Will Russia be able to win an open war against NATO and the EU


The EU and NATO are building a coalition to fight Russia. This was stated on June 24 by Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov at a press conference held following talks with Azerbaijani Foreign Minister Jeyhun Bayramov.


When World War II began, Hitler gathered a significant part, if not most, of the European countries under his banners for the war against the Soviet Union. Right now, in the same way, including the EU and NATO, they are gathering the same modern coalition to fight, and by and large, war with the Russian Federation. We will look at all this very carefully.

- Lavrov emphasized.

Europe vs. Russia: attempt number three


The world is moving at full speed towards the Third World War. Today it is already difficult to deny even the most notorious skeptics. Sergei Lavrov's statement was hardly a revelation, but it once again demonstrated that our Foreign Ministry is extremely sober in assessing the situation and has no illusions about the true intentions of the West.

United Europe has already tried twice to destroy Russia, and the first time it happened back in 1812. Why united, many will be surprised, did they fight against Napoleon? Really? And look at his Russian campaign. On the side of the French Empire then fought: the Italian, Spanish and Neapolitan kingdoms, the Duchy of Warsaw, the Confederation of the Rhine, Switzerland. In addition, together with the French, the Austrian Empire, as well as the Kingdom of Prussia, came out against Russia. On the side of Russia, only our army and navy fought.

Now we look at the second attempt by Europe to destroy Russia - during the Second World War. Then, having suffered a defeat in the blitzkrieg, and then the entire war, civilized Europe cleverly attributed everything to Hitler and the Nazis. It is curious, but the Spanish Blue Division, as well as volunteers recruited in France, Scandinavia and other European countries, were also all convinced Nazis? No, of course, there were fascists among them, but it is foolish to deny that many Europeans then went to fight on the side of Hitler in order to destroy and plunder our country. After almost the entire European continent fell or went over to the side of Germany, it seemed to them that the campaign against the USSR should be the ideal end to the march of the victorious united European army. Yes, its backbone was made up of the Germans, but in fact, in essence, it was precisely that of a single European one. Almost the same as the EU is going to create now.

In general, Europe in general has such a secret desire - to attack Russia in every century. In the nineteenth century, repelling European aggression cost us hundreds of thousands of lives. In the twentieth - tens of millions. And only God knows what will happen in the twenty-first.

It is time to recognize that Europe's desire to fight against Russia is sewn into the very DNA of Europe. The enemy in the east, which must be destroyed, has long been part of their cultural code. Take, for example, the Lord of the Rings trilogy by the Englishman John Tolkien, where under Mordor, an evil and cruel country in the east, opposed to the beautiful and kind West, Russia was meant. It is significant that in the final of the trilogy Mordor fell - the only true outcome, according to not only Western politiciansbut also their cultural elite.

The Europeans want to destroy our state, plunder our resources and enslave our people. They wanted it in 1812, they wanted it in 1941, they want it now. Such is the true bestial essence of Europe - it is vitally important for it to constantly seize more and more new territories, enslave more and more new peoples. They were born colonialists, they will die colonialists. And it is likely that very soon, if they still dare to unleash a war with Russia.

What will the Third World War be like, and who will emerge victorious from it?


Speaking about the war between Russia and Europe (read NATO), it is not so much the fact that it is important that everyone is convinced that it is inevitable. What matters is who she is. And in my humble opinion, it will have two important features. The first is to be carried out exclusively with conventional weapons. And secondly, the nuclear powers will conduct military operations among themselves only on the territory of third countries.

If you look at the alignment of forces between Russia and NATO, one thing should be understood: the territories of the United States, France and Great Britain - the nuclear powers that are part of the Alliance, as well as the Russian Federation itself - are “untouchable” for each other’s strikes. And the "nuclear" NATO countries will not attack Russia, even if our troops clash on the battlefield in third countries. Just like we won't hit them first. Simply because a destructive response is guaranteed, and mutual destruction is unprofitable for anyone. And what then will be the collision, you ask? First of all, in the war on the territory of small and medium-sized European states that do not possess nuclear weapons. For example, the Baltic countries and Eastern Europe due to their geographical location between the Western European powers and Russia.

It is already obvious that the initiators of a new conflict in Europe will be precisely Washington and London, which remain profitable in almost any scenario. And they will design it with the hands of small puppet states. For example, they will try to set the Baltic States and Poland, which are actually vassals to them, against the Kaliningrad region. They will wait until Russia rebuffs them and launches a counteroffensive, and even then they will try to draw the European Union into a war on its territory, so as not to give rise to a nuclear strike on themselves. Playing off the EU and Russia, and sitting out across the English Channel and the Atlantic is quite in the spirit of the Anglo-Saxons. The scheme may seem intricate to some, but after the conflict in Ukraine is ignited, is it any wonder at the perfidy of the US and Great Britain?

