After Sergei Shoigu, long-range bombers of the Aerospace Forces and carriers of "Daggers" arrived in Syria

February 15 2022 53

On February 15, Russian Defense Minister General of the Army Sergei Shoigu held a working meeting with Syrian President Bashar al-Assad. This is stated in the communique of the Russian military department.

The trip to Damascus was commissioned by Russian leader Vladimir Putin. During the meeting, various issues were discussed: the fight against terrorism, aspects of the further development of the military-technical cooperation, the humanitarian problems of the Syrian people suffering from the monstrous sanctions of the West and other topics. In particular, Shoigu told Assad about the exercises of the inter-fleet grouping conducted by the Russian Navy in the eastern part of the Mediterranean Sea.

Following the Russian Minister of Defense, aircraft of the Russian Aerospace Forces arrived in the SAR. Tu-22M3 long-range missile-carrying bombers and carriers of 9-A-7660 Kinzhal (or Kh-47M2 Kinzhal) hypersonic aircraft systems, MiG-31K high-altitude interceptors landed at the Khmeimim Russian military base. All these planes arrived to participate in the mentioned maneuvers of the Russian Navy.

After talking with the Syrian leadership, Shoigu inspected the Khmeimim air base. He inspected the infrastructure facilities, talked to the military, laid a wreath at the busts of the Heroes of Russia who died in the SAR and presented a special air helmet to the pilot who made more than 300 sorties, introducing a new tradition.

After that, Shoigu flew by helicopter to Tartus to check the naval exercises. which are aimed at protecting the interests of Russia in the oceans.

Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

VK Zen Telegram

Information

Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.

gunnerminer

-12

15 February 2022 21: 24

MiG-31K high-altitude all-weather fighters

The MiG-31 was not designed as a fighter, but as an interceptor. The MiG-31K is the carrier of the X-47M2, and cannot be a fighter. The radar, guides for air-to-air missiles, the refueling system (pump, pipelines) were removed from it.
1. Ulysses
  
  +7
  
  15 February 2022 21: 35
  
  The MiG-31 was not designed as a fighter, but as an interceptor.
  
  The MiG-31 is a Soviet and Russian two-seat supersonic high-altitude all-weather long-range fighter-interceptor.
  
  PS Remove the bucket from your head ..
  The radar was removed from him ...
  1. gunnerminer
    
    -17
    
    15 February 2022 21: 45
    
    The MiG-31 is currently an old rudder, with a poor obsolescent radar. Could attack a single target flying with constant elements of movement. under the most simple conditions. Without the use of electronic warfare by the enemy. It was upgraded to the level of the MiG-31BM. The equipment listed above was removed from the MiG-31BM, including the Strooper radar. And it turned out the MiG-31K. Psychological weapon. Which is still brought to combat readiness for 5 years, at least. In a stationary target, with pre-known coordinates, the X-47M2 hits every other time.
    I recommend talking confidentially with the flight crew of the Russian Aerospace Forces. They will tell the exact opposite of what the slogans of the ingenuous say.
    1. Ulysses
      
      +8
      
      15 February 2022 22: 05
      
      The MiG-31 is currently an old rudder, with a poor obsolescent radar.
      
      Um.
      Radar already put back??
      Whenever we succeed.
      
      Your fairy tales are already very fed up, goose lover ..
      
      I recommend talking confidentially with the flight crew of the Russian Aerospace Forces.
      
      PS "Soon you will just be beaten, possibly kicked"
      1. gunnerminer
        
        -15
        
        15 February 2022 22: 15
        
        Read carefully. Leading a finger along the lines.
    2. Ulysses
      
      +5
      
      15 February 2022 22: 13
      
      Without the use of electronic warfare by the enemy. It was upgraded to the level of the MiG-31BM. The equipment listed above was removed from the MiG-31BM, including the Strooper radar.
      
      The ignoramus completely messed up..
      
