Russian S-400s completely covered the airspace of Ukraine

January 27 2022

Against the backdrop of the ongoing Western hysteria about Russia's "probable attack" on Ukraine, data appeared on the Web that the Russian S-400 air defense systems deployed on the territory of the Russian Federation and allied Belarus completely covered Ukrainian airspace.

The presented map shows the places of possible deployment of "Triumphs" in the Republic of Belarus, in the Crimea and the European part of the Russian Federation, not far from the border with Ukraine. And no later than January 18th. It is noteworthy that the Baltic direction is blocked the weakest, and the S-400s located in the Kaliningrad region are not shown at all.

Western "partners" are trying to focus on Moscow's "aggressive" intentions towards Kiev. Such maps should help to intimidate the population of Ukraine, creating the illusion of an “imminent invasion” and making Ukrainians the enemies of the Russians.

In addition, experts in the West are also concerned about the security of NATO aviation, which is now unceremoniously using the Ukrainian skies for its “peace-loving” purposes.

If one of the three S-400 divisions in Belarus is deployed to the Luninets air base, the 40N6 missiles will potentially create A2 / AD (restriction and prohibition of access and maneuver) for strategic and transport aircraft operating at medium and high altitudes over northwestern Ukraine

Western analysts express concern.

We remind you that a joint check of the forces and means of reaction of the Union State of the Russian Federation and the Republic of Belarus is being carried out on the territory of Belarus, which is carried out in two stages. This was announced by the Russian and Belarusian military just on January 18. In the period from February 10 to 20, the Allied Resolve-2022 exercises will take place. Russia sent 12 Su-35 fighters, two S-400 air defense systems and a Pantsir-S air defense missile division there.

48 comments

Information

Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.

Offline Bulanov

Bulanov (Vladimir) 27 January 2022 13: 24

+11

13

2
Is it now the Russian Federation will be able to declare a no-fly zone over Ukraine, as NATO announced over Libya?
1. Offline Sasha Anatolyevich
  
  Sasha Anatolyevich (Sasha Anatolyevich) 27 January 2022 14: 14
  
  +4
  
  6
  
  2
  
  just thought about that too.
2. Offline sH, arK
  
  sH, arK 27 January 2022 17: 51
  
  +4
  
  7
  
  3
  
  Right! And since the war on Russia has actually already been declared, it is reasonable to clearly pose the question - does the Chief Clown of the Durkains think that he is at war with Russia ?! If yes, then declare a complete ban on all flights and calls of ships and ships without agreement with Russia! No war! Why?! Only air and sea blockade! With the current export-import oriented economy of the Durkains, this death is quick, although not instantaneous! At the same time, it is not necessary to attack aircraft! Not a single civilian ship will go there, fly!
  1. Offline Half a hundred second
    
    Half a hundred second (Half a half second) 27 January 2022 21: 33
    
    -4
    
    4
    
    8
    
    Quote: sH, arK
    declare a complete ban on all flights and calls of ships and ships without agreement with Russia! No war! Why?! Only air and sea blockade!
    
    And how do you see it? There is, for example, a dry cargo ship flying the American flag to Odessa. Don't let me? And if he doesn’t obey, he will send nafig and continue to sip, what are your actions?
    It's the same with transport workers. A German board will go to Kiev, what will you do?
    I think you are talking complete nonsense.
    1. Offline sH, arK
      
      sH, arK 27 January 2022 21: 44
      
      +2
      
      6
      
      4
      
      Yes, you are talking nonsense, I agree. Therefore, I will explain to you - when a state of war between two states and a blockade is declared - not a single civilian vessel of a third party can enter the blockaded port and be considered neutral at the same time! The entry of a military vessel is also excluded! Exceptions may be, subject to agreed humanitarian assistance, evacuation and hospital ships - but they can all be subject to inspection!
      Those. in the event of an official declaration of war, one of the parties has the right to declare a ban on all civilian air / sea vessels to cross the blockade zone! Violating ships are legitimate targets, no matter whose they are! Well, as a consequence, all ships and aircraft crossing these zones will be deprived of insurance services. Do you think that someone will dare to go to Durkaina?! Well, maybe someone like you? Are you from there yourself?
      You can see, apart from the sofa, you didn’t serve anywhere?
      1. Offline Half a hundred second
        
