Russia began "railway cutting" of Ukraine into two parts

32

On April 22, Russian troops began to implement actions to “cut the railway” of Ukrainian territory into two parts by striking railway (and other) bridges. This, in particular, is pointed out in his telegram channel by journalist and blogger Yuri Podolyaka.

So, four railway bridges cross the Dnieper, and they were attacked by units of the Russian Armed Forces. Three such bridges are located in the Dnepropetrovsk region and one in Zaporozhye. According to the Dnepropetrovsk administration, a number of strikes by the Russian troops reached their goal.



In addition to railways, another 21 bridges pass through the Dnieper, 9 of which are automobile, 6 are connected with hydroelectric power plants, 7 combined bridges (railway and road) and one pedestrian. Russia controls only three of them.

Meanwhile, successful strikes against these facilities will significantly bring the achievement of the goals of the special operation closer. So, it is better to attack the bridges passing through the hydroelectric power station at the crossing points above the locks. It is also desirable to destroy the Podolsko-Voskresensky bridge in Kyiv, since even in its current unfinished state it is capable of moving a heavy combat equipment. If necessary, it is also possible to disable the Kyiv pedestrian bridge.

It is important to note that special attention should be paid to the protection of bridges that are already controlled by Russian troops. Their destruction can cut off the supply of the Russian Armed Forces units located on the right side of the Dnieper, and also create a threat of the capture of Kherson by Ukrainian troops.
    Our news channels

    Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

    VK Zen Telegram
    32 comments
    Information
    Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
    1. Smilodon terribilis nimis
      Smilodon terribilis nimis
      +1
      April 22 2022 16: 57
      Khokhols are anxious to turn Odessa into Mariupol. Which Kherson?
      1. Vdars
        Vdars
        +1
        April 23 2022 12: 47
        Unreal bastards!
    2. Afinogen
      Afinogen
      +11
      April 22 2022 16: 58
      That's right, even if it's too late. They think hard. It is also necessary to destroy all bridges on the border in Western Ukraine in order to make it as difficult as possible for the supply of weapons and fuel with NATO countries.
    3. Volga073
      Volga073
      +7
      April 22 2022 18: 52
      Well done Shoigu!
      Started watching TV.
      They've been talking about it for a month now!
      1. Dingo
        Dingo
        +4
        April 23 2022 07: 02
        Not ... It was his women-generals who suggested it to him ...
    4. FGJCNJK
      FGJCNJK
      +1
      April 22 2022 20: 50
      The cruiser was in the Odessa region, closer to Romania! A year ago, they put a new phased array locator on it, the illumination range is 500 km! Why was he there? Ukrainian planes flew to the airfield in Romania, and from there they took off towards the sea, made a detour, and from the side of Odessa they went ashore, then flew to Dnepropetrovsk and Zaporozhye, and struck at the Russian troops! All the airfields in, in the area of ​​Nikolaev and Odessa, were destroyed, and they could not understand from where? Therefore, they drove Moscow with a powerful locator! It began to shine, and from the airfields of the Crimea and from near Donetsk, our Su 35 crests began to be intercepted, so 9 MiGs and Susheks were shot down! All this was calculated by NATO! And here is the result! First, a drone hit the cruiser, smashed radars and antennas! The cruiser shot down one! But already half blind! Then Khokhols launched 2 Neptune cruise missiles from the shore! Guidance was carried out by NATO Orion, which hung over Romania, he also turned on the REP, and lit up the cruiser's air defense detection station! The missiles went to the ship, with the homing heads turned off, so that the ship would not detect the radiation beam, the guidance was carried out by Orion NATO! By transmitting the exact coordinates of the ship to the missiles! The result is 2 hits, ammunition detonation, and the cruiser began to sink!
      The story of the cruiser Moscow may have a very serious continuation. And it can take the conflict to a whole new level. The Russian Ministry of Defense has not yet said anything about the impact of the Ukrainian Neptune missile, not because it wants to hide the impact of this missile, which is shouted by all the world's media. But because, apparently, there was not a Ukrainian Neptune rocket.
      With a high probability, the cruiser Moskva was destroyed not by the Ukrainian army, but by the NATO military.
      1. The missile that hit Moscow was not Neptune, but a Norwegian anti-ship missile, which was delivered in January.
      2. Missile guidance in Moscow was carried out not by the Ukrainian military, but by officers from NATO countries.
      3. All electronic intelligence was conducted by the armies of NATO countries.
      4. All electronic suppression of Russian ships was carried out by the military resources of NATO countries.
      5. The decision to destroy the cruiser Moscow was made by officers of the NATO countries.
      6. And from Ukraine there was only the territory from which the NATO countries attacked Moscow. While on the cruiser Moscow.
      And what should Russia do now?
      Recognize that the cruiser Moscow was destroyed by NATO countries? And then Russia should declare war on NATO countries?
      Or do nothing in return? Then NATO will get a taste of it and will inflict more and more and more and more powerful blows on the Russian army. First on the territory of Ukraine. And then strikes on the territory of Russia.
      The leadership of Russia now faces such a difficult dilemma. The strike on the cruiser Moscow shows the escalation and the increasing inclusion of NATO countries in the war against Russia. NATO is just pretending that it is Ukraine that is fighting. Therefore, the Pentagon claims that it was a Ukrainian Neptune rocket. But this is apparently not the case. This is a NATO strike.
      1. svetlanavradiy
        svetlanavradiy
        0
        April 22 2022 21: 45
        However, the ice has broken, gentlemen of the jury. The EU is already ready to buy gas for both euros and rubles. The UN Secretary General is in a hurry to Moscow. What is it for?
        1. Vladimir Orlov
          Vladimir Orlov
          0
          April 22 2022 23: 41
          so what's the difference..? who believes in this nonsense ..?
          any export to Europe means that the euro is exchanged for rubles. The whole difference is who and where changes (before our exporters independently, on the stock exchange, and now the euros go from Europe to Gazprombank, and he already converts on the stock exchange and that's it ...)
          THERE IS NO DIFFERENCE
          The difference would be if India buys rubles from China, for example (but this will be possible only when the ruble is a freely convertible, stable, reserve currency).

