Tokyo's statement about the Kuriles could lead to Japanese aggression against Russia

March 22 2022 24

On March 21, the Russian Foreign Ministry, taking into account the unfriendly actions of Japan, refused to conduct further negotiations on the conclusion of a peace treaty between Moscow and Tokyo. As a response to the imposed anti-Russian sanctions, the Russian Federation also stopped visa-free trips of the Japanese to the southern Kuriles.

In this regard, the Japanese authorities sent a "severe protest" to the Russian Foreign Ministry. How it differs from the usual note, we do not know. But in the "Land of the Rising Sun" they do not hide the fact that they still hope to return the "northern territories" (the islands of Kunashir, Shikotan and Iturup, as well as the Habomai ridge).

The head of the Japanese government, Fumio Kishida, called the decision of the Russian authorities unacceptable. He was not even embarrassed that before that Tokyo had joined the sanctions of the West and deprived Moscow of the most favored nation status in trade. This great friend of the US probably thinks the Russians should have applauded.

We consider this absolutely unfair and completely unacceptable, in connection with which we strongly protest

- declared Kishida.

At the same time, the Prime Minister specified that Japan would not change its course towards "solving the problem of the northern territories", based on previous agreements. It should be noted that on March 7, probably having completely lost touch with reality, Kishida loudly объявил about the "sovereignty" of Japan over the southern Kuriles.

We remind you that the negotiations between Moscow and Tokyo were based on the Soviet-Japanese declaration of 1956, which provided for the transfer of the Habomai ridge and Shikotan Island by the USSR to Japan. However, after the adoption of amendments to the Constitution of the Russian Federation in 2020, this became impossible.

At the same time, it should be taken into account that Moscow and Tokyo are still at war after World War II, and such anti-Russian statements may be followed by real Japanese aggression against Russia. Tokyo may arrogantly assume that Moscow is heavily occupied by Kiev, so it will not be up to the southern Kuriles. The Japanese militarists simply forgot that they were guests on the Japanese islands, which since ancient times belonged to the Ainu people.

Information

Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.

wamp

-3

22 March 2022 11: 00

The Japanese militarists simply forgot that they were guests on the Japanese islands, which since ancient times belonged to the Ainu people.

And where did the Japanese themselves come from then ?!
1. chemurij
  
  +2
  
  22 March 2022 11: 23
  
  Quote: Wamp
  The Japanese militarists simply forgot that they were guests on the Japanese islands, which since ancient times belonged to the Ainu people.
  
  And where did the Japanese themselves come from then ?!
  
  From the Chinese. The Chinese say that the Japanese are not the correct Chinese, the bad Chinese who settled on these islands.
  1. Akuzenka
    
    0
    
    22 March 2022 11: 36
    
    The Japanese are the result of mixing the Ainu with the Chinese. The process was long and not very productive. They didn't mix well. The phenotypes are completely different. But since kind of one, yet patience and "work" gave results.
    1. chemurij
      
      +1
      
      22 March 2022 11: 49
      
      Everything can be, and this only confirms that the Japanese are no longer Ainu, especially since they have not been Chinese for a long time, so if they lived quietly and calmly on their islands, they would be better off from this in the first place.
      1. Akuzenka
        
        +1
        
        22 March 2022 12: 30
        
        I can not agree.
  2. Eduard Aplombov
    
    0
    
    22 March 2022 18: 32
    
    wrong chinese,
2. DV tam 25
  
  -2
  
  22 March 2022 12: 56
  
  Nonsense - the Japanese have nothing to do with the Chinese and in general with any South Asian peoples (especially the Ainu, who are closer to the Papuans).
  These are the Chukchi. Came from the north of Eurasia. They walked in a very peculiar way, incl. through the north of Primorye, Khabarovsk Territory, Sakhalin, and possibly Kamchatka. One genetics. There are large-scale studies on this topic in the 90s, and the Japs themselves gave the loot. True, the results of the Japanese themselves did not recognize this. They did not like being Chukchi. But this is a fact.
  1. Lynx2000
    