        Half a hundred second (Half a half second) 27 January 2022 21: 59
        
        -3
        
        3
        
        6
        
        Quote: sH, arK
        Are you from there yourself?
        You can see, apart from the sofa, you didn’t serve anywhere?
        
        that's what flowed out of you ... If a person does not agree with you, is he necessarily a crest from the sofa who did not serve? Are you leaking anything anywhere? And yes, from a great mind they begin to discuss the personality of the interlocutor, and to be rude to the heap. Were you brought up in a barn?
        If I answer these non-essential questions, will it change anything? I doubt. Then why are you interested? In the absence of the opportunity to play by the rules, will you play without rules?
        
        Quote: sH, arK
        Those. in the event of an official declaration of war, one of the parties has the right to declare a ban on all civilian air / sea vessels to cross the blockade zone! Violating ships are legitimate targets, no matter whose they are! Well, as a consequence, all ships and aircraft crossing these zones will be deprived of insurance services. Do you think that someone will risk going to Durkaina?
        
        you do not take into account some of the nuances, but for now we will omit them. It was not about a legal justification and legal norms and the opportunity to do something (although here you don’t speak to the end, or just don’t know?), But for real measures. Have the opportunity to do и do - two different things. Dancing is not kissing.
        Therefore, you did not answer the question, our dear boor. In case of disobedience, for example, by an American ship, are you ready to sink it?
        
        Offline sH, arK
        
        sH, arK 27 January 2022 22: 04
        
        0
        
        4
        
        4
        
        I didn't bullshit you. You yourself started talking nonsense. And I simply, albeit not quite correctly, actually asked where they served. And you began to write nonsense about:
        
        And how do you see it? There is, for example, a dry cargo ship flying the American flag to Odessa. Don't let me? And if he doesn’t obey, he will send nafig and continue to sip, what are your actions?
        
        I just answered you in your style ... Yes, when the blockade is declared, no one will go to Odessa! And if it goes - well, the law is not written for fools!
        The whole question and nuance is in the official declaration of war and blockade. Well, we actually declared war. It remains either to officially demand clarifications, and this can be done in such a way that it will be very humiliating to abandon the already declared "war" ... At this point, the flag is in the hands of diplomats ...
        
        And yes, in fact, someone can break through the blockade ... But the fact that he will be both at the entrance and at the exit is an ABSOLUTELY LEGITIMATE PURPOSE - a fact beyond doubt! And what, that it will be an American?! Who will deal? You are sure that you did not serve anywhere ...
        Excuse me ... I did not raise the degree and did not want to offend you.
        
        Offline Half a hundred second
        
        Half a hundred second (Half a half second) 27 January 2022 22: 15
        
        -3
        
        1
        
        4
        
        Quote: sH, arK
        Yes, when the blockade is declared, no one will go to Odessa! And if it goes - well, the law is not written for fools!
        
        Believe me, there will be "fools", at least to check the strength. Here the blockade breaker did not obey. Enough steel in coca to shoot him? In fact, this will be followed by a declaration of war by the United States (since we are talking about an American ship), if they also have enough gunpowder. Are you ready to play such games and is the game worth such high stakes?
        
        Now the expression of concern will not roll. Now if you said "I will shoot", then you will have to shoot, and not compose explanations why you didn't.
        
        Everything is clear what you say - we are not afraid of the Americans and all that. But it's not about "who is behind the ss al". The point is that in this way the problem can not be solved, but only aggravated. If you do not touch the striped ones, they themselves will not climb into the open either. Do both countries need such problems? And with Ukraine and in other ways, you can deal with it faster and more efficiently (and it will take less time than for an 8-8-8 war) than to arrange a naval blockade. It also has land borders, so not everything is decided by the sea and air.
        
