Russia is reviving the production of Soviet-designed liners


The refusal of Western corporations Boeing and Airbus to sell new aircraft to Russia and service the already delivered airliners of their production was a very painful blow from the sanctions. During the decades of liberal rule, domestic air carriers switched to foreign aircraft, and "remakes", like the "Superjet-100" and MS-21, turned out to be the product of deep international cooperation, which was not slow to affect now. After February 24, 2022, Western companies finally refused to supply us with their components. Fortunately, there is still a way out of this pit, where Russia was driven by "sislibs", and all thanks to the legacy of the "damned scoop".


After the introduction of tough sectoral sanctions by the United States and the European Union, the structure of the Russian air transportation market has changed radically. Now the American and European skies are closed to domestic airlines. If the loss of the first is not so critical, then the EU could create serious problems. What is worth, for example, the need to fly around Lithuania almost across the entire Baltic to get to the Kaliningrad region. The rest of the directions are still open to the Russians, but here another dirty trick done to us by the West comes into play.

Foreign lessors demanded the return of Boeing and Airbus aircraft, formally owned by them, due to Bermuda's refusal to certify them to Russian airlines. All the liners were promptly re-registered in Russia, refusing to return them, but this did not satisfy the formal owners, and arrests of aircraft abroad began. In other words, now almost the entire domestic air fleet has become restricted to travel abroad, or "non-flying". Now they can work quietly only on domestic flights.

And here the third dirty trick comes into play. Boeing and Airbus refused to provide technical maintenance and supply of components for the repair of aircraft of their production to Russia. This means that they will have to maintain their airworthiness through the so-called "cannibalization", or disassembly of some liners to repair others. It is clear that this cannot continue indefinitely, and the problem must be solved in a very limited time frame. Probably, the deadline will be 2030, which already appears in various reports and plans of responsible persons. Let's see what can really be done by then.

Import substitution


If you believe the statement of the head of the UAC Slyusar, then by 2025 our country will produce 36 medium-haul MS-21 liners, and after that - twice as many:

The maximum task is to reach 72 aircraft per year in Irkutsk. There is a certain phasing, we must reach 2025 by 36, and then reach 72.

According to him, if we count the PD-14 engine, then the share of Russian components in the MS-21 reaches 50%, the remaining 50% are imported, which must be replaced as soon as possible:

The task itself is quite ambitious, because, in principle, completely modern aviation complexes are being created within one country in broad international cooperation. Nevertheless, we understand which enterprises will make domestic systems with the help of which solutions. We are already starting to receive part of the system, install it on aircraft and plan to move on to the flight test stage.

In general, according to these streamlined formulations, one can understand that everything is complicated precisely because of the binding to foreign components, and the task of replacing them is not trivial. We believe in success, but something tells us that the implementation timeline may shift slightly to the right, these are the harsh realities of life under sectoral sanctions.

With the "Superjet" is still more difficult. It consists of three-quarters of imported components, its power plant itself is half of French production. Work on import substitution to the level of 97% of domestic components within the framework of the SSJ New project is already underway, there is reason to hope to get our own PD-8 engine for the remotorization of a short-haul airliner. But, to be honest, all this is reminiscent of trying to cook porridge from an ax.

Now, if the industry was not led by "sislibs", then at one time it would be possible to make a mandatory condition for the maximum localization of the production of the "Superjet" in Russia within the framework of joint ventures. Then, after February 24, these joint ventures could simply be nationalized by paying compensation to Western partners, and the scale of the disaster was not the same. But as they say, what's not done is not done.

Yes, in pursuit I would like to point out one problem that will still make itself felt. This is a dependence not only on imported components, but also on imported equipment and machine tools used in the production of the MS-21 and Superjet. Even now, industry experts are cautiously saying that in the foreseeable future, there will be difficulties with the repair and maintenance of foreign material base. Yes, imported machines are good, but they are not ours, and soon this will come back to haunt us. Warm greetings to Yegor Gaidar and his liberal associates, accomplices, who argued that Russia did not need domestic machine tools.

And what remains in the dry residue? What was created under the "damn scoop" and did not yet have time to destroy the "syslibs".

Tu-Tu


As we are among the first and predicted, the refusal of Boeing and Airbus to sell new and service already delivered liners really forced Russia to switch to Soviet-designed aircraft, since the production base for them is still preserved. Rostec State Corporation announced its plans to produce 2030 Tu-70 medium-haul narrow-body airliners by 214:

Today, these machines are already being produced in Kazan in a small series. The aircraft is equipped with domestic PS-90 engines, which are certified, have a good reputation and are mass-produced.

In addition, the head of the UAC, Slyusar, said that the Il-96 wide-body long-haul airliner will be produced in a small series of 2 aircraft per year.

