The Russian general spoke about further goals in Ukraine: the southern regions and access to Pridnestrovie

19

On April 19, the head of the Russian Foreign Ministry, Sergei Lavrov, announced the start of the next stage of the Russian special operation in Ukraine, which should completely liberate the territories of the Donetsk and Luhansk People's Republics from the Armed Forces of Ukraine.

The Deputy Commander of the Central Military District for Military Affairs spoke about the further goals of the Russian troops in Ukrainepolitical the work of Major General Rustam Minnekaev.



Since the beginning of the second phase of the special operation, one of the tasks of the Russian army has been to establish full control over the Donbass and Southern Ukraine

- the general emphasized on April 22 at the annual meeting of the Union of Defense Industries of the Sverdlovsk Region.

According to Minnekaev, the liberation of Donbass will make possible a direct corridor from this region to the Russian Crimea. At the same time, thanks to control over the southern regions of Ukraine, the Russian Federation reaches Transnistria, where the Russian-speaking population is often oppressed by Chisinau and local nationalist elements.

The general also expressed the opinion that at the moment Russia is actually fighting against the whole of Europe, as it was during the Second World War. Therefore, Moscow needs to complete the special operation. As Vladimir Putin emphasized earlier, the goals of the Russian Federation are “noble and absolutely understandable.”
19 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. -11
    April 22 2022 14: 20
    Not a single major city has been taken (except Kherson), and they say let's go to Odessa. Which Odessa? Where is captured Kharkov? He's right on the border. It is necessary to reach Odessa, which against the background of the same Kharkov already seems not so feasible. From the sea, the advantage is lost, and without an amphibious assault, Odessa cannot be captured from the word at all. Odessa has the largest region in Ukraine, an area that is filled with bridges, estuaries, ravines, rivers, and other troubles. It will be like near Kyiv, another shame with the words "But we didn't want to capture", "It's just a gesture of goodwill"
    1. +4
      April 22 2022 15: 03
      You don’t understand that large cities don’t take it precisely because the ukrovoyaks are fixed in cities and hide behind the local population? They don’t go out to fight in the field. But they sit in densely populated places. We are not Americans to destroy everything in our path. The inhabitants of these lands are our people We feel sorry for them, unlike ukrovoyak. We have to pick them out almost hand-to-hand.
      1. -2
        April 22 2022 23: 24
        and where is the "wide network of anti-fascists" ..? what have you been doing all this time..?
        if hand-to-hand, then every city will turn into Mariupol. Then everyone will hate us. and ourselves. But it is quite clear that there are no clear plans on how to take cities at the moment. And it's very, very bullshit.

        In addition to the assault, you can still "wet the quiet" top, starting with the main Natsiks and SBU. Where are the "Petrovs / Boshirovs" when they are needed ..? Why climb into the forehead, I don’t understand in any way ...
        1. -1
          April 23 2022 00: 45
          Petrovs and Boshirovs are no longer in trend. They stopped talking about them.
          Now Kadyrov is in trend. He stated that his fighters would defeat everyone and destroy Zelensky's shaitan ..
          Will wait.
          1. -1
            April 23 2022 02: 26
            in the fighters, including the Kadyrovites, there is no doubt and honor and praise to them. But how many of them are there and how many are needed for such a territory ... after all (albeit not PR, but) "morale support" and results are not the same thing ...
            will wait
    2. +4
      April 22 2022 15: 24
      and without an amphibious assault, it is impossible to capture Odessa from the word at all.

      Did the Germans and Romanians also take Odessa from the sea?
      1. +2
        April 23 2022 01: 35
        Did the Odessans themselves fight for their city? For more than 2 months, the defense of Odessa was held by the Red Army and Navy.
        And the inhabitants of Odessa turned out to be traitors and welcomed the Romanian occupation.
        Alexander Neukropny wrote about this well on the same website "Reporter", having studied all the materials and photographic documents of the liberation of Odessa from the Romanians in April 1944.
        Yes, and the current people of Odessa are passive. Remember May 2, 2014, the house of trade unions, which was called the Odessa crematorium. How many Odessans expressed their protest?
        That's why the "Right Sector" steers there
    3. +1
      April 22 2022 15: 47
      Not necessarily in a rush. You can take both hunger and cold. Even if it's hot, it will be bad. And without electricity, neither watch TV nor find out what the neighbors are doing.
    4. 0
      April 22 2022 18: 42
      Point one:

      Nazism is when a nation is declared a "superior" race. And some of its representatives are higher than any representatives of other races. Those. smarter, more industrious, more sober, in one word "civilized" and so on...

