Inconsistent statements by the Russian authorities bring confusion to the goals of the NWO


The topic of ambiguous statements directly related to the conduct of a special military operation to denazify and demilitarize Ukraine, voiced by representatives of the highest echelons of power in Russia, has become almost a constant for our publication. It may seem to someone that too much attention is being paid to her. Nevertheless, the issue of the absence of any clear and unambiguous position, which does not allow double, triple, and so on, regarding the goals and objectives of the NWO is the most painful today both for its participants and for those for whom it is actually carried out.


Millions of people, who at first saw in the events of February 24, even if it brought them personally certain trials and dangers, but a beneficial process of cleansing the country from Nazi filth and their own personal liberation, today simply cannot understand what is happening and how it will all end. First, one thing is said, then another, after that something is done that does not fit at all into any previously voiced perspectives ... As a result, such “confusion and vacillation” cannot lead to anything positive. And they won't.

We will discuss - we will not discuss?


The commentators of one of my previous texts, in which I traditionally touched on this topic, tried to accuse me of being “vague” and “lack of references to speakers”. Well, if you please - this time I will try to be as accurate as possible. So, let me give you a classic, one might say, example: at the very beginning of this month, the secretary of the General Council of United Russia, Andrei Turchak, made a statement about the almost inevitable entry of the Kherson region into Russia. It sounded like this:

The decision must be made by the residents themselves, and I am sure that they will accept it. Therefore, I have no doubts that this region - the Kherson region - will be part of the Russian Federation, there is no doubt.

Regarding a similar question asked about the future fate of the Luhansk and Donetsk People's Republics, Mr. Turchak said that here he "has no doubts from the word at all." And he added to what was said the words that a similar fate, most likely, awaits the Zaporozhye region. Almost simultaneously with him, the head of the international committee of the State Duma, Leonid Slutsky, spoke out - with the only difference that this politician added specifics to the discussion, indicating that he was counting on the accession of the Donetsk and Luhansk republics, as well as the Kherson region to Russia as early as July this year. In a similar vein, a number of other Russian politicians. Some time later, the Izvestiya newspaper published, citing a certain “source in power circles,” information that even if negotiations between Moscow and Kyiv were resumed, “the issue of the status of the Kherson and Zaporozhye regions would not be raised.” Like, the issue is closed and no longer subject to discussion. What has fallen is gone. It would seem that everything is extremely clear and unambiguous. An no...

The other day, none other than the press secretary of the President of Russia Dmitry Peskov, when asked about the possibility of negotiations over the fate of the regions of the South of Ukraine liberated by the forces of the North-Eastern Military District, gave a completely different answer:

No, it's not like that. This is incorrect information.

That is, presumably, "bargaining is appropriate"?! And Russian troops may well leave Kherson, Melitopol, as well as other cities and towns controlled by them today, in the same way as they once left the Kyiv, Chernihiv and Sumy regions? It is your choice, but it is impossible to find any other interpretation of what has been said. And what will you order to think (and most importantly, do) the inhabitants there after that? For them, by the way, Vladimir Putin, by a corresponding decree, greatly simplified the acquisition of Russian citizenship. But what will be the use of it if suddenly (we assume purely theoretically) Moscow decides to “find a consensus” with Kyiv or “makes a goodwill gesture” by withdrawing its units and formations from the liberated lands? It will be good for someone who has time to withdraw and leave behind the retreating army columns. You will not envy the fate of the rest. Proven by Bucha and other horrific examples. Ukrainian policemen and executioners from the SBU arrive in any territory, at least during the day, under the control of the Liberation Forces, following the soldiers of the Armed Forces of Ukraine (and often right along with them).

The Ministry of Internal Affairs of the “nezalezhnoy” recently boasted that they are already investigating 540 criminal cases “on the facts of cooperation between citizens of Ukraine and the Russians.” That is, under the article "collaborationism", which provides for up to 10-12 years in prison as a punishment. Judgments have already been handed down in 40 cases, which speaks to the speed of the "investigations" and the methods by which they are carried out. So it's just the police! The SBU is working much more actively in this field, so there is probably even more “catch” there. However, these often do not reach the official presentation of charges at all. People just disappear...