          Now the ruble is strengthening due to the stupidity of our Central Bank - since all operations of non-residents with foreign currency are prohibited. Those. free conversion is NOT available (see above - about the difference).
          But at the same time, they also raised the rate to 20% (which, due to these bans on currency trading, is not tied to the exchange rate at all, but perfectly stimulates internal "cost-push inflation" - a high rate = expensive loans).

          BUT: Nabiullina was elected for another 5 years!! How much common sense can be mocked?!
          1. calagin407
            calagin407
            +1
            April 25 2022 00: 51
            The difference is huge! All euros and all rubles remain with us!
          2. Blast
            Blast
            +2
            April 25 2022 15: 56
            The difference is that the Central Bank can issue the same number of rubles for the amount of purchases. Russia is now putting horseradish on the dollar, and this is like a blow to the causal place of the entire dollar system.
            1. Vladimir Orlov
              Vladimir Orlov
              0
              April 26 2022 15: 47
              The difference is that the Central Bank can issue the same amount of rubles for the amount of purchases

              "Issuing" is to inflate inflation, especially in a closed market (all the "surplus" of the money supply is accumulated in the price of goods).
              Moreover, in conditions of a growing shortage of goods (in conditions of a shortage, you are ready to pay more - this is a rise in prices / inflation).
              Especially in conditions of cost inflation (for example, diesel per year - from 48 to 55 rubles / liter, imported raw materials and semi-finished products for domestic industry, etc.). Aren't the prices in stores too high already now ..? Our salary is also growing..? I don't have it, unfortunately.

              and the Central Bank is just trying to act "according to the textbook" to strengthen the ruble and reduce inflation - it does not print, but removes excess money from the market - by raising the interest rate (it seems that they simply don’t know how to do anything else).
              But the problem is that now it DOES NOT AFFECT the exchange rate in any way under total ban non-residents (they are also "market makers" on the exchanges), since now there is no "carry trade" (purchase of OFZ, for which the dollar is exchanged for the ruble, i.e. the ruble is strengthening) and they cannot even sell their assets (for rubles, then buy currency on them). What does NOT work can be seen from the dynamics of the exchange rate (now - a closed non-market official rate - exactly like in the USSR, when there was an official dollar and a dollar from the black market).

              The high rate partially curbs inflation, in a draconian way - through a reduction in consumption. But also in the opposite direction - to stimulate cost-push inflation (loans for industries are now more expensive). Is it really good..?

              But most importantly, the exorbitant rate works AGAINST the main task of the economy - stimulation of production (= offers of goods on the market). Under a loan of 20% / year, there are no fools to build factories.

              Only our Central Bank (as well as the Turks and Africa) use the rate so aggressively - immediately by 15%. America and Europe - do it a quarter / half a percent because they do not want to ruin their industry.