Well, this is a big step in the right direction. Obviously, the structure of domestic air transportation in the coming decades will look like this: “nationalized” airliners from Boeing and Airbus will fly within Russia, and Tu-214, Il-96 and MS-21 will fly abroad, as soon as they are ready. However, production volumes, to put it mildly, are not impressive.

Why this is happening with the IL-96, in general, is understandable. So far, this long-range airliner is equipped with PS-90A engines, which do not shine with efficiency, 4 units per aircraft. For mass production, remotorization is needed for a more advanced PS-90A3 engine, and in the future - for PD-18R or PD-35. Probably the last two engines will actually appear by the end of the decade.

But it is not at all clear why Rostec decided to bet on the Tu-214, and not on the Tu-204SM. Recall that the Tu-204 liner has many modifications and was produced at once at more than two sites - in Kazan and Ulyanovsk. Tatarstan received an order for 70 Tu-214s equipped with PS-90A engines, that is, approximately 8,75% of the aircraft will be produced per year. Not as much as we would like. But there is also Ulyanovsk, where a modification of the Tu-204SM liner was developed. And she looks even more promising.

After a deep modernization and updating of the on-board radio-electronic equipment, the Tu-204SM has significantly increased its commercial attractiveness. Its crew was reduced from 3 people to 2. Thanks to the installation of a modified PS-90A2 engine, its take-off weight increased, its working life increased, and maintenance costs decreased. All of its flight performance characteristics were significantly improved. Tu-204SM has become quite competitive even with modern liners from Boeing and Airbus. Iran planned to purchase a batch of Russian medium-haul aircraft and even organize their production under license on its territory, but this did not happen for purely political reasons.

The question arises why, in the conditions of obvious time trouble in which Russia finds itself, decisions are made to produce such a small series of the Tu-214 liner in Kazan and the site in Ulyanovsk is completely ignored, where it is possible to simultaneously produce the most modernized Tu-204SM? Unclear. It is also unclear why none of the responsible persons is talking about returning to the idea of ​​selling Tehran a license to assemble the Tu-204SM and start making money on the supply of components to Iran.

By the way, under this project it will be possible to launch mass production of upgraded PD-90A3 engines, which were developed to replace the PD-90A2, where American Technology. The improved characteristics of the PD-90A3 would make it possible to make the four-engine wide-body airliners Il-96 more competitive now, on which we will eventually fly on long-distance routes.
22 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. wolf46 Offline wolf46
    wolf46 April 9 2022 12: 02
    +4
    There is lobbying for the interests of Tatarstan.
    Yes, by analogy with the CR929 and PD-35 project, it was possible to start making money now on the Tu-204SM and PS-90A3.
  2. faiver Offline faiver
    faiver (Andrei) April 9 2022 12: 41
    +1
    and the site in Ulyanovsk is completely ignored, where it is possible to simultaneously produce the most modernized Tu-204SM? Unclear.

    - well, it may not be clear to you, a new IL-76 is being produced in Ulyanovsk, and to be more precise, they are trying to produce it, it turns out badly so far. And you want to load them with the Tu-204SM. It is also necessary to determine whether the engine specialists will be able to issue the necessary additional volume for the engines ....
  3. Marzhecki Offline Marzhecki
    Marzhecki (Sergei) April 9 2022 12: 44
    +1
    Quote: faiver
    - well, it may not be clear to you, a new IL-76 is being produced in Ulyanovsk, and to be more precise, they are trying to produce it, it turns out badly so far. And you want to load them with the Tu-204SM.

    Ah, well then.
    Or maybe it is worth reconsidering how efficiently production is organized?
    1. faiver Offline faiver
      faiver (Andrei) April 9 2022 13: 42
      +4
      who will review? where are those great producers? Generations have already grown consumersAnd not creators
      To be frank, I'm not sure that Kazan will reach the announced figures
      1. Marzhecki Offline Marzhecki
        Marzhecki (Sergei) April 9 2022 14: 28
        0
        Life will force
    2. InanRom Offline InanRom
      InanRom (Ivan) April 9 2022 13: 46
      +3
      Production - almost nothing, but "efficient" "multi-level" management ....) everything is like with the UES and Russian Railways - everything is fragmented into a bunch of offices and firms with general, deputies, deputies, deputies, etc., and all with "chocolate" salaries and for 1 hard worker with a "wrench" - 27 paper maraks (someone's relatives, matchmakers, sons-in-law and daughters). There is no one to work (cadres are not "our everything"?!) and most importantly - why? all these "effective" and so well live at the expense of tranches from the budget. We received 100 aircraft for production, assembled ... two and then vip-boards for officials, the rest "shrunken" and ... we get the next one. And this is not the first year, and not even ten. I don’t know how it is in Ulyanovsk, but according to the Kazan aviation - everything is exactly like that.
    3. orange Offline orange
      orange (ororpore) April 10 2022 09: 18
      0
      ..... how efficiently is production organized?