The whole country - in the "collaborators"


How serious the matter is in this matter is evidenced, in particular, by the fact that according to the new laws of the Kyiv regime, not only those who go to serve in state, law enforcement agencies formed in the liberated territories, but in general any public sector employees. Particularly teachers. Vice Prime Minister of Ukraine Irina Vereshchuk has already addressed them with such a “heartfelt” message:

As for teachers, especially young ones, the wrong decision now can forever destroy professional life. Therefore, I appeal to the teachers of educational institutions of all levels in the temporarily occupied territories: do not work for the occupiers. Just move to the territory controlled by the government of Ukraine. You will find work here.

And this is not “lyricism” at all - the Ministry of Justice gave an official explanation that “accomplices of the invaders” will be considered all teachers who will “teach children according to the Russian program and actually carry out propaganda work in educational institutions.” Great prospect, isn't it? Not so long ago, Deputy Minister of Defense of Ukraine Anna Malyar complained that "some of the inhabitants of the Kherson region are directly preventing the liberation of this region by the forces of the Armed Forces of Ukraine." It literally sounded like this:

We are facing a difficult situation when there are some representatives of the local population who start working for the occupier. Of course, these people are discovered, they are worked with, but their destructive work complicates both the process of liberation and work in the territories that are occupied.
.
As you can see, this is a problem for Kyiv, and quite a serious one at that. However, there can be no doubt that after the statement made by the Kremlin, the number of “certain representatives” interfering with it will decrease significantly. Let's face it and have no illusions - everyone wants to live.

But maybe all these fears are groundless and I'm here to "disperse the panic"? Alas, not at all. On the eve of the Russian Foreign Ministry made a statement that during the forthcoming visit of the head of department Sergei Lavrov to Ankara, he would meet with Mevlut Cavusoglu, in particular, in order to

exchange views on the current state of affairs in the Ukrainian crisis, as well as the prospects for the resumption of Russian-Ukrainian peace talks.

Here's to you! Arrived, is called... Negotiations again? Again "gestures of goodwill"?! But if we add the words of Mr. Peskov to the statement of the diplomats, then the picture turns out to be rather gloomy. At least, it is completely indefinite and does not give people in the liberated territories (not to mention those who are still in the lands controlled by the Ukronazis) the slightest confidence in the future. What does this mean? I'll try to explain in words, imagine... Arestovich. This half-witted talker is not as insane as he sometimes wants to seem, and sometimes he blurts out quite relevant things. The other day he issued the following:

The time for peppy slogans is over. We can wait a long time for a counteroffensive. We can also wait a long time for the stabilization of the front. Now a split has begun in the army - more precisely, not a split, but a division of people into those who have crumbled morally and do not hold the situation, and those who are ready to fight to the end ... We now need people-stayers who are able to run evenly and for a long marathon race ...

Arestovich is modest - "split", "separation" are observed throughout Ukrainian society. People are getting tired of what is happening, from the growing wave of problems, rolling poverty and hopelessness. However, in order for all this to lead to the right result - the collapse of the Armed Forces of Ukraine and the front, mass desertion and refusal to die for the criminal regime, Moscow's information policy must change in the most radical way, and the sooner the better.

The Ukrainian media immediately picked up the words of Dmitry Peskov and replicated them with might and main - they were read from Chernigov to Nikolaev and from Kharkov to Lvov. It is clear that this was accompanied by appropriate remarks in the style: "Moscow is already ready to bargain and give up the occupied territories"! Against this background, the line of Kyiv, even if it is voiced by inadequate Zelensky and similar “speakers” like Arestovich, Podolyak and Danilov, looks much more consistent and tough. For example, yesterday, June 7, during a video conference with the editors of the Financial Times, his clown majesty once again pompously said that "victory over Russia will be achieved on the battlefield"! And then she declared that she was open "to peace talks with Putin." Is he bullying? Definitely. And all because he is allowed to. And, by the way, the West, listening to these nonsense about Kyiv's "unshakable determination and resilience" and comparing them with vague messages emanating from Russia, also draws conclusions that it is worth, perhaps, to throw in the Armed Forces of Ukraine another hundred or two tanks, guns, and even MLRS - maybe something will burn out.

