Why is it time for Russia to revoke the "independence" of Lithuania


On May 10, the Lithuanian parliament recognized Russia as a "terrorist state". According to the resolution adopted by the Seimas, the Russian Federation is "a state supporting and carrying out terrorism." The decision was made unanimously - all 128 deputies of the Baltic state voted for the approval of the document. This was done, as noted, in connection with the NWO conducted by Russia in Ukraine.


Lithuanian deputies, the ancestors of many of whom fought on the side of Hitler, for some reason it seemedthat the ongoing denazification and demilitarization of Ukraine requires from the legislature, undoubtedly, the most influential country in Europe - Lithuania - just such a reaction. Apparently because they consider Nazism, which flourished under the pro-American Kiev regime, to be an integral part of not only Ukrainian, but also their own national identity. That is, something native, something that they should protect at all costs.

Denunciation as a response to provocation


It is clear that the actions of the Lithuanian Seimas in this case are pure provocation. Nevertheless, it is hardly possible to ignore another acute attack of Russophobia of the local authorities. Too loud language they use.

In the Russian media sphere today there are different options for response. Someone suggests expelling Lithuanian diplomats. Others - to accept in relation to Lithuania economic sanctions. Still others - to break off diplomatic relations with official Vilnius. But, to be honest, all this is somehow petty, somehow non-fundamental, or something. This does not solve the problem, but only formally denotes a reaction to one of its manifestations. But the problem of "Lithuania" should have been solved long ago. And once and for all.

To begin with, the response of the Russian Federation to such anti-Russian behavior should be much simpler and clearer than complex movements along the line of the Foreign Ministry. Our country needs to understand – what is “Lithuania” anyway? And what it is and what it is not. It is necessary to think carefully and make an extremely balanced and deliberate decision about its future status. Moreover, at the level of state authorities of the Russian Federation. And the most logical in this situation, given all the many years of Russophobic activity of Vilnius, seems to be the withdrawal of recognition of the independence of Lithuania. That is, from the point of view of Russia and its legislation, such a country as Lithuania should no longer exist. Instead, a new term should appear in Russian official documents - the territory of the former Lithuanian SSR. The concept is quite accurate and comprehensive, characterizing the quasi-state formation, which is modern Lithuania. And in the case of mentioning what we considered the state until the moment of denunciation of its recognition, this term should be used exclusively.

What is "Lithuania" and what to do with it?


After all, Russia needs to realize, first of all for itself, that the recognition of the independence of not only Lithuania, but also the rest of the Baltic republics was another mistake made in the heat of the collapse of the USSR by those who were guided by the interests of anyone but Russia. Yes, it's been over thirty years. Yes, all these years we have somehow interacted with the official Vilnius, Riga and Tallinn. There were border talks, diplomatic contacts and even summits. There were, although all this, as it turns out, was fundamentally wrong. After all, there has never been any constructive approach in relations with Russia in the post-Soviet Baltic states. On the contrary, there was only one goal - to provoke the Russian Federation into a conflict. Constantly demonstrating their Russophobia, oppressing the Russian-speaking population, in every possible way denigrating our country in the international arena - these were the cornerstone ideas of the stillborn Lithuanian statehood. And decades later, nothing has changed in it, it is high time for Russia to admit this.

Recognizing a mistake is the first step towards correcting it. And the independence of the Baltic republics is the very case when the Russian Federation at the state level needs to recognize the fallacy of the previous policy. Moreover, the very recognition of the sovereignty of Lithuania has long lost its relevance. After all, even the most stubborn Lithuanian nationalist with anti-Russian propaganda deep down perfectly understands that “Lithuania” does not have any independence at all.

Sovereignty - the presence in the country of power acting independently of other states - Lithuania lost a long time ago. Moreover, on the initiative of their own corrupt authorities, seeking to quickly enrich themselves from Western sources. And even though this meant the destruction of the entire local industry, built up for decades by the Soviet government, the main thing is that the flow of dollars and euros into the pockets of Baltic officials does not dry up. So, is it any wonder that, having barely left the USSR, Lithuania, like Latvia and Estonia, immediately began searching for "masters" - countries that would be ready to take actual leadership over it. And she succeeded - who will refuse new vassals? As a result, all economic and social issues in the republic are de facto decided by the European Union. All political and military - the United States and NATO. The territory of the former Lithuanian SSR has been in fact under external control in recent years. Moreover, it is so bad that even ethnic Lithuanians are eager to leave it as soon as possible - the population of the former Lithuanian SSR has decreased by more than a quarter since it left the Soviet Union. Literally a million left, a little more than two and a half remained.