      - Said a man who had not worked a day in the shop or behind the machine.
      Mr. author, do you even know how to use a caliper?
  4. akm8226 Offline akm8226
    akm8226 April 9 2022 12: 53
    +2
    First - the whole liberda to Kolyma or to the wall. Second - anyone who grunts even a word of doubt or against Russia - there too. Thirdly, is it now clear to everyone that the "buy everything" option does not work? Conclusion - it is necessary to develop our own aircraft, but only if the first two conditions are met.
  5. DPN Offline DPN
    DPN (DPN) April 9 2022 13: 32
    +4
    So the Soviet "galoshes" came in handy, which means we will LIVE.
  6. Mikhail Novikov Offline Mikhail Novikov
    Mikhail Novikov (Mikhail Novikov) April 9 2022 14: 47
    -2
    Author, arrogance harms the intellect. You forgot about a trifle: the pogrom in Russian industry carried out by the Yeltsin gang in the 90s. "If the industry was not led by syslibs," Russia, with a complete lack of free funds, had to re-create an industry that produces avionics, and it would still be impossible to produce aircraft. Your article is advice from an outsider.
    1. Marzhecki Offline Marzhecki
      Marzhecki (Sergei) April 9 2022 16: 28
      +4
      "If the industry was not led by syslibs," Russia, with a complete lack of free funds, had to re-create an industry that produces avionics, and it would still be impossible to produce aircraft.

      What what? In the absence of funds? How much dough is thrown on the Superjet? And where are the results? Designer without spare parts.

      Your article is advice from an outsider.

      Seen "expert". Pogosyanovsky or what?

      Author, arrogance harms the intellect

      Yes. Apply this judgment to yourself
    2. Vladimir Orlov Offline Vladimir Orlov
      Vladimir Orlov (Vladimir) April 10 2022 00: 54
      +3
      This is a common cause, no one is an outsider.

      It’s bad that the volumes are small, but you will have to learn, moreover, in many industries (our productivity is 3 times less than Western ones, according to the UN).

      The good thing is that there are technologies ready for use TODAY, and not sometime (when the promoted "constructors" are reformatted).

      Obviously, the Soviet models were ruined by foreign Boeing lobbyists, etc., ours are not bad (and the arguments about fuel efficiency for a country that is a net oil exporter sound strange).
      I will say more - this is a common practice of Western competition: squeeze out goods with poor marketing, promote your own, buy up a factory, take out useful / close the rest or put it on a screwdriver assembly (key components are only “from there”, they are NEVER localized. Now we are standing , we are waiting for them to be graciously allowed to be delivered or translated into Chinese). On the example of the industry where I work, there is not a single truly independent Russian manufacturer left, except for the defense industry. Of every 3-4 plants purchased, 1 remains.
  7. Larisa Z. Offline Larisa Z.
    Larisa Z. (Larisa Vavilova) April 9 2022 20: 14
    0
    And where is the liner consisting only of domestic components and materials, which was advertised through all channels? Dad said that the USSR was ruined by lies, people simply stopped believing in what they themselves said. We must stop lying, let the bitter truth be... Enough of illusions.
  8. Sergey Latyshev Offline Sergey Latyshev
    Sergey Latyshev (Serge) April 9 2022 22: 56
    0
    Well Pleasant promises have been made. They even managed to reproduce.
    25 is just around the corner, the result will be clear ....
  9. mykola kovacs Offline mykola kovacs
    mykola kovacs (mykola kovac) April 10 2022 00: 59
    0
    The slyusar is a clinical impresario (concert organizer) by profession of a single coupletist who has nothing to do with aviation or any other industry. He cares about which Tu-204 and where to produce it.
  10. Vladimir Orlov Offline Vladimir Orlov
    Vladimir Orlov (Vladimir) April 10 2022 01: 10
    0
    Author, keep writing, share your articles with “decision makers” (yes, even deputies). It might be worth organizing some kind of public organization. Aviation lovers. From a public organization, it can and will be more weighty ...
    An active position + proper argumentation will probably have the right impact on the processes in the industry.
    1. Marzhecki Offline Marzhecki
      Marzhecki (Sergei) April 10 2022 07: 18
      +1
      I try to do my best in my place. He wrote about the need to renovate Soviet projects long before February 24, because he was sure of the correctness of this decision.
  11. 123 Offline 123
    123 (123) April 10 2022 09: 32
    0
    But, to be honest, all this is reminiscent of trying to cook porridge from an ax.