Few people already have hopes that the format of the special operation that binds the hands and limits the capabilities of the military, which clearly has not justified itself in Ukraine, will be replaced by something more effective. NWO is so NWO - but we must at least stop stunning society with statements that give reason to fear that even it will be “merged” through humiliating negotiations and end up with the loss of the territories liberated at such a high price.
32 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Colonel Kudasov Offline Colonel Kudasov
    Colonel Kudasov (Boris) 8 June 2022 10: 15
    -13
    Well, you'll probably have to give something back. But this should not concern the LDNR, Kherson. Ideally, it is desirable to leave Zaporozhye, but is it realistic? Other regions of Ukraine, like Mykolaiv, would be good for bargaining, but so far there is nothing, unfortunately. I'm afraid that the only "asset" will be Zaporozhye with access to Azov, which can serve as the last tasty carrot for Kyiv
    1. goncharov.62 Offline goncharov.62
      goncharov.62 (Andrei) 8 June 2022 11: 51
      +3
      The only thing you can give away is a couple of megatons. And that's it - the auction is over.
    2. The comment was deleted.
    3. k7k8 Offline k7k8
      k7k8 (vic) 9 June 2022 09: 10
      +1
      Well, you'll probably have to give something back.

    4. isofat Offline isofat
      isofat (isofat) 9 June 2022 11: 20
      -1
      Colonel, today, it is the Russian component of Russia, historical Russia, that has been subjected to aggression. We started from our lands. I think that other peoples of Russia should not rely on indulgence either.

      My conclusion is that it is necessary to collect the split Russia. Let there be Russia, as part of Russia!

      PS And let the outskirts remain in our history. We are one people.
  2. wasp Offline wasp
    wasp 8 June 2022 10: 25
    +12
    Fully agree with the author! Also, Putin is silent like a groundhog, as if he had lost the power of speech? Muddy type.
    1. goncharov.62 Offline goncharov.62
      goncharov.62 (Andrei) 8 June 2022 11: 53
      +6
      Akela has aged and somewhat lost his grip. Unlike the Merikos and other English people. Those have a truly bulldog grip, and you will spend their hell on tears and other liberal chaff ...
  3. Romutis 1 Offline Romutis 1
    Romutis 1 (Romutis 1) 8 June 2022 10: 28
    +9
    Look at the strikes of calibers and other missiles on the territory of Ukraine, otherwise these attacks cannot be called chaotic. Apparently, the Kremlin does not want to break the back of Ukraine and force it to capitulate on Russia's terms, but they want to bring everything to a draw, otherwise this confusion does not fit into the logical framework. Donetsk is being beaten from large-caliber artillery and MLRS after THREE MONTHS of a military operation with impunity. Every day people die in the city, although no one and nothing prevents them from cleaning up the Donetsk region from terrorist groups, but apparently the Kremlin is against it. Could this be revenge on the DNR for the referendum in 14??? Easily. There is even a version that Putin was only interested in Crimea in the Kremlin.
  4. duschman80-81 Offline duschman80-81
    duschman80-81 (Sergei) 8 June 2022 10: 33
    +2
    Listen less to Peskov and various "experts" ... very harmful.
    1. goncharov.62 Offline goncharov.62
      goncharov.62 (Andrei) 8 June 2022 11: 54
      +1
      He is at court... And if He Himself is silent, then... "The trembling of my left calf is a great sign!" (Buonaparte)
  5. steelmaker Offline steelmaker
    steelmaker 8 June 2022 10: 59
    +11
    Moscow's information policy must change radically,

