It became known how Biden calls Putin and other world leaders at closed meetings

15

Joseph Biden, in behind-the-scenes meetings with advisers, sometimes gives very frank characteristics to his foreign colleagues. According to the NBC television channel, the words of the American president reveal his ideas about European allies and reflections on the actions of the United States, trying to draw attention to the danger of a possible “Russian aggression” on Ukraine.


In particular, as NBC points out, Biden does not consider the current Chancellor Olaf Scholz to be a full-fledged replacement for Angela Merkel (“Scholz is no Angela Merkel”), who held this post from 2005 to 2021. In the apt expression of the President of the United States, Scholz is "never a Merkel." Apparently, Biden means that the current chancellor of Germany is deprived of the decisiveness and political instinct that his active predecessor possessed at one time.

The American leader considers Emmanuel Macron a candidate for the laurels of Charles de Gaulle (“He wants to be Charles de Gaulle”), the legendary statesman, symbol of the French Resistance and President of France from 1959 to 1969.

Biden found the behavior of one of his closest allies, British Prime Minister Boris Johnson, rather harsh, calling him "violent" and "cocky" ("Prime Minister Boris Johnson's demeanor as blustery").

The head of the United States did not miss the opportunity to express his opinion about the Russian president. According to Joseph Biden, Vladimir Putin can be called "a guy with nukes and no friends" ("A guy with nukes and no friends").
Reporterin Yandex News
Reporterin Yandex Zen
15 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. EVYN WIXH Offline EVYN WIXH
    EVYN WIXH (EVYN WIXH) 9 February 2022 16: 14
    0
    Wow, they remembered de Gaulle, whom they themselves compromised and "dumped." The height of cynicism.
  2. bobba94 Offline bobba94
    bobba94 (Vladimir) 9 February 2022 16: 14
    0
    Biden's opinion about Putin is a paraphrase of the famous statement of Alexander III: "Russia has only two allies - its army and navy" ........
    1. Oleg Rambover Offline Oleg Rambover
      Oleg Rambover (Oleg Pitersky) 9 February 2022 16: 32
      -7
      Judging by the experience of 17 and 91 of the last century, there are no absolutely reliable allies.
      1. 123 Offline 123
        123 (123) 9 February 2022 16: 51
        +1
        Judging by the experience of 17 and 91 of the last century, there are no absolutely reliable allies.

        The task of the army and navy is protection from external aggression, these examples are not entirely correct.
        But this experience is undoubtedly worth the fate and think of a third ally to fight the internal threat. All sorts of troublemakers to hard labor should be sent to the right in advance, and others should be hung on the lanterns. But the Terran is soft and good-natured laughing , sometimes too much winked
        1. Oleg Rambover Offline Oleg Rambover
          Oleg Rambover (Oleg Pitersky) 9 February 2022 17: 13
          -7
          In 17 the army and navy did not stand aside. Here such a thing, according to the experience of 17 years of the last century, they hung and escorted, it did not help.
          Will you hang? And according to experience 37, it is a very dreary and costly business, first the executions of the unreliable (the process quickly gets out of control and the criterion of ingratitude quickly blurs), then the executions of those who executed, then the executions of those who executed.
          1. 123 Offline 123
            123 (123) 9 February 2022 17: 30
            +1
            In 17 the army and navy did not stand aside. Here such a thing, according to the experience of 17 years of the last century, they hung and escorted, it did not help.

            I repeat.

            The task of the army and navy is protection from external aggression, these examples are not entirely correct.

            Will you hang? And according to experience 37, it is a very dreary and costly business, first the executions of the unreliable (the process quickly gets out of control and the criterion of ingratitude quickly blurs), then the executions of those who executed, then the executions of those who executed.

            They hang it when everything is already running, it is more expedient "to go to hard labor in advance on the right."
            It may be a chore, but 37 did not make it to your list, there are only 17 and 91.
            In my opinion, this is not accidental.
            1. Oleg Rambover Offline Oleg Rambover
              Oleg Rambover (Oleg Pitersky) 9 February 2022 20: 39
              -5
              Quote: 123
              I repeat.

              I repeat, at 17 it was the Petrograd garrison that made a significant contribution to the revolutionary events of that year. Actually, if the soldiers had not joined the revolution, there would not have been a revolution.

              Quote: 123
              They hang it when everything is already running, it is more expedient "to go to hard labor in advance on the right."

