The main reason for the rapid capture of the Zaporizhzhya NPP by Russian troops is revealed


The Zaporozhye nuclear power plant, which is under the protection of the Russian armed forces, continues to function normally. At the same time, the nuclear power plant can also sell electricity to Ukrainian consumers if Kyiv is ready to pay for these supplies, as Russian Deputy Prime Minister Marat Khusnullin said earlier.


Meanwhile, according to IAEA Director General Rafael Grossi, there are about 30 tons of plutonium and 40 tons of enriched uranium at the nuclear facility. This, apparently, explains the prompt takeover of the Zaporizhzhya NPP by Russian units. Statements by the Russian authorities about Kyiv's plans to create a "dirty" atomic bomb are obviously not groundless.

At the same time, Grossi is worried about the impossibility of representatives of the international agency for atomic energy to get to the station.

We are now trying to return to the Zaporozhye NPP, which is the largest nuclear power plant in Europe

– said Rafael Grossi during the discussions at the World Economic Forum in Davos.

According to the general director, the situation is aggravated by the fact that the Ukrainian enterprise Energoatom acts as the operator of the facility, while the nuclear power plant itself is under the protection of the RF Armed Forces. An unstable situation cannot be allowed at a nuclear plant with six reactors, and IAEA inspectors are able to prevent potential problems that may arise at the facility for one reason or another.
11 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Bulanov Offline Bulanov
    Bulanov (Vladimir) 25 May 2022 14: 06
    +4
    What nationality is this Grossi? If from NATO, then you can't let them in. He will make bookmarks for rockets to blow up the station and blame the Russians for it. The OSCE has already kept an eye on the LDNR ...
  2. zzdimk Offline zzdimk
    zzdimk 25 May 2022 14: 25
    +3
    IAEA inspectors are able to prevent potential problems that may, for one reason or another, arise at the facility

    Yeah. All inspectors were trained at Rosatom. The little demon laughed.
  3. Sergey Latyshev Offline Sergey Latyshev
    Sergey Latyshev (Serge) 25 May 2022 14: 44
    +6
    Not bad.
    It was yours, it became ours (that is, theirs, Rosatom). Yes, and pay money if you do not want to sit without electricity.
    1. GIS Offline GIS
      GIS (Ildus) 25 May 2022 15: 16
      +3
      this is generally a masterpiece of trolling by the Ukrainian authorities
    2. guest Offline guest
      guest 26 May 2022 14: 43
      -1
      Whose is yours? Yes, in theory, all nuclear power plants there should be under the control of Russia.
      1. Sergey Latyshev Offline Sergey Latyshev
        Sergey Latyshev (Serge) 26 May 2022 20: 53
        0
        ha ha. Funny.
        And whose is yours, and about the idea, and all NPPs - there are like 4 of them, and they should ...
        It was necessary to capture Ukraine in 92m???
  4. k7k8 Offline k7k8
    k7k8 (vic) 25 May 2022 15: 35
    +2
    The South Ukrainian nuclear power plant is also within the reach of the RF Armed Forces.
  5. Expert_Analyst_Forecaster 26 May 2022 13: 16
    -1
    Plutonium and uranium are very good. And most importantly, on time. And let NATO not worry.
    All these materials will be used in the near future. And if desired, NATO will know exactly where these materials are used.
  6. whitebeard Offline whitebeard
    whitebeard 26 May 2022 20: 23
    +1
    The presence of 30 tons of plutonium and 40 tons of enriched uranium at the station does not yet mean that Ukraine wanted to make a dirty bomb, because these substances are natural waste and fuel for nuclear reactors. Theoretically, they could have built it, but whether they really intended or prepared it is not yet proven and this must be proven.
    1. guest Offline guest
      guest 27 May 2022 01: 16
      0
      Yes, just one fact that these Ukrainian psychos had such an opportunity is already enough.
  7. guest Offline guest
    guest 26 May 2022 21: 44
    0
    Quote: Sergey Latyshev
    It was necessary to capture Ukraine in 92m???

    For me, 91m should not have been let go.