Ukraine has lost a strategically important way of supplying Western weapons


A month ago British intelligence warned Kyiv that the Russian Armed Forces are going to cut off the Armed Forces of Ukraine from the supply of Western weapons. In response, the Ukrainian authorities reported on the strengthening of the most important Beskydy railway tunnel with air defense systems. Late on the evening of June 1, the leaders of the Lviv region informed the public that Russian troops had attacked one of the transport infrastructure facilities, and the Ukrainian Ministry of Internal Affairs clarified that the missiles had hit and damaged the aforementioned tunnel in the Carpathians.


It should be noted that the Beskydy Tunnel was not only of great importance in the logistics supply chains from the West. More than 60% of cargo from Ukrainian territory to Europe went through it. It is located between the Beskid station (Lviv region) and the Skotarskoe station (Transcarpathian region). Thus, Ukraine has lost a strategically important way of supplying Western weapons and its own exports.

However, it is not yet clear how badly the tunnel, which has several passages, was damaged, and how long it will take for restoration work. It should be added that at the same time a large railway junction in Stryi (Lviv region) came under attack, which will further complicate the logistics.

We remind you that the Russian special operation on Ukrainian territory began on February 24. According to the assurances of the military-political leadership of the Russian Federation, the NMD will not stop until all the intended goals are fully achieved.
38 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Igor Viktorovich Berdin 2 June 2022 11: 34
    -1
    Restore means to strike with tactical nuclear weapons. They are worse than enemies. They are traitors.
    1. Oleg Rambover Offline Oleg Rambover
      Oleg Rambover (Oleg Pitersky) 2 June 2022 12: 52
      -3
      The use of nuclear weapons is insanity. Whoever uses it will become the Hitler of the XNUMXst century.
      1. guest Offline guest
        guest 2 June 2022 13: 01
        +6
        But your American masters used such weapons.
      2. isofat Offline isofat
        isofat (isofat) 2 June 2022 16: 53
        +4
        Quote: Oleg Rambover
        The use of nuclear weapons is insanity. Whoever uses it will become the Hitler of the XNUMXst century.

        Oleg Rambover, this place is firmly held by the United States. They used their nuclear weapons back in 1945, perpetrating the Holocaust of civilians in Japan. And since then, they have not taken away his place of Hitler. laughing
    2. Just a cat Offline Just a cat
      Just a cat (Bayun) 2 June 2022 13: 16
      0
      they are Ukrainians laughing dealt with the bridge near moisha from odessa without nuclear weapons and stupid advice
  2. zzdimk Offline zzdimk
    zzdimk 2 June 2022 11: 51
    0
    No confirmation. Not yet
    1. guest Offline guest
      guest 2 June 2022 12: 53
      0
      09:36 Russian Aerospace Forces launched a missile attack on the Beskydy railway tunnel, which passes through the Carpathians in the Lviv region, - Advisor to the Minister of Internal Affairs of Ukraine Anton Gerashchenko.
  3. Teacher Offline Teacher
    Teacher (Wise) 2 June 2022 12: 37
    -3
    Looking at the course of the NMD and how the General Staff of the Russian Federation works (entry-exit, occupied-withdrew, wrong directions of strikes, disasters at crossings and conducting columns), at the rapid re-equipment of the Armed Forces of Ukraine with Western weapons, I begin to lean towards the idea of ​​using tactical nuclear weapons. The war in Japan ended very quickly after Hiroshima.
    It should be used only in western Ukraine. If tactical nuclear weapons were used at the Yavoriv test site in April, I think so. it would all be over. Not a single mercenary would come for sure.
    And the rabid West would have quieted down. Now, seeing the endless empty threats of Moscow, everyone understood everything - Russian weaklings, you can try to fill up.
    And they will push you against the wall. By the time it gets to the "concerned" Kremlin, Russia will have lost tens of thousands of its sons.
    1. Expert_Analyst_Forecaster 2 June 2022 12: 54
      -1
      It should be used only in western Ukraine.

      Why in Western Ukraine? And why only tactical? And where to hit?
      All these sage teachers are just children compared to the experts. They forcefully squeeze out some kind of semi-reworked idea and mentally call themselves a genius.

      We must first warn. Officially and as widely as possible. As soon as any city that is controlled by Russia is fired from American weapons, there will be a nuclear strike on the twenty largest urban agglomerations of Poland (for starters). Do all the preparatory work in order to destroy these targets with certainty and even with a guarantee.