World War III is much closer than it seems, precisely because its result will not be the transformation of the world into radioactive ashes, as adherents of apocalyptic moods gloomily predict, but a change in the political map of Europe. And it will end completely differently than the previous two. There will be no complete and unconditional surrender by either side. Simply because both Russia and the West have nuclear weapons, which will certainly be used in the event of an existential threat. So no one will reach London or Paris, however, as well as Moscow, once burned by Napoleon.

It is important that whatever the outcome of a full-scale conventional war on the territory of Europe, it will not mean the final victory or defeat of any of the parties. Paradoxically, history is once again spiraling. But it goes much deeper than it seems at first. And what awaits us is not the conditional First or Second World War, which lasted four and six years, respectively. Ahead, rather, is something similar to the Hundred Years War - a series of endless conflicts, during which neither side can prevail. And the point is not so much that it does not have enough resources for this, but that it is physically impossible due to the presence of nuclear weapons in the enemy. Whether this is good or bad, time will tell. But one thing is clear for sure, the time of conditional peace on the European continent is over. And something tells me that for a very, very long time.
68 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Expert_Analyst_Forecaster 26 June 2022 11: 24
    +9
    Let's take Japan as an example. Will Russia fight it with conventional weapons?
    Personally, I think not. Just destroy it completely with nuclear explosions.
    Without any warning shots or finding out whose Kuril Islands or there have the right to fish in a separate part of the sea.
    I will explain why it will be so. Relying on the fact that our enemies will act according to some rules is stupid.
    And it is extremely dangerous for Russia to limit itself to some far-fetched ideas.
    The enemy must clearly know - we will beat in mortal combat, and not engage in sports fencing.
    Any other line of conduct will lead to the destruction of Russia and its people.
    1. bobba94 Offline bobba94
      bobba94 (Vladimir) 26 June 2022 14: 30
      +2
      The area of ​​Japan is equal to the area of ​​the Amur region (2% of the area of ​​the Russian Federation). 125 million people live in Japan ..... One Mace is 150 kilotons, this is only one rocket ...... Japan does not even need to think about the war ........
    2. We will select Hokkaido for ourselves, we will organize the Republic of the Ainu as part of Russia. The Ainu are white and hate colonizing Japs. So that DO NOT bomb Hokkaido!!!
    3. Dukhskrepny Offline Dukhskrepny
      Dukhskrepny (Vasya) 1 July 2022 16: 05
      +1
      Parts of the United States and nuclear weapons are stationed in Japan. After the retaliatory strike, the Russians and Putin will go to heaven, the rest will die
  2. Expert_Analyst_Forecaster 26 June 2022 11: 28
    +3
    There is a clear trend that is beneficial to our enemies.
    They are trying to convince public opinion that Russia can and should fight only with conventional weapons.
    Otherwise, they scare us, they will immediately destroy us.
    At the same time, the West does not assume any obligations. And if he does, he will break easily.
    Only a nuclear club will save you from your "hundred-year" war. And there will be no "hundred-year" war. Our economy will not last long, and the enemies can launch a nuclear strike at any moment convenient for them.
    1. skeptic Offline skeptic
      skeptic 26 June 2022 21: 58
      +1
      Quote: Expert_Analyst_Forecaster
      They are trying to convince public opinion that Russia can and should fight only with conventional weapons.
      Otherwise, they scare us, they will immediately destroy us.

      If they could, they would destroy it. The rest is from the evil one.
    2. Marzhecki Offline Marzhecki
      Marzhecki (Sergei) 29 June 2022 09: 14
      +1
      There is a clear trend that is beneficial to our enemies.
      They are trying to convince public opinion that Russia can and should fight only with conventional weapons.
      Otherwise, they scare us, they will immediately destroy us.

      Not at all. It's just that our political leadership itself is not ready to actually use nuclear weapons. It also fights in Ukraine with its left hand and left foot.
  3. Colonel Kudasov Offline Colonel Kudasov
    Colonel Kudasov (Boris) 26 June 2022 11: 30
    +4
    The first is to be carried out exclusively with conventional weapons. And secondly, the nuclear powers will conduct military operations among themselves only on the territory of third countries.

    In such a war, Russia against the West has no chance. It just won't work economically. At the same time (in the case of a non-nuclear war), Japan will certainly attack, that is, a war on 2 fronts. The key to Russia's security is primarily in nuclear weapons. It is not necessary to immediately use it massively, but the enemy must understand that a nuclear armored train is not on a siding)
    1. Bobik012 Offline Bobik012
      Bobik012 (Vladimir) 26 June 2022 12: 45
      +2
      Will Russia be able to win an open war against NATO and the EU

      Well, as it were, while we are winning .... In any case, we are advancing

      Japan will surely attack

      Hitler hoped too.
    2. Geo73 Offline Geo73
      Geo73 (George) 26 June 2022 18: 36
      0
      Of course, tactical yao
  4. Expert_Analyst_Forecaster 26 June 2022 11: 31
    +1
    Another deception. Who guarantees the inviolability of the territory of Russia?
    You don’t have to look far for examples - the Armed Forces of Ukraine are shelling the territory of Russia and no one in the West is preventing this.
    1. skeptic Offline skeptic
      skeptic 26 June 2022 22: 01
      0
      Quote: Expert_Analyst_Forecaster
      Who guarantees the inviolability of the territory of Russia?