      And now the question:

      And why, in fact, is it necessary to "take" Odessa? Really "Mariupol" taught nothing to anyone?

      And now almost the answer:

      Nazis always! ALWAYS!!! lose because of inferiority and limitations, including because of the limitations of their own fantasies. Including because of the obstinacy in the conviction of their own superiority. But the more advanced races, in fact, not infected with fascism and Bandera, ALWAYS give them LYULEY!

      This is an axiom within a repeating infinity.

      Point two: ... There are no other options. And if there is - See point one. And so in a circle.
  2. 0
    April 22 2022 15: 44
    Plans are huge! And there is no government plan!
  3. +4
    April 22 2022 15: 46
    Quote: Andrey Vasalov
    Not a single major city has been taken (except Kherson), and they say let's go to Odessa. Which Odessa? Where is captured Kharkov? He's right on the border. It is necessary to reach Odessa, which against the background of the same Kharkov already seems not so feasible. From the sea, the advantage is lost, and without an amphibious assault, Odessa cannot be captured from the word at all. Odessa has the largest region in Ukraine, an area that is filled with bridges, estuaries, ravines, rivers, and other troubles. It will be like near Kyiv, another shame with the words "But we didn't want to capture", "It's just a gesture of goodwill"


    If you have something to object, the cards are on the table. I think taking or blocking Odessa is more important than messing with Kharkov. Deprive access to the sea and break through to Transnistria. So that the Moldovan-Romanians quieted down, finally.
    1. 0
      April 28 2022 21: 30
      unrealistically long supply arm
  4. +1
    April 22 2022 15: 59
    Who will explain why it is not the Commander-in-Chief and not even the Minister of Defense who speaks about this ??? Is this his private opinion or something else?
    1. +2
      April 22 2022 19: 50
      This is a political officer. He says that all "political scientists" are on TV channels.
    2. 0
      April 23 2022 01: 41
      If you read the Ukrainian press, then in Ukraine they took this as a "private opinion" of a Russian general. Besides, little is known.
    3. 0
      April 28 2022 21: 30
      because not everyone will undertake to voice such ...
  5. 0
    April 22 2022 19: 59
    Quote: Igor Viktorovich Berdin
    Who will explain why it is not the Commander-in-Chief and not even the Minister of Defense who speaks about this ??? Is this his private opinion or something else?

    What if you think for yourself? If the same is said by the Minister of Defense, and, moreover, by the Commander-in-Chief, then this will become an order to be executed. The statement of an officer of a lower rank is a stuffing for everyone, including the enemy. Let me rack my brains and build their plans based on this statement. And it's not a fact that this is misinformation. Can it be that the enemy will consider this disinformation, and will do something, but it will turn out to be true?
  6. 0
    April 24 2022 11: 52
    It is necessary to systematically bomb the industrial, general economic and logistical infrastructure of Ukraine, only then the war will be successfully completed.
  7. 0
    April 28 2022 21: 39
    It is necessary to capture the southern part of the Nikolaev and Odessa regions, taking Nikolaev and Odessa in a blockade. This territory should eventually become part of the Russian Federation, so military-civilian administrations should be created everywhere in order to clean up part of the regions adjacent to the sea from Bandera. You may have to do a sweep of Odessa, as in Mariupol. It is necessary to occupy territories based on the capabilities and resources of the Russian Federation. The main bonus in the special operation is not the Donbass, but the land corridor to the Crimea, Odessa, Transnistria. Donbass is a tool. Area boundaries can be changed. For example, the southern part of the Zaporozhye region wants to become part of the DPR.
    It is necessary to clean Kyiv hard, changing the power there. The new government in Kyiv will give the command to surrender the army, which is supposed to clean up Ukraine from the Nazis. We need to help the Ukrainians themselves fight for their country by organizing a civil war in Ukraine in order to save the lives of our soldiers.