Russia will have to liberate Europe after Ukraine

Russian President Vladimir Putin is convinced that in the modern world, states can be either sovereign or colonies, there is no third way. He stated this on June 9 as part of a meeting with young entrepreneurs.

The world is changing, and changing rapidly. And in order to claim some kind of leadership, I'm not talking about global leadership, but at least in some way, of course, any country, any people, any ethnic group must ensure its sovereignty. (...) Because there is no intermediate state: either the country is sovereign, or a colony, no matter how the colonies are called

- Putin emphasized.

If a country or a group of countries is not able to make sovereign decisions, it is already a colony to a certain extent, and the colony has no historical prospects, (has no) chances to survive in such a tough geopolitical struggle

- he added.

Fight against colonialism

It is no coincidence that the Russian president spoke of colonialism in the context of the intensifying struggle on the world stage. After all, it is neocolonial policy Anglo-Saxons is the most dangerous threat to the modern world. A threat that provokes wars, prevents countries from developing, plunges entire nations into chaos. And this problem resonates too much with Russia's national interests and its historical mission to leave it unresolved. We freed the world from fascism by winning the biggest war in the history of mankind. And it is we who, apparently, will have to free him again, this time from liberal fascism, which goes hand in hand with neo-colonialism. Against us, as in 1941, almost all of Europe. The only difference is that instead of the banners of the Third Reich, there are star-blue EU rags. Otherwise, everything is the same - we are again not considered human, they want to destroy us again. History repeats itself.

After the collapse of the Soviet Union, the West felt a weakness in Russia and did not fail to take advantage of it in order to realize Hitler's old dream and gain "living space in the east" through the expansion of NATO and the EU. And he did it - today the forces of the alliance are literally at our doorstep. And we have no one to blame but our own weakness.
Yes, we lost the cold war. Yes, we have lost our ideology, political system and were one step away from losing our identity. The building of communism was the most ambitious task of the XNUMXth century. And throughout the years of the existence of the Soviet Union, Western countries have constantly tried to destroy it. And they succeeded. Not because they were so strong, no, the fish, as always, rotted from the head. The two worst rulers in Russia's thousand-year history, Gorbachev and Yeltsin, have fallen to rule one after the other. And together they lost so much population and land that any other country would have long since collapsed completely.

But still we persevered. They resisted, but not in order to silently watch how the United States, unrestrained after the collapse of the USSR, is destroying the world. We resisted not in order to stand aside while the Anglo-Saxons format our brotherly peoples under their perverted thinking, turning them into their colonies. Under the pretext of bringing them the benefits of capitalist society, they are morally deformed, put on their knees and subjected to their will.

Neo-colonial formatting

After all, what is happening in the countries of the former socialist bloc that have joined the European Union? Ordinary people leave or die out, and the elite becomes a lure. Credit needle - in a vein economics, LGBT blue glasses - in the eyes of young people and the flow of "democratic" feces - in the brains of the population. Let this hellish combination brew for several decades, and at the end you will get a completely obedient and easily controlled society, whose members will sincerely believe that they decide their own fate.

The British and similar Western European colonial scum have always treated the occupied territories disgustingly. They pretended to favor the natives with civilization, but in fact they squeezed them dry, destroying entire civilizations along the way. Where did the Maya go, where are the highly developed Aztecs? Where are the indigenous peoples who lived in the modern United States? What about Australian tribes? Their civilizations were destroyed, their culture was replaced, and people were reduced to the level of subhumans and driven into reservations that still exist in America and Australia to this day. Yes, there are still hundreds of reservations in the US in 2022, and this does not stop Washington from brainwashing the whole world with its “democracy and human rights”. So he maintains his status as a moral censor, denoting power over the world. The power that begins to weaken before our eyes.