      Nuclear weapons, airborne forces, air defense.
    2. Marzhecki Offline Marzhecki
      Marzhecki (Sergei) 29 June 2022 09: 12
      +1
      Yeah, they are shelling, and for some reason the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation cannot prevent this. And you were going to wet Japan and Britain with a nuclear baton. Funny. fool
  5. Expert_Analyst_Forecaster 26 June 2022 11: 48
    0
    However, you can still use the scheme of the "hundred-year" war. When small conditions are met.
    It is required to agree with the United States that Russia will destroy only three countries with nuclear weapons - Great Britain (without Northern Ireland), Japan and Poland (an exemplary flogging for mongrels). In this case, the United States will not interfere. And then let's butt heads in the "hundred-year" war. China, I think, will be completely in favor.
  6. Indifferent Offline Indifferent
    Indifferent 26 June 2022 12: 00
    +2
    If our leaders have time to create a reliable anti-missile defense, then it may well be that with one nuclear strike they will immediately end the completely west. This is one moment. There is another. And will the peoples of Europe and the United States want to live in poverty and hunger. Wars do not happen without the full strain of forces and resources. This means that in some places a "gevolutionary situation" will ripen, as Lenin used to say. There is already a general strike of railroad workers in England, joined by other working people. So with the war, not everything is so simple! The Hundred Years' War was fought in a completely different way.
  7. aslanxnumx Offline aslanxnumx
    aslanxnumx (Aslan) 26 June 2022 12: 13
    +2
    Throw hats yes, it’s really very difficult to win.
  8. Pat Rick Offline Pat Rick
    Pat Rick 26 June 2022 12: 21
    +1
    I didn’t read it - I already learned these rehashings for a hundred times almost verbatim.
  9. Alexey Davydov Offline Alexey Davydov
    Alexey Davydov (Alexey) 26 June 2022 12: 22
    -3
    The calculations are correct, but the conclusion of the article is unrealistic.
    There will not be a hundred years (and even ten years - hardly).
    The plans of the West include bleeding and forcing Russia to surrender due to the clear advantage of the enemy, or beheading it even earlier as a result of a multi-domain operation with blocking our decision to use strategic nuclear weapons.
    Today's Russia will not pull the war on several fronts and in isolation.
    The author convincingly showed that the use of tactical nuclear weapons by us will not change anything for us either. It will not reach the initiators, customers and sponsors of the war.
    The use of our strategic nuclear weapons as revenge at the very end does not give us anything. And so, and so - we will be destroyed.
    For 20 years, the current government has conceded geololithic space to the enemy, and played it out.
    In 2004, instead of tacitly agreeing to the entry into NATO of a large group of countries, including the Baltics, Putin needed to get nuclear weapons back then and declare the threat to the West with a nuclear war. The world was not ready then. Our geopolitical space and "buffer" from the countries were in place. Then the collapse of production was still reversible in a short time. The red lines drawn by us then, the West would have to accept. Their operation would have failed.
    Now, all the same, we will have to get our strategic nuclear weapons, but the enemy is already at many of our gates, collected and purposeful. We are in the "trap" of a fratricidal war with Ukraine. The blame for our current situation lies entirely with the current government. Russia will be able to get out of it (if we are still lucky) only by replacing it. constitutional way.
    The new government must have "balls of steel", and its main tool for talking with the Hegemon will be strategic nuclear weapons. So far as a real threat
    1. Bobik012 Offline Bobik012
      Bobik012 (Vladimir) 26 June 2022 12: 51
      0
      we will be destroyed