        Offline sH, arK
        
        sH, arK 27 January 2022 22: 33
        
        0
        
        1
        
        1
        
        Excuse me, don't ask stupid things! I understand that they didn’t serve, certainly not an officer! But I’ll try to explain to you - you are a captain on a submarine, or a captain of a ship blocking a port, or a pilot of an aircraft patrolling a closed area - you saw a target on the radar that is forbidden to enter / exit - and how do you figure it out ?! There is an order - blockade! Everyone, they saw, launched! If suddenly a "friend" signal arrives - the receiver on the warhead will retarget, if it does not find the target - it will self-destruct!
        The question is - does an American, a German and other dritz-tsa have a defendant "his own"? Not? Well, who's to blame? And you - carried out the order! Understanding who and what is none of your fucking business! You have only two options - the enemy or not the enemy! Enemy - I launch, at a long distance - I just launch if the target does not give me the label "own". Alien tags - no ;) Everyone who is not "one's own" is alien! Am I explaining clearly?
        
        And absolutely all the military of all armies have such an algorithm! And therefore, alas, there is the concept of "friendly fire", this is when our own people could not, for some reason, give a "friend" signal. Alas... Sometimes there are a lot of friendly losses. In Iraq, the Americans mowed down their own. During 08.08.08 we destroyed half of the lost aircraft ourselves, yes ... It's a shame ... Now we are silent in a rag ... So chio, if war and a blockade are declared, no one is rocking the boat! And if he rock the boat and gets it, then he is silent!
        
        Offline Half a hundred second
        
        Half a hundred second (Half a half second) 27 January 2022 23: 10
        
        -4
        
        1
        
        5
        
        Again you are not talking about that. They came up with it themselves, they were outraged. I'm just talking about - will there be an order? (you so famously decided to jump on the topic. as if I put you in the cockpit of a fighter or in the place of the commander of the warhead-2 of the ship? These people are following the order, this is clear to everyone) So, are you ready to give such an order (we will appoint you commander-in-chief for clarity) ? Since you are arguing "let's declare a blockade", it is probably clear that you are reasoning from the position of those who make "high" decisions and give no less "high" orders, the pilot or commander of the warhead or ship does not make such decisions (declaring a blockade).
        
        In my opinion, it was written very clearly, you aim to drag out the dispute. However, it's up to you whether to answer or not, I drew conclusions. For this, I think the topic has been exhausted.
        
        Offline sH, arK
        
        sH, arK 28 January 2022 10: 22
        
        0
        
        2
        
        2
        
        You are a strange person! What order?! If there is an order to blockade - a ban on flights, a ban on entry and exit from the port - THIS IS ALREADY an ORDER! There are two options for an outgoing / incoming ship / aircraft or agrees and a separate instruction comes to it - "skip" with an explanation - hospital, evacuation, humanitarian aid. It passes inspection and moves on. If the ship is carrying humanitarian aid, then there is help, and it can only go to the port with the specified and agreed cargo! More - ANYWHERE! If hospital - maybe back and forth, evacuation - from the port. Full reporting on the cargo on the ships is transmitted, the inspector's job is to verify and skip if there are no violations.
        Everything. In the army - not at a rally, everything is clear and unambiguous! Otherwise, no officer or soldier will want to risk answering with their lives. You are just so far from it that you absolutely do not understand! Those. if you confirm the execution of any order, for example, you destroyed a ship / aircraft, then, let's say your side eventually lost the war, then there can be no questions for you about the execution of the order.
        
        Therefore, the eggs must first of all be with the one who gives the ORDER! And the higher the commander sits, the more responsibility he has. The decision on the state of war and the complete blockade of Durkaina can only be taken by the commander-in-chief, and this in Russia is the PRESIDENT, and the decision to blockade a specific port, if a complete blockade is not declared, is the operational headquarters. But the state of war between the two states already excludes the free movement of people and goods by a third party! Even without the announcement of the blockade! But with your ships, if there is no blockade - you can take risks, in a foreign port and foreign territorial waters - they are inviolable! But in open water - they can be attacked if you are sure that they belong to the enemy. Inspection in international waters of ANY CIVIL SHIP CAN MAKE ANY SHIP OF ANY STATE ALWAYS, AT ANY TIME!
        