      According to the materials of the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation, the broad combat capabilities of the MiG-31BM are provided by the Zaslon-M radar station (RLS). It can detect targets at a distance of up to 320 km and direct ground-based air defense systems, as well as other fighters, at them.
      1. gunnerminer
        
        -13
        
        15 February 2022 22: 28
        
        I see you have no arguments. I recommend that you communicate confidentially with the military personnel of the Aerospace Forces, preferably with the flight crew. Or workers, technicians, engineers of the Nizhny Novgorod enterprise Sokol. The MiG-31s were unable to catch up with the SR-71s flying at top speed. For the sake of interest, look at the turning radius of the MiG-31 at maximum speed. Which one is the "fighter". We have too few fighters, there are 226 Su-30/35 units throughout the country, about ~ 300 obsolete and frankly old Su-27s, MiG-29s. Russian fighters are not equipped with AFAR radar.
        
        sH, arK
        
        +2
        
        16 February 2022 01: 37
        
        I wonder how, while in Durkain, you communicate with the "flight" crew of the MiG-31K, of which there are only 10 pieces or so ?! And why shoot the radar?! Moreover, "Barrier" was originally able to work on the underlying, and this is the first PFAR in the world with very high characteristics for its time and now they are very good! Why remove the refueling bar?! Considering that in the MiG-31 even the tail is used as a fuel tank!
        
        The logic is just the opposite - the radar is needed with work on the underlying, to aim the Dagger, and you also need a height and speed to disperse it, which is why the MIG-31K was chosen as the carrier! Altitude and speed are the advantage of both him and the rocket! Where is the logic?!
        
        gunnerminer
        
        -7
        
        16 February 2022 09: 28
        
        The radar and other equipment was removed to reduce takeoff weight. The X-47 has an inertial guidance system for firing at a stationary target, with coordinates known in advance. The missile is not hypersonic, but quasi-ballistic. There is no hypersonic engine.
        
        sH, arK
        
        0
        
        16 February 2022 10: 38
        
        Again you muzzle in the excrement?! Well, how else is that?!
        The starting weight of the 9-A-7660 "Dagger" is 4 tons, the standard combat load of the MIG-31 (unmodified, from the old Zaslon radar, and not from the new Zaslon-M) is 5 tons! And with a refueling bar! ;);)
        After the modification, the weight of the radar has decreased, what is the question ?!
        Now the second question is "quas ballistic" is it speed or trajectory? ;);) And what does "quasi" mean?! And what does "no hypersonic engine" mean ?! What is it? Does the Soyuz rocket or the "democratic" Falcon have "hypersonic" engines?! ;))) Not?! So they go into space in supersonic ?! (By the way, this is theoretically possible!)
        
        Okay, I would still believe that the Dagger enters the attack line at 7-10M hypersound, and attacks at 4-5M - you need to remove the plasma, which makes it "invisible" on the one hand, and on the other - makes it impossible to homing !!! Not control, but homing, i.e. the problem is with the GOS !!! But the problem is clearly solved, because there is already a Zircon, on the way - Gremlin - they are already with a scramjet, so it's easier, they don't need a MIG-31 for acceleration and lifting!
        
        So, wash the excrement off your face, wash your face with soap ... Stop clowning around here - the resident president of your 404 quarter is enough for us ...
        
        gunnerminer
        
        -6
        
        16 February 2022 11: 59
        
        Wikipedia is a so-so source for an unprepared ingenuous reader. No hypersonic Zircons, no Gremlins. An engine for such ammunition was not created, as well as heat-resistant materials, guidance systems.
        
        sH, arK
        
        -1
        
        16 February 2022 15: 53
        
        Not?! Ah, well, yes!? Cartoons... Putin's fantasies... Exactly! Forgot ;););)
        
        Yes, the question is: is there a dagger? Or, too, that ... Fantasy and a cartoon?! And then they are discussing ... Discussing ... Maybe it's time for them to call the doctor already? Or you?
        
        gunnerminer
        
        -7
        
        16 February 2022 17: 20
        
        There is ammo of the Iskander complex corrected on the knee. Placed under several interceptors stripped of some critical equipment.
        