      You - yes ... We will go to heaven, and you will just die (quote)
      1. Alexey Davydov Offline Alexey Davydov
        Alexey Davydov (Alexey) 26 June 2022 15: 20
        -4
        Bobby yap, but reality is still reality
    2. dpu Offline dpu
      dpu (Andrei) 26 June 2022 15: 36
      -2
      Putin has not gained full strength yet. And what to talk about in 2004, then a full yard was in Chubaisyatina. The army lay on its side. He just sat in a chair, so he was immediately drowned by the nuclear submarine "Komsomolets", every corner of the "bunch" was under the control of the ovs. The debt hung around the neck of the Russian Federation and not small. Yes, and much more...
      1. Alexey Davydov Offline Alexey Davydov
        Alexey Davydov (Alexey) 26 June 2022 16: 03
        -3
        I no longer believe him, and the reason is that he is just a talented screen behind whose back the oligarchs rule the country while she gives them something. Shameless and thoughtless. My complaint to him personally is that he took up this role from the very beginning.
        Having formed a system of power, optimized for pumping money out of the country.
        It is not surprising that the oligarchs are forced to dance under the States, because all financial platforms are controlled by them.
        And what can you say about our foreign exchange reserves substituted for the States. And what about half a billion dollars of debt sent to the thief with his own hands?
        And how long do you personally intend to "wait" for Putin?
      2. Alexey Davydov Offline Alexey Davydov
        Alexey Davydov (Alexey) 26 June 2022 17: 48
        +3
        My claim is that the country (together with opportunities and hopes) lost 20 (!) years that it could develop. Instead, the authorities, pumping resources out of the country, stupidly collected a "pod", half of which has now "safely" departed to our enemies, and the other half will remain in reserves, already out of necessity.
        These lost years now, in the face of the West ready for war, no one will return to us. I walked with the line all these years, gradually losing hope and trust in the authorities.
        Putin himself took an active part in all this (at least).
        1. alexey alexeyev_2 (Alexey Alekseev) 27 June 2022 11: 20
          -4
          Despondency is a mortal sin .. You somehow don’t notice that something has happened in these twenty years. Without undue pomp and fanfare, Putin slowly carried out a new industrialization; Support for pence ... Yes, a lot of things are being done. I don’t know about you, but I didn’t even notice the departure of leading Western manufacturers from Russia .. and Putin is to blame for all this sad
    3. soloist2424 Offline soloist2424
      soloist2424 (Oleg) 26 June 2022 22: 10
      +2
      In 2004, instead of tacitly agreeing to the entry into NATO of a large group of countries, including the Baltics, Putin needed to get nuclear weapons back then and declare the threat to the West with a nuclear war.

      In 2004, start a confrontation?! Without ending the Chechen war, without an economy? Without loyal China and India in the rear? Adventure plan.
      "The world was not ready then..." They chewed up Yugoslavia, Iraq, Libya... They were ready.
      1. Alexey Davydov Offline Alexey Davydov
        Alexey Davydov (Alexey) 26 June 2022 23: 57
        -2
        Without ending the Chechen war, without an economy?

        Of course, it was not bad to ask the enemy to wait until we had everything and stock up on everything we needed. However, this is never the case in real life. You have to take a deadly risk where the stakes are high. If you do not go, it is tantamount to defeat.
        The country's leadership should have been aware of WHERE this road leads us.
        The Chechen war in NO way could prevent us even then from putting forward a threat, and in case of disobedience, from starting a nuclear war on the territory of the States. Which, of course, would mean mutual destruction. Together with Chechnya.
        With sufficient persuasiveness, the States would have believed us.
        It was this threat that in 1962 the Soviet Union forced the Americans to retreat by planting missiles in Cuba and firing a warning shot with a nuclear weapon.

        "The world was not ready then..." They chewed up Yugoslavia, Iraq, Libya... They were ready.

        The world in 2004 was not ready to accept a new world war. The team of its beneficiaries has not been formed. The US and NATO were also not ready for it. It took 18 years
    4. Moray Boreas Offline Moray Boreas
      Moray Boreas (Morey Borey) 27 June 2022 23: 22
      +1
      I support. And there is. And let the various sofa and Kremlin dreamers continue to live with rosy hopes for "maybe it will work out" ... It will not work out. Get ready for a full scale nuclear war!
  10. Tourist Offline Tourist
    Tourist (tourist) 26 June 2022 12: 43
    +2
    For starters, it’s not bad that the author mentioned Napoleon’s Russian Company. There is still a little more to read history and it is easy to find that in fact it was not France that attacked, but revolutionary France was soaked by the surrounding monarchies, incl. and Russia. And France fought back for a long time. The Russian company was after the Fifth Coalition, and after it, respectively, there was the Sixth Coalition in which they occupied Paris. But what happened before?

    For example, the famous passage of Suvorov through the Alps - the Swiss campaign of the army of Alexander Vasilyevich Suvorov - the transition of Russian troops under the command of Field Marshal Suvorov from Northern Italy through the Alps to Switzerland, lasted from September 10 to September 27, 1799. It was committed during the war of the 2nd anti-French coalition (Great Britain, Austria, Russia, Turkey, the Kingdom of both Sicilies, etc.) against France. So - the second coalition, Russian troops on the territory of the European Alps are going to fight together with an international coalition against France.

