InanRom (Ivan) 30 June 2022 13: 47
        +2
        it seems that the minuses - lovers of the "Azovites" and impunity have pulled themselves up? or admirers of Rogozin's "photos" instead of hitting the centers?
      2. Eduard Aplombov Offline Eduard Aplombov
        Eduard Aplombov (Eduard Aplombov) 30 June 2022 14: 19
        +1
        Azov people are also all different, there are frostbitten ones, there are ordinary ones, like ASU, and if ours slip the wounded, with severed limbs, etc., then it’s easier for a mare with a cart than it is for us to treat them to feed them in camps, let Bandera feed, treat, pay benefits , healthy prisoners can be used at construction sites and only feed the sick and injured.
  6. Spasatel Offline Spasatel
    Spasatel 30 June 2022 13: 55
    +4
    Well, why did you pounce on the poor, unfortunate Dimon of All Russia? Yes, he missed the stars from the sky, yes, stupid, yes, greedy, yes, envious. But do you think he single-handedly decided to give the sea to the Norwegians? And "our everything" sat quietly on the sidelines and stroked Alina's knee? Oh well...
  7. Victor Du Offline Victor Du
    Victor Du (Victor) 30 June 2022 13: 57
    0
    Using Medvedev as a dowel to drive his idiocy into the wall, agreeing (who raped him, and did Russia have a hopeless situation THEN?) is a great opportunity to kill him as a politician. It is a pity that the director in this situation is not me. (I remember such a column in Soviet newspapers).
  8. Victor Du Offline Victor Du
    Victor Du (Victor) 30 June 2022 14: 02
    0
    Quote: Expert_Analyst_Forecaster
    The author is thinking too narrowly. In the meantime, a system is being created. The first move is Lithuania, the second is Norway, and there will probably be further similar steps.

    Crazy Americans were ready to unleash a nuclear war when the USSR wanted to blockade West Berlin.
    However, only those who studied history know about this. Therefore, I cite this case as a precedent.
    By the way, the USSR then retreated.

    To break the system, you need to take some action. Papers, signatures, slogans and wishes will not change anything.
    No need to reinvent the wheel. It is time to officially announce that preventing the delivery of goods to the island will be considered by Russia as a declaration of war.
    Let Norway and NATO think whether they need a war or not. We have no other way to protect our rights. Of course you can complain to someone.

    Since only a nuclear war with NATO is possible, if our ships are not allowed on the island, diplomatic relations with Norway will be broken and the main military facilities of this country will be destroyed by tactical nuclear weapons.
    I am sure that NATO countries will appreciate Norway's contribution to world peace.

    I understand that those who like to substitute (crossed out by censorship) the right cheek when they hit you on the left will be against it.

    Before you rumble into the drum of war, you need to weigh the pros and cons. Alien island. Russian there is only a coal deposit bought in the bud. In 1931, and even then, not by the state, but by the Arktikugol gasket specially created at that time. With the condition - until stocks are exhausted. To this end, saving and stretching time, we mined, in the USSR, (under the contract), renting another coal field. The abandoned villages of Grumant and Pyramiden and the village of Barentsburg, which has halved its population. (now 500 people). Mining in the best years - in the 80s of the last century. 600 thousand tons of coal, 70% of which was used there. Year-round central heating, local slingshot farm, poultry farm. school, kindergarten. The rest of the coal to Arkhangelsk. Coal production at Kuzbass Raspadskaya per month exceeds annual output at Svalbard. The remaining composition is hardly able to provide itself with this coal. political games. that's what's in the head of many today. I don't see a way or possibility to start a bodyagu from this event. Clearly a losing situation that needs to be overcome without getting involved in a major scandal. The bigger the chatter, the stronger the defeat will be. Take advantage of the blockade and leave everything as it is. To mothball the rights to deposits, not agreeing to the denunciation of these agreements.
    1. The comment was deleted.
    2. Expert_Analyst_Forecaster 30 June 2022 14: 50
      +4
      Before you rumble into the drum of war, you need to weigh the pros and cons.

      It's not about the island. It's about the system being created. Beyond Kaliningrad and the island, similar steps will be taken in other places and other countries. Do you propose to give in everywhere?
  9. Victor Du Offline Victor Du
    Victor Du (Victor) 30 June 2022 15: 08
    +1
    Quote: Expert_Analyst_Forecaster
    Before you rumble into the drum of war, you need to weigh the pros and cons.

    It's not about the island. It's about the system being created. Beyond Kaliningrad and the island, similar steps will be taken in other places and other countries. Do you propose to give in everywhere?

    I suggest not to get involved in a scandal in a obviously losing situation. For the loss in this case is conditional, and it hits the reputation of the country. Weak arguments should never be used in an argument. No matter how many there are. They fight back easily and you lose. Wait and look for the only, but deadly argument. Do you want to look like an idiot woman running around the market and swearing at everyone you meet? Not listening and not hearing anything around? Trust me, it's a pitiful sight. Russia shouldn't be like that.
    1. Expert_Analyst_Forecaster 30 June 2022 15: 13
      0
      Quote: Victor Du
      Weak arguments should never be used in an argument. No matter how many there are. They fight back easily and you lose. Wait and look for the only, but deadly argument.

      I see that you love to teach. Too bad you don't read what they write. Commenting on the last comment in a thread is not good. Although you may think that my proposals are not deadly enough, who knows?
  10. Expert_Analyst_Forecaster 30 June 2022 15: 39
    +2
    What should the population and authorities of NATO countries and Japan know.
    Russia does not plan to fight these countries with conventional weapons. Let them not dream.
    If these countries continue to infringe on our sovereignty, threaten our security, then sooner or later (rather sooner) a nuclear war will begin. And first of all, the countries-provocateurs will be destroyed. Then the decision-making countries. Enough warheads and missiles for everyone.
    Hopes for some rare and tactical ammunition is an illusion. The war will be to destroy the entire population of the enemy countries.