        sH, arK
        
        -1
        
        16 February 2022 19: 19
        
        Well, we believe that Iskander was quasi-ballistic, speed 7M (i.e. hypersonic), weight 3800, height 50km, overload during PRM - 30G, gyroscope guidance, GLONASS, external control. In principle, Iskander is already applicable to the ship when using an external control channel. The disadvantage is the range of 300 km (I think it is artificially limited, slightly lighten the warhead, slightly modify the turbojet engine - and we will get at least 2 times more!
        The dagger, given that the launch is carried out at an altitude and already at a speed of under 2.5M - we get, even without alteration, a range of under 1000 km. At the same time, it is already more difficult to use the external control channel due to the range (target designation, in principle, is enough to transmit the current coordinates of the target using GLONASS coordinates), therefore, a seeker is definitely needed, possibly a quasi-optical one.
        At the same time, removing the radar from the carrier is complete nonsense! There are no restrictions, the radar is needed by the carrier itself to assess the situation, and as one of the sources of information for target designation.
        Logic doesn't take into account the desires of the Durkains, it's just logic...
        
        gunnerminer
        
        -6
        
        16 February 2022 20: 19
        
        There is no external guidance channel on the Kh-47M. There is no external guidance source. And this will not appear soon. If it appears at all. Your calculations are at the junior high school level. By mentioning the quasi-optical seeker, you contradict yourself.
        
        sH, arK
        
        -1
        
        17 February 2022 09: 27
        
        "External control channel", not guidance, Bandera - this is on Iskander! And there is a GOS on the Dagger, and an external control channel too! For missiles with such a range without a KVU, it’s bad.
        I think that sooner or later you use it on yourself;)
        
        gunnerminer
        
        -5
        
        17 February 2022 18: 52
        
        On Iskander, they tried to establish a channel for external control, guidance. The MiG-31 engines capitalized to nikakism allow it to be accelerated to a maximum of 1200 km / h. Yes, planes with a fuselage may not withstand high speeds. As in 2019 on the Tu-22M3 during landing.
2. mark1
  
  +3
  
  15 February 2022 21: 39
  
  Quote: gunnerminer
  The radar, guides for air-to-air missiles, the refueling system (pump, pipelines) were removed from it.
  
  Radar - perhaps, but what was put in its place? centering is disturbed decently. The refueling system is unlikely - the range is critical, and the 5t MiG-31 and without dismantling all the "stray" regularly raises
  1. gunnerminer
    
    -16
    
    15 February 2022 21: 48
    
    I recommend talking confidentially with the flight crew of the Russian Aerospace Forces. The refueling system and the shielding radar were removed. How the aircraft was centered, he did not delve into the details.
    1. mark1
      
      +3
      
      15 February 2022 21: 55
      
      Well, if you were talking and not in any article you read (I also read it), then I’ll only scout it out with my hands. But, having thought about it at my leisure, I came to the conclusion that this refinement is typical for the MiG-31D, for which dynamic characteristics and rate of climb are important, so it was made as light as possible, while the MiG-31K has slightly different priorities. And the article ... -paper will endure everything.
      I wonder who from Ukraine is included in the "flight-lifting" (loaders on "Ruslans"?) composition?
      1. gunnerminer
        
        -12
        
        15 February 2022 22: 13
        
        It is clear that "the Russian army is the strongest of all", but war 080808 is recalled, that Ukrainian calculations operated as part of the Georgian air defense. They acted wisely. They were defeated in less than a week. But with all this, we lost an obscenely lot of aviation, and a lot of guys were killed on the ground. But Ukraine is still not Georgia, layered air defense, including S-300, Buki, MANPADS, including Stingers of extreme modifications. There is fighter aviation, even if it is outdated, but it will be able to work effectively against our turntables, attack aircraft and long-range ones. The numerical strength of their Armed Forces significantly exceeds Georgia, the territory of Ukraine is much larger, almost like France. After the extreme unsuccessful attempts to take the Donbass, they have learned something. Of course, in the event of the outbreak of hostilities, we will drive them far and for a long time, but this will not be an easy victory for us, there will be losses on our part, and considerable ones.
        PS. By the way, for those who are not only interested in "grunting" on this site, but also to think with their heads, I recommend reading aviaforum and forumavia, there is a lot about the Ukrainian Air Force, in particular, about their flying hours, repaired equipment, modernization of the fleet, contrary to the articles on forums, everything is not so joyful for us, the serviceability of equipment is growing, the flight time of pilots has increased on average to 50-70 hours a year, and this is already a level. They regularly process polygons, in Starkon they regularly fly in pairs, which indicates a good flight of crews. So I see no reason to breed bravura speeches.
        Didn't talk. Listened carefully. There was no opportunity to ask questions.
        
