The weapon that allowed Putin to speak to the US from a position of strength

155

The end of the military-diplomatic sagas, which I took up without even thinking that it would turn out to be so long. The ending came out in three parts (today the 1st part), you’ll have to be patient (you yourself asked to lay out the performance characteristics of Putin’s arguments, I’m posting it), especially since Putin himself is in no hurry to throw the final “presentation” on Biden’s table, why should I run ahead of the locomotive ?

I still don't know exactly what he's going to throw out. There are at least three options, because Putin is so unpredictable! If even in the Pentagon and the CIA people with big stars and salaries are lost in terrible guesses, then what do you want from me? As they say, the question is not about salary, but I will offer my version of the plot development at the end of the 3rd part. All other options have been considered in предыдущих texts and dismissed them, proceeding from the principle of "by contradiction". But this is not my fault, Putin is to blame for everything, who, like any great politician, knows how to pause. In the previous parts, we have covered diplomatic component of the confrontation along the Moscow-Washington line, today we are finally moving on to military phase. And the whole joke is that no one in Washington knows how it could end. The hope that Putin is just frightening still lingers in their souls. But in vain!



Everyone who flatters themselves with such illusions in the hope that Putin is bluffing does not understand the main thing - why did he start all this, putting forward impossible demands to the collective West in a defiantly daring and ultimatum form, which can only be considered as a package, and the answer must be given exclusively in writing form, and even within a predetermined minimum time frame. The answer to this puzzle lies in the last sentence - the Kremlin needs a written answer. It is clear that such ultimatums are not issued in order to be accepted. What Putin really needed was a refusal on paper. Then Plan B comes into play.

To all the haters of Putin who declare him a fiend who has lost touch with reality, I would advise you to remember his basic specialty. Putin is an intelligence officer by his second specialty, and by first he is an international lawyer. This is the key to his strange behavior. Putin needs a legal document certifying that the West refuses to provide security guarantees to Russia and why. After that, Russia's hands become untied. Legally, after a written refusal to provide security guarantees, it has the right to ensure its protection by any means available to it. And she has more than enough of these funds! And the West knows about them.

To everyone who finds Biden’s behavior strange, who has begun to seriously consider the Kremlin’s demands, which are impossible from the point of view of an ordinary layman, I suggest simply typing in the Google search engine such banal search queries as “successful launches of Zircon hypersonic missiles and Bulava strategic ballistic missiles” , and score a search period of at least the last 6 months. At the same time, it would be nice to know which new nuclear submarine missile carriers, including strategic ones, were accepted into the Russian Navy in the last 45 days, and when the new air-launched hypersonic missiles will enter service with the Russian Aerospace Forces. And then think that this is not all. Not all events are reflected in the press.

Cause of Biden's Nightmares


The experience of the war in Syria taught the Americans a lot - you need to keep your ears open with the Russians. They have not yet forgotten October 2015, when just on Putin’s birthday, 26 winged Caliber took off in one gulp from some inflatable mattresses in the Caspian Sea and, flying 1,5 thousand km, fell on the heads of the unsuspecting warriors of Allah in the provinces Raqqa and Deir ez-Zor, sending them to meet with the Almighty much earlier than scheduled in Washington. And this at a time when all 17 US intelligence services were convincing the White House in unison that Russia did not have any Calibers (at least with such a range), as well as a fleet capable of carrying them, not to mention the Caspian the sea, which did not appear on the Pentagon maps at all - for one strongly tanned gentleman, who was then temporarily registered in the White House, this came as a complete surprise and overshadowed the last year of his stay there, with which he retired to write memoirs under the general title “I and Genius Villainy Putin. Losers from Langley, who then overslept the Russian "rusty" Caliber, went to school to study where the Caspian Sea is, from where they can atone for their guilt straight to the Syrian front, but the nightmares for America did not end there. They were just getting started. Putin, it seems, was just getting a taste of it.

When, 4 years later, the pale-faced brother of Obama, who had retired to a well-deserved rest, who did not live up to our hopes placed on him and fell under the weight of internal corporate intrigues, Donnie Trump, tried to drag the Kremlin into an unnecessary arms race by withdrawing from the INF Treaty and scaring him with the withdrawal from START III, Putin he, as always, politely warned:

If someone has a desire to withdraw from the Treaty on the Reduction of Nuclear Arms - our answer will be instant! And mirror...