        Offline Half a hundred second
        
        Half a hundred second (Half a half second) 28 January 2022 10: 30
        
        -3
        
        3
        
        6
        
        Do not continue, I already understood that you are a demagogue with CSV. There are many letters - in fact, not a single one. Why did you write so much? Do you really think that only you know something?
        It's rude not to answer direct questions.
        That’s all for now, I won’t give you any more comments on this topic. Since you don’t deign to answer the repeatedly asked question (you shiver and avoid answering) - there’s nothing to talk about with you.
        
        The comment was deleted.
        The comment was deleted.
        The comment was deleted.
        The comment was deleted.
        The comment was deleted.
        
        Offline Boa kaa
        
        Boa kaa (Alexander) 28 January 2022 20: 16
        
        +1
        
        1
        
        0
        
        Quote: sH, arK
        Inspection in international waters of ANY CIVIL SHIP CAN MAKE ANY SHIP OF ANY STATE ALWAYS, AT ANY TIME!
        
        Ignorance of the law does not exempt the ignoramus from responsibility!!! (C).
        There is a m-n of the Convention on the Law of the Sea. In particular
        "United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) (concluded in Montego Bay on 10.12.1982/23.07.1994/110) (as amended on XNUMX/XNUMX/XNUMX)", article XNUMX of which determines who can be inspected by a warship in the waters of the high seas ... (it is possible if there is a suspicion that the ship is engaged in: piracy, slave trade, unauthorized radio and television broadcasting, has no nationality - without a flag -; has the same nationality as the ship inspecting it ...
        But, if you were mistaken in your "suspicions", then you will pay all the costs and damage caused to the ship by the inspection ...
        So, land brother, maritime affairs are!
        
        Offline sH, arK
        
        sH, arK 28 January 2022 20: 30
        
        -1
        
        0
        
        1
        
        You write nonsense again, it seems that you don’t understand the meaning of the above! Of course, if you did not find anything, if you detained the ship without a reason, you must pay the costs! What did you think?! Only for this you need to go to court, justify the costs, etc. And it is generally possible to land an inspection team at no cost! How about a rationale? Also a problem?
        
        I repeat, you are a strange person, if not to say a more offensive word to you! The mildest thing is ... no, I won’t talk ... I’ll tell you more - and in a war, according to the results, there are also reparations! :-) So let's put our paws together?!
        
        And by the way, I’ve been at sea all my life, but have you seen him? ;);)
        
        Offline Boa kaa
        
        Boa kaa (Alexander) 28 January 2022 20: 35
        
        +1
        
        1
        
        0
        
        Quote: sH, arK
        You write nonsense again, it seems that you don’t understand the letters!
        
        Colleague, of course I thank you for your restraint ... BUT !!!
        It's not me who carries the gag. This is the legal framework of the International Maritime Law (IMP) that defines the relationship of ships and vessels in the waters of the high seas (in your opinion - in International Waters - although there is no such term in the IMP ...)
        Therefore, PLZ, be more careful in your judgments. Rely on the knowledge and legal framework of the MMP, and not on your own emotions and incompetent judgments.
        Yours faithfully,
        
        Offline sH, arK
        
        sH, arK 28 January 2022 20: 49
        
        -1
        
        0
        
        1
        
        Forgive me, but let's explain again, if you don't understand ... There are rights to the sea, as everywhere else for all parties! An ordinary passer-by, a policeman and a soldier on guard have them! But there are also nuances! A policeman, like a warship, can stop and check your documents, and even a car ... But you have the right to go to court, in which you will prove, if you can, that he was wrong, and you missed the plane from -for him! This can be! But how often? How easy is it to prove everything in court? And who is easier, you or the policeman? So it is with the courts - yes, there are rights to search and to go to court. Only an inspection is here and now, and believe me, they will show you the rationale! And you?
        But everything changes if you're on guard, right? There are no more rights! There is only access mode! And the sentry has regime control!
        