Destruction of the world order

After all, what are Western leaders talking about today? The fact that Russia is trying to destroy the existing world order. Indeed, they sat well, what did these Russians start with? The United States is the main one, Europe eats from their hands, and the rest of the countries are somehow forced to develop with an eye on them, supplying them with natural and human resources. From time to time, the States, together with their European henchmen, destroy entire countries: Yugoslavia, Libya, Iraq - well, so that they don’t lose their uniforms and cut up money on defense orders. And not a single major Western publication opposes their wars. Hundreds of thousands of civilians killed, millions of refugees - everything is going according to plan. Today, the same media are screeching like rabid hyenas, covering the productions of Ukrainian Nazis in Bucha and presenting Russia in the most black colors.

After all, we dared to challenge their picture of the world and stop the process of colonization of Ukraine. In the understanding of the West, the inhabitants of the post-Soviet space were barbarians who were supposed to sell resources for nothing and not ask many questions, bowing humbly to the “white masters”. But everything did not go according to their plan, and they, who thought they had caught God by the beard, went berserk, issuing sanctions packages one after another. After all, their carefully built world for the last thirty years suddenly began to crumble.

Do you think the British Empire was delighted when, through the efforts of the USSR, too, they began to lose colonies one after another? In the depths of their hearts, the prim London peers were shaking like pigs before the slaughter, realizing that they were being deprived of a centuries-old source of prosperity and prosperity: dependent territories that bring a stable income. The same thing is happening today. And the history of the colonial Ukraine plundered by the Anglo-Saxons is coming to an end.

Although the inevitable liberation of Ukraine should be only the beginning. American colonialism, at least on the territory of Europe (and at the maximum - in the whole world) must be put an end to. Not only because it is historically correct, but also because it directly threatens our country. It is not necessary to act militarytechnical methods, for starters, a powerful economic response to the sanctions war and the rocking of puppet authorities in the EU countries is quite suitable. And then we'll see who blinks first.
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Alexey Davydov Offline Alexey Davydov
    Alexey Davydov (Alexey) 10 June 2022 14: 45
    Before "liberating Europe" it is useful to think about whether we ourselves are free to threaten such a thing.
    Heads with a Soviet worldview already live in a completely different country, with other possibilities.
    It would be worth looking around, or something, and understanding where you really are, and what will have to be released in the first place
  2. gorenina91 Offline gorenina91
    gorenina91 (Irina) 10 June 2022 15: 07
    Russia will have to liberate Europe after Ukraine

    - Well, about Europe - this author clearly "turned down" and very much!
    - But, as for Kazakhstan, then ... then ... then, if the WSO in Ukraine were faster and more successful (approximately as it was previously envisaged), then after Ukraine, all "territorial misunderstandings" with Kazakhstan should be immediately resolved! - Yes, besides, about 3 million Russians remained in Kazakhstan (and if we also take into account the "Russian-speaking and Russian-speakers", then this figure will be even higher)! - And now this part of the population, to put it mildly, does not have "full rights" that the Kazakhs have! - In other words - they live "below the grass and quieter than the water" !!!
    - And what this (sooner or later) leads to - is not worth explaining !!!
  3. Jacques sekavar Offline Jacques sekavar
    Jacques sekavar (Jacques Sekavar) 10 June 2022 15: 19
    Putin may be wrong. An example of this is his dispute with Medvedchuk about the family ties of the population of Ukraine.
    The third option is the Protectorate. The EU, Turkey, India and some other state formations are an example of this, and therefore, unlike the colonies, the United States is forced to be more delicate with them, but it can also rein in for disobedience.
    In the era of colonialism, competition and the concentration of capital formed the National Monopoly Associations, which became Over the state formations. The struggle of these National Monopoly Associations to expand their sphere of influence led to two world wars.
    In the era of neo-colonialism, national monopoly associations gave way to transnational, mostly Anglo-Saxon, which actually govern the states within their sphere of interest, and the collective interest of transnational monopoly associations, mostly Anglo-Saxon, as one of the US presidents said - the whole world.
    After the coup d'etat and the restoration of capitalism in the Russian Federation, the so-called. “natural” monopolies incl. with the participation of foreign capital. The interests of monopoly capital demanded the expansion of the sphere of activity, and in a non-military way this is possible only through entry into the WTO and the redistribution of markets. This destabilized the established order and led to a confrontation with transnational associations, which themselves were not averse to “eating up” fat new competitors, against which V.V. Putin rebelled and therefore became an outcast in the West.
    The threat of destruction of the established world order does not come from the Russian Federation, but from the PRC, which picked up the banner of Socialism that had fallen.
    There are temporary difficulties with the Russian Federation that will be resolved one way or another over time, and with the PRC there are fundamental differences that are not in the supremacy of big capital over states and peoples, but in the dictatorship of the absolute majority of the population - the proletariat, represented by the Communist Party, and this is a completely different democracy - not a small handful of oligarchs, but the vast majority of the population,
    1. Alexey Davydov Offline Alexey Davydov
      Alexey Davydov (Alexey) 10 June 2022 23: 33
      This destabilized the established order and led to a confrontation with transnational associations, which themselves were not averse to “eating up” fat new competitors, against which V.V. Putin rebelled and therefore became an outcast in the West.