    You would have offered them to repent for the collapse of the USSR. You write articles like this more often. And the more facts showing the mediocrity of power, the less sycophants there will be and the greater the desire to change mediocre people in power.
    Maybe Russia does not need all of Ukraine, but it is necessary to take all of it. In order to have the opportunity to bargain and it is only Western Ukraine. We need to keep in mind the land corridor to Kaliningrad. And bargaining with Western Ukraine is appropriate here!
    1. goncharov.62 Offline goncharov.62
      goncharov.62 (Andrei) 8 June 2022 11: 56
      +2
      And Poland should still deserve it! Well, like a dog for candy. And they are no strangers to dancing "zigel-zigel-ai-lulu" on their hind legs ...
    2. Pavel N Offline Pavel N
      Pavel N (Paul) 9 June 2022 08: 28
      0
      "more often ..." is spelled together
  6. Griffith Offline Griffith
    Griffith (Oleg) 8 June 2022 11: 06
    +11
    I won't be surprised if Russia gives up everything, except for the Lugansk and Donetsk regions. Let me explain. From the 90s to the present day, several million, if not a dozen, people have been living in Russia on the money of the West, and these people have influence on the politics, culture, and economy of Russia. And they will be nekamilfo until the end of his life and their children's life to be enemies of the West. But it is not unprofitable for them to be an enemy of Russia.
    1. Colonel Kudasov Offline Colonel Kudasov
      Colonel Kudasov (Boris) 8 June 2022 11: 20
      +1
      But what about Putin? He has the last word
    2. goncharov.62 Offline goncharov.62
      goncharov.62 (Andrei) 8 June 2022 12: 01
      +1
      Such frills will be very sad for ... Himself ...
  7. Ingvar7 Offline Ingvar7
    Ingvar7 (Ingvar Miller) 8 June 2022 12: 25
    -2
    The interpretations of self-proclaimed experts bring confusion. There is no unrest in the army, judging by the deeds.
  8. Sergey Latyshev Offline Sergey Latyshev
    Sergey Latyshev (Serge) 8 June 2022 13: 17
    +1
    If you believe all sorts of promises literally, like simpletons, then they bring confusion.

    And if you remember that the 21st century, imperialism, it must expand, and, for example, export coal and metal from the LDNR with a poor population, without investing in development, then everything adds up 100%
  9. ficshr Offline ficshr
    ficshr (Nikolai Anisimov) 8 June 2022 14: 43
    +4
    It is bitter and shameful to realize that the leadership of the Russian Federation is still capable of surrendering the liberated and liberated territories. There are still no clear and precise positions about their structure and belonging. Especially against the backdrop of all sorts of ceasefire negotiations. Resentment stifles for our fallen and warring warriors.
    1. Evdokimov Sergey Yurievich 8 June 2022 21: 05
      0
      This was an intelligence mistake or the government did not believe her, they decided that Medvedchuk, maybe someone else would quickly concoct a coup, do not underestimate the states, you need to learn from them. Then we will be able to manage the former republics. Therefore, they quickly fled. We replaced the commander well, now we are moving confidently. We are sharpening the building like termites, the house is still standing, but not for long.
  10. vlad127490 Offline vlad127490
    vlad127490 (Vlad Gor) 8 June 2022 16: 22
    +3
    All the statements of the Russian authorities are coordinated among themselves, it only seems that the statements are chaotic, in fact it is a controlled chaos aimed at orienting that everything was planned by the Kremlin and the plan was 100% fulfilled by the Kremlin. And the fact that the Russian people have brains from the NWO in a flash, because it was so conceived. When the people have brains, as in Krylov's fable, a swan, a cancer and a pike, this is good for the authorities.
    1. Evdokimov Sergey Yurievich 8 June 2022 20: 55
      +5
      Most of the leaders are pro-Western, they are fighting under pressure, the West has boarded up the gate for them, there is nowhere to go.
  11. NikolayN Offline NikolayN
    NikolayN (Nikolai) 8 June 2022 16: 26
    +1
    So I didn't understand what was wrong. The denazification and demilitarization of Ukraine means that it (Ukraine) will no longer exist. This is the goal of the whole.
    1. Evdokimov Sergey Yurievich 8 June 2022 20: 56
      +6
      If Ukraine remains, there will be no Russia, only a matter of time.
      1. Igor Viktorovich Berdin 9 June 2022 12: 13
        -1
        I agree completely. There cannot be a number of Russia and Anti-Russia. Ukraine under the control of the West is in any case Anti-Russia. And there is no big difference, 27 areas there or only one. 27 areas will be armed with tanks and guns .. 1 area will be armed with nuclear weapons. Ukraine should not be independent from Russia. As well as in Belarus. If Belarus becomes pro-Western, it will immediately become Anti-Russia. Therefore, go to Transnistria. Galicia can be given to Poland. Then it will already be a headache for Poland and to answer it, if anything. Well, and Transcarpathia in Hungary. Sev.Bukovina Romania. Independent Ukraine should not be.
  12. Dust Offline Dust
    Dust (Sergei) 8 June 2022 18: 29
    +3
    Here is Peskov, he is just Putin's personal secretary. The figure is completely dependent. He's not stupid enough to speak his mind. Most likely he expresses the point of view of Putin. And then they look at how the people in Russia react.
    1. Evdokimov Sergey Yurievich 8 June 2022 20: 47
      0
      Putin himself said that Peskov sometimes carries such nonsense.
      1. Dingo Offline Dingo
        Dingo (Victor) 8 June 2022 21: 46
        +1
        ... not nonsense - a snowstorm ... (literally - "a snowstorm sweeps").
  13. Evdokimov Sergey Yurievich 8 June 2022 20: 46
    +3
    Give only Galicia and then to the Hungarians, otherwise in the future there will be war again, but with Germany. As long as the state created by Russia - Ukraine exists, we will not have peace. The West will always have a reason to attack us. Galicia was part of Austria-Hungary. Finally understand , we are talking about the complete destruction of Russia. The main enemy is the United States, and he began his chess game - Ukraine, Poland, then Germany. Putin already made a mistake in 2014, if we repeat it, it will be fatal for us. In my opinion, it is necessary to replace the leadership MIDA. Otherwise, there will be only negotiations. Lavrov is like our soldier on the front line, who instead of fighting, drags wounded enemies. or he will destroy you!!!
  14. FGJCNJK Offline FGJCNJK
    FGJCNJK (Nikolai) 9 June 2022 07: 10
    +2
    Quote from: guepe
    And Putin is silent