              I hope someone Nabiullina will be enlightened, in the end - otherwise we will soon see the big Zh ... on the horizon. Now is not the time for stupid decisions.

              To summarize, there is a lot of money in the country, there are few good production projects, and there are almost no effective managers (without quotes), unfortunately.
          3. Blast
            Blast
            +1
            April 25 2022 16: 20
            Now the ruble is strengthening due to the stupidity of our Central Bank - since all operations of non-residents with foreign currency are prohibited. Those. free conversion is NOT available (see above - about the difference).

            Yes, that's right, the conversion has hung ... the ruble has strengthened, and inflation has fucked up the dollar just on expectations of further events. For once, the Central Bank did everything right, and now Putin is "holding the balls" of the entire financial dollar system, and Sarmat launched it so as not to rock the boat. In general, this is very bobo in the West and nothing can be done ... Biden said just that - "Putin is to blame." And in order to win back, we need to negotiate, including on Ukraine.
        2. Blast
          Blast
          0
          April 25 2022 15: 49
          Launched Sarmat urges ...
        3. Blast
          Blast
          +1
          April 25 2022 16: 00
          The United States is accustomed to exporting its inflation to third countries. Russia with rubles for gas
          played in reverse, so much so that it didn’t seem enough, now inflation is in the west, and so far only on expectations, and nothing can be done ... So they fussed.
      2. VlVl
        VlVl
        +1
        April 22 2022 22: 47
        What is REP?
        1. Andrey_8
          Andrey_8
          0
          April 23 2022 10: 49
          electronic interference
    5. dub0vitsky
      dub0vitsky
      +4
      April 22 2022 22: 47
      It is necessary to beat on the power system of the railway. Traction substations. 800 de-energized electric locomotives will be laid up, and two hundred diesel locomotives will remain in operation. which is clearly not enough. Restoring the energy sector is more difficult than railway tracks and control nodes. Even if the entire power system is not destroyed, the gaps between neighboring, still working sections will still slow down the movement of weapons well.
      1. And W2
        And W2
        -2
        April 23 2022 06: 09
        At whose expense is the banquet? Who will restore your maximum energy losses? Or did you write off the people of Russia in Ukraine? Minimal quickly recoverable damage to infrastructure and work. We have one problem to destroy Bandera and their patrons with their minimum losses!
    6. Observer2014
      Observer2014
      +2
      April 22 2022 23: 03
      Podolyak is better aware of the Russian Ministry of Defense? There is nothing like this in today's briefing.
      1. And W2
        And W2
        +1
        April 23 2022 06: 22
        Thoughts do not go in formation, even in the General Staff)
    7. Kapany3
      Kapany3
      0
      April 22 2022 23: 37
      Quote: FGJCNJK
      The cruiser was in the Odessa region, closer to Romania! A year ago, they put a new phased array locator on it, the illumination range is 500 km! Why was he there? Ukrainian planes flew to the airfield in Romania, and from there they took off towards the sea, made a detour, and from the side of Odessa they went ashore, then flew to Dnepropetrovsk and Zaporozhye, and struck at the Russian troops! All the airfields in, in the area of ​​Nikolaev and Odessa, were destroyed, and they could not understand from where? Therefore, they drove Moscow with a powerful locator! It began to shine, and from the airfields of the Crimea and from near Donetsk, our Su 35 crests began to be intercepted, so 9 MiGs and Susheks were shot down! All this was calculated by NATO! And here is the result! First, a drone hit the cruiser, smashed radars and antennas! The cruiser shot down one! But already half blind! Then Khokhols launched 2 Neptune cruise missiles from the shore! Guidance was carried out by NATO Orion, which hung over Romania, he also turned on the REP, and lit up the cruiser's air defense detection station! The missiles went to the ship, with the homing heads turned off, so that the ship would not detect the radiation beam, the guidance was carried out by Orion NATO! By transmitting the exact coordinates of the ship to the missiles! The result is 2 hits, ammunition detonation, and the cruiser began to sink!
      The story of the cruiser Moscow may have a very serious continuation. And it can take the conflict to a whole new level. The Russian Ministry of Defense has not yet said anything about the impact of the Ukrainian Neptune missile, not because it wants to hide the impact of this missile, which is shouted by all the world's media. But because, apparently, there was not a Ukrainian Neptune rocket.
      With a high probability, the cruiser Moskva was destroyed not by the Ukrainian army, but by the NATO military.
      1. The missile that hit Moscow was not Neptune, but a Norwegian anti-ship missile, which was delivered in January.
      2. Missile guidance in Moscow was carried out not by the Ukrainian military, but by officers from NATO countries.
      3. All electronic intelligence was conducted by the armies of NATO countries.
      4. All electronic suppression of Russian ships was carried out by the military resources of NATO countries.
      5. The decision to destroy the cruiser Moscow was made by officers of the NATO countries.
      6. And from Ukraine there was only the territory from which the NATO countries attacked Moscow. While on the cruiser Moscow.
      And what should Russia do now?
      Recognize that the cruiser Moscow was destroyed by NATO countries? And then Russia should declare war on NATO countries?
      Or do nothing in return? Then NATO will get a taste of it and will inflict more and more and more and more powerful blows on the Russian army. First on the territory of Ukraine. And then strikes on the territory of Russia.
      The leadership of Russia now faces such a difficult dilemma. The strike on the cruiser Moscow shows the escalation and the increasing inclusion of NATO countries in the war against Russia. NATO is just pretending that it is Ukraine that is fighting. Therefore, the Pentagon claims that it was a Ukrainian Neptune rocket. But this is apparently not the case. This is a NATO strike.

