Russia forced to draw a front line along the Dnieper


The United States and other Western countries continue to pump weapons into Ukraine, supplying long-range artillery as well. This forces Russia to use additional methods of influencing the Kyiv regime and its sponsors, as well as to expand the possible boundaries of the special operation.


At the same time, neither Kyiv nor Western countries want to negotiate and make any concessions. Apparently, the Ukrainian authorities are counting on the so-called lend-lease and the latest weapons, which supposedly will be able to turn the tide of hostilities. Russia has something to respond to such plans.

New shipments of long-range weapons will be destroyed. At the same time, this forces our troops to move the front line further from the borders of Donbass and Russia in order to protect the population

- said the deputy of the People's Council of the DPR Vladislav Berdichevsky in an interview LOOK.

Meanwhile, as political scientist Marat Bashirov said in a conversation with journalists of the newspaper, Ukraine also has its own long-range systems and long-range missiles.

Therefore, the front line must be moved closer to the Dnieper, regardless of what the West supplies or does not supply.

- the expert emphasized.

Earlier, Vladimir Putin warned that if such weapons were supplied to Kyiv, Russian troops would be forced to attack targets that had not yet been hit during the special operation.
14 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Neville Stator Offline Neville Stator
    Neville Stator (Neville Stator) 8 June 2022 20: 42
    +2
    There is no other way but to move towards the center of Ukraine.
    1. Nike Offline Nike
      Nike (Nikolai) 8 June 2022 20: 56
      +4
      ..and quickly, without chewing snot.
  2. Sergey Latyshev Offline Sergey Latyshev
    Sergey Latyshev (Serge) 8 June 2022 22: 28
    0
    Ha. What naivety in an anonymous article.
    21st century in the yard, imperialism.

    At the same time, neither Kyiv nor Western countries want to negotiate and make any concessions.

    It’s beneficial for Western countries, just to give away junk, rearm, and blame all the problems on someone else.
    And to Kyiv - what you give in, you will not save. it's clear.
  3. Igor Viktorovich Berdin 8 June 2022 23: 58
    +1
    Is it really not clear to Ukrainians that the more they fight, the less territory they will have.
  4. 1_2 Offline 1_2
    1_2 (Ducks are flying) 9 June 2022 00: 37
    +4
    bander must be driven away to Lviv at least, maximum to Poland, because the territory that will remain for them will be a NATO foothold, so it’s better to deprive them of territory altogether, and in order to quickly extinguish artillery and rocket launchers, Bander needs a radar and dozens of UAVs like Orlan in the air around the clock to detect and then suppress the Grads Tornadoes UAV-kamikaze Cube Lancelot, RSZO Hermes. all this, of course, and the children of the LDNR know, but things are still there
  5. cooper Offline cooper
    cooper (Alexander) 9 June 2022 01: 10
    0
    Well, why not along the borders of the EU. Bye..
  6. The comment was deleted.
  7. Potapov Offline Potapov
    Potapov (Valery) 9 June 2022 07: 30
    +3
    The authorities are blown away ... Lavrov - the demilitarization of the East, the Dnieper ... Any fascist farm is a guarantee of problems in the future ... Only until the last fascist and his bunker ...
  8. Yuriy88 Offline Yuriy88
    Yuriy88 (Yuri) 9 June 2022 07: 57
    -1
    probably it will be like this .. In the South - we will try to take Odessa and Nikolaev, cutting off Ukraine from the sea, and in the East, having completely freed the LDNR, we will create a "gray security zone", a kind of border - 300-500 km wide, which will be observed and completely shot through, without all sorts of lyrics .. Naturally, in other parts of the border between Russia and Ukraine there is a "gap" of 300-500 km .. Another is not necessary and is very expensive in every sense ..
    1. Storm_2022 Offline Storm_2022
      Storm_2022 (Storm _2022) 10 June 2022 20: 29
      +2
      But what about the risks of deploying missiles near Kharkov, which have a flight time to Moscow of 5 minutes?
      At the beginning of the special operation, the GDP announced them as one of the main reasons for starting the special operation.
      Although the same missiles can be deployed in Chernihiv, Sumy and Kyiv regions, they all border on Russia and no guarantees from the leadership of Ukraine will work without their complete release.
  9. horseradish Offline horseradish
    horseradish 9 June 2022 10: 08
    +3
    Better on the border of Poland. Otherwise, there will never be peace.
  10. Jacques sekavar Offline Jacques sekavar
    Jacques sekavar (Jacques Sekavar) 9 June 2022 18: 36
    +1
    You still have to reach the Dnieper and take such large cities as Kyiv, Dnepropetrovsk, Zaporozhye, and this is not like Mariupol. Judging by the results of 3,5 months of CBO, it will not be very easy to do this. Therefore, there is a high degree of probability that after the liberation of the LNR-DNR, bargaining will begin and it is not known how it may end. In any case, the complete denazification of Ukraine can be forgotten.
  11. zenion Offline zenion
    zenion (zinovy) 9 June 2022 19: 18
    0
    No need to scare anyone. These are not Greek myths. Every word gives credibility, or undermines it with just chatter.
  12. vlad127490 Offline vlad127490
    vlad127490 (Vlad Gor) 11 June 2022 16: 23
    0
    The worst enemy is fear for one's own skin. Everyone knows what NATO wants, what the liberals-shitcrackers want, the oligarchs and the bureaucratic mafia know everything, these Wishlists are the same.
    There is only one decision on Ukraine in favor of the people of Russia. The state of Ukraine must cease to exist. The entire territory of Ukraine should return to Russia, in the form of regions and republics. There is no need to ask permission from anyone, everything must be done unilaterally. There is no state of Ukraine, there are no debts, there is no government of Ukraine in exile, there are no Ukrainian participants in various international organizations, there is no hostile state on the border of Russia.
    If the state of Ukraine is left, then today and in the future, Russia will always have a headache. Ukraine will definitely join NATO. Everything that is promised and will be spelled out in the Constitution of Ukraine, in its documents, Ukraine will change, in the way that is beneficial to the United States and its satellites.
    We need a law for Ukraine.
    It is necessary to legislate that the entire territory of Ukraine, seized by the separatists with the help of NATO, is the property of Russia.
    Then, in accordance with the Law, the military operation carried out by Russia in Ukraine is the liberation of the territory of Russia occupied by separatists, the restoration of the territorial integrity of Russia, the reunification of peoples.
    The presence of the Law will designate the goal, give certainty about the future to the citizens of the Russian Federation and citizens of Ukraine. Citizens living on the territory of Ukraine will not have to be afraid in the future for themselves, for persecution by the fascist regime.
    All actions of the Russian Army on the territory of Ukraine will comply with the Law. The law will not allow NATO to intervene, to bring troops from Poland, Romania, Hungary into the territory of Ukraine, and the annexation of Ukraine by these countries will automatically disappear.
    Why has the government of the Russian Federation still not adopted the Law on Ukraine???
  13. ont65 Offline ont65
    ont65 (Oleg) 13 June 2022 04: 35
    0
    8 years of shelling by the DPR/LPR have shown quite clearly that no, even tiny territories, can be left to this or subsequent regimes. Until a corresponding constitution is in force in a country or a group of countries on the territory of the former Ukraine and management under the control of the Russian Federation, the situation will sooner or later, under the supervision of the West, return to the beginning in a more critical form.