    So that's where the wind blows from! Was it not from there that orders were given 8 years ago to stop the advance of Lugansk and Donetsk in their desire to go to Kyiv? Muddy, oh muddy at the very, very top, and why are the best sons of Russia dying? Will Kadyrov also swallow this "fruit of the mind" of the Kremlin inmates? Will the Chechens forgive the betrayal of the interests of their people and all other peoples of Russia? So Peskov? Oh well!
  15. The comment was deleted.
  16. The comment was deleted.
  17. weddu Offline weddu
    weddu (Kolya) 11 June 2022 11: 07
    0
    Turchak and Slutsky are not the authorities, but the leaders of competing parties and parliamentarians, they only express their personal opinion, and Turchak and Slutsky cannot make uncoordinated statements on behalf of the party, although this was common in the Liberal Democratic Party). By making populist statements, they only draw attention to themselves, trying to increase their rating not even in their own parties, but among the masses. Even the Minister of Foreign Affairs regarding NWO can only voice the position of his country regarding the conflict. The president, the minister of defense, the chief of the general staff, the official representative of the ministry of defense can make official statements on the NVO... The fate of post-war Ukraine is decided by the president and members of the Security Council of the Russian Federation.
  18. Zhenya Gurdjieff (Zhenya Gurdjieff) 12 June 2022 13: 42
    0
    Quote: goncharov.62
    Such frills will be very sad for ... Himself ...

    I remember how angry Boris Berezovsky said such words in his car, leaving the Kremlin))
    The words were something like this: he will be swept away, he will not stay in power!
  19. ficshr Offline ficshr
    ficshr (Nikolai Anisimov) 13 June 2022 09: 28
    0
    I fully share the fears of the AUTHOR. Everything can be expected from our compassionate (I hope not military) authorities, from meanness to betrayal. If there is a surrender of the liberated territories, they will not be forgiven from the peoples of the Russian Federation forever and ever.