    A slightly less well-known episode, but probably many have heard the phrase "ships storm the bastions." The siege of Corfu (1798-1799) is a military operation of the Russian-Turkish fleet against the French troops entrenched on the island during the Mediterranean campaign of the Black Sea squadron under the command of Admiral F.F. Ushakov.
    Here is a little background - On the way to Egypt, Napoleon captured Malta, which, in fact, then belonged to Russia. The capture of Malta by the French was perceived by Pavel Petrovich as an open challenge to Russia. The Russian sovereign Paul I was the Grand Master of the Order of Malta. Another reason for Russia's intervention in Mediterranean affairs soon followed. After the landing of French troops in Egypt, which was formally part of the Ottoman Empire, the Porte asked Russia for help. Pavel decided to oppose France, which in Russia was considered a hotbed of revolutionary ideas. Russia joined the Second Anti-French Coalition, in which England and Turkey also became active participants. December 18, 1798 Russia concludes preliminary agreements with Britain to restore the union. On December 23, 1798, Russia and Porta signed an agreement under which the ports and Turkish straits were open to Russian ships.
    https://topwar.ru/40731-shturm-nepristupnoy-morskoy-kreposti-korfu.html

    It is easy to see that the dates of these glorious events are somewhat earlier than 1812. So to say that all of Europe just got together and went to Russia is nonsense. We need to see the whole situation.
    1. Bobik012 Offline Bobik012
      Bobik012 (Vladimir) 26 June 2022 12: 56
      -2
      alternative history
  11. soloist2424 Offline soloist2424
    soloist2424 (Oleg) 26 June 2022 12: 53
    +2
    An interesting article, but I can’t call it serious.

    Ahead is rather something similar to the Hundred Years War - a series of endless conflicts, during which neither side can prevail.

    I do not agree. That's why the war began, because the Anglo-Saxons understood - "we can't wait any longer, we'll lose further. It's not a fact that we'll win now, but there is a chance, and then it won't be."
    Look at what is happening in the States: from problems with the delivery of goods, to rising prices, unemployment, crime, squabbles in the ruling parties. Is it really the little things? And if you can't deal with such trifles, what will happen when the not trifles begin?
    You will not be finished off, afraid of your nuclear weapons? Is not a fact. The Union had nuclear weapons, what did they do with its economy? I'm not sure that the States will get out if they fall into the same hole.
  12. Vox Populi Offline Vox Populi
    Vox Populi (vox populi) 26 June 2022 13: 21
    -3
    The Europeans want to destroy our state, plunder our resources and enslave our people. They wanted it in 1812, they wanted it in 1941, they want it now. Such is the true bestial essence of Europe - it is vitally important for it to constantly seize more and more new territories, enslave more and more new peoples. They were born colonialists, they will die colonialists. And it is likely that very soon, if they still dare to unleash a war with Russia.

    Now things are usually different...
    And yes why they did not do this before (for example, in the 90s, convenient for them), but until recently they preferred to trade, buying raw materials and products of low processing from us and selling us "all sorts of things" and high-tech products?!
    1. Moray Boreas Offline Moray Boreas
      Moray Boreas (Morey Borey) 27 June 2022 23: 28
      -1
      It's simple: then there was a puppet government of Yeltsin-Gaidar-Chubais- and other evil spirits ... they thought it was forever
    2. Chukchi farm worker (Chukchi farm worker) 28 June 2022 09: 20
      0
      Because the country was completely under external control. More precisely, its "decision-making centers". In fact, for 40 years, the West provided itself with cheap and uninterrupted raw materials. This is a long time. The stupidity, greed and pride of the West still played a cruel joke on him. They have ceased to be able to "negotiate" with the whole world, incl. with the Russian Federation, considering themselves higher, stronger and smarter. Which is not true at all. Let's hope that continuing to consider ourselves white masters of the so-called. the collective West will bring itself to very unpleasant things. Arab refugees, Albanians, Turks and especially Ukrainians, other "freedom fighters" such as LGBT representatives and all sorts of greens (GreTTa ahead) to help them!
      Let's keep our fingers crossed for Colombia and wish them good harvests!
      And on the ruins of this worthless, misanthropic pseudo-civilization, we will establish the Red Banner of Victory!
  13. Avarron Online Avarron
    Avarron (Sergei) 26 June 2022 14: 03
    +1
    Yes, this series of endless conflicts did not end after the 45th. Vietnam, Korea, Angola, Afghanistan, Chechnya, etc. The PNDs have always been on the side opposing Russia.
  14. steelmaker Offline steelmaker
    steelmaker 26 June 2022 14: 14
    -4
    has no illusions about the true intentions of the West

    As Putin says: "We should rejoice, trade is growing."
    Were there any illusions in 2014? Money doesn't smell, and then it turns out, "we've been pushed to the wall."
    And judging by the fact that Russia is in trade with the EU, now with a huge profit, the illusions still remain!!!
  15. Sergey Latyshev Offline Sergey Latyshev
    Sergey Latyshev (Serge) 26 June 2022 14: 50
    -4
    And while these standard old patterns are being voiced, the media are proudly boasting - profits are either growing for trading in gas oil and resources !!!

