Strikes around the world: NATO predicted a "destructive reaction" of Russia in case of intervention in Ukraine


After the start of the Russian special operation in Ukraine, hostilities between Moscow and the NATO bloc may become a reality. Publicist Robert Hunter wrote about this in an article for the American electronic magazine American Thinker.


The author notes that on February 24, the RF Armed Forces attacked Ukrainian territory from several sides, but met with serious resistance from the Armed Forces of Ukraine. After that, the Russians changed tactics and began to slowly but methodically push the Ukrainians.

The outlook for Ukraine is grim. Russia seems bound to win, albeit with heavy losses and massive damage to Ukraine's infrastructure and population.

- stated in the material.

Hunter clarified that the countries of the Western world were not sitting idly by. Now the Russian Federation is the most sanctioned state on the planet. Washington is transmitting intelligence to Kyiv, military personnel of the Armed Forces of Ukraine are being trained in NATO countries and there are probably alliance advisers on Ukrainian soil. The United States has provided Ukraine with gigantic aid worth tens of billions of dollars. Other Western countries are also helping Ukraine in any way they can.

But even in this case, NATO support is unlikely to prevent the Russian Federation from winning. As a result, pressure is mounting for American-led intervention. The outbreak of hostilities between Russia and NATO is now quite real

- explains the author.

Hunter believes that a successful NATO intervention in Ukraine is militarily impossible. The fighting will cause monstrous damage to the infrastructure of the alliance and the economy Europe, and will also lead to the death of many thousands of troops from Western countries. At the same time, Moscow can strike all over the world, while Washington has too few forces and means in Europe. Therefore, the United States will begin to think about the use of nuclear weapons against the Russian Federation to correct the situation in their favor.

Such a forecast of the military situation may seem apocalyptic, it is confirmed by the facts. The balance of power in Eastern Europe is in most cases in favor of the Kremlin, despite months of fighting in Ukraine

- he is sure.

Russia, with the help of its air defense and electronic warfare / electronic warfare systems, can block the airspace. Therefore, NATO does not have to talk about superiority in the sky, and without this, all ground armies will be destroyed, given the incredible firepower of the cannon and rocket artillery of the RF Armed Forces, and no professionalism will help Western soldiers here. Everything will be decided by the number of shells fired per square kilometer.

There are simply no resources for this, which puts the troops of NATO countries at a disadvantage in the event of a war. The Alliance is plotting disaster by considering military intervention under these conditions, not to mention escalating tensions by pouring arms and money into a doomed cause. Russia's response to the fighting will be devastating

- he stressed.

Hunter comes to the conclusion that the Russian Federation and NATO are now balancing on the edge of an existential trap. An alliance victory in any war against the Russian Federation in Europe is unlikely without nuclear weapons. At the same time, the defeat of the West is quite possible. Therefore, the United States must do everything to avoid such a development of events, abandoning any intention to intervene, refraining from arming the Armed Forces of Ukraine and calling on Moscow and Kyiv to negotiate. In his opinion, there is too little time left to prevent the worst crisis since the end of World War II.
7 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Praskovya Offline Praskovya
    Praskovya (Praskovya) 7 June 2022 13: 20
    -4
    Seeing the words and the real reaction of the government to the Western intervention in the special operation, I can only assume one thing - in the event of NATO intervention in the special operation in Ukraine, ours, as usual, will only be able to express their CONCERN. What did ours promise in the event of the entry of NATO troops into Ukraine? So what? The Poles are already in Ukraine.
  2. Bulanov Offline Bulanov
    Bulanov (Vladimir) 7 June 2022 13: 22
    +9
    First, the West, in the person of the Freemasons, overthrew the tsar in Russia, then imposed the Bolsheviks, who divided Russia into "republics", and then destroyed the USSR and began to pit these "republics" against each other, influencing some of them. And now the West is talking about its democracy and Russian aggression?
    So, when Georgia or Ukraine separates from the USSR, then this is good, but when Abkhazia and South Ossetia separate from Georgia or Crimea and the LDNR from Ukraine, then this is bad? Does the West like this? And when, despite the positive referendum in March 1991 on the preservation of the USSR, the country was nevertheless destroyed, then this is democracy?
  3. Jacques sekavar Offline Jacques sekavar
    Jacques sekavar (Jacques Sekavar) 7 June 2022 14: 10
    +1
    Initially, there were talks about non-expansion of NATO and a return to the borders of 1979, it has expanded and is building up troops on the border of the union state, which greatly worries A.G. Lukashenko.
    Then there was talk about the demilitarization and denazification of Ukraine, militarization and nazification acquired the status of state policy - weapons are supplied in unprecedented volumes and more and more modern over time, and they want to increase the size of the army to 700.
    Today they are talking about protecting the population of the DPR-LPR, however, shelling of the capital of Donbass after the start of the NWO only intensifies and now they are shelling not only the front-line areas, but the entire city.
    We started negotiations with the nationalists about denazification - so that they denazify themselves, and the territories occupied in the NWO are the subject of bargaining in these negotiations?
    Lavrov, a member of the Russian Security Council, says that if they put in missiles with a range of 500 km, then the Russian troops will advance the same distance deep into Ukrainian territory - but what about demilitarization with denazification, which are impossible without the occupation of all of Ukraine and a change in the state system?
    1. Jacques sekavar Offline Jacques sekavar
      Jacques sekavar (Jacques Sekavar) 7 June 2022 14: 18
      0
      And yet, the Russian Federation, according to Mr. Medinsky, does not seem to object to Ukraine's entry into the EU, and the EU is almost 100% composed of NATO members. Therefore, the EU and NATO are two sides of the same coin, and in practice this means nothing more than the consent of the Russian Federation to Ukraine's entry into NATO.
      1. GIS Offline GIS
        GIS (Ildus) 8 June 2022 08: 40
        0
        Quote: Jacques Sekavar
        And yet, the Russian Federation, as it were, according to Mr. Medinsky, does not object to Ukraine's entry into the EU,

        this is trolling. as well as with grain through mariupol or belarus
    2. GIS Offline GIS
      GIS (Ildus) 8 June 2022 08: 39
      0
      a lot of bukufff....
      I don't understand what you wanted to say
      CBO is on, the backbone is being ground to pieces. soon a fluffy animal will come to the EU and Ukraine that will make them take a fresh look at some things. GSH Armed Forces of the Russian Federation operates according to the situation, but the goal has not changed. When traveling from point A to point B, can you use different routes or cross over gullies and ditches?
  4. Yuriy88 Offline Yuriy88
    Yuriy88 (Yuri) 9 June 2022 13: 47
    +2
    in case They attack us with the whole World We will answer Them with blows all over the World. If they stop completely complying with the rules, what rules can be for us .. ??? All in the stone age .. all ..!