      That's from this and dance. Let the US choose.
      We can stop the war to destroy Russia only by the threat of a powerful nuclear strike. And not only in Poland. Poland is a warning shot. .
      1. Serzh Offline Serzh
        Serzh (Sergey Ilyich) 2 June 2022 14: 58
        +1
        Don't you see the big picture? Do you seriously think that someone is trying to stop or warn someone? Don't you realize that this card has long been played? It will be as it should be and in no case otherwise!
    2. Oleg Rambover Offline Oleg Rambover
      Oleg Rambover (Oleg Pitersky) 2 June 2022 12: 54
      -5
      Quote: Teacher
      I'm starting to lean towards the idea of ​​using tactical nuclear weapons.

      In addition to being insane, it means signing the weakness of the RF Armed Forces. And you already talked about the article.
  4. Expert_Analyst_Forecaster 2 June 2022 13: 00
    -1
    Quote: Oleg Rambover
    And you already talked about the article.

    Well, yes, slander on the General Staff of the Russian Federation wink
    By the way, Olezhek also goes under the article. The use of nuclear weapons cannot speak of the weakness of the Russian army. So he slanders again, servant of the bourgeoisie.
  5. Teacher Offline Teacher
    Teacher (Wise) 2 June 2022 13: 08
    -1
    Why in Western Ukraine? And why only tactical? And where to hit?
    Firstly, it is as far as possible from the Russian Federation and the liberated regions;
    secondly, tactical, because you still feel sorry for people:
    thirdly, at least along the same tunnel - the collapse of the railway. the minimum number of human victims, a guarantee of the impossibility of repair;
    fourthly, Poland will not go there (everyone will understand the determination of the Russian Federation);
    Fifthly, tactical nuclear weapons are still very local in the affected area.
    1. Expert_Analyst_Forecaster 2 June 2022 13: 23
      -1
      The tunnel is good, but it seems to be how well it is protected. So it's not a fact that it will be possible to hit him.

      About the farthest. There is a large industrial area near Krakow. It is located much further from the Russian Federation (and by the way from Belarus). Why not bang this area?

      You feel sorry for the people. Strange, but it looks like you feel sorry for the Poles than the inhabitants of b. Ukraine. But for me it's the other way around.

      Poland will not turn up? I think that after the destruction of Krakow and its environs, this is a more weighty argument. And about the determination of the Russian Federation (and opportunities) will say much more. By the way, the Czech Republic is not far away. Which is nice too.

      Well, you forget one more thing. Why do we need to hit our territory with nuclear weapons?
  6. Gadley Offline Gadley
    Gadley 2 June 2022 14: 22
    +5
    The fact that the tunnel was damaged is good. Extra weapons at the front are not needed.
  7. Teacher Offline Teacher
    Teacher (Wise) 2 June 2022 14: 50
    -4
    Yes, I would be glad both in Poland and in Romania with the Czechs. But. This is NATO. We are here, we can’t cope with the three times laughed at by the Armed Forces of Ukraine. And NATO has thousands of aircraft and missiles.
    If on March 13, 2022, a tactical poison was applied to the Yavorovsky training ground. blow, then the CBO would have ended by now.
    Firstly, the US and everyone else is in shock, there would be no military assistance to Ukraine after such a warning;
    secondly, paradoxically, there would also be fewer sanctions (they are afraid, so they respect);
    thirdly, not a single mercenary would go to a country where he can evaporate in the epicenter of a poisonous explosion;
    Fourthly, voluntary terrorist battalions could be forgotten; and about the stability in the defense of the Armed Forces of Ukraine - too.
    1. Expert_Analyst_Forecaster 2 June 2022 17: 57
      +5
      Quote: Teacher
      If on March 13, 2022, a tactical poison was applied to the Yavorovsky training ground. blow, then the CBO would have ended by now.
      First, the US and everyone else is shocked

      Strange logic. Let's strike with a tactical nuclear charge on our own land - and NATO will be in shock.
      If we destroy a large area in Poland, then we need to be afraid: And NATO has thousands of aircraft and missiles.

      NATO should be hung with a nuclear axe. As in the days of the Soviet Union. The balance of fear. Neither the Warsaw Pact nor NATO crossed the red lines. Because there was no doubt that a nuclear strike would be delivered. Massive and inevitable.