        Offline Boa kaa
        
        Boa kaa (Alexander) 28 January 2022 21: 00
        
        +1
        
        1
        
        0
        
        Quote: sH, arK
        There are rights to the sea, as everywhere else for all parties!
        
        Colleague, the whole point is that at sea there are special rights, because ships and vessels flying the flag of the state under which they follow are the SOVEREIGN TERRITORY of the state of the flag under which these ships sail. THEIR RIGHTS (!) and obligations of the parties are strictly regulated by INTERNATIONAL laws (conventions) recognized by the UN members. No one else has such a m-n / legal status as ships in the waters of the high seas: neither airships, nor planes, nor carts ... This is the whole peculiarity: actions against a ship are an attempt on the TERRITORY of a sovereign state! Those. -- ACT OF DIRECT AGGRESSION against the state whose flag the ship is flying. With all the ensuing consequences...
        
        Offline sH, arK
        
        sH, arK 29 January 2022 09: 44
        
        -1
        
        0
        
        1
        
        You forgot a little... Or didn't know. The territory of the state is ships (i.e. military ships, even transport ships), and ordinary ships are available for stopping, inspection and are required to obey everywhere except their territorial waters. But that doesn't mean they don't have rights! Yes, but "all ships are equal, but the ships are more even"! And of course, always, the captain of any ship can go to court - the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea, he has this right;) By the way, most often they turn to him not after stopping, but during the detention and escort of ships or arrests in ports.
        
        Zs: and there is still a nuance. When I served, or rather, even studied - there were, it seems, nuances - not all countries signed the Convention, i.e. Not everyone could even sue! Well, only in their own courts in "their" courts;) And the United States, it seems, had not yet signed it either! True, all their ships sailed under Panama and Liberia, and the American flag was only on military and coastal ships (according to the laws, coasting is only on American ships and only under their flag!).

Offline

Boa kaa (Alexander) 28 January 2022 19: 45

Quote: Half a century and a half

Here the blockade breaker did not obey. Enough steel in coca to shoot him?

Right away and shoot a "peaceful civilian ship under the amsky flag"! This, my friend, is an act of piracy, undisguised aggression. But to land an inspection team on it and bring it to your port with a note through the Ministry of Foreign Affairs to the Government of the flag and a notification to the shipowner - this will all be the same ... As if by notes ... And all this under video filming, with protocols and other bureaucracy ... So that later the little darlings do not twitch either to the right or to the left ... It will be right, however.

Offline sH, arK

sH, arK 28 January 2022 20: 58

-1

0

1
Again, the blockade declared in wartime is no longer the analogy of a passerby-cop, when both sides have equal rights! The blockade is already a sentry - "it is not clear who", and the sentry is obliged to warn, and then immediately shoot! He is not a policeman, he must act quickly! And climb under guard - suicide! And the demand will not be from the guard, but from you, posthumously ...
The policeman can also shoot - but now he will have big problems with an excuse! This is the difference between the operation of the Navy in peacetime in open waters and in wartime in a conflict zone!

nikolai.shupenin 29 January 2022 19: 07

American, first of all, to sink and shoot down. this is our continent, it’s not a damn thing to fly here

alexey alexeyev_2 (Alexey Alekseev) 28 January 2022 07: 34

Well, I won’t say about air transport, but the capabilities of sea transport can be reset by simply mining ports. With a subsequent announcement about it. Yes, and air as well. According to the Amer press in Syria, there was an inexplicable failure of the jeepies system. It seems to me that it was the Russian electronic warfare systems that put the handles on this.

Offline Boa kaa

Boa kaa (Alexander) 28 January 2022 20: 21

+1

1

0
Quote: Aleksey Alekseev_2
and the possibilities of sea (transport) can be reset by simply mining ports.

What, however, you are an indefatigable aggressor !!!
Exhibiting MZM in state-va tervods is an ACT OF WAR !!!
1. Offline alexey alexeyev_2
  
  alexey alexeyev_2 (Alexey Alekseev) 28 January 2022 22: 06
  
  -1
  
  0
  
  1
  
  If my memory serves me, they have been trying for 8 years that they are at war with Russia.
  1. Offline Half a hundred second
    
    Half a hundred second (Half a half second) 28 January 2022 23: 35
    
    -1
    
    0
    
    1
    
    Quote: Aleksey Alekseev_2
    they have been trying for 8 years that they are at war with Russia.
    