    0
    
    23 March 2022 02: 20
    
    The Chukchi as an ethnic group appeared on the territory of modern residence (by historical standards) relatively recently, in the course of migration from the West. They could not participate in ethnogenesis on the territory of the Japanese archipelago.
    Japan data has been updated since the 90s...
    Currently, there are two hypotheses or theories of the origin of the Japanese in the scientific community.
    Opponents agree on one thing that the representatives of the first Jomon culture, more precisely, the Jomon anthropological type of representatives of this culture, did not look like either the Ainu or the Japanese.
    However, the Ainu, the Ryukyuans, and the northeastern population of Yamato are considered their direct descendants.
    Moreover, archaeologists have found that there were several waves of migration to the Japanese archipelago from the Korean Peninsula.
    The Japanese themselves do not deny the influence of Chinese culture on the formation of the Japanese archipelago.
    1. DV tam 25
      
      -1
      
      23 March 2022 02: 57
      
      Nonsense through and through. Learn materiel. I repeat - modern and non-modern Japanese have nothing to do with the Ainu. To claim otherwise is sheer ignorance. As for you, it’s not even funny - they piled everything up and made a schoolboy’s conclusion). Good luck in learning. Drobyshevsky reproachfully looks at you))).
      
      There are no intelligible theories of the origin of the Japanese, except that they are from the Chukchi (which is an unaccepted fact, but genetics ...) does not exist. Unless, of course, these are theories of British scientists ...
    2. DV tam 25
      
      0
      
      23 March 2022 03: 55
      
      Indeed, since the 90s, some areas in anthropology have greatly degraded, especially in the West (Negroes have disappeared there). Opponents can converge or diverge - this is their own business, and the Japanese, as they were Chukchi, have remained. Don’t touch the Jomon culture, really something, but these majestic buildings have EXACTLY nothing to do with the Japs, by the way, in Japan, apparently, they are presented quite fragmentarily (maybe time has tried, or maybe not) and are mostly scattered in the adjacent territories of the Russian Far East (Primorye, possibly Sakhalin, Khabarovsk Territory (assumed)). There is in Korea. Maybe to the south ... but who was looking for them there? There were no migrations from the Korean Peninsula, leading to some kind of emergence of civilizational processes on the Japanese islands. It is a fact. There were migrations, of course, as without them, yes, that's all, they just were and ... swam away. And there were no traces left. It seems like 2% of the Japanese wear the "Korean" haplogroup, but where it came from - no one cares. I repeat once again - modern and non-modern Japanese have nothing to do with the Ainu, different genetics, different cultures, everything (!) is different, not a single contact, unless you consider that the robes are Japanese (the so-called . kimono) borrowed))). Presented by Hanihara, by the way, in 1991, the "dual structure model" of the origin of the Japanese, in fact, did not explain anything. No way. Nothing is mentioned at all about studies in the 90s of FENU, but in vain - they were closest to the truth, perhaps, of course, as much as it is appropriate in such studies. Although old finds were discovered and compared, incl. parking lots, artifacts, they were identical in Primorye, in Hokkaido and in the Khabarovsk Territory. But, these studies are forgotten and not recognized by the Japanese. Well, then the N1 haplogroup, which the Japanese and the Chukchi have, has not gone away, it is in them and is waiting for an explanation. And such an interesting feature as alcohol intolerance, yes, this ONE people has this. In the end, everything is certainly not as it seems, this is understandable, but at the moment there are no theories of hypotheses or whatever that would refute that the Japanese and the Chukchi are one great people! But most likely, the outcome of what is - this is so. Let the Japs themselves do not like it). And then they came up with - the sacred wind of Kamikaze, you know ... Chukchi, just Chukchi! In short, good luck with your research. Drobyshevsky reproachfully (crossed out) looks at you with hope))).
      