Everyone has already noticed that Putin does not throw words into the wind. The balance of power in the world is very important, and when the Americans try to break it over and over again, we have to respond to it. And this is not a maniacal desire to wipe the nose of the Americans, but a cruel necessity caused by concern for maintaining peace throughout the world and, of course, in order to ensure their own independence and security. If you paid attention to the words Putin said then, he said - the answer will be mirrored. And this means asymmetrical (because in the mirror you see yourself the other way around). This means that Obama's nightmare with Putin's signature asymmetrical response will continue. And who said that he would be in the nuclear plane? Not at all. After all, back in September 2005, Putin transparently hinted that Russia had committed technological breakthrough in the creation of hyper-weapons. I quote the original source:

We are developing new strategic complexes that no one else in the world has. They will operate on hypersonic, change direction along the course and height. Virtually invulnerable to missile defense.

He said it back in 2005! Then no one believed it. Nor did they believe it two years later, when Putin delivered his famous Munich speech. The West then only laughed at him: “Yes, who is this Putin? How many divisions does he have? Then we got lost. But a year later they saw the first divisions of Putin. In Georgia. Apparently, in 2008 they did not impress our “partners” much, because six years later they decided to repeat the Georgian scenario. This time in Ukraine. After that, Putin realized that the "partners" did not understand in a good way, they would have to talk to them differently. As our favorite Donnie Trump said: “If you don’t want it in a bad way, it will be worse in a good way!”. But in 2014, Putin did not take the advice of the Fearless Cowboy, on the contrary, because he knew little about him then (Trump would become president only two years later). But already during his term in 2018, Putin moved from words to deeds, playing his famous cartoons in front of the Federal Assembly of the Russian Federation. In Washington, then, they were speechless for a second, then they messed themselves up, went under themselves a couple of times, but then, having changed diapers, they pulled themselves together and continued what they started with the words “You are still lying!”. Putin had to return them to the sinful earth, while again verbally. Listen, he said then:

We all live in a world whose security is based on nuclear potential. Russia is one of the largest nuclear powers in the world. And, as a response to the construction of a missile defense system in the United States, we are improving our strike systems. And they are already in service with us. Some... And some, I mean the Vanguard system, will be delivered within the next few months. We are absolutely perfect, and experts understand and realize this, we have overtaken all "partners" and competitors in this area. So far, no one has high-precision hypersonic weapons! And we already have it in service! This is a high-tech modern weapon.


Grandpa Joe's Mental Improvement Medicine #1: Vanguard


So do not force us to use it (this is me already on my own)! For those who do not know or have forgotten, I will remind you what Avangard is. This is another option for our new Sarmat heavy-class intercontinental ballistic missile, which replaced the famous Voyevoda ICBM, which terrified our “friends” so much that it received the SS-18 “Satan” index according to NATO classification. I don’t even know what name they will come up with for Sarmat, but considering that it will be equipped in its warhead with the Avangard air-stratospheric complex, capable of moving in dense layers of the atmosphere at hypersonic speeds exceeding the speed of sound by 20 times, which makes it inaccessible to enemy missile defense systems, then most likely it will be "Invisible Satan".

Imagine a fireball rushing towards the earth in a cloud of plasma almost from the first space one! This is the very Avangard, which embodied in metal and composite the very breakthrough in technologies that VVP spoke about. The genius of our scientists has created materials that can withstand the temperature of the plasma without breaking down. Secret is not only the material of the product, but even its shape (the level of secrecy goes off scale). Among the Sarmat's multiple warheads, there can be from one to three such modules, some of which may be nuclear-capable, some conventional, and some are decoys for withdrawing enemy anti-missiles (there can be up to 15 decoys).

So, Avangard has been in the army since December 2019. They are equipped with a regiment of the Strategic Missile Forces near Orenburg, which is part of the Dombarovsk division of the Strategic Missile Forces. As of December 2021, the regiment is already equipped with six such missile systems. So far, the old Soviet liquid-propellant ICBM UR-100N UTTKh is used as a carrier for this, but the first test launch of the newest heavy multi-stage liquid-propellant ICBM Sarmat, to which it should switch, is scheduled for this year (a test site for its testing near the village of Severo-Yeniseisky Krasnoyarsk Territory has already been built). If the tests are successful, then the first samples of our newest heavy-class intercontinental ballistic missile will enter the troops this year (they will be equipped with two divisions of the Strategic Missile Forces - the 62nd Uzhurskaya near Krasnoyarsk and the already mentioned 13th Dombarovskaya near Orenburg, located at an inaccessible distance from cruise missiles of our potential enemy).