    They can tryndet anything. It's called propaganda and poulism. We have individuals over there who also trynd a lot of things, so what?
    Did they show us a note declaring war? In fact, they are fighting, treacherously bombing cities?
    
    You yourself know perfectly well that there is no de jure or de facto war with Ukraine (except for the information one). Then why all these ... childish antics? All of us have not attended the nursery for a long time, someone even graduated from school. Maybe it's time to act like an adult?
    
    And the fact that the galloping neighbors, that you - behave almost the same. They scream that they were attacked and already occupied, you - that we are at war with them. It feels like I'm in the theater of the absurd.

Boa kaa (Alexander) 28 January 2022 19: 32

Quote: sH, arK

No war! Why?! Only air and sea blockade!

Dear! Well, you can’t disgrace yourself like that: according to international maritime law, the establishment of a sea (air) blockade is an act of declaring war!

Offline sH, arK

sH, arK 28 January 2022 20: 09

-1

1

2
War in the legal sense has actually already been declared to us. This is already a matter of diplomacy - either to force them to "apologize and lose face" for these statements, or to confirm! If this is done competently and very publicly, then the likelihood of the rulers of Durkaina refusing to actually declare war with humiliating apologies is quite real - and if not, then war has been legally declared, and a blockade can be declared. There is a win in both cases. At the same time, it is logical to require coordination with us of all transportation, all flights. It's not a hard line, no. In fact, they are also trying to threaten us with a blockade - SWIFT, transit, movement of civilians - obtaining visas now, in the United States, for example, in Russia, is almost impossible. At the same time, it will not make much difference whether we control the sky and the sea at all transition points - legally, the blockade removes liability from the insurance company, imposes it on the owner of the vehicle - this will already be a huge problem, given that most aircraft are leased, rented and etc. Yes, the war is official, a double-edged sword! A blockade can also be announced to us by Durkaina! With the same problems. But no one can forbid us to use our fleet of air and sea vessels. And the fact that foreigners stop flying - maybe for the better ?! Then the reason to move the confrontation to the next level will appear.
1. Offline Boa kaa
  
  Boa kaa (Alexander) 28 January 2022 20: 44
  
  +1
  
  1
  
  0
  
  Quote: sH, arK
  War in the legal sense has actually already been declared to us.
  
  Dear Mr Akula! Confirm, PLZ, your such categorical statement by some thread of a LEGAL document of interstate relations between Ukraine and the Russian Federation ... Well, there, a NOTA officially issued and handed over to the legal representative of the Russian Federation with Ukraine declaring war on us ... Breaking diplomatic relations and expelling ambassadors ... An ultimatum or something else, a thread of "LEGAL" - well, at least, in your opinion -
  Bla-bla shows of the Ukrainian Clown are not accepted. Propaganda - according to another department - for example, Dr. Goebbels ... or there Kuleba and K * ....
  AHA.

zzdimk 27 January 2022 13: 25

And where are the maps with ground "calibers" and diameters from them? This is precisely what is missing for the Western citizen to start packing up and emigrate to Africa in wild horror. The media is bad. Well, if you intimidate, then it’s necessary to shit. And you also need to write which civilian airfields are at gunpoint so that they stop flying.

gunnerminer (gunner miner) 27 January 2022 16: 44

-9

The circles are too big, the artist drew. At low viewing angles, the detection range of the surveillance radar is no further than 40 km. With a retractable mast, only 60 km.

Michael1950 (Michael) 27 January 2022 20: 43

- S-400s in Belarus are carried out by F-22/F-35 stealth aircraft in no time. It's like they were never there...