      It follows from this that there is simply no place for capitalist Russia in the existing world of transnational associations.

      The threat of destruction of the established world order does not come from the Russian Federation, but from the PRC, which picked up the banner of Socialism that had fallen.

      Thus, Chinese socialism is the only support for Russia in the existing world of transnational associations for the continuation of its life and development.
      Therefore, a return to the path of building socialism is Russia's only ticket to the future.
      The sooner this imperative reaches everyone in Russia and its authorities, the sooner we will begin to get out of our steep dive. Unless, of course, Russia wishes to be saved.
      Moreover, the world socialist system is the world's only hope for its survival and a brighter future.
      1. Alexey Davydov Offline Alexey Davydov
        Alexey Davydov (Alexey) 11 June 2022 00: 38
        I will try to explain the essence of the differences between the capitalist and communist approaches to building the society of the future - as I understand it.
        The capitalist approach leaves the human personality untouched with all its shortcomings and creates external restrictions for it (laws, rules, financial mechanisms), forcing the individual to behave rationally in relation to society.
        Communist - educates a creative person in the conditions of moral coordinates in order to understand what is useful and necessary, and to form these restrictions for herself in her free actions according to the principle “freedom is a conscious necessity”.
        In the limit:
        the first will eventually turn life into a concentration camp entangled in barbed wire (which may be digital) with stupid embittered prisoners, until such a society destroys itself in any way at hand
        the second - will form a free society of new, positive people leading humanity up the ladder of development
        1. Gulo Offline Gulo
          Gulo (Anatoly) 11 June 2022 10: 03
          Utopia for now.
          1. Alexey Davydov Offline Alexey Davydov
            Alexey Davydov (Alexey) 11 June 2022 11: 50
            Rather need the first step on this long road
            1. Dingo Offline Dingo
              Dingo (Victor) 19 June 2022 10: 02
              The first step on this long road is to destroy the "EBeNkin Center" stinking all over Russia for a start (I'm not talking about buildings).