    For simpletons - trenches, for Gazprom - profit ...
    1. Chukchi farm worker (Chukchi farm worker) 28 June 2022 09: 21
      0
      Blondes - suffering.
  16. VlVl Offline VlVl
    VlVl (VladVlad) 26 June 2022 15: 54
    +1
    Win the war? I don't like this wording. Until he himself appeared on the battlefield, he did not pay attention. And then I realized that it was impossible to win the war. You can only win. War is not a game, children play it. And yet... Russia will win. There will be failures, there will be mistakes... But he will win. And it is impossible to win against those who play with marked cards. And the "gentlemanship" voiced by the president, in my couch opinion, of course, must end immediately. The operation has long been a war. The ruins of Mariupol and thousands of deaths are proof of this. The Ukrainian army is a worthy adversary. No one was going to panic and raise their hands.
  17. zenion Offline zenion
    zenion (zinovy) 26 June 2022 16: 01
    -6
    It is unlikely that a victory over Europe will be possible. I don’t see who will remain alive there to sign the surrender. If the West gets very excited, then I saw this. When the fox pressed the hare, and he had nowhere to go, the hare fell on his back and tore the fox's stomach with his lower paws. The atomic weapon of the hare, its hind legs are very strong. The fox of course threw back all four legs. The hare had not yet run, he was very frightened by what he had done. The blacksmith Ivan Pavlovich said that he never thought that the hare would be able to defend himself.
    1. Moray Boreas Offline Moray Boreas
      Moray Boreas (Morey Borey) 27 June 2022 23: 34
      0
      hare fell on his back and bottom !!! paws....

      eh, and what did the upper paws do at the same time? In fact, there were such cases. With the claws of its hind legs, a seasoned hare - a hare can rip open the belly of both a fox and a wolf ...
  18. guest Offline guest
    guest 26 June 2022 16: 19
    0
    Quote from Vox Populi
    And yes, why didn’t they do this earlier (for example, in the 90s that were convenient for them.)

    Then they believed that Russia itself would soon die, and it was not worth wasting a bullet on a dead person.
    1. Vox Populi Offline Vox Populi
      Vox Populi (vox populi) 27 June 2022 20: 08
      0
      Sounds good, but not very convincing... winked
  19. vlad127490 Offline vlad127490
    vlad127490 (Vlad Gor) 26 June 2022 16: 50
    -1
    The Russian Federation now, in an open non-nuclear war, cannot defeat NATO. War is resources and economy. NATO is slowly shrinking the economic space of the Russian Federation. NATO compresses slowly so that it is not particularly noticeable, it's like boiling a frog, throwing it into boiling water, the frog will jump out, and in cold water, slowly heating it, you can boil it. During the time of the NMD of the Russian Federation, not a single countermeasure against sanctions has been taken, not a single one. The Kremlin will start acting when there is a mortal danger for its "elite".
  20. Potapov Offline Potapov
    Potapov (Valery) 26 June 2022 18: 31
    0
    We need something from them - prisoners, slaves, land, rivers, seas - no ... We have enough of our own ... Maybe there are a few southern coasts of Spain and Italy, but without blacks ... The rest goes under complete demilitarization ...
  21. Netyn Offline Netyn
    Netyn (Netyn) 26 June 2022 18: 46
    0
    Take, for example, the Lord of the Rings trilogy by the Englishman John Tolkien, where under Mordor, an evil and cruel country in the east, opposed to the beautiful and kind West, Russia was meant.

    What a sweet lie.
    It is not clear for what purpose
  22. Hydrogen will solve everything!
  23. 1_2 Offline 1_2
    1_2 (Ducks are flying) 26 June 2022 18: 55
    -2
    while there is the Strategic Missile Forces and Ashes with Boreas. as well as Daggers Caliber Zircons with apples and their carriers, the Russian Federation can easily and quickly destroy NATO. moreover, in order to destroy NATO, it is necessary to actually destroy only two countries, the United States and a small British, all other countries are just mongrel mongrels, who were taken into a gang for the crowd and in order to get closer to the borders of the Russian Federation.
    NATO can also be destroyed from the inside, that is, change the regimes in the USA and the British to be friendly to the Russian Federation, yes, this can be done, in these countries a small group of people-families rule, according to Berezovsky)) only 8-10 Jewish families rule in the USA, then if their elimination will free the suffering American people from the despotism of a bunch of Zionist perverts who decided that they are the omnipotent masters of the planet because they own the FRS machine)), then there is a third option for the collapse of the United States: the destruction of the dollar as the currency of the world, and this can also be easily done - unite as many countries as possible in the BRICS, and completely prohibit the circulation of the dollar in these countries, you can also prohibit the sale of resources for the currencies of the West, or even prohibit the sale of resources of the BRICS countries to the hostile West
    1. Marzhecki Offline Marzhecki
      Marzhecki (Sergei) 29 June 2022 09: 09
      +1
      while there is the Strategic Missile Forces and Ashes with Boreas. as well as Daggers Caliber Zircons with apples and their carriers, the Russian Federation can easily and quickly destroy NATO. moreover, to destroy NATO, it is necessary to actually destroy only two countries, the United States and a small British, all other countries are just mongrel mongrel

