The Marines will have a new combat vehicle: the first picture of the BMMP being developed in Russia


A Marine Combat Vehicle (BMMP) is being developed in Russia, as evidenced by the first photo of the prototype published on the Web.


The BMMP is designed to ensure the landing of naval infantry units on an unequipped coast, including over-the-horizon landings, as well as operations in skerry areas and on islands and provide fire support to landing operations.

According to sources, the design features of the BMMP platform will allow the installation of mass-produced combat modules such as "Bakhcha" or "Dagger".

The Marines will have a new combat vehicle: the first picture of the BMMP being developed in Russia

The combat weight of the vehicle will be about 35 tons, the crew - 3 people, the speed on the highway will reach about 75 km / h, on the water - 37 km / h. The cruising range on land will be 300 km, on water - 100 km. The engine power of the car will reach 1500 hp. The BMMP will be capable of carrying 10 paratroopers, while it is assumed that the BMMP body will be protected with aluminum using a polymer composite material. The armament complex will include a 57-mm automatic cannon, a 7,62-mm PKT machine gun and a Kinzhal combat module.
  • Photos used: "Uralvagonzavod"
27 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. mark1 Offline mark1
    mark1 7 February 2022 15: 13
    +4
    It will probably be good to swim, but on land, and with aluminum armor, and in such dimensions (it is clear that the Americans inspired) ... That is. probably as a means of delivery from ship to shore no more, and so in battle ... - some kind of surrealism ...
    1. Half a hundred second (Half a half second) 8 February 2022 21: 44
      -4
      Quote: mark1
      but on land, yes with aluminum armor

      and what is it on the BMD now? on the BMP? Is it possible that they put the steel in 150 mm and covered the DZ?

      Quote: mark1
      Those. probably as a means of delivery from ship to shore

      exactly

      Quote: mark1
      as well as in battle

      like BMD or BMP.
      1. mark1 Offline mark1
        mark1 8 February 2022 21: 50
        +1
        And you re-read what I wrote, think for a minute, and then be clever.
        1. Half a hundred second (Half a half second) 8 February 2022 22: 12
          -5
          Was there any hidden meaning in your words? I can read. If you don't understand something, please explain. Competently, and not with claims of rudeness. I'm not rude to you, but very correctly explained why and for what.

          Apparently, a minus for trying to explain to you the real state of affairs? Read my comment below. It does not contradict either the TTZ for the car or how it was going to be used.
  2. The comment was deleted.
    1. The comment was deleted.
  3. etsa ... but I thought, shta ... our iron was invented!
  4. assault 2019 Offline assault 2019
    assault 2019 (assault 2019) 8 February 2022 01: 16
    +1
    Frankly speaking, this is a bulky and clumsy "trough" that will get stuck on the very first coastal boulder.
    Where are they going to "plane" on them, to the fjords of the Kola Peninsula or to the Kuril Islands?
    It would be better if the marines were armed with a BMP Boomerang modified for the MP than spending money on this squalor.
    1. Half a hundred second (Half a half second) 8 February 2022 21: 40
      -3
      Quote: assault 2019
      Frankly speaking, this is a bulky and clumsy "trough" that will get stuck on the very first coastal boulder

      otsel such "expert" opinion?
      The Americans did not get stuck with EFV.


      She passed the test with flying colours.

      Quote: assault 2019
      It would be better to arm the Marines

      read my comment below. While the marines are arming the BMP-3F, it will not be able to travel 20-30 kilometers through the water at high speed. Maybe you will understand something.

      I do not want to hurt you, just something new is always perceived with hostility. And the steam locomotive in due time, and the car. now the Russian Federation is adopting the concept of an over-the-horizon landing with UDC (which are being built), equipment is being prepared for it. Believe me, the people sitting in the offices are no worse than you. If you do not understand something, most likely you do not have all the information.
      1. Dear sofa expert. 9 February 2022 09: 30
        0
        She passed the test with flying colours.