              I repeat, before 17 they were hung up and "to hard labor in advance on the right", we know the result.

              Quote: 123
              It may be a chore, but 37 did not make it to your list, there are only 17 and 91.
              In my opinion, this is not accidental.

              Then they were let into consumption indiscriminately according to the order. It is difficult to call that process "Hang it up when everything is already running." This may mean that "to go to hard labor in advance on the right" and hang up is not particularly related to the final result. In addition, the main inspirer was either poisoned, or the doctor was not called when he became ill, his grateful associates. In my opinion, this is not accidental.
              1. 123 Offline 123
                123 (123) 10 February 2022 07: 56
                +1
                I repeat, at 17 it was the Petrograd garrison that made a significant contribution to the revolutionary events of that year. Actually, if the soldiers had not joined the revolution, there would not have been a revolution.

                I repeat again.

                The task of the army and navy is protection from external aggression, these examples are not entirely correct.

                I will tell you without any ideological component, without any throwing, they say who are ours, white or red, whether there was a revolution or a coup.
                It all started a little earlier, there was a rehearsal in 1905 when the filthy liberda decided that she was the power here. And then there was February 1917 and everything happened again. This bastard should have been hung on the lanterns even then. And the "joined soldiers" are already the result of a mess. It is not the business of the army to participate in all this; it is intended for something else.

                Then they were let into consumption indiscriminately according to the order. It is difficult to call that process "Hang it up when everything is already running." This may mean that "to go to hard labor in advance on the right" and hang up is not particularly related to the final result.

                From what? The "final result" is obvious, you just pretend that it is not so. Again forced to repeat.

                It may be a chore, but 37 did not make it to your list, there are only 17 and 91.
                In my opinion, this is not accidental.

                I will not blame or justify anyone, but in relation to our question, 1937 is the year when nothing happened. There was no coup (revolution) and this is a fact.

                In addition, the main inspirer was either poisoned, or the doctor was not called when he became ill, his grateful associates. In my opinion, this is not accidental.

                I'm not going to dig into this at all. But this does not apply to our question.
                1. Oleg Rambover Offline Oleg Rambover
                  Oleg Rambover (Oleg Pitersky) 10 February 2022 16: 47
                  -4
                  Quote: 123
                  I repeat again.

                  I repeat once again, without the Petrograd garrison, which swore an oath for the faith of the tsar and the fatherland, there would have been no revolution.

                  Quote: 123
                  It all started a little earlier, there was a rehearsal in 1905 when the filthy liberda decided that she was the power here.

                  Again, liberals seem to you everywhere. What a fantasy that someone decided something. Of course, it is the liberals who are to blame, and not the shooting of a peaceful procession with portraits of Nikolashka. What bad people, these liberals, demanded an eight-hour working day and equality in rights with the bakers. That's what the fools thought. In vain they abolished serfdom.
                  By the way, a good example is from 1905. Do you prefer lampposts for some practical reasons? How many people were shot then and what was the result? We got a revolution in return.

                  Quote: 123
                  And then there was February 1917 and everything happened again.

                  Liberals again? Yes, something like that. And what did they do this time? Did you eat all the bread in Petrograd?
                  You have a very unique view of history. Let's just say, strongly ideologized.

                  Quote: 123
                  This bastard should have been hung on the lanterns even then.

                  Just curious, do you have a list of who should have been hanged? And there is a list of whom today?

                  Quote: 123
                  From what? The "final result" is obvious, you just pretend that it is not so. Again forced to repeat.

                  That is, the recipe for a stable state from 123 is simple, half a million executions a year and everything will be fine.
                  You know, the Russian state has existed for more than one hundred years, and most of the years of this period did without mass executions. How they survived is not clear.

                  Quote: 123
                  I will not blame or justify anyone, but in relation to our question, 1937 is the year when nothing happened. There was no coup (revolution) and this is a fact.

                  You know, and in 1970 nothing happened. And 1971. Yes, and 72. And at 55. And even at 49. And so on. How could it be without executions?
                  In 37, extrajudicial executions of hundreds of thousands of people, citizens of the USSR, took place.
                  So I'm wondering, what are your political views, if nothing happened to you at 37?
                  1. 123 Offline 123
                    123 (123) 10 February 2022 17: 47
                    +1
                    I repeat once again, without the Petrograd garrison, which swore an oath for the faith of the tsar and the fatherland, there would have been no revolution.