        Dart2027
        
        0
        
        16 February 2022 07: 27
        
        Quote: gunnerminer
        Yes, and a lot of guys died on the ground
        
        Of the 67 dead servicemen, 48 people died directly from enemy fire, the remaining 19 were victims of road accidents, "friendly fire" and careless handling of weapons. CAST attributed them to the "non-combat losses" of the Russian army in this conflict. The role of accidents was especially great, they accounted for 9 deaths. Such high losses are explained by the objective difficulty of transferring a large group of troops, carried out at high speed along a narrow mountain serpentine, in some cases even at night. So, out of 30 wounded of the 429th motorized rifle regiment, only two were injured by enemy fire, the rest were injured on the march (severe bruises, fractures, craniocerebral injuries). Of the 9 wounded of the 292nd mixed artillery regiment, 8 were injured as a result of an accident. At the same time, the 70th, 71st, 135th, and 693rd motorized rifle regiments, well prepared for operations in mountainous terrain, took up positions without suffering significant non-combat losses.
        
        Quote: gunnerminer
        But with all this aviation, we lost an obscene lot
        
        At the same time, out of six downed aircraft, only two were reliably shot down by the Georgians, and the cause of the losses of the rest was “friendly fire”.
        
        gunnerminer
        
        -6
        
        16 February 2022 09: 54
        
        When assessing losses, the operational period during which losses were incurred, the composition and level of training of the enemy are also assessed. The Russian military had serious problems with communications. Officers had to use household
        mobile phones. The headquarters of the 58th Army almost got captured. Saved by the hero Major Vetchinov. "Distinguished" KChF.
        
        Such high losses are explained by the objective difficulty of transferring a large group of troops, carried out at high speed along a narrow mountain serpentine, in some cases even at night.
        
        The lack of qualified drivers in the autobahns. Conscripts, converted in a few hours into contract soldiers, were not trained to drive vehicles in difficult conditions.
        On September 3, the chief military prosecutor of the Russian Federation, S. Fridinsky, published data according to which the losses of Russian servicemen amounted to 71 dead and 340 wounded.
        
        In February 2009, Deputy Minister of Defense, General of the Army Nikolai Pankov, stated that 64 servicemen were killed (according to the list of surnames), three were missing and 283 were injured34. However, in August, Deputy Foreign Minister Grigory Karasin reported 48 dead and 162 wounded35 The reasons for this discrepancy in the numbers are unknown. Journalists from the Russian newspaper Kommersant, who were in Tbilisi on August 11, quoted an unnamed Georgian army officer as saying that his unit had delivered nearly 200 killed Georgian soldiers and officers from South Ossetia to the hospital in Gori alone.41
        
        Some Russian sources accused Georgia of significantly underestimating the losses suffered. According to the assumptions of Russian military experts, expressed in the information program "Vesti" on the TV channel "Russia" on August 15, the losses of the Georgian army could amount to 1,5-2 thousand people killed and up to 4 thousand wounded. On September 15, an unnamed Russian intelligence source claimed that Georgia had lost about 3000 security forces during the war. 42 Unconfirmed by independent sources, these reports remain mere speculation.
        
        https://www.kavkaz-uzel.eu/articles/210899/
        
        Dart2027
        
        +1
        
        16 February 2022 13: 37
        
        Quote: gunnerminer
        https://www.kavkaz-uzel.eu/articles/210899/
        
        On October 8, 2021, the Ministry of Justice of the Russian Federation included the MEMO company, the founder of the publication, in the media register of “foreign agents”.
        
        gunnerminer
        
        -5
        
        16 February 2022 13: 39
        
        The relevance of the source is more important than the label pasted by the capricious.
        
        Dart2027
        
        0
        
        16 February 2022 18: 57
        
        Quote: gunnerminer
        Relevance of the source
        
        depends on who pays.
        
        gunnerminer
        
        -6
        
        16 February 2022 20: 11
        
        Complain about the fee?
        