Offline oberon2000oberon

oberon2000oberon (Evgeny Tikhonov) 27 January 2022 21: 16

+4

7

3
"Stealth" flies well when no one is going to shoot down. And in which case they are taken out in two accounts. as if they had never flown there.
Offline sH, arK

sH, arK 28 January 2022 21: 02

0

1

1
Where are these planes coming from? :-):-) Who will send?! And if they don’t, then how and what?! An attack on a sovereign state, a member of the CSTO?

oberon2000oberon (Evgeny Tikhonov) 27 January 2022 21: 12

-2

As well as "Iskander" and "Caliber".

Michael1950 (Michael) 27 January 2022 21: 51

-5

Quote from oberon2000oberon

"Stealth" flies well when no one is going to shoot down. And in which case they are taken out in two accounts. as if they had never flown there.

- Is that what Skabeeva told you? She doesn't know...

Offline Eduard Aplombov

Eduard Aplombov (Eduard Aplombov) 28 January 2022 12: 24

+2

2

0
and you apparently Gordon chewed up how to endure with 400, right?
you have experience, the great Ukrainian army
the horses stand drunk, the horses are harnessed ...

Art Pilot (pilot) 27 January 2022 22: 16

Hopefully, along with Russian weapons, our advisers will also arrive in the LDNR.

Offline Expert_Analyst_Forecaster

Expert_Analyst_Forecaster 28 January 2022 09: 44

0

1

1
Конечно.
On the way they will visit Kharkov. And then all three divisions of advisers will organize a cauldron for the Ukrainian army.
1. Offline Art Pilot
  
  Art Pilot (pilot) 3 February 2022 14: 23
  
  0
  
  0
  
  0
  
  I don't think there will be boilers. If UkroReich jerks to Donbas, there will be an instant destruction of its military infrastructure by missile strikes. Everything. I even doubt that the LDNR troops will reach the administrative borders of their regions. It is better to focus on the collapse of Ukraine through an economic and energy collapse, which is time to organize. And after the collapse of Ukraine, non-military work should be done.

Expert_Analyst_Forecaster 28 January 2022 08: 58

Enough steel in coca to shoot him? In fact, after this, a declaration of war by the United States will have to follow (since we are talking about an American ship),

Why would? The American people will not understand this (c).
To fight with Russia because of the provocateur ship. Perhaps even the owner of the vessel will not be paid insurance.
In principle, a situation similar to the story of the blockade of West Berlin is possible. But there the question and the situation were somewhat different. So I'd rather support your opponent.

Offline Half a hundred second

Half a hundred second (Half a half second) 29 January 2022 00: 05

0

1

1
Quote: Expert_Analyst_Forecaster
The American people won't understand this.

The American people will understand and support this very much. If properly presented to the media. And for this they are masters, masters of PR and provocations. This will be filed as an act of aggression by "Putin's Russia" against a peaceful civilian ship that was transporting food to starving Ukrainian children, orphans, pregnant women and pensioners in the blockade. With appropriate photographs of these most starving. They will appreciate and understand not only in the USA, but also in Europe and many countries of the other world.
Moreover, they used similar Casus belli more than once. Substitute your own (even better civilians) in jeopardy in order to have a win-win reason. "Ours are beaten" works not only for Russians. And the "righteous" Americans themselves will demand the toughest measures from the government, and it, of course, "will not be able to refuse the democratic will of the nation"

Not everything is as simple as it seems. The international situation must be taken into account. And it is not in our favor, alas.

Moreover, my counterpart did not reason at all from the point of view of maritime and international law, but solely on emotions. Right does not always go hand in hand with the concept of justice, don't you know that. No wonder they wrote - the law is harsh, but it is the law. By not complying with the law, even if you do not like it and seem unfair, you yourself are stepping into the path of crime. With all the consequences. In order to assess the situation and make decisions, emotions must be sent far and irrevocably. Otherwise, we would have crushed each other long ago.

The consequences can be anything from harsh sanctions to a retaliatory blockade. They didn’t let one ship in, or they sank or arrested it - a second one will appear, but already accompanied by a military escort. With uncovered guns and with the most serious intentions. And what's next?