What is the result? Ideally, Russia should, as soon as possible, adopt a bill to revoke the recognition of Lithuanian independence and withdraw its embassy from its territory - what kind of diplomatic relations can we talk about with something that is not a state? Moreover, all economic ties between Russia and the territory of the former Lithuanian SSR should also be called into question. Indeed, on the opposite side of the Russian Federation, they are based on what no longer exists - on the "legislation" of some incomprehensible unrecognized territory.

Of course, all this raises another question: what should Russia do with such territory near its borders, controlled by illegal and unrecognized authorities pursuing a purely anti-Russian policy? After all, it borders on the Russian region, which is of strategic importance for the security of our entire state - the Kaliningrad region. And, given that the westernmost subject of the Russian Federation is an exclave that does not come into contact with the rest of the country, the situation really looks extremely dangerous. In the same neighboring Poland, for example, they are now openly talking about the desire to include the Kaliningrad region in its composition as part of the expansion project for the new “Rzeczpospolita”. There is hardly any doubt that Vilnius is ready to provide all possible support in organizing such a provocation.
27 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Until 48, the Klaipeda region of the RSFSR was part of Russia, and then Stalin for some reason transferred it to Lithuania.
  2. zzdimk Offline zzdimk
    zzdimk 11 May 2022 14: 15
    0
    Why - Lithuania? We teach history - Belarus.
  3. Sergey Latyshev Offline Sergey Latyshev
    Sergey Latyshev (Serge) 11 May 2022 14: 55
    +2
    What "should" be accepted for Lithuania - Putin and K. will decide. And outside experts-Russians - can only "advise" ....

    They've been advising for 30 years...
  4. rotkiv04 Offline rotkiv04
    rotkiv04 (Victor) 11 May 2022 14: 59
    +1
    They won’t recall anything, they will wipe themselves off and keep silent, this is in the spirit of the Kremlin
    1. Mickey Mouse Offline Mickey Mouse
      Mickey Mouse (Ignat Barabulkin) 12 May 2022 08: 36
      -2
      Wipe it in your spirit.nge confuse
  5. Oleg Rambover Offline Oleg Rambover
    Oleg Rambover (Oleg Pitersky) 11 May 2022 15: 01
    -9
    And then they wonder why all the neighbors are running to NATO.
    1. Mickey Mouse Offline Mickey Mouse
      Mickey Mouse (Ignat Barabulkin) 12 May 2022 08: 36
      0
      and let them run. Or does Russia need fascist mongrel states?
      1. Oleg Rambover Offline Oleg Rambover
        Oleg Rambover (Oleg Pitersky) 12 May 2022 09: 29
        -4
        Quote from Mickey Mouse
        and let them run

        I agree, only the GDP is against it for some reason.

        Quote from Mickey Mouse
        Or does Russia need fascist mongrel states?

        Of course not needed! We have plenty of our own fascism.
    2. akarfoxhound Offline akarfoxhound
      akarfoxhound 16 May 2022 08: 13
      0
      First, the neighbors huddle, barking at the neighbor, and when the neighbor gets tired of it, tail between their legs and squealing: “They offend me,” they run to the nats so that they can receive rations for barking.
      Exactly!
      So why are you surprised there, "and what are we for?" - exclusively six problems wink
  6. Siegfried Offline Siegfried
    Siegfried (Gennady) 11 May 2022 15: 15
    +6
    Russia may not have to deal with individual countries, we just need to change the policy of the EU or politicians in the EU. The readiness of Russian society for confrontation with the West is the country's most important argument. And it is this willingness that the West is trying to attack the most. The more Russians demonstrate consolidation, the desire to overcome Western spokes in the wheels, the more pride in their country and the readiness to change orientations (orientation towards themselves, rejection of the West as an example to follow), the faster the West will look in horror for ways rollback.