        Dart2027
        
        +1
        
        16 February 2022 20: 31
        
        Quote: gunnerminer
        Complain about the fee?
        
        That is, there is nothing to argue?
        
        mark1
        
        0
        
        16 February 2022 08: 02
        
        Quote: gunnerminer
        not everything is so joyful for us ... ... pilots' flying time on average increased to 50-70 hours a year ,,,
        
        Well, he rose and rose ... no one planned to engage in beating babies, BUT ... we are actually preparing to fight with NATO and the USA, so your calves ...
        I read the aviation forum carefully - a lot of people gathered there (like an epidemic ...)
        
        gunnerminer
        
        -6
        
        16 February 2022 10: 11
        
        in general, we are preparing to fight with NATO and the USA, so your calves ...
        
        Strangely, we are preparing for war with NATO. For several years in a row we have been reducing officers, warrant officers, warrant officers, military academies and military schools, SSGN divisions, destroyer divisions, TARKRs, TAVKRs, reconnaissance ships, naval attack aircraft, hospitals, air defense corps and armies. We are burning the newly repaired BOD Kerch, sinking a submarine B-380 veste with a floating dock (800 million rubles were spent on repairs).
        
        mark1
        
        0
        
        16 February 2022 10: 29
        
        Yes, yes ... only here we are developing and you are rotting
        
        gunnerminer
        
        -6
        
        16 February 2022 11: 56
        
        Yes, there is development. With significantly negative dynamics. This development did not leave the triad of strategic nuclear forces. Turning it into a monad in 20 years. The crew of the American submarine "inspected" the KTOF KPUG, very quickly, and impressively. In August 2008, the Georgians also inspected the 58th army. That sharply accelerated the reform of the Armed Forces. The first to be expelled as a civilian was the long-term loafer Korabelnikov. But along with him, the GRU special forces brigades, posts, and the central apparatus suffered. For several years, the leadership of the GRU was in a fever with frequent changes of chiefs and their deputies. Sometimes with a tragic outcome.
        The development led to an acute shortage of aircraft in long-range aviation, in fighter aviation, in reconnaissance aviation, and in transport aviation. Things are bad with refueling tankers, with AWACS and U systems, with electronic warfare, RTR aircraft.
        
        The comment was deleted.
        
        gunnerminer
        
        -5
        
        16 February 2022 13: 33
        
        On the topic of the post. Relocation from one theater to another MiG-31K, there is a clear demonstration of Trishka's caftan. Despite the allocation of colossal sums to the military budget of Russia. The same is true about the fleet, with the ancient BDKs as part of the DESO (a detachment of landing ships). You don’t agree on something. The Armed Forces of Ukraine and the Ministry of Defense of Ukraine suffer from outrageous theft and technological backwardness. And most importantly from the lack of patriotic leadership. What are the reasons for the failures of Russian military construction? I'm waiting for a concrete answer. No frills and gimmicks.
        
        Dart2027
        
        0
        
        16 February 2022 13: 38
        
        Quote: gunnerminer
        The crew of the American submarine "inspected" the KTOF KPUG, very quickly, and impressively.
        
        Is this the one that was discovered and chased away?
        
        gunnerminer
        
        -5
        
        16 February 2022 13: 55
        
        The crew of the boat has an advantage over the ship, using the HAC in active mode. He discovers his parcels much earlier. Moreover, according to the statement of the Russian Ministry of Defense by General of the Army S. Shoigu, a foreign submarine was discovered from the outside of the islands. So she could calmly and quietly go seaward. But its commander, fulfilling the will of the command, set himself up. Probably this maneuver hid another boat. Or boats. Without embarrassment, he used electronic warfare (GPA) means. For three hours, demonstratively, he maneuvered in the territorial waters of Russia (according to the statement of the Russian Ministry of Defense.). I checked the capabilities of the KPUG, aviation, the impossibility of using anti-submarine helicopters by the crews of new corvettes.
        Japanese boats wandering in that area, as well as in Peter the Great Bay, have not been found for more than 30 years.
        