      Can I ask for a link? And that sounds like a "stream of consciousness", you'll forgive.
      1. And W2
        And W2
        -1
        April 23 2022 06: 27
        What about the flow? Straightforward, logical.
        1. YES UZH
          YES UZH
          0
          April 23 2022 12: 19
          So many versions can be offered, from underwater sabotage, various options, to sabotage on board, and let's say spontaneous operation of an air defense missile.
    8. Siegfried
      Siegfried
      +2
      April 23 2022 04: 20
      Russia has an overabundance of oil. To what extent do our oilmen depend on the domestic market? How painful will it be to make gasoline in Russia at the cost of production? Like in Kuwait. The burden on transport companies will drop sharply, making it easier to transport goods from China. The burden on the family budget will decrease sharply. At that time in the west prices will rise.
    9. The comment was deleted.
    10. Kulikov Victor
      Kulikov Victor
      +4
      April 23 2022 10: 08
      It is quite obvious that first of all it is necessary to disable all the railway bridges connecting Ukraine with the West. Currently, NATO countries have begun to supply Ukraine with howitzers on a large scale, the firing range of which is approximately twice the performance characteristics of Russian guns. If the howitzers supplied by the collective West reach the "Nazis", then this will radically change the situation on the battlefield in favor of the Armed Forces of Ukraine.
      In addition, why until now no one pays attention to the trains with fuel and lubricants continuously coming from the West. Strange, but the Armed Forces of Ukraine until now, as a whole, have not experienced any problems with fuel, which allows them to conduct a maneuver war. How long will this continue?
      1. zenion
        zenion
        -2
        April 23 2022 13: 13
        The Americans bombed German cities, but did not bomb factories. Factories are private property. But then, when the factories were supposed to get into the Soviet sector, they were bombed. If trains are bombed, then Russia will be sued, not against the people, but against the rulers.
      2. Amper
        Amper
        0
        April 24 2022 23: 24
        Probably someone is involved in this business, a very respected person (s).
    11. Jacques sekavar
      Jacques sekavar
      +1
      April 23 2022 18: 07
      The Dnieper is crossed by four railway bridges

      Yuri Ivanovich spoke of seven bridges and was very surprised why they were safe and sound.
      The inviolability of cross-border communications for the supply of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, as well as authorities, not to mention the decision-making center in Ukraine, without the destruction of which neither demilitarization, nor denazification, and nothing else is possible, also raises questions. This center will never be recognized as Russian and the independence of the DPR-LPR, and by destroying it, you can try to disorganize Everything with one blow.
    12. Joseph Vissarionovich
      Joseph Vissarionovich
      0
      April 24 2022 03: 26
      The video shows that the missiles did not fly over the cruiser "Moskva", there is a clear torpedoing or explosion inside the ship, it is clear that the shock wave is below the waterline. Maybe underwater mines
    13. kriten
      kriten
      +1
      April 24 2022 09: 36
      It is also necessary to cut off railway tracks from the countries of Europe.
      1. Elephant
        Elephant
        0
        April 24 2022 17: 53
        It was necessary to cut all the logistics there at the beginning of hostilities, the primary goal.
    14. likas
      likas
      0
      April 27 2022 13: 07
      Kyiv pedestrian should not be destroyed, it will fall apart on its own not today or tomorrow ... it was built by the key