It is shown how easily Russian air defense shoots down the Turkish "Bayraktar" over Ukraine

25

A video appeared on the Web showing how easily the Russian air defense system detects and shoots down the Bayraktar TB2 UAV flying over Ukraine during a special military operation to denazify and demilitarize Ukrainian territory. The presented frames document the operation of one of the air defense systems of the RF Armed Forces.

It should be noted that Kyiv receives mentioned UAVs from Ankara. Recently, another batch of drones for Ukraine arrived in Poland from Turkey. At the same time, Russian military personnel regularly reset these deliveries.




For example, on March 4, 2022, by decree of the President of Russia, for the courage shown, the title of Hero of the Russian Federation was awarded to the commander of the anti-aircraft missile division, Captain Alexei Ponkratov. On February 28, his unit with well-aimed fire destroyed one Su-25 and two Bayraktars of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, which were about to strike at a concentration of Russian troops. The next day, two more Bayraktar TB2 APUs were shot down. Thus, Ponkratov's division prevented an air attack and saved the lives of servicemen of the RF Armed Forces.

We remind you that the Russian special operation in Ukraine began on February 24. According to the statements of the military-political leadership of the Russian Federation, all the tasks set will be fulfilled in any case. This will either be forced, i.e. by military means, or voluntarily by Kiev itself, but here everything depends on the degree of stubbornness of the Ukrainian leadership.
25 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +15
    6 March 2022 14: 46
    The "Bayraktarov" sect will now start to burn, especially among the bandits of all sorts, how is it, this is an invincible weapon, and their Svidomo will easily defeat the "backward" RF Armed Forces just like Azerbaijan Armenia crying
  2. 123
    +14
    6 March 2022 14: 47
    Work beautifully good
    1. +13
      6 March 2022 14: 54
      But not as beautiful as Rebbe Gunnerminer would like laughing
      1. The comment was deleted.
      2. 123
        +5
        6 March 2022 16: 06
        But not as beautiful as Rebbe Gunnerminer would like

        It's impossible to please an old bastard request
        An involuntary and endless release of discontent, like a cow in a bomb bay, is a calling. laughing
        1. +3
          7 March 2022 09: 52
          Quote: 123
          It's impossible to please an old bastard

          A grumbler, or a banal troll?
  3. +9
    6 March 2022 15: 11
    Bayraktaaaaaaaaar - a burnt horse, bayraktaaaaaaaar - the shell landed the horse!
  4. -6
    6 March 2022 15: 24
    I have never been an air defense specialist, but there are questions about the video. Firstly: why does such a simple, in general, goal as TV2 spend as much as 2 sp? Secondly: they never showed the destruction of the drone. Or did the second sp also not hit the target?
    1. +3
      6 March 2022 15: 35
      And who told you that this is a real video of the defeat of the BPL?
    2. +4
      6 March 2022 15: 51
      I don’t know how it is now, but in the USSR, 2 missiles were always used for guaranteed hitting a target, since the effectiveness of one missile was around 95 percent, and 100+ are required to complete the task.
    3. +5
      6 March 2022 16: 35
      2 missiles are nothing against the background of the fact that the Armed Forces of Ukraine are losing 1 UAV.
      1. +4
        6 March 2022 21: 26
        Right. The lives of Russian soldiers are much more important.
        For which gratitude and respect for the anti-aircraft gunners of the Russian Federation.
    4. +1
      8 March 2022 10: 52
      This is the use of cheap short-range missiles designed specifically to destroy UAVs. Last year they were tested for adoption. The first missile was damaged (these missiles exploded near the target with the ejection of a cloud of fragments), and the second one already went to finish off after the first missile. It can be seen that the drone lost control and fell into a tailspin.
  5. AND
    +4
    6 March 2022 15: 37
    Quote: m.cempbell
    I have never been an air defense specialist, but there are questions about the video. Firstly: why does such a simple, in general, goal as TV2 spend as much as 2 sp? Secondly: they never showed the destruction of the drone. Or did the second sp also not hit the target?

    You probably saw that the first missile hit the target and TV2 was already falling. The gunner probably decided to play it safe, next time he will understand that one missile is enough for TV2.
    1. +1
      8 March 2022 06: 45
      Ours did not immediately understand that the UAV was falling or it did not immediately begin to fall.
  6. +4
    6 March 2022 17: 19
    Quote: AND
    Quote: m.cempbell
    I have never been an air defense specialist, but there are questions about the video. Firstly: why does such a simple, in general, goal as TV2 spend as much as 2 sp? Secondly: they never showed the destruction of the drone. Or did the second sp also not hit the target?

    You probably saw that the first missile hit the target and TV2 was already falling. The gunner probably decided to play it safe, next time he will understand that one missile is enough for TV2.

    In order to guarantee. The enemy, after all, in principle, could have provided some kind of trap in his apparatus? Shooting something smoking for example? Submariners. do similar. Shooting noise traps.
  7. +3
    6 March 2022 17: 39
    You won’t get off with Bayraktars alone)
  8. The comment was deleted.
  9. KLV
    0
    7 March 2022 08: 12
    I wonder if UAVs of sufficiently large sizes are capable of performing aerobatics? For example, to break away from missiles, go into a dive and get out of it near the ground? Are they strong enough to build?
    1. 0
      7 March 2022 10: 11
      Quote: KLV
      I wonder if UAVs of sufficiently large sizes are capable of performing aerobatics?

    2. 0
      8 March 2022 11: 03
      No. For maneuvering, you also need to detect a missile launch on it. And its filling does not have such capabilities, and the operator, after all, is not inside the craft, but controls it via a communication channel. The operator sees what the CCTV camera sees. Yes, and in order to maneuver competently, you need to be a pilot with appropriate training. And the layout of these UAVs suggests that it is not possible to make sudden movements.
    3. 0
      8 March 2022 13: 26
      Quote: KLV
      to break away from the missiles, go into a dive and get out of it near the ground?

      It's quiet. Even if it accelerates by diving, it will fall apart from vibration (flutter).
      And it has a limit G (overload during maneuver) - this characteristic is much less than that of air defense missiles.
  10. -4
    7 March 2022 12: 26
    Everyone sees that this is exactly "Bayraktar"? (And "who else" else). Everyone sees the explosion of the first rocket? (Yes). Does everyone see that the second rocket flew off somewhere? ( Yes). "Bayraktar" - killed? Yes! fellow
    1. +1
      8 March 2022 11: 07
      Bayraktar fell into a tailspin, 100 percent that he was shot down - either the control equipment or controls were damaged. So intelligible?
  11. -7
    7 March 2022 13: 32
    These are corncobs in terms of speed. and the height is not so hot. They are shot down wherever they are allowed. Syria, Libya, Ukraine...
    2 missiles, take our word for it...
    1. 0
      8 March 2022 06: 47
      If these are corn, then rockets must be used "corn"
  12. AND
    +1
    7 March 2022 16: 50
    Quote: Tamaray and I go as a couple!!! Sergey Latyshev and Monster_Fat
    These are corncobs in terms of speed. and the height is not so hot. They are shot down wherever they are allowed. Syria, Libya, Ukraine...
    2 missiles, take our word for it...

    Maybe there is something else to blurt out the headquarters of cheap euro-propaganda? lol