The military must also show the art of diplomacy and be able to think. To be able to think much more and better than to use weapons, otherwise there will be no victory. You don't need to shoot a lot.

Michael1950 (Michael) 28 January 2022 13: 44

-3

Quote: Eduard Aplombov

and you apparently chewed Gordon how to take out 400, so, a saucepan?
you have experience, the great Ukrainian army
the horses stand drunk, the horses are harnessed ...

- What does the "ukroarmiya" have to do with it? Did stealth fighters appear there?!

I'm talking about Americans...

Offline Eduard Aplombov

Eduard Aplombov (Eduard Aplombov) 28 January 2022 15: 08

-1

1

2
so the warriors are coming out and hope for the usa and natu, like, the west will help us ..
Americans became famous for centuries, fleeing from Afghanistan, trampling everyone and everything along the way
back in Yugoslavia, US fighters were shot down by locals with weapons from the early USSR
but you don't remember that, do you?
I remember here, I don’t remember here, you are contraindicated in the top shelf of a railway car

Michael1950 (Michael) 28 January 2022 13: 46

Quote: ArtPilot

- Necessarily! Several tank battalions from Buryatia ... They will advise ...

Michael1950 (Michael) 28 January 2022 13: 51

-6

Right! And since the war on Russia has actually already been declared, it is reasonable to clearly pose the question - does the Chief Clown of the Durkains think that he is at war with Russia ?!

- Of course not! He believes that Russia is attacking him.

If so, then declare a complete ban on all flights and calls of ships and ships without agreement with Russia! No war! Why?! Only air and sea blockade! With the current export-import oriented economy of the Durkains, this is a quick death, although not instantaneous! At the same time, it is not necessary to attack aircraft! Not a single civilian ship will go there, fly!

- And any pindos ship trying to enter the Ukrainian port will be sunk!

Michael1950 (Michael) 28 January 2022 13: 53

Yes, you are talking nonsense, I agree. Therefore, I will explain to you - when a state of war between two states and a blockade is declared - not a single civilian vessel of a third party can enter the blockaded port and be considered neutral at the same time! The entry of a military vessel is also excluded! Exceptions may be, subject to agreed humanitarian assistance, evacuation and hospital ships - but they can all be subject to inspection!
Those. in the event of an official declaration of war, one of the parties has the right to declare a ban on all civilian air / sea vessels to cross the blockade zone! Violating ships are legitimate targets, no matter whose they are! Well, as a consequence, all ships and aircraft crossing these zones will be deprived of insurance services. Do you think that someone will dare to go to Durkaina?! Well, maybe someone like you? Are you from there yourself?
You can see, apart from the sofa, you didn’t serve anywhere?

- Hammer! He took it and declared war on the United States right from the couch!

Michael1950 (Michael) 28 January 2022 14: 00

Again you are not talking about that. They came up with it themselves, they were outraged. I'm just talking about - will there be an order? (you so famously decided to jump on the topic. as if I put you in the cockpit of a fighter or in the place of the commander of the warhead-2 of the ship? These people are following the order, this is clear to everyone) So, are you ready to give such an order (we will appoint you commander-in-chief for clarity) ? Since you are arguing "let's declare a blockade", it is probably clear that you are reasoning from the position of those who make "high" decisions and give no less "high" orders, the pilot or commander of the warhead or ship does not make such decisions (declaring a blockade).

In my opinion, it was written very clearly, you aim to drag out the dispute. However, it's up to you whether to answer or not, I drew conclusions. For this, I think the topic has been exhausted.

- Do not pay attention to nonsense, "a soldier from the construction battalion." No one from Moscow will ever give an order to attack American ships, ships or planes. There are no such fools. You can sink the ships of sunny Georgia, but sink American ships, or ships?! There are no crazy ones.
sH, arK they just don’t know what was under Deir ez-Zor ...

The comment was deleted.

Vasya Petrov (Vasya Petrov) 28 January 2022 16: 32

Yes, there are logs and sprats covered

, even Slovakia passes by the edge