      Yeah, but without a modern surface fleet with effective air defense and anti-aircraft defense to cover our SSBNs are a fairly easy target for the Americans, and 40% of the strike power of our "nuclear triad" is tied to them.
      Do you fundamentally ignore the fact that Russia can just as easily be destroyed by a nuclear attack?
  24. Cucumbers Offline Cucumbers
    Cucumbers (Cucumbers) 26 June 2022 19: 00
    -2
    There are several statements on this subject. 1. Why do we need such a world where there will be no Russia. 2. If a fight is imminent, it is necessary to beat first. You probably don't need to name the author. In the West, they do not understand who they contacted. If explosives have entered the warpath, then there will be a nuclear strike, a preemptive nuclear strike, unless of course they change their minds. He was able to start a self-defense against a kindred people, and those in general are strangers, eternal enemies. Two targets, the rest will scatter. People didn’t know 300 years ago that America exists, now they will know for sure that it doesn’t exist.
  25. sat2004 Offline sat2004
    sat2004 26 June 2022 21: 19
    +1
    Will be able. Russia has already defeated fascism several times. Europe (a united fascist organization) is fighting against Russia for the preservation of fascism with the help of NATO. Any country that opposes fascism will be the object of NATO's "attention", as Russia is now. Enough illusions about "friends" Europeans, Japanese and immigrants from Europe such as the United States, Canada.
  26. k7k8 Offline k7k8
    k7k8 (vic) 27 June 2022 08: 34
    0
    I wonder what the local iksperds mean when they mention the term "tactical nuclear weapons"?
    1. Chukchi farm worker (Chukchi farm worker) 28 June 2022 09: 25
      -1
      This is such a not very big thing, when it is buuum, then everyone piii ..... and that's it. But... in a small area.
      1. k7k8 Offline k7k8
        k7k8 (vic) 28 June 2022 10: 27
        0
        Quote: Chukchi farm worker
        This is such a not very big thing, when it is buuum, then everyone piii ..... and that's it. But ... in a small area

        You, like the vast majority of commentators and not only here, are making the usual amateur mistake. A strict division into tactical and strategic nuclear weapons solely on the basis of the power of the ammunition is, at the very least, incorrect. In addition to power, the purpose of the application is also taken into account. That is why a "not very big thing" can be a strategic munition (for example, to destroy the White House or the Capitol together with their filling, a charge with a capacity of one Hiroshima is enough), and a "very large thing" with a capacity of 1 megaton, used in the area of ​​\uXNUMXb\uXNUMXbdeployment of a motorized infantry division, will be considered a tactical nuclear weapon, because the purpose of its use will be to solve tactical problems. .
  27. rotkiv04 Offline rotkiv04
    rotkiv04 (Victor) 27 June 2022 10: 49
    +1
    I disagree with the author, the war will move into the phase of the use of nuclear weapons as soon as one of the parties starts to lose, do not forget Putin's words "why do we need such a world if ...", so World War 3 will end in a nuclear apocalypse anyway
  28. Jacques sekavar Offline Jacques sekavar
    Jacques sekavar (Jacques Sekavar) 27 June 2022 11: 02
    -1
    Can't win, but can't lose either.
    As V.V. Putin said - we will die, but they will also die.
  29. Vladimir T_2 Offline Vladimir T_2
    Vladimir T_2 (Vladimir T) 27 June 2022 12: 01
    +1
    Well, it is so, only the EU also has nuclear weapons. Someone nervous will press the button, and there are enough von derlyans like that, and the soul will rush, some to heaven, some to hell.
  30. Moray Boreas Offline Moray Boreas
    Moray Boreas (Morey Borey) 27 June 2022 23: 40
    -1
    I have read this article. Get ready for a full scale nuclear war. An analysis of the situation and the dynamics of events suggests that the first nuclear strike will take place in a year - a maximum of one and a half years. And then they will sprinkle like ripe pears ...
    1. Chukchi farm worker (Chukchi farm worker) 28 June 2022 09: 34
      0
      Let's hope it doesn't come to that. Who knows, maybe millions of immigrants liked to live in a good European climate - hearty, warm and cozy. And, I think, they understand that the reckless behavior of all sorts of Johnsons, macrons, zaused (who is this ???), stolne ... snolte ... stlotte ... ugh you ... st o l ten erg about in (so that he ...) and others of these same can deprive them of such a good life. Maybe they ask WHY? In many European countries there are already many such citizens, and it is possible that in time there will be more than the titular population. Maybe it's time to involve them in European politics?
  31. Sergey Ochkivsky (Sergey Ochkivsky) 28 June 2022 09: 32
    +2
    Forgot about 2 more attempts. The Crimean War does not live up to its name. There were more fighting: the Balkan Peninsula, the Caucasus, the Black Sea, the Baltic Sea, the White Sea, the Far East. They fought against the British, French, Ottoman Empire and the Kingdom of Sardinia. The United Kingdom of Great Britain ruled over 31 km² of land, which is about 878% of the earth's land mass. The total population of the empire was approximately 965 million people. The territory of the Russian Empire In the XIX century - 22 million km², population - 480 million hours. Russia was inferior to the enemy coalition not only technically, but also in terms of resources. The second is the intervention of 23,8. The military intervention of the Entente countries and the Central Powers (Quadruple Alliance) in the Civil War in Russia on the side of the white movement. A total of 71,6 states took part in the intervention.
    1. k7k8 Offline k7k8
      k7k8 (vic) 28 June 2022 10: 35
      0
      Quote: Sergey Ochkovsky
      Crimean War

