How Russia can avoid becoming a raw material appendage of Southeast Asia

19

The sixth and upcoming seventh package of EU sanctions should, according to the idea of ​​their authors, hurt the Russian the economy, depriving it of the opportunity to pay for a special military operation to demilitarize and denazify Ukraine, as well as to effectively resist the NATO bloc. We face problems in the medium term, and serious ones, but with due diligence, Russia will be able to benefit greatly even from the restrictive measures introduced against it.

It's no secret that dependence on the oil and gas sector is Russia's real Achilles' heel. It is believed that it is gas that is our everything, but the real share of gas exports in federal budget revenues fluctuates at the level of 6-7%. The main contribution to the replenishment of the country's budget is made by oil exports - this is 30% of the total. That is, the sale of "black gold" abroad for the Russian economy is even more important than "blue fuel", if you look at the bare numbers. At the same time, it should be taken into account that about 30% of the gas produced in the country is exported, and the rest is consumed domestically. For crude oil and oil products, the proportion is different: approximately 50% is exported, and the second half is used for own needs. Domestic oil refining remains at a relatively low level so far, the need to create a system of storage facilities for the national oil reserve is only being discussed.



It is also necessary to remember that Europe's gas consumption has historically been tied to pipeline supplies from Russia, which accounts for about 40% of the total. It is impossible to simply replace them with LNG, since there are no free volumes of liquefied natural gas on the market. It is necessary to sharply increase production and processing volumes, which means building new LNG plants, numerous new LNG tankers to deliver raw materials to consumers. This is a very expensive and long story.

With oil, the situation is somewhat different. Refusing to supply "black gold" from Russia and replacing it with other suppliers is a problem for the EU that is not as grandiose in scale as with gas. Difficulties will not matter, since a number of European countries have historically focused specifically on Russian oil and demand exceptions from the norms of the Sixth package of sanctions. Hungary, Slovakia, the Czech Republic and Bulgaria have achieved a significant delay for themselves, clearly hoping that "either the padishah will die, or the donkey will die." The United States and the countries of Western Europe loyal to them have decided to refuse to purchase Russian oil and oil products, hitting Moscow at its very sore point.

A logical question arises, where should Russia attach its "black gold", which was fundamentally abandoned in the West? The answer is not as simple as it seems at first glance.

On the one hand, the trade in Russian oil has obviously moved into the "grey zone". Our Baltic "partners" began to turn over schemes to "deboss" her with the aim of further resale. So, tankers with hydrocarbon raw materials from Russia come to the port of Latvian Ventspils, and there they pour it into other tankers, mixing it with oil of a different origin, in a ratio of 50 to 50. The resulting “cocktail” is no longer considered “Russian oil”, and it can trade freely.

In China, state-owned companies continue to regularly consume Russian raw materials supplied under long-term contracts, but they are now avoiding entering into new spot contracts for much cheaper oil. At the same time, smaller private companies began to actively work in the "gray zone", the British Financial Times notes:

The purchases of private Chinese refineries show how some importers are bypassing traditional routes to cheap Russian oil, helping Beijing stay in the background while the West slams sanctions on Moscow.

In general, our country is confidently following the path of Iran, which has been living under the hood of Western sanctions for decades.

On the other hand, the difficult situation in which Russia finds itself today is used without a twinge of conscience by all our business partners. So, conditionally friendly India began to buy Russian hydrocarbon raw materials with great pleasure. At the same time, New Delhi demands huge discounts from Moscow and, it must be said, receives them.

Instead of the lost American and European market, domestic exporters need to quickly gain a foothold in the Southeast Asian market. Excess volumes of “black gold”, which cannot be processed or stored inside Russia due to the lack of a national reserve oil storage system, have to be drained to the insatiable Asian and, above all, Indian market. At the same time, our partners demand that Russian exporters also pay for shipping. And they do pay!

The situation is really very difficult. Only a reform of the national oil and gas industry can change it. If you invest in deep processing of oil and gas, our country will be able to export not banal raw materials with a penny profit, but products of its deep processing, for completely different money. The serious development of the petrochemical industry will have a very beneficial effect on the state of the domestic economy, allowing Russia to shed the label of a “raw material appendage”, now not of the West, but of Southeast Asia.
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

19 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +1
    10 May 2022 11: 08
    It should be remembered that part of this is private, and part is public.
    and since no one began to invest heavily in processing, it means that it is not profitable.