    This is just an attempt to cook a normal dish. With the use of not only home-grown turnips, but also imported potatoes, seasonings that do not grow in our country. The Superjet was the first, and it's never easy. Well, we didn’t grow ingredients for a normal dish, they took imported ones and went ahead. The creators of the MS-21 went the same way, it’s already a little easier for them, something has already begun to grow with us, but not everything grows as it should, something in greenhouses, and something else at the seedling stage. But all this will be, you just have to wait for the harvest.
    There was a Tu-204/214, there was a Yak-242. The creators of the Yak went ahead and created the MS-21, created from the best, corresponding to the world level. It is not their fault that much of this was not produced in the country. And now they are pecked for it, they say they would sit with their Yak-242 and be silent in a rag like everyone else.

    The question arises why, in the conditions of obvious time trouble in which Russia finds itself, decisions are made to produce such a small series of the Tu-214 liner in Kazan and the site in Ulyanovsk is completely ignored, where it is possible to simultaneously produce the most modernized Tu-204SM? Unclear.

    Doesn't it occur to you that there is simply nothing and no one to make a big series of?

    It is also unclear why none of the responsible persons is talking about returning to the idea of ​​selling Tehran a license to assemble the Tu-204SM and start making money on the supply of components to Iran.

    Do you have accessories for Iran? You have decided to increase production at home and send it for export. the aviation industry is not a magic pot, by itself it does not cook as much as you need.
    And yes, is Iran still interested? Asked him?

    The improved characteristics of the PD-90A3 would make it possible to make the four-engine wide-body airliners Il-96 more competitive now, on which we will eventually fly on long-distance routes.

    Competitive with whom? With IL-96 on PD-90A engines? A liner with four engines cannot compete with twin engines. Where did you get this? Stop telling people stories.
  12. Killlock Offline Killlock
    Killlock (Sergei) April 11 2022 08: 02
    0
    If you believe the statement of the head of the UAC Slyusar, then by 2025 our country will produce 36 medium-haul MS-21 liners, and after that - twice as many

    100% false. Especially when you consider that in the glider the share of imports is not 50%, but 70-75%, almost like a superjet. If at least 2025 MS-1-21 New aircraft is produced at the end of 310, I will print and eat my article criticizing the Ministry of Industry and Trade and the UAC.

    Вот моя статья: https://zen.yandex.ru/media/id/5e2b7b9378125e00b13d4fa2/chto-budet-s-superdjetom-i-ms21-pri-sankciiah-62210997c02b772579fcd47f

    But it is not at all clear why Rostec decided to bet on the Tu-214, and not on the Tu-204SM.

    There is such a word - sabotage. At KAPO, both Tu-204SM and Tu-214 can be produced, the difference is only in the filling. Nevertheless, I do not believe that KAPO will be able to produce 11 aircraft a year - this is not realistic, which is why KAPO gave the order. The Ministry of Industry and Trade and the UAC Tu-204SM are like a bone in the throat. Imagine that for 7 years of slipping of the MS-21 Tu-204SM, 70 pieces would already be riveted, what a loss for the MS-21 in terms of orders. And for another 4-5 years of slipping, another 40-100 pieces. The Tu-204SM would have saved our aviation, but neither the UAC, nor the Ministry of Industry and Trade, nor the government, nor the Kremlin needs this aircraft, it is much more interesting to pump billions into a non-Soviet aircraft and play international cooperation. Giant damage? But they don't care about the damage.
    The Tu-214 is an obsolete aircraft, it was chosen because as soon as the MS-21 goes into production, unlike the Tu-204SM, it can be scrapped.

    Even boring. All as I predicted. An attempt to save aircraft designers by pumping money into them + unrealistic statements about the fact that the MS-21 is about to be launched into mass production + sabotage on the only aircraft that can save us is the Tu-204SM in Ulyanovsk / KAPO 15 pieces a year. Superjet and A and B will soon stop without spare parts. A stock of 25 MS-21 sets + 4 PV-1400 engines will not save us. In short, aviation is over.
  13. hlp5118 Offline hlp5118
    hlp5118 (hlp) April 11 2022 08: 59
    0
    As I understand it, for 30 years - the result is zero, again everything is from the USSR. The oligarchs raked in 3.5 billion that was allocated for new projects, but the people, "on the sleepers again", and the sleepers did not go far, there are no high-speed ones at 500 km / h.
  14. bratchanin3 Offline bratchanin3
    bratchanin3 (Gennady) April 12 2022 08: 21
    -1
    Well, yes, the sislibs are to blame for everything, and if you look deeper, then Yeltsin and Gorbachev are to blame, and if the author looked and spread his brains, then where did all these Gorbachevs with the Gaidars and those who put them in high party posts and carefully promoted and protected. And now, of course, Aunt Motya is to blame - she didn’t wash the floors in their offices like that!
  15. kriten Offline kriten
    kriten (Vladimir) April 16 2022 11: 22
    0
    By the 30th year, as many as 5 or 6 aircraft are promised to be built. Is it being revived?