The infrastructure of Eastern Europe is completely unprepared for a war with the Russian Federation


Having a superior army doesn't really matter if it can't be forced to move. At present, the infrastructure of Eastern Europe is completely unprepared for a war with the Russian Federation, writes the American publication Politico, against the backdrop of the recent EU ban on transport links with Russia since April 16.


The conflict between Moscow and Kiev drew attention to this issue. The European Union has already taken care of the possibility of a quick deployment of troops. Now, the farther to the east of the EU, the less prepared for this is the infrastructure, which simply cannot withstand the weight of modern American, British and German tanks. On this over the past few years regularly emphasizes attention of the former commander of the US Army in Europe, retired Lieutenant General Ben Hodges.

We must show that we can move as fast or faster than the Russian Federation in the Suwalki corridor or in Romania

- says Hodges.

Therefore, it is necessary to properly prepare roads and railways, seaports and airports. Otherwise, the troops will not be able to move quickly, which has not been given attention for many years. Eliminating bottlenecks and strengthening roads and bridges used by both military and civilians is critical to the implementation of the European defense program. But despite this, the EU does not plan any immediate increase in spending to solve the existing problem.

Last year in the EU created The Connecting Europe Fund (CEF) is a funding mechanism for infrastructure projects to support troop mobility. Its amount is 1,7 billion euros - less than the proposed 6,5 billion euros, but more than nothing at all, which some countries have advocated.

When the conflict between Russia and Ukraine was considered a distant and vague prospect in the EU, the savings were at least somehow justified. On April 7, EU diplomats agreed with the European Commission that 2022 million euros from the CEF budget in 340 will be spent on small projects. This money will be invested in improving the railway lines from the port of Antwerp (Belgium) to Germany, so that longer trains (trains) can move east, upgrading two airports in Poland and expanding the system of transport links with the Tapa military base in Estonia. Critics say that this money is categorically insufficient to prepare the EU for the threat and demand more spending.

This is funny money. It's practically nothing

– said MEP from Romania Marian-Jean Marinescu.

Marinescu insists the EU needs to allocate more money to infrastructure rather than wait for the next seven-year budget. In a debate in the European Parliament's transport committee last week, he proposed using some of the money from the Comprehensive European Recovery Plan. economics after the pandemic, to which 232 billion euros have been reserved but not yet allocated. After that, 60 MEPs sent letters to EU leaders to draw their attention to the urgent need to step up the military mobility program, summed up the media.
6 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Just a cat Offline Just a cat
    Just a cat (Bayun) April 10 2022 18: 03
    +2
    what kind of war is this if roads and bridges need to be prepared for it? and if the bridge "gets tired" will the war end? laughing
  2. Krapilin Offline Krapilin
    Krapilin (Victor) April 10 2022 19: 37
    0
    The infrastructure of Eastern Europe is completely unprepared for a war with the Russian Federation

    Eastern Europe is not going to fight with Russia on its territory. For this there is a theater of operations in Ukraine.
    All these dances with "information tambourines" about the fact that NATO or Eastern Europe will openly "fit in" for Ukraine against Russia are nonsense.

    Weapons, yes - they will supply.
    Mercenaries, yes, will be transferred.
    Logistics and intelligence information, yes, I will help the ukrovermacht.
    And in a different way to spoil finely - yes, they will.
    And so that with their "armies" they will stick themselves "into the batch" - they will not stick themselves.
  3. AndreyVCh Offline AndreyVCh
    AndreyVCh (Andrei) April 10 2022 21: 06
    -3
    The war between Russia and NATO will be without the use of ground troops, we will use nuclear missiles against them, they will be against us, in fact, that's all. We have the advantage of being able to send a few missiles into the Yellowstone Preserve. A volcano wakes up, only one name will remain from the USA. But you won’t envy the survivors either, winter will come, which will last 50 months, maybe a little less. Why build bridges, moorings and so on?! Waste of public funds.
    1. Valentin Borisov (Valentin) April 11 2022 00: 51
      0
      Yes, where does the war come from .. We need to shake money out of the EU for bridges and roads in Romania ..
  4. 123 Offline 123
    123 (123) April 10 2022 22: 30
    +2
    Nothing in this booth changes.

  5. Kofesan Offline Kofesan
    Kofesan (Valery) April 11 2022 07: 09
    0
    War with Europe? With tanks near Vienna and campfires in Budapest?

    And do we need it? Why drag around with heavy guns through the garbage heaps to make sure that being in a radioactive area is very unhealthy?