The Kremlin spoke about the future of the Russian economy

There is not a single country on the planet that has a full-fledged technological sovereignty (CU), so Russia must obtain it in order to avoid further risks and threats. He wrote about it in his column for RBC Special Representative of the President of the Russian Federation for Digital and Technological Development, Head of ANO NTI Platform Dmitry Peskov (not to be confused with the press secretary of the head of state).

The functionary explained that for some time now he has been studying models of the coming near future with his colleagues. They are interested in what will happen on the planet in 10-15 years in terms of technology, resetting the world order and the emergence of new social relations.

In 2020, the world has virtually zeroed out. And now four development scenarios are being implemented simultaneously

the Kremlin spokesman said, apparently referring to the COVID-19 pandemic.

The first is New Left Nationalism, a mixture of take-and-divide equality and national economics in the option "China above all" or any other country. The second is “Green post-capitalism” – moving away from direct money making and paying more attention to the environmental agenda. The third - "Islandization" - the division of large techno-economic blocks. The fourth one is the "Half-life" - the entry of mankind into the period of destruction of existing international institutions.

"Islandization" is the most probable development scenario, according to which further development will proceed. It guarantees the end of globalism and the end of the world security system that took shape after the Second World War. According to the forecast, there will be a reboot of global technology markets, nationalization of technical standards, relocalization (return of business processes previously transferred to other regions) of the production of important goods. Large countries and large techno-economic blocks will want to produce everything on their own territory, and this process is already underway.

Technological sovereignty is the implementation of a part of our scenario (RF - ed.) about how to build our own "island", on which we are in charge, we are adults, we make decisions, we are responsible for them. This is the main story for the next 10 years for us, and also for countries such as the USA, China, and possibly for India

He pointed out.

He drew attention to the fact that now Russia faces several main challenges along this path: a green agenda, the creation of its own techno-economic block, an export agricultural package and new transport and logistics routes between the Russian Federation and Asia, as well as the export of global security and solving the problem of human capital.

The CU is not isolation, but a serious component in creating alliances with other states. The CU must solve the following tasks: provide security, receive energy, food sovereignty, essential goods, transport communications, information production and access to the means of production.

A second industry will be formed in the Russian Federation, based not on departments and corporations, but on development teams, on medium-sized technology companies and universities. These will be engineering firms that have other goals - the production of the final product and market formation, and not the desire to immediately extract shareholder value, the expert summed up his story about the creation of a sovereign "technological island" in the Russian economy.
  • Photos used:
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Jacques sekavar Offline Jacques sekavar
    Jacques sekavar (Jacques Sekavar) 9 June 2022 22: 02
    There is not and will not be a single country on the planet that would have full-fledged technological sovereignty, because this means isolation from the world in science, technology, technology, culture, art, etc., etc.
    Vladimir Putin never tires of repeating about the openness of the Russian Federation for cooperation with the whole world in all spheres, including security.
    Forecasting the future should be based on a scientific basis, and the only such basis is the theory of Marxism, the extension of the provisions of dialectical materialism to the study of society and social life, the economic laws of society and material production, which underlie the entire history of mankind, and the future originates in the past and therefore it is important to study the past in order to understand the present and the future, which is why politicians around the world so often distort history for the sake of their interests
  2. InanRom Offline InanRom
    InanRom (Ivan) 9 June 2022 22: 50
    in the Kremlin they talk a lot about things and that prices have stopped and that:

    17.40 Putin: Russia will not step on the same rake as the USSR, its economy will remain open.

    funny, with a closed economy, everything was different - from nails to rockets, from nuclear power plants to reactors, from bicycles to mining dump trucks, from machine tools to computers.
    With the current "open" puff and feeders for Russian bottling oligarchs with foreign citizenship and thieving officials.
    You can not be half pregnant.