      Influence and origin is of course close, but completely from different songs).
      1. Lynx2000
        
        0
        
        23 March 2022 13: 53
        
        Are you sure that only Chukchi and Japanese belong to branch N1?
        This group (N) has many subgroups...
        Is alcohol intolerance inherent only to the Chukchi and the Japanese?
        S. Drobyshevsky as a popularizer of science is known to me, who is interested in history.
        For example, in the Bulletin of the Far Eastern Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences 2005 No. 4, materials were published: "Some Problems of the Stone Age of Primorye" by A.M. Kuznetsova, AA. Krupyanko, B.K. Starostina, T. Kobayashi, T. Fujimogo, S. Ito.
        When, according to you, the Chukchi (or their ancestors?) entered the territory of the Japanese archipelago, what was the route of their migration to Japan, in what period of time?
        Tell S. Drobyshevsky is currently an indisputable authority in the field of anthropology and genetics, paleontology and archeology?
        
        DV tam 25
        
        0
        
        26 March 2022 02: 11
        
        I'll start with when. Perhaps there were several waves. But the most massive was about 10-12 thousand years ago. There are legends about these events among the Ainu, which allegedly say that once many, many yellow, small, hungry people sailed on boats. The Ainu tried to make friends with them, but they were aggressive and did not make contact, and therefore the Ainu had to kill them, there were many of these people and the Ainu still had to leave their homes. As a result, after 1500 years of cohabitation, the Japanese have survived the Ainu from all the islands in Hokkaido to date, absorbing their culture almost completely and passing it off as their own. Oral traditions were received in the 18th and early 20th centuries by Russian soldiers, explorers, and settlers. Naturally, not in this form, it is, as it were, a squeeze from some of them). I already wrote about the route above. It seems to be the most logical; the infiltration came from Hokkaido. According to haplogroups ... it’s difficult and it’s probably impossible to discuss this moment in a nutshell. Let's just say that genetics does not deny the possible (very possible) relationship between the Chukchi and the Japanese. About alcohol tolerance is a medical fact - the Japanese and the Chukchi, or rather their bodies, practically do not process the by-product of alcohol, acetaldehyde. Yes, this applies to many Asian peoples to one degree or another, but if you delve into the aspects, it is the Japanese and Chukchi who are almost completely deprived of this important gene. Again, here again we need to look at genetics, since the Japanese are not one people, but at least there are three of its branches, then the Ryukyus have this trait in no more than a third of the population (or less, here, in general, the question is, the Ryukyus are not at all the Japanese seem to) and so on. On average, 70-80% of the Japanese, almost 99% of the Chukchi.
        Of course, it is impossible to say 100% that the Chukchi settled the Japanese islands and created such a distinctive culture, but anthropology, and history, are such branches of knowledge that they can hardly claim accuracy). However, it is very likely that, perhaps, the events were in such a vein.
        S. Drobyshevsky is a promising young scientist and a wonderful popularizer of science (good phrase))).
        
        Lynx2000
        
        0
        
        26 March 2022 09: 54
        
        As far as modern science knows, the Chukchi are not autochthonous peoples of the modern North-East of Russia, they migrated to the territory of modern residence from Eastern Siberia in the period from 800 to 1000 AD.
        You write about the penetration of the Chukchi into the territory of the Japanese archipelago, quote: "the legends of the Ainu, which allegedly says that once many, many yellow, small, hungry people sailed on boats. ... As a result, after 1500 years of living together, the Japanese survived Ainu from all the islands in Hokkaido"
        Questions: Were these little yellow people Chukchi? If, in your opinion, the Chukchi migrated to the Japanese islands from the North, then why did they oust the Ainu from the southern islands, but could not conquer (assimilate) Hokkaido? Not logical.
        Regarding genetics and anthropology, peoples with the r1a genotype live in Central Asia, but they do not even remotely resemble Europeans (Slavs) ...
        In some modern Japanese, there is Ainu blood, you yourself admit this fact. Moreover, some samurai clans of Japan trace their ancestry from the Ainu clans of warriors, for example, the clan of Shinzo Abe.
        Regarding S. Drobyshevsky, I do not deny that he is a good and young scientist, however, I recommend that you read the article from the journal "Scientific Achievements" in the Anthropology section: "Ancient genomics reveals the triple origin of the Japanese population" published in 2021: https:/ /www.science.org/doi/10.1126/sciadv.abh2419
        
