The EU is afraid to pay for gas in rubles, as this will lead to lending to Russia

14

The EU leadership is distributing among its members a non-binding document, the purpose of which is to allow European companies to pay for Russian gas in rubles. Thus, the EC actually calls for the execution of the decree of Russian President Vladimir Putin and almost cancels its own sanctions. This is stated in the message of S&P Global Platts.

De jure, the whole of Europe, thus, agreed to pay for energy in rubles, taking as a basis the experience of Hungary and the mechanism developed in Moscow. Under the document under consideration, the European Commission issues an “indulgence” to companies cooperating with Gazprom to use the Russian payment scheme and the Russian bank, which officially indicates non-violation of EU and US sanctions. Now such recognition has been made at the level of the whole of Europe.



Simply put, the aim of the EC was rather политическаяthan functional or economic. All customers of Russian fuel, without exception, already knew the procedure. A clear signal was needed for the use of the conversion method, which would mean the absence of repression in its implementation.

The only thing that worries the EU authorities is the lengthy process of converting euros or dollars into rubles in a Russian bank account (this will most likely be Gazprombank). EU sectoral departments suspect that while the amount deposited will be converted into rubles, and until Gazprom receives payment in Russian currency, these funds will be considered a loan to the sub-sanctioned bank from EU companies. This is because the deposited currency is for some time entirely in the hands of the government of the Russian Federation. And this is unacceptable. But in general, the scheme will be applied despite the flaws and nuances.

Moreover, in the EU, they fear that in order to convert huge amounts of money, Gazprombank may seek help from the Central Bank of Russia, conducting certain transactions and asset management. It is forbidden.

As a result, the European bureaucracy clarifies and details its own restrictions, and as the mechanisms of what “can” and what “can’t be done” crystallize, it turns out that sanctions are completely unnecessary for the full functioning of cooperation in the gas sector with the Russian Federation. They are a complete hindrance to the EU. A vicious circle emerges.

At the same time, without exception, all EU bodies and departments are confident that contracts must be respected. On the part of Gazprom, there are no problems with this, moreover, the holding even supplied raw materials for free for some time. But the EC decided only now and issued a document confirming Putin's decree. Now payment for the delivered gas will go much quicker.
14 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +6
    April 23 2022 09: 17
    At the same time, without exception, all EU bodies and departments are confident that contracts must be respected.

    All contracts, or only gas? EU wants to be a little pregnant?
    At one time, France terminated the contract for the supply of Mistrals. Siemens terminated the contract for the supply of generators. Dozens and hundreds of contracts are being broken right now. Lithium supplies to Russia, supplies of equipment for the oil and gas sector. Contracts for the supply of electronics and components. The list is huge. Automotive, aircraft, equipment licensing, software ban. More than a thousand sanctions. Moreover, contracts are broken for political reasons. Under pressure from state and supranational bodies. Direct state intervention in the economic activities of private companies.
    It is still not clear to me why exactly gas contracts must be observed?
    1. +2
      April 23 2022 11: 50
      There is no alternative in the near future. And without cheap gas, no one needs their technology.
      1. +5
        April 23 2022 11: 57
        The EU says that the EU economy will collapse without Russian gas within 6 months. Medvedev said that this is an "optimistic forecast". Kirdyk will come in a week.
        German industrialists believe that the maximum period without Russian gas is a few weeks. The maximum is two months.
        This is about how to stop feeding Ukraine.
        1. +1
          April 23 2022 22: 00
          The contract is signed, it must be fulfilled. Otherwise, there will be no trust.
          In the case of the Mistrals, France paid something like 2 billion euros (too lazy to look for the exact figure on the Internet) of a fine for breach of contract. In addition, the French handed over all the documentation for the Mistral construction project and returned all the advance payment received. so it's all fair.
          Similarly, under other agreements in all spheres of industry, the agreements are observed or fines are paid under the agreements. But the new ones are not concluded.
          Nobody wants to risk their reputation. It will cost you more.
          1. -1
            April 23 2022 22: 10
            If the contract is signed, then it must be fulfilled. It's right. I need a refrigerator, I paid, waited, and they returned the money to me.
            Refund is a breach of contract. And loss of trust. So the reputation of France is tarnished.
            The same goes for all other contracts.
            1. +1
              April 23 2022 22: 26
              The money was returned to you for the refrigerator, but your moral and material damage was not paid to you. You just got thrown.
              And France paid a fine for not fulfilling the contract. Probably the amount of the fine was also spelled out in the contract. In any case, in Russia they do not consider themselves offended and abandoned.
              Another thing is when France itself was thrown. Australia canceled a contract to supply twelve submarines from France in order to buy them from the United States. ... And it was a huge contract worth 56 billion euros for the supply of 12 submarines. But even then everything calmed down. It seems like the Americans themselves paid, compensated France for its losses.
              1. +2
                April 23 2022 23: 29
                Again. The contract said that France (in particular the firm) would supply two ships. We do not know what was said about the penalty. The ships were ready and not delivered by order of the state.
                I needed a refrigerator, and Russia needed ships. So the contract was broken. Time has been lost. Such ships are being laid only now. How many years has Russia lost? Yes, and my food went bad without a refrigerator.
                The same applies to Siemens. The same applies to the refusal to supply oil and gas equipment. And much more.
                So, which contracts are to be fulfilled and which are not, the West decides. About which I wrote.
              2. 0
                April 24 2022 15: 28
                Haha! Das glaubst du wirklich? Weder Frankreich noch Deutschland haben je Barren Gold ihrer Reserven aus den USA vorübergehend wiederbekommen. Nicht einen einzigen Barren Gold. Und du glaubst jetzt die USA zahlen etwaige Entschädigungen über Vorbereinbarungen? Dass ich nicht lache. wassat lol
                1. 0
                  April 24 2022 21: 15
                  Und viel Deutschlands Gold in den USA ?
                  1. 0
                    April 25 2022 05: 56
                    Alles Deutsches Gold ist in den USA (1500t) . Es war mal da, aber jetzt haben es andere Leute.
                    1. +1
                      April 25 2022 18: 58
                      vielleicht ist es Gold seit Hitlers Zeit?
      2. GIS
        0
        April 26 2022 15: 26
        We are waiting for a "reciprocal move" from the GDP. I think analysts have prepared them for a long time.
  2. +1
    April 25 2022 09: 23
    A clear signal was needed for the use of the conversion method, which would mean the absence of repression in its implementation.

    The cornerstone, but this will not lead to lending to Russia ... But this opens the way to the internal emission of the ruble for the same amount, and this is what infuriates them. This is a partial exit of Russia from the dollar zone, and if it is complete?. Only one threat of this accelerated inflation, and throughout the west. Believe me, they have something to think about, including in Ukraine.
    1. GIS
      0
      April 26 2022 15: 29
      great way of thinking))
      it remains to be "rejoiced" for the "partners" ... although ordinary people are not 100% to blame ... so we are not to blame for the fact that "crippling" sanctions are applied to us ... a vicious circle turns out