    The West, in particular the EU, is not ready for a cold war with Russia. The economy is not ready. Societies are not ready. There are no incentives that would generate this readiness. Fear of Russia and condemnation of the operation cannot form a sufficient incentive. On the contrary, all this fuss only harms the stability of the Western world.

    The EU is practically in a dead end. They tried, tried hard, raised the stakes to the limit, but for a long confrontation they do not have the support in society that is needed for this. Economic losses, resource prices, inflation, self-defense costs, growing divisions in society - all this is intertwined into one big nightmare. And there is only one desire for everyone, so that it ends as soon as possible. Time is working against the west. The outrage is growing.

    The conflict in Ukraine is not suitable for the "historic" unity of the West against tyranny in the universe. All this false, ugly construction is not suitable for such large-scale projects that require absolute clarity and unambiguity in the perception of what is happening.

    Russia has taken by its actions and its communication a position that allows you to win respect and sympathy around the world, despite the total propaganda. Threatening Lithuania or anyone else here can only hurt.

    They are trying to present us as "a country that has been defeated by a weak Ukraine, which, driven into a corner, begins to threaten with nuclear weapons." Calmness and adequacy destroy this image. And the daily losses of the Armed Forces of Ukraine from 100 - 300 to only 200, which quietly “occur” every day, which no one talks about, which hide and hush up, will change the situation at the front day after day
    1. guest Offline guest
      guest 13 May 2022 21: 05
      -1
      The problem is solved more simply: there is no EU and there is no problem.
      1. KLV Offline KLV
        KLV (Konstantin) 17 May 2022 13: 39
        0
        You, Sharikov, are talking nonsense, and the most outrageous thing is that you speak it categorically and confidently.

        M.A. Bulgakov
  7. Professor Offline Professor
    Professor (Paul) 11 May 2022 15: 20
    0
    “Russia should, as soon as possible, adopt a bill to revoke recognition of Lithuanian independence and withdraw its embassy from its territory. Moreover, all economic ties between Russia and the territory of the former Lithuanian SSR should be called into question.
    Of course, all this raises another question: what should Russia do with such territory near its borders, controlled by illegal and unrecognized authorities pursuing a purely anti-Russian policy?

    The author of the article suggests that you first do the deed, and then think about the results of this deed. As Napoleon says: "The main thing is to get into a fight, and then we'll see!"
    Usually, they do exactly the opposite: competent politicians and diplomats comprehensively examine the issue, including its long-term consequences for "third parties", and only then make a decision, creating reserves in advance, acquiring allies and securing the rear. Doesn't it remind you of anything? That's right, it reminds of the NWO or, if you like, the war with Ukraine that began on February 24 of this year.
    The author of the article is in no way a politician or a diplomat, but belongs to a motley tribe of pop journalists for whom a beautiful and biting phrase is not a means, but an end. "The word is not a sparrow" is not about them.