        And so in 2011 (more than 30 years old!) The development of this machine was finally stopped?)
        1. Half a hundred second (Half a half second) 9 February 2022 16: 36
          -4
          What kind of expert are you if you don't know the reason? The car suited the USCPM to everyone, except for the price.
          1. Dear sofa expert. 9 February 2022 16: 53
            0
            What kind of expert are you if you don't know the reason? The car suited the USCPM to everyone, except for the price.

            Price is always one of the deciding factors. Especially when it exceeds the benefit of your expectations.
            35 years of development, about 600 pieces of prototypes.
            And then once, and suddenly it turned out that for 35 years on the shore, something has also changed.)
            Of course, this initially stupid idea cost the Americans dearly.
            Today it is no longer possible to save transport by “beyond the horizon”, but to lose the entire landing force, which would need to overcome a couple of tens of kilometers (no matter how fast it moves) - for today's realities - a matter of a few minutes.
            1. Half a hundred second (Half a half second) 9 February 2022 17: 26
              -3
              Price has nothing to do with it. which, from a technical point of view, the US Marines car arranged. What do you and my opponent, out of deep ignorance of the topic, doubt

              Quote: Dear sofa expert.
              this initially stupid idea cost the Americans

              your words are stupid. Can you suggest a better way to land an amphibious assault than an over-the-horizon landing?
              1. Dear sofa expert. 9 February 2022 17: 59
                +1
                Price has nothing to do with it. which, from a technical point of view, the US Marines car arranged.

                Did they tell you personally?

                By the way, we didn’t discuss the technical side of the machine itself .. you apparently imagined it.

                . your words are stupid. Can you suggest a better way to land an amphibious assault than an over-the-horizon landing?

                You already mentioned it below.
                "Convertible & Co" ... only the topic of this article in the context of the use of this floating thing - this does not apply. There "over-the-horizon" is a slightly different scale. To lift a tiltrotor into the air or launch an LCAC, you do not need to approach the coast for 25 miles.
      2. assault 2019 Offline assault 2019
        assault 2019 (assault 2019) 10 February 2022 01: 12
        0
        While the marines are arming the BMP-3F, it will not be able to travel 20-30 kilometers through the water at high speed.

        What state are you from?
        Whose marines are armed with the BMP-3F?
        The Russian MPs are arming the BTR-82AM.

        The Americans did not get stuck with EFV.

        But did American EFVs land under their own power on the rocky coast of the Kuril Islands or the Kola Peninsula?
        Even in your photo, the EFV drives out onto a perfectly flat sandy beach.
        For high-speed delivery of armored vehicles over long distances, there are landing craft Serna and Dugong, which should be at the disposal of the marines in the required quantity.

        Believe me, the people sitting in the offices are no worse than you.

        Believe me, the more important and higher the cabinets, the more crooks there are, who are not interested in increasing the defense capability of Russia, but in lining their own pockets.
        Otherwise, the troops would not have been supplied with T-72B3 suitable only for "biathlon rides" or patrol ships, pr. 22160, useless for the Navy at the price of a frigate, and there are dozens of such examples ...
        1. Half a hundred second (Half a half second) 10 February 2022 10: 03
          -5
          Horses mixed in a bunch, people ...

          Quote: assault 2019
          Whose marines are armed with the BMP-3F?

          Russian.

          The Ministry of Defense decided to re-equip one of the battalions of the 810th Separate Guards Marine Brigade stationed in Crimea with new BMP-3Fs. The supply of equipment will be carried out as part of the implementation of the state defense order.

          The 155th Marine Brigade of the Pacific Fleet, stationed in the Primorsky Territory, received 3 new BMP-40F infantry fighting vehicles into service. The equipment was delivered as part of the state defense order in accordance with the plan for rearmament with modern models of military equipment.

