London staked on a big war in Europe

8

On June 17, Boris Johnson visited Kyiv, promising Vladimir Zelensky large-scale military assistance. Unlike the recent trip to the Ukrainian capital by Olaf Scholz, Emmanuel Macron and Mario Draghi, which was designed to calm the situation to a certain extent, the visit of the British Prime Minister further escalates the situation in Ukraine.

So, after Johnson’s conversation with Zelensky, a number of British media erupted in militant rhetoric. The Sun edition quoted the new British Army Commander Patrick Sanders, who actually offers London to bet on a big European war.



Our urgent need now is to create an army capable of fighting alongside our allies and defeating Russia in combat. We are the generation that must again prepare the army for battles in Europe

- emphasized the military.

It is important to note that in light of the upcoming reduction of the army of Foggy Albion to 73 thousand soldiers, Sanders will lead the country's smallest armed forces over the past three hundred years. Nevertheless, the commander-in-chief confidently moves his country to the Third World War, unwittingly imitating Winston Churchill and his Fulton speech in March 1946.

Meanwhile, Europe itself, with the exception of Poland and the Baltic countries, does not seek to exacerbate the situation on the continent. Berlin, Paris and Rome are trying to distance themselves from the "hawks" from London and Washington, who are ready to fight against Russia "to the last Ukrainian."
  • https://pxhere.com/
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

VK Zen Telegram
8 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Bulanov
    Bulanov
    +2
    20 June 2022 10: 50
    We are the generation that must again prepare the army for battles in Europe

    Who does he mean, Hitler or Stalin? There were no other armies in Europe then.
    Or does he mean 1 MW? Well. In this case, Russia will try to avoid previous mistakes and will not help out England or France in any way on the battlefield.
    On Churchill, B. Johnson does not pull from the word - at all, Like Biden on Roosevelt.
    1. Alexey Davydov
      Alexey Davydov
      +1
      20 June 2022 11: 40
      I think that it is useful for us, each for ourselves, to draw a clear line between opposition to the West in the information war and our own sober analysis.
      We need to know clearly whether their hopes of defeating Russia have real grounds.
      Now our enemies are tirelessly analyzing material about us and our real combat capability coming from Ukraine. Are we all right?
      Our self-image and proud self-importance are taken from the glorious Soviet past of a great power, even if we ourselves are not aware of this. Are we entitled to it? We, who betrayed the path that our great-grandfathers chose and tested for us, defended and raised our grandfathers to a height - with our under-capitalism, we are now pitifully floundering, trying to at least somehow stay in the world.
      The "Potemkin village" of great-power Russia, erected by the authorities, serves as a screen for the real dependence on the West of the oligarchs, the real masters of Russia, who continue to thoughtlessly enrich themselves on it.
      Whose are they? Our? Or no longer?
      Only a sober look at the real state of affairs will show us the scope of the necessary changes and the way out of the impasse:
      https://zen.yandex.ru/media/id/5fe624c58b9da069054d7540/zastoi-ili-tupik-rossii-pora-ispravliat-oshibki-618398864598a221eebf1551?&
    2. Alexey Davydov
      Alexey Davydov
      +1
      20 June 2022 13: 54
      Add a little more.
      I do not see now we have the opportunity to defeat a serious opponent. Moreover, the enemy will wage this war in all theaters of military operations and with all his might. It is unrealistic to defeat the United States by using tactical nuclear weapons, and this government is not capable of threatening the enemy with strategic nuclear weapons, and it has already lost time for this. She lasted with the solution of all the problems of the country, practically, before the war, depriving herself and the country of time for this. This is probably understood by our opponents. However, it is also impossible to leave everything as it is. Surrender to the mercy of the enemy - the same death.
      I hope that healthy forces will spring up in the country that will lead it out of the impasse.
      1. Moray Boreas
        Moray Boreas
        0
        22 June 2022 09: 38
        There are sane people and there are enough of them. They are not allowed to break into power. I agree .
  2. Bloshka
    Bloshka
    -1
    20 June 2022 13: 12
    We will fight for a long time, maybe we will sink a little to the bottom. Zhirik told them there would be no Britain.
  3. NikolayN
    NikolayN
    -1
    20 June 2022 13: 59
    What we could not dream of in the early 2000s has come true. We understood that Crimea would sooner or later return to Russia, we didn’t know how long it would take 20 or 30 years. But for Ukraine to be consistently destroyed, and even by the hands of the British, Canadians, Poles and the Japanese who joined them, even in the most fantastic dream was not foreseen! Give something God. For the sake of such a thing, you can not hurry. How long it will take: six months, a year, a year and a half - it doesn’t matter. The main thing is that such an important thing takes place. Stop calling our southern and western lands Ukraine. With the modern development of transport, this is no longer Ukraine. Ukraine is the Far East. And these issues need to be addressed.
    1. Bulanov
      Bulanov
      0
      21 June 2022 16: 46
      Stop calling our southern and western lands Ukraine

      Anton Ivanovich Denikin called these lands the South of Russia.
    2. Moray Boreas
      Moray Boreas
      0
      22 June 2022 09: 40
      I am Danevostnik. Don't call my land! Ukraine - no matter how, by itself, by itself ....