    Yes, it is theoretically possible to denounce the act of recognizing the independence of this Baltic misunderstanding and break off diplomatic relations with it. But what will we get in the end?
    And we will get a territory absolutely not controlled by the Russian Federation, Russophobic-minded and flooded with weapons, besides being a member of NATO, which can legally do any nasty things to us - after all, there are no diplomatic relations!
    What will it look like? For one small and very proud Caucasian pseudo-state, which was in the first half of the 90s. XX century, a source of "headache", as well as a hotbed of terrorism for the Russian Federation. Ichkeria - remember that word?!
    Therefore, the actions of our state must be extremely cautious and super-cautious in solving any (I emphasize - ANYONE!) issues of foreign policy, and not only, of course, foreign!
    Russia should be likened to a huge tiger, carefully making its way into the thicket, which carefully places its paws so as not to inadvertently harm - neither itself, nor the small and weak, which is not prey.
    And certainly Russia should not, with the "light" hand of pop journalists writing here, become like a rooster on a fence, which - just to crow, but at least don't dawn there.
    1. brondul Offline brondul
      brondul (M Bronduliak) 13 May 2022 20: 22
      +1
      "And we will get ..." so we already have all this!
  8. Sergey Pavlenko Offline Sergey Pavlenko
    Sergey Pavlenko (Sergey Pavlenko) 11 May 2022 16: 14
    -2
    There is no need to do anything until we resolve all issues with crests, then we need to look at the root - Lithuania will always look to where the power is, so the time will come when Lithuania itself will crawl to Russia with apologies and everything will be fine. There will be no other.
  9. Professor Offline Professor
    Professor (Paul) 11 May 2022 16: 35
    0
    I will add: if diplomatic relations are broken, the Russian Federation will lose an important source of information in the host country - a legal intelligence residency working under cover, and will also lose many agents of influence. In today's world, one illegal intelligence, unfortunately, will not go far...
    1. guest Offline guest
      guest 13 May 2022 21: 04
      -1
      What are the agents of influence? If these agents somehow influence there, they should be shot for negative influence.
  10. akm8226 Offline akm8226
    akm8226 11 May 2022 17: 47
    -1
    Not under this government. This is already clear. The only question is, where and how soon will the next Russian ambassador be killed?
  11. Mikhail Novikov Offline Mikhail Novikov
    Mikhail Novikov (Mikhail Novikov) 11 May 2022 18: 37
    0
    Well, and for what subject is she needed here? It stinks for hundreds of years, and itself is getting smaller and smaller. She will disappear from anger.
  12. Professor Offline Professor
    Professor (Paul) 11 May 2022 20: 58
    0
    Quote: Siegfried
    The more Russians demonstrate consolidation, the desire to overcome Western spokes in the wheels, the more pride in their country and the readiness to change orientations (orientation towards themselves, rejection of the West as an example to follow), the faster the West will look in horror for ways rollback...
    Russia has taken by its actions and its communication a position that allows you to win respect and sympathy around the world, despite the total propaganda. Threatening Lithuania or anyone else here can only hurt.

    Authors, Learn!
    If you are blinded by the loot and you write only on those topics that will bring you the maximum dividends, then here is an example of a thought for you of normal person.
    So, y.g. Kotlin, Gorynych and relatives - to the optometrist! Your rantings on "why Ukraine cannot be considered a Nazi state" and "why Russia should revoke the independence of Lithuania" will be of great interest to Dr. Bortnikov, who, I'm sure, will quickly fix you correct vision!
  13. vlad127490 Offline vlad127490
    vlad127490 (Vlad Gor) 11 May 2022 23: 49
    +2
    First, give a legal definition of the events of the 90s. Who owned the territory of Lithuania? Based on what, suddenly Lithuania became an independent state. From what hangover did Lithuania become a subject?
  14. Monax Offline Monax
    Monax (Hermann) 12 May 2022 11: 50
    +2
    Quote: vlad127490
    First, give a legal definition of the events of the 90s. Who owned the territory of Lithuania? Based on what, suddenly Lithuania became an independent state. From what hangover did Lithuania become a subject?

    Let's wave our time earlier - for example, from the beginning of the 18th century. Who bought these territories from the Swedes for 30 tons of silver? So whose land is this?
  15. GoreSoviet Offline GoreSoviet
    GoreSoviet (Andrei) 12 May 2022 17: 39
    +1
    You don’t have to do anything - just officially publish the lists of KGB agents from the Lithuanian SSR, they themselves will withdraw or trample on elections from power such as Lansbergis and the family
  16. Igor Viktorovich Berdin 12 May 2022 21: 59
    +1
    Withdraw recognition. Make a corridor to Kaliningrad. And build pig farms along the Lithuanian border. So that the stink all went to them.
  17. FGJCNJK Offline FGJCNJK
    FGJCNJK (Nikolai) 12 May 2022 22: 27
    0
    Quote: Igor Viktorovich Berdin
    So that the stink all went to them.

    First you need to decide on the "WIND ROSE"!
  18. cooper Offline cooper
    cooper (Alexander) 13 May 2022 02: 03
    +2
    Not just withdraw the so-called. independence of Lithuania, it's time to close the project "Lithuania" altogether.
    1. The comment was deleted.
  19. guest Offline guest
    guest 13 May 2022 21: 00
    -1
    Quote: Professor
    And we will get a territory absolutely not controlled by the Russian Federation, Russophobic-minded and flooded with weapons, besides being a member of NATO, which can legally do any nasty things to us

    And how will it differ from what we have there now?