          Quote: assault 2019
          The Russian MPs are arming the BTR-82AM

          and this is just evil, transplanting marines onto these cardboard boxes. The machine itself must confidently float on the water and have more or less serious weapons. The BMP-3Fs themselves are far from ideal in this role, but they are the best available.
          Landing craft, of course, are also needed - only faster and more lifting.
          The components of a modern amphibious assault are UDC, high-speed landing craft, high-speed armored amphibious vehicles, landing helicopters (tiltiplanes), combat helicopters and landing support aircraft.

          Quote: assault 2019
          But did American EFVs land under their own power on the rocky coast of the Kuril Islands or the Kola Peninsula?

          and Russian armored personnel carriers and infantry fighting vehicles landed on the coast of Alaska? Why ask stupid questions?

          Quote: assault 2019
          the more important and higher the cabinets, the more crooks there are, who are interested not in increasing the defense capability of Russia, but in stuffing their own pockets.

          you are just presented with a machine that can enhance the capabilities of the "black berets". But you're all wrong. Old technology - not that, new - not that.
          If the admirals decided to follow the American path, i.e. accept the concept of an over-the-horizon landing (and nothing better has yet been proposed - do not go to the BDK ̶n̶a̶ ̶u̶b̶o̶y̶ to the shore, slowly and sadly, under the influence of enemy PDO fire?), then the technique should correspond to this concept. The BDKs are really outdated, it is difficult to come up with a more tempting target, like a low-speed unarmored "transporter" slowly moving towards the shore, on which the fire of all available enemy weapons will be concentrated. And they will, anyway, something "alive" will remain, even after preliminary processing of the coast by aviation and artillery. The current concept proposes the dispersal of landing forces during landing, the enemy will have to deal with many small-sized high-speed targets, supported by aviation and rocket and artillery fire from ships of the security group. With simultaneous coverage in depth, landing from helicopters in the tactical rear of the enemy. The "paratrooper" himself remains outside the zone of effective fire of most of the enemy's anti-aircraft defense systems, under the protection of escort ships.

          If you have better ideas - offer them to generals / admirals.
  5. Demonlivi Online Demonlivi
    Demonlivi (Dima) 8 February 2022 05: 19
    0
    This article was a couple of years ago! But there was a Kharkov plant! ;))) and the same monster
  6. skeptic Offline skeptic
    skeptic 8 February 2022 11: 52
    0
    Quote: assault 2019
    Where they were going to "plan"

    For cutting. For this is not an erroneous decision, but an expected expenditure of funds, without benefit to the army.
  7. Half a hundred second (Half a half second) 8 February 2022 21: 31
    -2
    Hmmm ... I read the comments, and realized that none of those noted even imagine what and why this car was made for. It is for the UDC, which are now being built here in Russia. The principle of landing with UDC is fundamentally different from the concept of BDK. Not directly on the forehead on the PDO, but at a great distance, this is the so-called over-the-horizon landing. When vehicles leave the ship outside the PDO effective area and overcome the sea section under their own power. Accordingly, at maximum speed, to become difficult targets, and not crawl at a speed of 5 knots. Hence, the speed afloat is greater.
    When I had not yet retired, they let us study this topic. The appearance of the car is strongly reminiscent of study.
  8. Mantrid Machina Offline Mantrid Machina
    Mantrid Machina (Mantrid Machina) 9 February 2022 05: 58
    0
    Dofiga here ExPerdov, who understand the concept better than MO wassat . This is a watercraft for UDC and not for ramp landing ships. Therefore, some kind of seaworthiness is needed. And what is the seaworthiness of the BMP everyone knows very well
    1. Dear sofa expert. 9 February 2022 11: 16
      +1
      Dofiga here ExPerdov, who understand the concept better than MO. This is a watercraft for UDC and not for ramp landing ships.