    This is a very bad option. But the one offered by the fifth column is even worse.

    Some people don't like what I write. But no one has come up with a better option yet.
    I am not writing about what I want to have in reality, but about what is most likely to happen.
    To ostriches and dreamers to shower NATO with hats is a big hello.
    1. vlad127490 Offline vlad127490
      vlad127490 (Vlad Gor) 30 June 2022 23: 11
      +2
      Read my comment. If you cannot resolve the issue today without harming yourself, then hang it in the air, create uncertainty, ambiguity, and let the enemy act, and you wait, your time will come, be patient.
  11. FGJCNJK Offline FGJCNJK
    FGJCNJK (Nikolai) 30 June 2022 17: 50
    +5
    He is some kind of muddy "Dimon", he constantly twists and turns something.
  12. Pavel57 Offline Pavel57
    Pavel57 (Paul) 30 June 2022 20: 04
    +2
    You can declare anything, revoke signatures, etc., but then the question of a demonstration of force arises.
  13. Teacher Offline Teacher
    Teacher (Wise) 30 June 2022 20: 43
    0
    Due to the fact that the fleet of the Russian Federation (Red Banner Black Sea) lost the battle for about. Serpentine 1-2 French self-propelled guns "Caesar", doubts creep in about the closure of the Barents Sea for Norway. No matter how you have to retreat to the Laptev Sea.
    And there is no need to wave checkers here. Yes we, yes them. Look at the Black Sea. Norway is not Ukraine. There is no chance at all with our multi-move.
  14. vlad127490 Offline vlad127490
    vlad127490 (Vlad Gor) 30 June 2022 23: 01
    +2
    Alas, the Kremlin will again smear snot, arrange a little Odessa noise. What needs to be done is to denounce the September 5, 2010 agreement "On the delimitation of maritime spaces and cooperation in the Barents Sea and the Arctic Ocean", which was signed by Russian President Dmitry Medvedev and Norwegian Prime Minister Jens Stoltenberg. To declare that the Svalbard Treaty of 1920 was concluded without the participation of Russia, the Russian Federation withdraws all signatures under the treaties and agreements on Svalbard. That's it, nothing more to do now and tomorrow on the issue of Svalbard. The question of Svalbard must be ambiguous, suspended in the air. The time will come, power will change, Russia will get stronger and this issue will be easily resolved.
    1. Expert_Analyst_Forecaster 1 July 2022 03: 22
      0
      withdraws all signatures on treaties and agreements on Svalbard.

      Oh how scared they all are! All signatures have been withdrawn. What will actually change? Nothing.
      Unless we give another reason to mock Russia.
      All your signatures, seals, pieces of paper and objections are empty and meaningless without real action.
      In this case, power.
      Russia allows you to create a system that will limit our rights around the world.
      As long as Russia chews snot, its authority will steadily decline. We will also bear economic losses. Until then, until we use military force.
    2. Expert_Analyst_Forecaster 1 July 2022 03: 26
      0
      The time will come, power will change, Russia will get stronger and this issue will be easily resolved.

      Yes Yes. We get "great" advice. Do nothing now. Someday, maybe something will change.
      They write that the government should change. Where? In Russia?
      According to the fifth column, the correct tactic is to do nothing.
      It sort of fixes itself later.
      The truth is that nothing will fix itself.
      The truth is that with each such case - the island, Kaliningrad and there will be many more episodes - we become weaker.
      "Easy to resolve" is a scam.
  15. Vladimir1155 Offline Vladimir1155
    Vladimir1155 (Vladimir) 1 July 2022 08: 26
    -1
    obviously it is necessary to transfer to the north all surface ships of the second and first ranks, impotently sawing allowances in closed water areas where they are of no use (the surrender of the snake is proof of this, the death of Moscow and Orsk) and begin to ensure the freedom of fishing in a 200-mile zone, for this even a bdk come in handy, no one will start a war because of the sunken Norwegian border (pirate) ships
    1. Expert_Analyst_Forecaster 1 July 2022 09: 34
      0
      In fact, our authorities did not even try to deliver the goods on their own. The Norwegians refused to deliver, and ours simply threw up their hands and said: "Well, how is it?". And they sit straight on the back.
  16. Igor Viktorovich Berdin 1 July 2022 11: 09
    -1
    Bring in troops, up to nuclear weapons and stop discussing this issue.
  17. Grei grin Offline Grei grin
    Grei grin (Gray Grin) 2 July 2022 22: 25
    +1
    Dimon refuse and repent, so and so they say, I admit, I admit, I admit!
  18. Grei grin Offline Grei grin
    Grei grin (Gray Grin) 2 July 2022 22: 31
    +1
    Say what you like, but the power of the huckster is cowardly! As they say, destroy not build, you can’t give in to another, otherwise in the end they will make you give in!


    this is how you should speak and act, no matter what the cost!
  19. Ingvar7 Offline Ingvar7
    Ingvar7 (Ingvar Miller) 6 July 2022 10: 28
    0
    For this it is necessary to give birth to Medvedev back.
  20. hlp5118 Offline hlp5118
    hlp5118 (hlp) 8 July 2022 09: 31
    0
    Medvedev was well walked. And this United Russia voted FOR in the State Duma when the treaty was ratified. The Communists and the SR were against, then they were called "politically short-sighted." Today, everything from EP with medals and titles ..