        2. Julia Offline Julia
          Julia (Julia Hegbom) 13 June 2022 00: 55
          Have you forgotten about the planned economy? The only thing that distinguishes socialism from capitalism in its essence is a planned economy. But the right upbringing (alas and ah) leads to the fact that society loses the genetic material of the most honest and correct, and survive and make their way upstairs ... less correct, let's face it. Well, the main question: how are you going to check that you agree with your model? And not just assent because of the desire to enjoy the benefits? You see, without the ability to telepathically check who is thinking about what, "building a personality through education" is impossible in principle. Otherwise, there would be no Yeltsin and Gorbachev and the current oligarchy in the Russian Federation ... almost all traitors to the USSR in the past are former members of the CPSU ... alas.
          1. Alexey Davydov Offline Alexey Davydov
            Alexey Davydov (Alexey) 19 June 2022 17: 31
            You are trying on us the present future tasks of communist society. It is not correct. Until we all grow up to them together, it is pointless to ask such questions.
            For many of us, of course, this is not possible.
            But for now.
            Some people are already living according to the moral standard of communism, wherever possible.
            For the people of a communist society, there will be no such questions. They themselves will solve them correctly within themselves. They will be replaced by other questions, more complex ones. This is the true development of man and society.
            Modern man has already passed a solid path of education for life in a social environment.
            Experience unequivocally shows that education, combined with the experience of conscious choice, changes people.
            The question is in what direction.
            The capitalist structure is one direction.
            Communist is different.
            As you can see, the question is not in feasibility, but in choosing the direction of development and its ultimate goal.
            1. Julia Offline Julia
              Julia (Julia Hegbom) 28 June 2022 02: 56
              Again, I repeat. Any relatively equal, socialist / communist state, including the state systems built by China and Sweden (both systems have not yet reached the USSR, but China has upward development, while Sweden has the opposite), and so, the existence of such societies without the ability to check the moral character of any man for a long period of time...
              impossible in principle, this is a utopia. So China solves it with control... and Sweden too. Totalitarian, absolute. But even control does not guarantee the absence of corruption. In the end, this same rampant corruption begins and then the death of society. Not a single civilization has been able to dodge. Total corruption = death. In addition, in a crisis situation, it is precisely those right ones who are trying to save this society that die. What is possible without telepathy/total control? Building a society, laws, which are limited by base vices, as in the USSR, taking into account the constant risk of internal betrayal of the elites. Without telepathy, this is (alas) the maximum, since without restrictions people (for some reason) are blown away, and 30 years have passed since the collapse of the USSR. Well, and a social axiom - rot invariably makes its way upstairs. If you had a choice, would you choose Gorbachev as president out of hundreds of millions of people with higher education? And how did he end up in the elite then? That's it. Well, something is doubtful to me that the new oligarchy will give their money voluntarily.
  4. The comment was deleted.
  5. k7k8 Offline k7k8
    k7k8 (vic) 10 June 2022 15: 54
    Russia will have to liberate Europe after Ukraine

    1. Julia Offline Julia
      Julia (Julia Hegbom) 13 June 2022 00: 57
      Hmm... do you prefer China to do this? Globalization is what it is. US & UK want to globalize the world... China is also willing to do it.
  6. Oleg Rambover Offline Oleg Rambover
    Oleg Rambover (Oleg Pitersky) 10 June 2022 16: 18
    Yes, the author pushed.

    The author asked the Europeans if they want liberation? Especially from Russia? Judging by how Finland and Sweden rushed into NATO, not really.

    And this problem resonates too much with Russia's national interests and its historical mission to leave it unresolved.

    When they talk about a historical mission, at best they want to get into your wallet. At worst, send you or your children on a crusade for some crazy fantasy.

    It's certainly funny who is the loudest shouting "Stop the Thief!". Now we are witnessing an attempt to strangle the national liberation movement of the former colony out of hand.
    1. Julia Offline Julia
      Julia (Julia Hegbom) 13 June 2022 01: 05
      Oh, let's not talk about Sweden, okay? We do not really like to harness ourselves and lose business for Ukraine, unemployment is growing, incomes are falling. I especially don’t like it when Ukrainian patriots continue to cut money in the Russian Federation, convincing us in Sweden that we need to switch to bicycles and heat one room with firewood instead of heating a seven-room cottage, and all this for the sake of Ukraine. Even I didn’t notice that for the sake of Ukraine, the Ukrainian site Litnet left the Russian Federation, the owner of which tried to cut loot from the “damned Muscovites” after the start of the special operation. Moreover, this Ukrainian patriot used Russian rubles to supply Azov with weapons. The ones with the swastika.
  7. Joker62 Offline Joker62
    Joker62 (Ivan) 10 June 2022 18: 44
    Russia will not liberate Europe from Nazism! Europe will destroy itself in the bud!
    1. KLV Offline KLV
      KLV (Konstantin) 14 June 2022 17: 26
      You forgot to insert the word "may" (or "should").
  8. steelmaker Offline steelmaker
    steelmaker 10 June 2022 20: 06
    or the country is sovereign, or a colony, no matter how the colonies are called

    - Putin emphasized.