      Yes, with regards to the use with UDC, this is already clear.
      But the concept of the most "over-the-horizon" landing, then today it is already just less relevant.
      There was a time when a transport ship's safety distance of 25 miles seemed sufficient to make them largely immune to coastal weapons.
      This is no longer the case, given the capabilities of modern means of coastal defense.
      Correct me if I somehow misunderstand this.
      1. Half a hundred second (Half a half second) 9 February 2022 16: 33
        -3
        Quote: Dear sofa expert.
        But the concept of the most "over-the-horizon" landing, then today it is already just less relevant.

        What are you saying) And what concept is relevant? Tell the world, have you come up with something new?
        1. Dear sofa expert. 9 February 2022 16: 47
          0
          What is the current concept? Tell the world, have you come up with something new?

          Well, you are a fan of showing off your knowledge of American tactics, so I will poke you with your nose right there.
          Having abandoned the “brilliant” EFV you mentioned (due to “unsuitability”, “over-the-horizon landing” tactics), your “overseas idols” returned to upgrading the old AAV7 (unsuitable for “over-the-horizontal” due to relative slowness). Conclusions, as I understand it, you know how to draw yourself.
          1. Half a hundred second (Half a half second) 9 February 2022 17: 22
            -3
            There are people who are not shy about talking with an empty head. And the more emptiness in the head, the louder their cries and the more boisterous nonsense. You are a perfect example of this people.

            You have merged with the topic without explaining which method of amphibious assault is now better. than over-the-horizon landing. Nothing to say?

            The Americans did not abandon the concept of an over-the-horizon landing. Moreover, the same tactics are now being adopted from us in Russia and China. Over-the-horizon landing is provided not only by high-speed amphibious armored vehicles, but, in relation to the United States, also by Osprey convertiplanes and fast-moving LCAC hovercraft
            The main thing in this concept is not to jeopardize the UDC, leaving the enemy PDO to deal with a lot of high-speed small-sized targets, which themselves can snarl with fire, and which operate with the support of (artillery and missile) escort ships and the UDC air wing.
            Naval landing is now a very dangerous thing, but still the concept of an over-the-horizon landing has a much better chance of successfully carrying out the operation, and with fewer losses, than stupidly poking the large landing ship directly into the shore (which still needs to reach the shore).

            You have another deuce) Conclusions, however, you will not do. This concept is accepted all over the world, well, everyone around the world is stupid, you are our only light))
            1. Dear sofa expert. 9 February 2022 17: 51
              0
              There are people who are not shy about talking with an empty head. And the more emptiness in the head, the louder their cries and the more boisterous nonsense.

              I even like your self-criticism.)

              You have merged with the topic ....
              ... and, in relation to the USA, also the Osprey convertiplanes and the LCAC two-wheeled hovercraft ...

              Well, who has merged with the topic?)
              We seem to be quite specific, did we talk about floating "brneviks" in the context of their use "over-the-horizon" with UDC? Everything is clear there. The Americans abandoned the use of these machines in favor of the old (non-horizontal) ones.
              1. The comment was deleted.
                1. The comment was deleted.
      2. Mantrid Machina Offline Mantrid Machina
        Mantrid Machina (Mantrid Machina) 9 February 2022 18: 45
        0
        Any relatively slow watercraft at sea is vulnerable.
        Of course, this is not a hydrofoil boat. Here, it might be worth returning to the topic of ekranoplanes, but not such huge monsters that there were platform-type devices. Well, WUAs like Zubr should not be written off
  9. Moscow Offline Moscow
    Moscow 10 February 2022 00: 04
    0
    Looks like a World War I chisel. In the picture it is good, in the sample it is clumsy.
  10. Yuri Palaznik Offline Yuri Palaznik
    Yuri Palaznik (Yuri Palaznik) 10 February 2022 08: 56
    -1
    The armor covers the tracks. It will be great to clean the dirt. I don't envy the crew. On the parquet ride on it.
    1. Dear sofa expert. 10 February 2022 11: 16
      -1
      Not really. It's a "transformer". The clearance changes - the tracks can be pulled in (when planing) or released out (down) - on land. In the photo, apparently - is in some kind of middle position.