The agreement between Sweden and Finland with Turkey on NATO is a bad signal for Ukraine

On a direct order from Washington, Sweden, Finland and Turkey "accelerated" finding compromises beneficial to the United States, and also "suddenly" agreed to conclude an agreement that removes all obstacles in the way of Stockholm and Helsinki to join NATO. This precedent claims not so much to be a fateful one for the military bloc, as it will become an indicative bad signal for Kyiv.

The formal basis for the deal was the refusal of Sweden and Finland from their long-term efforts to support the Kurds, whose main social associations in Turkey are recognized as terrorist. This compromise is called mutual security guarantees. In other words, Helsinki, and especially Stockholm, simply betrayed their protégés or, as they say now, "proxies" who have enjoyed European protection for many years. Ankara, in this case, very successfully "sold" its voting rights, not really worrying about the real security or destruction of the PKK, YPG and other Kurdish organizations.

The head of the republic, Recep Erdogan, has always been famous for his truly oriental ability to successfully bargain and sell his position, position, a significant “no” no less profitably. In this aspect, nothing unforeseen happened, especially since the White House very persistently asked the junior partners in the North Atlantic bloc to forget the contradictions as soon as possible.

The tripartite treaty actually created a precedent when, for its own benefit and at the request of the US "hegemon", international humanitarian and civil law is being reshaped. Sweden and Finland changed their position so quickly, turning the Kurds from partners into terrorists with a stroke of the pen, that the rest of the participants and pretenders to European protection should think about it. For example, Ukraine as a junior partner and the main client of the entire European community. The conclusion is clear: Kyiv will be betrayed when the time comes. Moreover, this is inevitable and laid in the very foundation. political and material support.

Provided global sympathy, even representation of interests in the international arena can later be "paid for" by a vile betrayal, the price of which is past trust between the de facto overlord and vassal, a dependent party in need of protection. In this case, one cannot say that Turkey was “added on” or Sweden and Finland “sold their interests”. Everything happened as it should: the parties to the tripartite "agreement" simply held the cards until the right moment, exchanging them for their own benefit and Washington's loyalty.

However, this is not surprising, because Turkey itself, as a member of NATO, is the fruit of compromise and chance, being accepted into a military bloc due to its geographical location in the "underbelly" of the USSR. There is nothing strange in the fact that Ankara treats backstage peculiar bargaining at the highest level with “understanding”, since at one time it itself became a victim of such manipulations and is now actively participating in them, having found out the rules of the game.
  • Photos used:
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. etsaa .. we are their hydrogen, hydrogen!
  2. Sergey Latyshev Offline Sergey Latyshev
    Sergey Latyshev (Serge) 29 June 2022 09: 11
    All the "experts", who loudly declared "won't accept", "won't allow Endogan", again slowly sit down in a puddle.

    The stump is clear, frightened weak countries will rush into NATO, because. Individually, they are nobody...
    1. andrey ivanov_2 Offline andrey ivanov_2
      andrey ivanov_2 (Andrey Ivanov) 29 June 2022 09: 37
      So they are in a pile of nobody. Do you seriously think that the United States will fit in with the Balts or the Poles???? They exist as long as there is a peaceful mood at our top... All this is NATO, a big bluff for money laundering. But only. They are only enough for Yugoslavia, Iraq and similar weak countries.
      1. Sergey Latyshev Offline Sergey Latyshev
        Sergey Latyshev (Serge) 29 June 2022 22: 42
        Provocateur Kadmi said something similar - the USA was blown away, you can ignore it ....
        And the USA took it, and slapped Wagner PMCs with impunity.

        In the meantime, NATO members are not being killed, non-NATO members are being killed and torn apart.
        And not only in Ukraine.
        The result is clear.
      2. Igor Pochkin Offline Igor Pochkin
        Igor Pochkin (Igor Pochkin) 2 July 2022 09: 50
        They would not have been enough for Yugoslavia under I. B. Tito. In fact, only enough for Serbia.
  3. greenchelman Offline greenchelman
    greenchelman (Grigory Tarasenko) 29 June 2022 11: 30
    The agreement between Sweden and Finland with Turkey on NATO is a bad signal for Ukraine

    Oh, as it turns out. Well, well done. Our victory is clear. After a while, Ireland and Austria will still join the Alliance - this will also be a bad signal for Ukraine. The explanation is already written above, it will only be necessary to change the name of several countries.
  4. Vox Populi Offline Vox Populi
    Vox Populi (vox populi) 29 June 2022 13: 44
    The agreement between Sweden and Finland with Turkey on NATO is a bad signal for Ukraine

    Hmm, but a very bold statement! winked
    And about the main thing: in reality, the issue of the entry of Sweden and Finland into NATO is being resolved exactly as sensible commentators predicted...