    17.30 Russia should not have benefits for foreign companies that undermine domestic production - Putin.

    Surrenders, someone has overslept all last years 20-30. And was it not he who organized the sale of state property at one time, as a priority, to foreign companies, when he was Sobchak's guarantors.
    everything is so slippery and muddy and twofold:

    13.30 The Ukrainian language remains the state language in those regions and regions of Ukraine that have come under the control of Russia, but the solution of this issue in the future will depend on the will of the local population - Peskov.

    maybe also "celebrating" Bandera as in the rest of Ukraine, leave it for now ?!

    12.55 Lavrov urged Kyiv to abandon militarism and focus on the settlement.

    again negotiations .... with the Nazis, freaks and drug addicts?

    At 8.00:XNUMX a.m., the Armed Forces of Ukraine fired on the village of Khotmyzhsk in the Belgorod region. Windows were broken in three households, roofs and fences were cut. None of the civilians were hurt. A task force is working on the spot, the door-to-door tour of the territory continues.

    and again promises:

    13.40 Russia will give an immediate response if it is attacked by long-range weapons systems - the head of the Russian delegation at the talks in Vienna on military security and arms control Konstantin Gavrilov.

    17.55 Putin called the main task for countries: this is demography - there should be more of us and we should be healthy.

    I wonder how this fits with extinction and pension reform? or demographic flourishing - is it migrants?
    In the meantime:

    where the Russian forest actually goes. There was a curious “nebitka” between the data of our authorities and the customs officers of a number of countries. So, it seems like we no longer carry timber to Japan. And in the Land of the Rising Sun they say that exports from the Russian Federation increased by 41%. And with China, everything is not so simple, according to their statistics, forests were bought much less. Where did he really go then?
    In the top five in the purchase of Russian timber, it seems like friendly Uzbekistan, as well as "unfriendly" Singapore, Estonia and Finland. All these countries do not need so much forest. And Singapore, which joined the “sanctions”, increased the volume of purchases of lumber by as much as 17 times.
    You don't need to be a genius to understand that Uzbeks, Finns, Estonians and other Singaporeans are just a screen, the timber goes to other countries. To the European Union, the United States, Japan and our other ill-wishers of Russia. Ministerial officials are aware of this and may receive a bribe from this.

    and what is the future of Russia and its economy with such "assistants" then?
  3. Oleg Rambover Offline Oleg Rambover
    Oleg Rambover (Oleg Pitersky) 10 June 2022 00: 29
    authorship? This is the road to nowhere. The USSR of the type was an authorship, but firstly this is not entirely true, and secondly, the experience of the USSR can hardly be called successful.

    The collapse of globalism is practically guaranteed

    A highly controversial statement, while we observe reverse processes.
    It seems like Peskovs with all sorts of Glazeevs are now in favor, I feel they rule the economy.
  4. Alexey Davydov Offline Alexey Davydov
    Alexey Davydov (Alexey) 10 June 2022 02: 35
    I would venture to suggest that countries that have a full-fledged state ideology and a planned economy will not feel any "reset" in themselves. They won't need it. They will accept new plans and will move forward - as they did.
    I consider a full-fledged ideology that consistently links the ultimate goal of the country with the positive ultimate goal of the development of the world.
    I know one such - the construction on the planet by all countries of a "society of a common destiny", or a communist society.
    As for Russia, we first need to resolve the question - are we still in control of ourselves, or is someone already in charge of us?
    It is useless to build crystal castles of dreams if the country belongs to large oligarchic capital, which primitively squeezes profit out of it. Even if it is taken away from him, after the question - how? the question arises - to whom to give it at the disposal?
    If not the people, then who else?
    And if the people - everything falls into place in a unique and natural way
    1. The comment was deleted.
  5. Serzh Offline Serzh
    Serzh (Sergey Ilyich) 10 June 2022 22: 04
    As always: whoever has truthful and objectionable information in the commentary has more minuses than pluses and vice versa. However, this is not surprising. In our time, the concepts have changed to the opposite.