    There are oil tankers, but somehow I haven’t heard gasoline tankers. Oil became cheaper - gasoline rose in price, profit went into someone's pocket ...
  2. +2
    10 May 2022 12: 21
    One can agree with the Author only partially.
    In order to shed the label of "raw material appendage": the Russian Federation should reform the oil and gas complex only in the context of the complete replacement of the dead-end oligarchic system with a workable one.
    But the liberal elite of the country is not capable of such a thing!
    1. +1
      10 May 2022 14: 06
      Hm. What then is the disagreement?
      1. +2
        10 May 2022 14: 43
        Dear is limited to one industry, without affecting the system as a whole.
        1. 0
          10 May 2022 19: 16
          So is the topic of the oil and gas industry.
          1. 0
            11 May 2022 07: 22
            The explanation is given above.
            If you don't understand, it's not for me! ;-(
  3. 0
    10 May 2022 13: 16
    First. The West wants to abandon Russian HYDROCARBONS. That is, for absolutely no money. And it's not just oil. A and

    our country will be able to export not banal raw materials with a penny profit, but products of its deep processing, for completely different money

    The proposal to invest in processing is absolutely correct. The offer to sell a "deeply processed" product is completely wrong.

    Second. Whether the West will be able to abandon Russian oil or not is not even a rhetorical question. Can not. "Latvian oil" has already appeared.

    I wrote a hundred times and I will write a hundred more times. We must think not about how to "attach Russian oil," but about how to leave the West without oil. And this is achieved only by a complete ban on the supply of hydrocarbons to the West. This applies primarily to oil, gas and coal. And after that, within two months, accept the surrender of the West.

    PS addition for fans of civilizational development.
    The world consumes approximately 100 million barrels of oil (oil only) per day. This makes 2,5 liters of oil per day per person. Out of a population of 7 billion. That is 2,5 liters of oil PER DAY for EACH. From Mongolian cattle breeder to Elon Musk. In medicine, it is said that a person needs 2,5 liters of water per day to ensure life. Man in his current civilizational model has long since become an oil man. Take away the oil and we will immediately slide into the 19th century. This is the price the West MUST pay to Russia. Anyway, Europe is a must.
    1. +1
      10 May 2022 14: 05
      The proposal to invest in processing is absolutely correct. The offer to sell a "deeply processed" product is completely wrong.

      Is there a contradiction here within one paragraph?

      Second. Whether the West will be able to abandon Russian oil or not is not even a rhetorical question. Can not. "Latvian oil" has already appeared.

      It seemed to me that this moment is reflected in the article?

      I wrote a hundred times and I will write a hundred more times. We must think not about how to "attach Russian oil," but about how to leave the West without oil. And this is achieved only by a complete ban on the supply of hydrocarbons to the West. This applies primarily to oil, gas and coal. And after that, within two months, accept the surrender of the West.

      Where the article contains a proposal to forcibly sell the West grew. oil?
      1. 0
        10 May 2022 17: 34
        There is no contradiction. There is a proposal to refine our own oil and not sell it to the West. Neither oil nor processed products. At least until the signing of the surrender of the West.