        For modern Russia, the power of the fleet, all its components, the nuclear potential of the USSR, like the former leadership in space, is a "relic of the past." It may very well be that we will not be able to do a lot of things soon, or we will forget how to do it. This is how our mother Russia is milked and "optimized" by the henpecked owners of transnational companies.
        Therefore, the headline about several Tu-22M3 (modernization to Tu-22M3M failed) and MiG-31K (alteration is an attempt to support at least somehow the Far
        aviation), this is for consolation, to our corvettes, which sometimes take 10 years to build and burn at shipyards from a lack of discipline. And it is not the Ukrainians or the Americans and the British who are doing this.
        
        Dart2027
        
        0
        
        16 February 2022 19: 05
        
        Moreover, according to the statement of the Russian Ministry of Defense by General of the Army S. Shoigu, a foreign submarine was discovered from the outside of the islands. Means
        
        she was spotted on the way and she did not see anything.
        
        But its commander, fulfilling the will of the command, set himself up.
        
        Did her commander say?
        
        For modern Russia, the power of the fleet, all its components, the nuclear potential of the USSR, like the former leadership in space, is climbing out of the hole where the communists drove it (Gorbachev, Yeltsin, etc.)
        
        This is how our mother Russia is milked and "optimized" by the henpecked owners of transnational companies. Which these same companies have been trying to remove for many years.
        
        gunnerminer
        
        -7
        
        16 February 2022 20: 14
        
        The commander's decision is obvious. Judging by the maneuvers of the crew of a foreign boat. Communists Gorbachev and Yeltsin were not the only party card holders. Anatoly Sobchak, one of the fathers of Russian democracy, and his students were also communists. Transnational companies are not going anywhere from Russia.
        
        Dart2027
        
        +1
        
        16 February 2022 20: 30
        
        Quote: gunnerminer
        The commander's decision is obvious. Judging by the maneuvers of the crew of a foreign boat.
        
        That is the source of the OBS.
        
        Communists Gorbachev and Yeltsin were not the only party card holders.
        
        And what changes from this?
        
        Transnational companies are not going anywhere from Russia.
        
        That is, to object to
        
        Quote: Dart2027
        Which these same companies have been trying to remove for many years.
        
        there is nothing.
        
        gunnerminer
        
        -4
        
        17 February 2022 18: 56
        
        I went to make color scans for you from the correspondence of the Commander of the KTOF, the Commander of the Kamchatka Flotilla, the Commander of the Aviation of the KTOF. Your opinion is extremely important to me.
        
        Dart2027
        
        0
        
        17 February 2022 19: 10
        
        Quote: gunnerminer
        I went to make color scans for you from the correspondence of the Commander of the KTOF, the Commander of the Kamchatka Flotilla, the Commander of the Aviation of the KTOF.
        
        Well, show me.
        Will there be anything else?
        
        gunnerminer
        
        -4
        
        17 February 2022 20: 13
        
        Scanning. Will.
        
        Dart2027
        
        +1
        
        17 February 2022 21: 14
        
        Well, where is it?
        
        gunnerminer
        
        -3
        
        18 February 2022 12: 42
        
        You are so impatient.
        
        Dart2027
        
        0
        
        18 February 2022 12: 58
        
        That is, there is nothing to show.
        
        The comment was deleted.
        
        alexneg13
        
        0
        
        17 February 2022 09: 31
        
        There are a lot of Wikipedians on the Internet, especially Dill with jackal states.
mark1

+1

15 February 2022 21: 29

So how many 31s arrived? Judging by the video - one, and judging by the text, at least two ...
Sergey Latyshev

-7

15 February 2022 22: 16

And, after reading an article here that in 2 moments with daggers from Kaliningrad, they are going to preemptively bomb NATO so that it does not get up from its knees, Shoigu hastened to transfer them to Syria.)))

Just in case, so that nothing happens - all the same, with 2 Daggers from Syria, it’s somehow more difficult to bomb the centers of NATO’s solution.))))
AND

+2

15 February 2022 22: 48

Quote: Sergey Latyshev
And, after reading an article here that in 2 moments with daggers from Kaliningrad, they are going to preemptively bomb NATO so that it does not get up from its knees, Shoigu hastened to transfer them to Syria.)))

Just in case, so that nothing happens - all the same, with 2 Daggers from Syria, it’s somehow more difficult to bomb the centers of NATO’s solution.))))