      Now provocateurs of various stripes are trying to instill into our consciousness that Russia should not use nuclear weapons. Under no circumstances. Otherwise, they say, we will be destroyed.
      The fact that we will definitely be destroyed if we are not ready to use nuclear weapons, these creatures are silent. These believe that someone will filter the inhabitants of Russia. They say the fifth column and holders of Israeli passports can count on good positions in the colonial administration.
      These are just stupid. They will destroy everyone who does not have time to hide. Submissive and hardworking Asians will be brought to the lands of Russia. They will work hard and conscientiously and extract cheap resources for the white masters.
  8. k7k8 Online k7k8
    k7k8 (vic) 2 June 2022 18: 13
    +3
    Quote: Teacher
    I'm starting to lean towards the idea of ​​using tactical nuclear weapons

    Quote: Igor Viktorovich Berdin
    Restored means to strike with tactical nuclear weapons.

    Quote: Expert_Analyst_Forecaster
    only the threat of a powerful nuclear strike

    Where do you grow these? Do you have any idea what nuclear weapons are? I'm sure not. Otherwise, you are all provocateur vulgaris.
    1. Vox Populi Offline Vox Populi
      Vox Populi (vox populi) 2 June 2022 19: 28
      +2
      I don’t know what to think either: who are these “beautiful” commentators brandishing virtual nuclear batons? Really provocateurs or absolutely narrow-minded, but extremely militant-minded inhabitants, or are they not all right with the psyche?!
  9. aslanxnumx Offline aslanxnumx
    aslanxnumx (Aslan) 2 June 2022 20: 08
    +3
    And without nuclear weapons, Russia could demolish all of western Ukraine. This requires the determination of the leadership to end the war with a complete victory over Ukraine.
  10. Neville Stator Offline Neville Stator
    Neville Stator (Neville Stator) 2 June 2022 20: 46
    +1
    An extraordinary blow. It is very necessary to periodically bomb the tunnel. Keep attacking road and rail targets in general. Ukrainian industry and other sectors of the economy must be bombed.
  11. kalita Offline kalita
    kalita (Alexander) 2 June 2022 21: 15
    +1
    It must be hammered with a dagger from above so that it pierces through and explodes inside.
    1. k7k8 Online k7k8
      k7k8 (vic) 2 June 2022 21: 37
      +1
      As I understand it, we have another iksperd in front of us. Do you know a weapon capable of penetrating several hundred meters of rock? Would you go to learn lessons.
  12. cooper Offline cooper
    cooper (Alexander) 2 June 2022 21: 40
    +1
    I will never believe that Russia does not have technological weapons capable of either destroying this tunnel or permanently putting it out of action. So what's the matter, the Ministry of Defense and the Supreme??
  13. Observer2014 Offline Observer2014
    Observer2014 2 June 2022 23: 37
    +1
    Ukraine has lost a strategically important way of supplying Western weapons

    And why only him? Is he, this strategic delivery route only one?
  14. Expert_Analyst_Forecaster 3 June 2022 04: 33
    -1
    Quote: k7k8
    Do you have any idea what nuclear weapons are? I'm sure not.

    I think I have a better idea of ​​what nuclear weapons are than you. Just because I have education - physics. Not a philologist like you.
    But the fifth column in your person is simply trying to divert the conversation towards oohs and sighs for poor NATO members. You are interested either in our defeat, with subsequent destruction. Or in our destruction with subsequent defeat.
    Although it is possible that you are just another provocateur from the b. Ukraine. Another "fighter" of the propaganda front. There are a lot of them on the site too.

    I remember in 2014 the inhabitants of b. Ukraine announced three (!!) social networks that they will create. Moreover, only two languages ​​will be used - Ukrainian and English (languages ​​for slaves and masters). But time has passed and something is not heard about these social networks. Therefore, residents b. Ukraine got into the habit of shitting on our websites and our networks. Which characterizes them well.
    1. guest Offline guest
      guest 4 June 2022 01: 23
      0
      Come on, these schizoids demand to ban the Russian language, but they themselves communicate only in Russian in all geyropas.
  15. cooper Offline cooper
    cooper (Alexander) 3 June 2022 07: 45
    0
    Losers for life.. wink
  16. Muscool Offline Muscool
    Muscool (Glory) 3 June 2022 08: 10
    -1
    Quote: isofat
    Quote: Oleg Rambover
    The use of nuclear weapons is insanity. Whoever uses it will become the Hitler of the XNUMXst century.