        As Prime Minister Mossadegh said, "Iran will extract as much oil as it needs. And the rest of the oil will remain in the ground for future generations." This is the main reason why Mossadegh was overthrown.
      2. 0
        10 May 2022 17: 35
        The mixing of Russian oil with other grades and the emergence of "Latvian oil" is the desire to sell oil to the West at any cost. As well as selling oil to India and China at a $30 discount.
  4. -2
    10 May 2022 14: 03
    According to the Chinese Communists, the benefits of confrontation, bloc politics and dividing the world into friends and foes are very doubtful and definitely do not contribute to the growth of the world economy.
    Dependence on the oil and gas sector was the result of a coup d'etat under the leadership of Yeltsin and the collapse of the economy. Western friends of the “democrats” need raw materials, which the Russian Federation has in abundance, and primarily energy. Therefore, the bulk of investments went not into science and the production of means of production, but into the extractive industries, turning the Russian Federation from the once industrial foundation of the USSR into a raw materials appendage of the “West” - a typical picture that is observed today in almost all post-Soviet state formations.
    The situation began to change with the advent of Vladimir Putin, and, accordingly, relations between the Russian Federation and the collective “West” began to change.
    A lot is being done to move the Russian Federation away from raw material dependence and new industrialization, but the desires do not coincide with the possibilities. It is impossible to direct all efforts to the development of industries of group A without exposing group B and thereby calling into question social stability with all the ensuing consequences. There are no wizards, you have to maintain a balance of interests.
    The transfer of payments for energy resources, and not only for energy resources, into rubles, firstly, deprives the “West” of the opportunity to steal them, as it stole 300 billion gold reserves, and secondly, it does not deprive the Russian Federation of an influx of currency, which can be used to buy the necessary equipment in a roundabout way for the modernization of production, as was the case during the Stalinist industrialization of the USSR.
    If the West refuses to supply from the Russian Federation, which is doubtful, then the released ones should reduce prices in the domestic market with all the ensuing consequences, the rest can be redirected to the Indo-Pacific region and, first of all, to the PRC, the supply routes of which are trying by all means ride the USA.
  5. +2
    10 May 2022 14: 14
    Only reform of the national oil and gas industry can change it

    Dear Sergey! Is it possible to explain in more detail - what industry do you call "national" and at whose expense should it be "reformed"?
    The oil and gas industry of the Russian Federation is completely private, even "state" companies have nothing to do with the population ("national") and have no goal of providing the population with, say, gasoline.
    The oil and gas industry of the Russian Federation WAS completely CONSTRUCTED as national ("public property") and was transferred free of charge into private hands, "reformed". That is, again at the expense of the population?
  6. +1
    10 May 2022 17: 57
    Mothball some of the wells. Europe is dead for Russia. If they don’t want to buy oil, don’t, more will remain for future generations. Stocks are limited, give away for free
    1. 0
      12 May 2022 09: 41
      By and large, I agree with you. I'll just express myself differently. It is necessary to legally limit the ceiling of hydrocarbon production in the Russian Federation with a review period of 5-10 years and introduce the principle of export delivery according to the residual. Something like quotas for catching fish or exporting grain ...
  7. 0
    10 May 2022 18: 21
    Will Putin definitely read this article?
  8. +1
    10 May 2022 19: 18
    Quote: Ingvar7
    Will Putin definitely read this article?

    Definitely not, he won't read it, it hurts busy.
    Specially trained people read and monitor the media, and analytical notes are made on the basis.
  9. +2
    10 May 2022 19: 19
    Quote: yakisam
    Only reform of the national oil and gas industry can change it
    Dear Sergey! Is it possible to explain in more detail - what industry do you call "national" and at whose expense should it be "reformed"?
    The oil and gas industry of the Russian Federation is completely private, even "state" companies have nothing to do with the population ("national") and have no goal of providing the population with, say, gasoline.
    The oil and gas industry of the Russian Federation WAS completely CONSTRUCTED as national ("public property") and was transferred free of charge into private hands, "reformed". That is, again at the expense of the population?

    As a person of leftist views, I see a way out in the nationalization of such assets and a gradual transition to a planned economy.
    With the war in Ukraine and the Cold War with the West, the alternative is defeat. IMHO.
  10. -2
    10 May 2022 19: 37
    How Russia can avoid becoming a raw material appendage of Southeast Asia

    - No, Russia should not even try to do something about the "status of a supplier of Russian gas and oil" - try to radically change this "its status" (the status of a raw material appendage)! - Nothing will work out - in this direction, Russia is already completely late and completely behind! - so we need to continue to export gas and oil and stop bothering about this - nothing will work out anyway! - But Russia has unlimited possibilities - just "turn over this oil and gas page" (leaving everything there as before - it's still already "the day before yesterday") and try to "go out into the world" in other areas - in the field of quantum physics and quantum mechanics; to try again to break ahead in the field of space exploration; research in search of new energy sources (plasma research), etc.
    - Why should Russia try to change the world "in the field of gas and oil" - everything is as old as the world there and will soon cease to be relevant!
    1. -1
      12 May 2022 09: 56
      Irina, I am very impressed by your pioneering enthusiasm and unenlightened Bolshevism. To try here and now to combine the general theory of relativity and quantum mechanics, great forces and means are needed. On the ivory coast, this is impossible.