Aren't you tired of composing euro-tales with a friend gunnerminer? Can you at least once say something positive about Russia? How long can one engage in propaganda here?
1. gunnerminer
  
  -5
  
  16 February 2022 13: 57
  
  What are the reasons for the failures of Russian military construction? I'm waiting for a concrete answer. No frills and gimmicks.
AND

0

16 February 2022 19: 46

Quote: gunnerminer
What are the reasons for the failures of Russian military construction? I'm waiting for a concrete answer. No frills and gimmicks.

The reasons for the failures of the Russian military construction are only in your head Euro-darling. Stop translating the arrows, artificial intelligence. Change the template, otherwise the phonite is already strong from Shoigu's Daggers. This is a concrete answer for you, the answer to your headquarters of the Euro-cyber troops of Poland, Latvia, Lithuania, Estonia and Ukraine.
1. gunnerminer
  
  -7
  
  16 February 2022 20: 09
  
  All state armaments programs since 2005 have been thwarted. The freshly repaired BOD Kerch burned down, the B-380 submarine sank together with the floating dock, the corvette burned down recently, the TAVKR Kuznetsov burned twice, the deadlines for the completion of the repair of the Nakhimov TARKR are constantly being postponed, the repair of the TARKR P. Velikiy is overdue for 10 years. The modernization of the SSGN 949A project was disrupted. The modernization of the Tu-22M3 to the Tu-22M3M standard was disrupted. Through the stump deck, the construction of the Il-76MD-90A and Il-78MD-90A is underway. Failure with serial production of Il-112V and Il-114-300, Su-57. The number of planned Tu-160Ms has shrunk from 50 aircraft to 20. According to the latest interview with Mr. Slyusar. Actually make five. Maneuvers with daggers, throwing from the gray Baltic to the Mediterranean - patching Trishka's lapserdak.
  They did not refrain from fiddling.
AND

+1

16 February 2022 20: 29

Quote: gunnerminer
All state armaments programs since 2005 have been thwarted. The freshly repaired BOD Kerch burned down, the B-380 submarine sank together with the floating dock, the corvette burned down recently, the TAVKR Kuznetsov burned twice, the deadlines for the completion of the repair of the Nakhimov TARKR are constantly being postponed, the repair of the TARKR P. Velikiy is overdue for 10 years. The modernization of the SSGN 949A project was disrupted. The modernization of the Tu-22M3 to the Tu-22M3M standard was disrupted. Through the stump deck, the construction of the Il-76MD-90A and Il-78MD-90A is underway. Failure with serial production of Il-112V and Il-114-300, Su-57. The number of planned Tu-160Ms has shrunk from 50 aircraft to 20. According to the latest interview with Mr. Slyusar. Actually make five. Maneuvers with daggers, throwing from the gray Baltic to the Mediterranean - patching Trishka's lapserdak.
They did not refrain from fiddling.

Thanks! We all know our news. You better tell us how you are, in America, Europe.
We heard inflation is breaking all records, there is no work, China and Russia are breathing down the back of the head. Forgot what debt America has now? And .... I wanted to ask something else, it’s good that I forgot, otherwise you can write another year ..

The Fed published the results of today's closed meeting. The interest rate remains unchanged, at least until the next meeting, which will be held on March 16.

“According to two reviews by SNC last year, credit risk on large syndicated loans improved slightly in 2021 but remains high. This is largely due to the effects of COVID-19.

— The SNC portfolio for 2021 included 5764 borrowers totaling $5.2 trillion, up 2.1% from a year ago.

— The percentage of non-performing loans, including special mention and classified liabilities, decreased from 12.4% to 10.6%.

— The non-performing loan rate decreased slightly to 25.7%, but remains well above the 13.5% percentage seen in 2019.

Also, if you can, of course: what reserves does Russia have now, please remind? I really appreciate your intelligence. How many production facilities have been built in the Russian Federation in five years, please write, as you can with your excellent understanding. Thank you.
zzdimk

+1

17 February 2022 10: 49

It would be funny if Shoigu flew to Cuba or Brazil with all this. That would be a nixie in Uncle Joe's wigwam.