    Oleg Rambover, this place is firmly held by the United States. They used their nuclear weapons back in 1945, perpetrating the Holocaust of civilians in Japan. laughing

    Hiroshima at that time is the center of army warehouses, a military port and the location of the general headquarters of the Navy and the Second Army
  17. k7k8 Online k7k8
    k7k8 (vic) 3 June 2022 08: 43
    +1
    Quote: Expert_Analyst_Forecaster
    Just because my education is physics

    I do not argue that you can know better than me the principle of operation of nuclear weapons, you can know how conditions are created for an uncontrolled chain reaction. But this is far from enough to understand the consequences of the use of nuclear weapons (political, economic, military-strategic, environmental, etc.). And you will not be able to calculate even the environmental consequences of the damaging factors of a nuclear explosion (I hope you know what it is) - neither the radii of the shock wave, nor the zones of radioactive contamination, nor the configuration of the trace of the radioactive cloud, nor the consequences of the outbreak of a nuclear explosion and EMP.

    Quote: Expert_Analyst_Forecaster
    And not a philologist like you

    You are absolutely right. I am fluent in two languages ​​- Russian and obscene command. The second studied in the nuclear missile bursa and gave the Strategic Missile Forces 22 years of his life.
    The rest of your verbal diarrhea is not even worth considering (although I had to read it). By the way, how sideways is the mention of someone else's social networks here? As for the promises, Roskosmos beat itself in the chest with its heel that in 2016 a manned station would start working on the Moon on a permanent basis. And as a result, there is not even a working sample of the ship.
    Z.Y. If you know at least a little history, you should remember that it was the military that prevented the use of nuclear weapons in the Korean War, which was advocated by civilian politicians. It was the developers of nuclear weapons (both in our country and in the United States) who were the first to advocate its total ban. Here they were real physicists, unlike you.
    1. Expert_Analyst_Forecaster 3 June 2022 09: 10
      -2
      Blah blah blah.
      1. k7k8 Online k7k8
        k7k8 (vic) 3 June 2022 10: 00
        +2
        Expert. Analytical. Predictive. Congratulations.
        1. Expert_Analyst_Forecaster 3 June 2022 10: 52
          -2
          You have no arguments. All you can do is blah blah blah. Philologist, what to take from him?
          1. k7k8 Online k7k8
            k7k8 (vic) 3 June 2022 13: 25
            +1
            Arguments that have weight are available only to those who make decisions. Your arguments are



            That's right, local banderlog pinch you
    2. Bakht Online Bakht
      Bakht (Bakhtiyar) 3 June 2022 23: 53
      +1
      If you know at least a little history, you should remember that it was the military that prevented the use of nuclear weapons in the Korean War, which was advocated by civilian politicians.

      Necessary clarification on history.
      It was the military who advocated the use of nuclear weapons in the Korean War. And civil politicians did not allow this. There are no data on the Soviet side. But from the American side it was just that.
  18. Andrey petrov_3 Offline Andrey petrov_3
    Andrey petrov_3 (Andrey Petrov) 4 June 2022 07: 46
    +2
    Germany in 1940 dealt with France (and at the same time with Belgium and Holland) in just a month without any nuclear weapons. And Ukraine is such a powerful adversary for Russia that without nuclear weapons it cannot be dealt with in any way? You just need to fight for real, and not chew snot, as near Kyiv, Kharkov and the Donbass. And if the army does not know how to fight, or the generals are fools, then no nuclear weapons will help ...
  19. k7k8 Online k7k8
    k7k8 (vic) 4 June 2022 09: 13
    0
    Quote: Bakht
    Necessary clarification on history.

    Thanks for the clarification. To be more precise, yes, some part of the US generals were thinking about launching nuclear strikes on Korea to, so to speak, raise the morale of their army (and along with the allies). But there were more sensible people both among politicians and among the military. I hope that our leadership will have enough restraint not to fall into a nuclear conflict.
  20. Mks7 Offline Mks7
    Mks7 (Maksim) 4 June 2022 09: 38
    +1
    It is impossible to fill up such a tunnel with a caliber. And Russia, which applied the tact of nuclear weapons, will become a global evil and there is no need to remember Hiroshima, it will not work.
  21. Mks7 Offline Mks7
    Mks7 (Maksim) 4 June 2022 10: 12
    0
    Quote: guest
    But your American masters used such weapons.

    The media shape the perception of events and historical memory. Who oversees the global media is understandable. What reality will be created in response to Russia's use of nuclear weapons is also clear. The use of nuclear weapons is not seriously considered even if the company loses in Ukraine. And by the way, today young Germans believe that it was the USSR that barbarously destroyed Dresden with civilians, young Japanese believe that the USSR burned Hiroshima and Nagasaki nuclear weapons.