        DV tam 25
        
        0
        
        27 March 2022 01: 39
        
        You don't want to understand anything ...... With regards to the fact that the Chukchi are not the indigenous northern population, this has absolutely nothing to do with it. And the dates of their migrations are incorrect. As for the travel of the Chukchi to the Japanese islands, I wrote that the movement came from Hokkaido and after some time the Japanese forced the Ainu out of Hokkaido by the modern time period, capturing, in fact, all the islands !!! That's what it is about. In general, I understood you, you do not understand what is written well, I thought that I could discuss with you, but probably not. Therefore, do not give me advice, it is stupid, not knowing, and also showing your ignorance. I wrote about the triple origin of the Japanese above, as well as about the fact that it is about nothing (the Japanese themselves admit this, not to mention international researchers). In short, good luck with your research!
        
        Lynx2000
        
        0
        
        30 March 2022 03: 41
        
        Quote: DV tam 25
        You don't want to understand...
        And the dates of their migrations are incorrect.
        
        As for the travel of the Chukchi to the Japanese islands, I wrote that the movement came from Hokkaido and after some time the Japanese forced out the Ainu in Hokkaido by the modern period of time, capturing, in fact, all the islands !!!
        
        I wrote above about the triple origin of the Japanese, as well as about the fact that it is about nothing (the Japanese themselves admit this, not to mention international researchers). In short, good luck with your research!
        
        You yourself write, the Japanese are the Chukchi. In your opinion, the Chukchi began migrating to the Japanese archipelago from about. Hokkaido, further south, and then ... after some time, the Ainu were ousted by the Japanese. It turns out that the Chukchi passed by the Ainu from Hokkaido to the south, and then, as the Japanese returned to the north, displacing the Ainu...
        Your "message" about the triple origin was not specific, on the contrary, it was understood as the origin of the Japanese from the Chukchi, period, as an indisputable fact ?!
        If you are related to history, paleontology, archeology, then I take my hat off to you, because I am interested in the history of the regions of my residence. However, if you are just "interested" like me, but reasoning like a "specialist" and declaring your opinion as indisputable, then from me - a minus for excessive arrogance.
Rusa

+3

22 March 2022 11: 07

The Japanese authorities can go to the restroom with their "severe protest". Fig them in oil, not the Kuril Islands.
Vladimir Vladimirovich Vorontsov

+3

22 March 2022 11: 49

Salmon tail splashed on the wave
The islands disappeared in the fog
They will not return
Deal with Nihon ...
1. The comment was deleted.
Then

+1

22 March 2022 12: 16

At the same time, it should be taken into account that Moscow and Tokyo are still at war after the Second World War.

The official cessation of the state of war between the USSR and Japan took place on December 12, 1956, the day the Moscow Declaration of 1956 came into force.
1. DV tam 25
  
  +2
  
  22 March 2022 13: 03
  
  Exactly! War is over. And the fact that the Japanese do not recognize the results is their own business. All in all, don't care. Japan is a wonderful country, but it will NEVER be an empire again!
  1. chemurij
    
    0
    
    22 March 2022 13: 31
    
    Quote: DV tam 25
    Exactly! War is over. And the fact that the Japanese do not recognize the results is their own business. All in all, don't care. Japan is a wonderful country, but it will NEVER be an empire again!
    
    This is true, but they still have the Emperor, Just in case.
    1. DV tam 25
      
      +2
      
      22 March 2022 14: 22
      
      They have an emperor. And there is no empire. Like no gas oil coal freedom and mind!
Tixiy

+1

22 March 2022 14: 46

What is being done!!! I learn that the Japanese are descended from the Chinese, and American geneticists have proven that Jews and Arabs are one people! How to live!? Who is next?!
1. chemurij
  
  0
  
  22 March 2022 15: 04
  
  Quote from Tixi
  Who is next?!
  
  Like who, we of course. Tomorrow the Americans will prove that we (Russians, Tatars, Chuvashs, and about 200 other nationalities descended from them, that is, from the Americans and nothing else, because it simply cannot be otherwise, but simply cannot be, because nothing else.
Kofesan

+3

22 March 2022 15: 42

Sweet Hokkaido
I love you Khonshu
For your Shikoku
I am Kyushu.