Kiev accused Moscow of deploying nuclear weapons in Crimea
The “pan” department of Klimkin, which for some misunderstanding is also called the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Ukraine, has broken another bottom in terms of its “analytics”. They suspect that Russia has deployed nuclear weapons in Crimea.
The Minister in worn jeans, with no passing sadness in March 2014, said that Crimea had turned into one large Russian military base. And he has reasonable suspicions that there might be nuclear weapons, or at least infrastructure for him.
After which he pointedly added that it was from the territory of Crimea that military supplies equipment to Syria. Now Kiev is feverishly preparing a draft resolution for the UN General Assembly on the “militarization” of the peninsula and the planet will inevitably shudder from Russia's “aggressiveness”.
And do not look for logic in the words of the Ukrainian “patriot,” especially when it links the deployment of nuclear weapons in Crimea and the supply of military equipment to Syria. She is simply not there, she is absent. So do not expect from him documentary evidence of all this "validity." This is a usual concussion in the favorite Russophobian style.
There is no nuclear weapon in the Crimea, since there is no practical sense in keeping it there. However, if Russia wants to place it on the peninsula, then no one will be able to ban it or prevent it. Since, in accordance with the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT), Russia is a country with the corresponding potential. Consequently, on its territory, it can place it, and anytime, anywhere.
The Minister in worn jeans, with no passing sadness in March 2014, said that Crimea had turned into one large Russian military base. And he has reasonable suspicions that there might be nuclear weapons, or at least infrastructure for him.
After which he pointedly added that it was from the territory of Crimea that military supplies equipment to Syria. Now Kiev is feverishly preparing a draft resolution for the UN General Assembly on the “militarization” of the peninsula and the planet will inevitably shudder from Russia's “aggressiveness”.
And do not look for logic in the words of the Ukrainian “patriot,” especially when it links the deployment of nuclear weapons in Crimea and the supply of military equipment to Syria. She is simply not there, she is absent. So do not expect from him documentary evidence of all this "validity." This is a usual concussion in the favorite Russophobian style.
There is no nuclear weapon in the Crimea, since there is no practical sense in keeping it there. However, if Russia wants to place it on the peninsula, then no one will be able to ban it or prevent it. Since, in accordance with the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT), Russia is a country with the corresponding potential. Consequently, on its territory, it can place it, and anytime, anywhere.
- https://zen.yandex.ru/
Information