                    So I say, there is nothing for the army to deal with internal affairs. And when a liberda makes a mess, this applies to the whole country, including the army.

                    Again, liberals seem to you everywhere. What a fantasy that someone decided something. Of course, it is the liberals who are to blame, and not the shooting of a peaceful procession with portraits of Nikolashka. What bad people, these liberals, demanded an eight-hour working day and equality in rights with the bakers. That's what the fools thought. In vain they abolished serfdom.
                    By the way, a good example is from 1905. Do you prefer lampposts for some practical reasons? How many people were shot then and what was the result? We got a revolution in return.

                    Am I imagining? Drive into the search "the 1905 revolution is the driving force", I quote from this site stupidly because the link is short (everywhere they write about the same thing, this is how students are taught).

                    The nature of the revolution: bourgeois-democratic (liquidation of the autocracy, landlordism, class system, inequality of nations, establishment of a democratic republic, ensuring democratic freedoms, easing the position of workers).
                    The driving forces of the revolution: the working class, the peasantry, liberal bourgeoisie, the democratic stratum of the population (intelligentsia, employees, representatives of the oppressed peoples, students).

                    http://rgrtu-640.ru/istoria/istoria56.html

                    As you can see, it was not without liberda, it was these bastards who eventually raked the power, and the peasants and students "Maidan masovka" and so it was until October 1917, until the Bolsheviks happened, and before that they were not considered the favorites of the race and were not seriously considered.

                    By the way, a good example is from 1905. Do you prefer lampposts for some practical reasons? How many people were shot then and what was the result? We got a revolution in return.

                    I'm afraid that one execution for the revolution is not enough, in Novocherkassk in 1962, you know, they also did not stand on ceremony, but somehow the revolution did not happen. The reasons are always deeper and more extensive.

                    Just curious, do you have a list of who should have been hanged? And there is a list of whom today?

                    See the list of ministers of the interim government and circles close to them. Today, there is no need for hanging, the liberda has degenerated into a noisy shelupony. It is not capable of doing anything on its own, it is enough to limit support from abroad. So do not tear the shirt on your chest, they say, shoot the fellows, the anger of the people will sweep you away. You are marginalized and have nothing to do with the people.

                    That is, the recipe for a stable state from 123 is simple, half a million executions a year and everything will be fine.

                    You start lying again. I didn't write anything like that.

                    You know, the Russian state has existed for more than one hundred years, and most of the years of this period did without mass executions. How they survived is not clear.

                    And why did you decide that executions should be massive, and even annually? Are you attributing something to me again? But executions still happened, I think it’s not worth going deep, but for example, Peter with the archers somehow didn’t act quite tolerantly.

                    You know, and in 1970 nothing happened. And 1971. Yes, and 72. And at 55. And even at 49. And so on. How could it be without executions?
                    In 37, extrajudicial executions of hundreds of thousands of people, citizens of the USSR, took place.
                    So I'm wondering, what are your political views, if nothing happened to you at 37?

                    Again, the standard rhetoric of vile liberda. You attributed to me that, in my opinion, it is necessary to shoot someone every year, saying that it is impossible to do otherwise. That's a lie, I didn't say that. So stop the tantrum, your hand-wringing is not appropriate here.
  3. S WITH Offline S WITH
    S WITH (N S) 9 February 2022 16: 32
    -2
    what is the name of the senile he guesses
  4. alexey alexeyev_2 Offline alexey alexeyev_2
    alexey alexeyev_2 (Alexey Alekseev) 9 February 2022 17: 47
    0
    Having such Western friends and enemies is not necessary. Army and Navy !! Although there were figures here too. Vaughn Ivashov bleated something. Stalin did not take a steam bath on this occasion. If you please, to the wall ...
  5. gorskova.ir Offline gorskova.ir
    gorskova.ir (Irina Gorskova) 9 February 2022 18: 17
    +2
    Well, why shouldn't he play a cowboy? Look how he dropped a German. The Poles jump for pleasure. Macron is still puffing up. But for how long?
  6. beeper Offline beeper
    beeper 9 February 2022 20: 06
    +1
    It is curious who Mr. Biden considers, with what words he characterizes himself, with this convex "complex" of such a "higher being who descended to nonentities" ?! winked
    After all "Whoever is called names, that one is"?! smile
  7. nod739 Offline nod739
    nod739 (Sergei) 10 February 2022 23: 17
    0
    Russia has friends
    Army, Navy and... Nukes