There was a video of the destruction of Ukrainian ships near Nikolaev

13

A video of the destruction of several ships of the Ukrainian Navy by the Russian armed forces got into social networks.

Among them are the small anti-submarine ship "Vinnitsa" with tail number "A 206" (corvette according to NATO classification) and the medium landing ship "Yuri Olefirenko".




Meanwhile, the Ukrainian port of Ochakov in the Mykolaiv region was virtually deprived of protection. Previously, two ships took on this role: the Vinnitsa MPK and the Yury Olefirenko SDK. However, the first one was destroyed, and the second one was put out of action due to the low morale of the sailors who refused to follow the orders of the commanders to patrol the Dnieper estuary.

At the same time, according to a source in the Crimean law enforcement agencies, the Ukrainian ships remaining on the peninsula since 2014 are waiting for disposal after the completion of the special operation. Currently, they are on the berths of the Black Sea Fleet and require the use of its resources. Moreover, many of the former ships of the Ukrainian Navy are unsuitable for further operation and are in a faulty technical condition.

During the Crimean events of 2014, about 50 ships of the Naval Forces of Ukraine came under Russian control. Some of them were transferred to Kyiv and relocated to Odessa.
    Our news channels

    Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

    13 comments
    Information
    Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
    1. +1
      10 June 2022 13: 45
      The anti-submarine ship "Vinnitsa" with tail number "A 206" was decommissioned in January 2021,
      The footage does not show the destruction of the KFOR "Yuri Olefirenko" (which is on the move). Gone?
      1. +1
        10 June 2022 14: 31
        The bigger, the better.
    2. +3
      10 June 2022 14: 42
      I watched the video and still did not understand who destroyed whom? The fact that they missed and the ship left saw it, but not to destroy someone. Here is the flagship of the Black Sea Fleet, the MOSCOW missile cruiser - it was destroyed ... to our sorrow.
      1. +2
        11 June 2022 09: 46
        Quote: Vyacheslav Bachurin
        I watched the video and still did not understand who destroyed whom? The fact that they missed and the ship left saw it, but for someone to be destroyed - no

        They looked carelessly. The ship at the pier was destroyed. At first he stood on an even keel, then a series of ruptures is visible, and then he lay down on his barrel.




        1. +1
          12 June 2022 13: 13
          Quote: Piramidon
          The ship at the pier was destroyed

          the title indicates the destruction of the "ships", the landing apparently left, or the destruction did not get into the frame. there are already a lot of malicious comments on YouTube under the video, which is why there are complaints about Konashenkov's service
    3. +3
      10 June 2022 15: 23
      - A slow, unprotected target without any cover - and firing at this target! - in general - when will they really learn how to use the firing system? - Why didn’t they prepare the personnel - after all, this is not training shooting - this is the conduct of hostilities, where it is necessary to destroy the enemy !!! - And here - they cannot capture the target, accompany it and deliver an accurate blow! - Who taught and prepared such "firemen" ??? - A continuous sea of ​​discarded ammunition - and everything is off target! - Who needs such a firing - "into the white light like a pretty penny" !!!
      1. +1
        10 June 2022 22: 33
        This video cannot be broadcast.
    4. -1
      11 June 2022 08: 08
      blunder from konashenkov?
      1. 0
        11 June 2022 08: 28
        The landing gear is gone. The volley looks like the MLRS lay down far away. It's strange, because the drone was at the top ... There, at the pier, on its side, MPK 1124, converted by Ukrainians, is lying around. But it was drowned earlier by aviation.
        1. 0
          11 June 2022 09: 51
          Quote: Monster_Fat
          There, at the pier, on its side, MPK 1124, converted by Ukrainians, is lying around. But it was drowned earlier by aviation

          Apparently you don't mean it. In this video, the ship at the pier first stands on an even keel, then gaps are visible at the side, and at the end it already lies on its side. Above, for clarity, I posted screenshots from this video.
          1. 0
            11 June 2022 13: 14
            So he was alone with the crests. They wrote about his sinking a week ago. They wrote that, like aviation and artillery, they hit the port and sank several boats. Mostly small ones, and among them the one that is lying on its side - it was somehow reclassified into a corvette. Not?
            1. +1
              11 June 2022 18: 13
              Quote: Monster_Fat
              They wrote about his sinking a week ago. They wrote that, like aviation and artillery, they hit the port and sank several boats. Mostly small ones, and among them the one that is lying on its side - it was somehow reclassified into a corvette. Not?

              Well, I don’t know who wrote what and about what, maybe the dill wandered around, or maybe the local "experts". I just watched this video carefully. Look for yourself - here he was standing, but here he lay down. I don’t know what kind of trough it was standing at the pier, but the fact that it gurgled is beyond doubt. So what about what they drowned is confirmed
              1. -1
                12 June 2022 05: 45
                I don’t know what kind of trough it was standing at the pier, but the fact that it gurgled is beyond doubt. So what about what they drowned is confirmed

                - So what is it - they shot at him, shot at him; and then they decided to torpedo, or what ??? - Or it was ours who sent "fur seals" to blow up the bottom of this vessel - because. there was no point in shooting at her ??? - Or is it that the Nazis themselves decided to flood it - a la the events during the Crimean War of 1853-1856 - in order to "make it difficult to approach the pier" ???