      No wonder its unofficial name is World Zero.
      In addition, with some stretch, but still, one can call the campaign of Europe (led by Poland and involving a huge number of the then "wild geese") against Russia the Great Troubles of the first quarter of the XNUMXth century.
  32. Bloshka Offline Bloshka
    Bloshka (Konstantin) 29 June 2022 06: 03
    -2
    You don't even need a nuclear weapon to destroy England. One kinetic power of the same Sarmatian is enough to lower it below sea level. The Balts will go to waste, but why should we pollute the Leningrad and Kaliningrad regions. But with the decision-making center in the Pentagon, it can turn out interesting. As in Hiroshima for eternal memory. To be remembered. And about third countries. Remember what the president said: In the event of aggression against Russia, strikes will be made on decision-making centers. This is not eastern but central Europe. And after testing the daggers in the bunker in Ukraine in real conditions, the ardor of their strategists fell. Remember what silence wafted from there - dead.
  33. The comment was deleted.
    1. Expert_Analyst_Forecaster 29 June 2022 13: 49
      0
      Actually, this is ironic about the idea of ​​a "hundred-year" war.
      However, for some, a lack of education makes it difficult to distinguish irony from an expert assessment or an analytical note. Education, not diplomas. Some are confused.
  34. Marzhecki Offline Marzhecki
    Marzhecki (Sergei) 29 June 2022 09: 06
    0
    Quote from Blosha
    You don't even need a nuclear weapon to destroy England. One kinetic power of the same Sarmatian is enough to lower it below sea level.

    Yep, another expert analyst. And what will you do with British nuclear submarines equipped with Trident-2 ICBMs that are on combat duty?
    1. Ulysses Offline Ulysses
      Ulysses (Alexey) 2 July 2022 20: 33
      0
      And what will you do with British nuclear submarines equipped with Trident-2 ICBMs that are on combat duty?

      Let's physically deprive home ports.
      And most importantly, every British sailor from the nuclear submarine must understand that nothing will protect his wife, children, relatives from fair punishment for his reckless actions ..
  35. vlad127490 Offline vlad127490
    vlad127490 (Vlad Gor) 1 July 2022 22: 59
    0
    Can or can not, it is better not to discuss and not to guess. The entire "elite" of the Russian Federation, in fact, the NATO elite, there in the West and in North America they have capital, wives, children, real estate, they have hidden NATO citizenship. What do you want from this "elite"? If tomorrow NATO drops an atomic bomb on the Kremlin, there will be no nuclear response from the Russian Federation. "Elite" will not kill themselves, their children there. There will be a big Odessa noise. Hope only for adequate military of the Russian Federation.
    1. Ulysses Offline Ulysses
      Ulysses (Alexey) 2 July 2022 20: 28
      0
      Can or can not, it is better not to discuss and not to guess. The entire "elite" of the Russian Federation, in fact, the NATO elite, there in the West and in North America they have capital, wives, children, real estate, they have hidden NATO citizenship. What do you want from this "elite"?

      You have a strange "elite".
      Having everything (according to your version) in the "West", she declared war on him and is not going to give up ... belay
      Do not find that there is a discrepancy?
  36. Evdokimov Sergey Yurievich 2 July 2022 20: 22
    +2
    Germany of the 40s cannot be compared with NATO. NATO is just a child. And our army and weapons cannot be compared either - at the beginning of the war there were simply not enough rifles, and horses carried guns. All these Poles and Balts are just in a grocery store among pensioners.
  37. Poligraf Poligrafovich (Vadim Vorobyov) 1 August 2022 00: 05
    0
    ... Immediately along the Tan and the impudent Saxon island ...