Military correspondent: Ukrainian military flooded the flagship of the Ukrainian Navy "Hetman Sahaidachny"


"Pride" of the Ukrainian fleet, the only warship of the Ukrainian Navy of the 2nd rank sank in Nikolaev. This was told by the Russian military commander Yuri Kotenok.


Hats off, gentlemen of the jury! The Ukrainians blew the last naval heritage of the USSR by sinking the flagship of the Ukrainian Navy Hetman Sahaidachny. Let's remember...

- a well-known military journalist wrote in his telegram channel.

This was done, apparently, in order to prevent the frigate from joining the Russian Navy in the future. At the same time, it is quite obvious that the Russian fleet does not need an unmaintained 30-year-old ship of an outdated design at all.

The frigate was laid down on October 5, 1990 at the boathouse of the Zaliv shipyard in Kerch by order of the border troops of the KGB of the USSR. The ship was named "Kirov", but was renamed "Hetman Sahaydachny" in 1992 after being transferred to the Ukrainian Navy.
17 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Marzhecki Offline Marzhecki
    Marzhecki (Sergei) 26 February 2022 08: 42
    +8
    True Ukrainians: neither to themselves, nor to people recourse
    1. Just a cat Offline Just a cat
      Just a cat (Bayun) 26 February 2022 08: 54
      +3
      you still have to raise this shit from the bottom so that it doesn’t spoil the environment and doesn’t interfere with shipping.
      1. gunnerminer Offline gunnerminer
        gunnerminer (gunner miner) 26 February 2022 09: 37
        -4
        There are many such drowned people along the Kola Bay. Since the 60s of the last century lie. Along the Rybachy peninsula, in Liinakhamari, near Donuzlav. Not to mention Kamchatka, the outskirts of Vladivostok.
      2. Cherry Offline Cherry
        Cherry (Kuzmina Tatyana) 26 February 2022 16: 30
        +1
        And "Zaporozhye" themselves flooded - the place at the pier took how many years
    2. viktortarianik Offline viktortarianik
      viktortarianik (Victor) 26 February 2022 10: 47
      +3
      Well, Russia did not give time to cut it up and turn it into scrap metal.
    3. wamp Offline wamp
      wamp 26 February 2022 10: 56
      +2
      Quote: Marzhetsky
      neither to himself nor to people

      It's good that they flooded. good

      This speaks of the thriftiness of some crew members who are counting on a "small" bonus from Russia. repeat After all, they could start a fire and all NATO equipment would then burn out.
      Now the Russian Navy will raise it and collect a bunch of interesting things. soldier
  2. gunnerminer Offline gunnerminer
    gunnerminer (gunner miner) 26 February 2022 08: 51
    -5
    This was done, apparently, in order to prevent the frigate from joining the Russian Navy in the future. At the same time, it is quite obvious that the Russian fleet does not need an unmaintained 30-year-old ship of an outdated design at all.

    There's enough of that kind of rubbish. Diesel engine 641B of the project (Som) B-380 drowned herself. Together with the floating dock. In one of the Sevastopol bays. Despite the spent 800 million rubles for repairs. The Ukrainian Navy sinks their ship out of desperation, but why we drown or burn is a mystery.
    1. 1_2 Offline 1_2
      1_2 (Ducks are flying) 26 February 2022 10: 31
      0
      Israeli tankers are also sinking despite the Israeli fleet
      1. gunnerminer Offline gunnerminer
        gunnerminer (gunner miner) 26 February 2022 10: 54
        -4
        They drown. Two a week. The United States is tired of supplying tankers to replace those that are quenched. laughing
        1. 1_2 Offline 1_2
          1_2 (Ducks are flying) 26 February 2022 10: 56
          0
          Jews and Americans will never admit losses, but this does not prevent Iranian missiles from making holes in the sides of Israeli merchant ships in response to attacks by Iranian ships
    2. svoroponov Offline svoroponov
      svoroponov (Vyacheslav) 26 February 2022 11: 41
      +3
      But they could, after all, be taken out to sea and give the last decisive battle. But not destiny. They drowned and went home with a clear conscience. Anyway, no one will be returned to this old ship to risk their lives. Right.
      1. gunnerminer Offline gunnerminer
        gunnerminer (gunner miner) 26 February 2022 13: 36
        -2
        What resource to output? The crew did not conduct exercises other than damage control for over five years.
  3. The comment was deleted.
  4. 1_2 Offline 1_2
    1_2 (Ducks are flying) 26 February 2022 10: 29
    +2
    flooded themselves and the country, Svidomo sixes of Amer gays
  5. Captain stoner Offline Captain stoner
    Captain stoner (Captain Stoner) 26 February 2022 11: 14
    +1
    The proud "Saiga" did not surrender to the enemy.
    I wonder how they practically drowned him "in Nikolaev" lol
    Directly at the pier adit?
  6. Pavel57 Offline Pavel57
    Pavel57 (Paul) 26 February 2022 20: 39
    +1
    Flooded in the bay?
  7. Ulysses Offline Ulysses
    Ulysses (Alexey) 26 February 2022 20: 57
    +3
    There are persistent rumors in Nikolaev that the crew is very scared.
    In anticipation of the "caliber" in the belly.
    At the general meeting, the ship's committee decided, well, his nafik, this is a trough.
    Let it sink, and my brothers and I are away from the war ..
  8. likas Offline likas
    likas (likas tyrlo) 28 February 2022 15: 20
    -1
    litter bastards! is called, sho do not eat, then I have a bite