    And what does a sovereign state or a colony indicate?

    Branches of power in the USSR:

    1. Legislative.
    2. Executive.
    3. Trial.
    4. Ideological is the key branch of power.
    The ideological branch of power was enshrined in the 1977 USSR constitution:

    Article 6. The Communist Party of the Soviet Union is the guiding and guiding force of Soviet society, the core of its political system, state and public organizations. The CPSU exists for the people and serves the people.
    The CPSU Party performed two tasks:
    1. Conducted personnel policy. Appointments went from the Politburo and the Central Committee to each workshop, and to each military unit.
    2. Carried out strategic planning for the entire country. Any order, any order of the Politburo and the Central Committee was brought to the party cell in the field and there it was already controlled
    Branches of power in Russia after the collapse of the USSR:
    1. Legislative.
    2. Executive.
    3. Trial.
    Ideology - forms the development strategy of the country. Ideology indicates to the chosen ones of the people (officials and deputies) the goals pursued by the state. Ideology determines the priorities in the work of government bodies.

    In general, it will take a lot of space to explain. If we take our Constitution, then Russia is a colony! Art.13, 15, 32.
    1. Alexey Davydov Offline Alexey Davydov
      Alexey Davydov (Alexey) 11 June 2022 12: 49
      Forced to correct you.
      The existing text (Art. 13, 15, 32) reflects only the UNRESOLVED question of Russia's choice of its path, and the possibility of choosing ANY direction.
      The problem is in the FINAL choice of direction by the country itself, by its authorities, which has not yet been made (we will assume so), and therefore is not enshrined in the Constitution.
      It would have been worse - if it had ALREADY been fixed in it, a choice that did not suit us.
      This is not there.
      There is an urgent need for a complete REVIEW of the positions that existed at the time of this text and a DECISION TO RETURN TO THE FORMER SOVIET ONE-PARTY MODEL, adjusted for socially oriented state capitalism as the first step.
      Work on the bugs must be carried out. Our Chinese comrades have done useful theoretical work (a view from the outside) on the analysis of the mistakes of the Soviet Union
    2. Julia Offline Julia
      Julia (Julia Hegbom) 13 June 2022 01: 09
      Hmm ... why did you get a minus? Alas, what you said is true. And you in the Russian Federation from the colonial status stomp and stomp again. Hmm...the EU is the same as what you said about the Russian Federation. So the EU has nothing to be proud of yet.
  9. Nikolai Pigin Offline Nikolai Pigin
    Nikolai Pigin (Nikolai Pigin) 10 June 2022 20: 39
    About washing your feet in the oceans, WE have already heard ... and where are these clowns now ...
  10. Sergey Latyshev Offline Sergey Latyshev
    Sergey Latyshev (Serge) 10 June 2022 21: 21
    Ah, complete naivety.
    21st century, imperialism, everyone is just fighting for neo-colonies.
    Hydrocarbons in Syria and Libya, Aluminum, titanium raw materials and shale in Ukraine, untapped reserves in the Arctic and Antarctic, Africa and the seabed....

    And all this requires the demilitarization of ... competitors.

    The oligarchs would like to take over the industry of Europe, but they are strong, strong ...
  11. 1_2 Offline 1_2
    1_2 (Ducks are flying) 11 June 2022 00: 50
    The Russian Federation can "liberate" the West only by inflicting a nuclear strike, otherwise it will again have to put millions of men in the Second World War, so why should we die? for what? moreover, the people of the West like to change their gender, and sparkle their asses in blue parades, and in general they consider us wild, rude homophobic Neanderthals, so let them live their own lives.
    and the fact that Putin mentioned the Russian Narva, well, he blurted out so that the Baltic mongrels would not forget who they bark at
  12. The comment was deleted.
  13. Mks7 Offline Mks7
    Mks7 (Maksim) 14 June 2022 00: 52
    Europe)), the Russian Federation is not the USSR, the forces are not the same, Ukraine cannot be overcome.