Now some performance characteristics of products (because most of them are classified). The product can reach a maximum speed of up to Mach 28 (in the latest tests on December 26, 2018, a speed of Mach 27 was achieved). The power of combat equipment is from 800 kilotons to 2 megatons (Biden will definitely have enough!). The estimated length of the block is 5-7 meters. The body of the product is made of composite materials, which provides resistance to aerodynamic heating of several thousand degrees and reliable protection against laser irradiation.

This was the main problem. We even stood a step away from closing the program, since we did not have a technical solution for controlling objects at speeds exceeding Mach 10. After a series of unsuccessful tests in 2013-2015, when it was not possible to solve the problem of stable control of the apparatus and ensure its protection from ultra-high temperatures, the government hesitated before the desire to close this project. The developers then barely managed to persuade Yuri Borisov (he oversaw the military-industrial complex from the Ministry of Defense) to continue work. Everything rested on the laws of physics - the signal did not pass through the Faraday cloud (this is a plasma cloud surrounding a rocket traveling at a speed of over Mach 10), and therefore the glider became uncontrollable. Who needs an unguided warhead? The Americans, who started their developments in hypersound even before us, eventually retreated, signing their own powerlessness before the laws of physics, and the genius of our scientists (and I will name them a little later, the Motherland should know its heroes!), Based on Soviet developments, allowed to find a way out where, it would seem, there was no way out. Against all laws of physics! As a result, we have hypersonic gliders, which our opponents do not have and will not have in the foreseeable future. It is this circumstance that does not allow Tired Joe to sleep peacefully.


In September 2020, Putin declassified the name of the main developer of the Avangard complex. This is Herbert Aleksandrovich Efremov, the greatest designer of rocket and rocket and space technology, honorary general director and honorary general designer of the famous military-industrial complex NPO Mashinostroeniya (headed this institute after the death of Academician Chelomey in 1984). It is his colossal merit that in the difficult post-Soviet years he was able to save the workforce of the enterprise and its scientific and technical potential. Grandfather is already 88 years old, twice Hero of Socialist Labor (1963 and 2017), both times by closed Decrees (one of two people awarded both of these titles at the same time - he received the GSC USSR at the age of 29, the GSC RF - at 84), other awards cannot be listed I will (there are more than enough of them). It is to him that we owe our peaceful future.

According to Russian President Vladimir Putin,

the hypersonic gliding winged warhead Avangard can break through even promising missile defense systems by maneuvering in pitch and yaw (altitude and heading - up and down, left and right - ed.). Its speed exceeds Mach 20 and it goes to the target like a fireball, the surface temperature of which is 1600-2000 degrees Celsius.

The warheads of the complex have their own engines and can maneuver on the trajectory both in direction and in speed. The control system allows you to quickly change the flight task and the distribution of targets before the start. Combat equipment can be a multiple reentry vehicle and has a set of means to overcome anti-missile defense. The warhead is positioned as an intercontinental range (more than 6 thousand km).

Russian Deputy Prime Minister Yury Borisov once noted that the Avangard strategic missile system with a hypersonic warhead devalues ​​all the US efforts spent on creating their own missile defense system. According to Russian military experts, at least 50 SM-3 interceptor missiles are required to destroy the Avangard UBB, which in fact makes the US missile defense system meaningless. Now do you understand why Putin can afford to talk to Biden from a position of strength?

But that's not all. A significant advantage of guided warheads (UBVs) is also their ability to adjust the trajectory with extraordinary precision and achieve accuracy that is not available with conventional warheads. So, similar to the Avangard, the American Advanced Hypersonic Weapon guided warhead has a CEP of about 10 m versus 250 m for Voyevoda ICBM warheads (the Americans are also working on hypersonic, let this not be a discovery for you, and have already achieved something, therefore Putin could not wait any longer - either we are them now, or they are us later!). This circumstance allows not only to drastically reduce the weight of the warhead by reducing its power due to the accuracy of hitting the object, but also fundamentally changes the scenario of use, including non-nuclear ones. The kinetic energy of the device in this case will be enough to hit a command post protected by a strong missile defense plant, nuclear power plant or other strategically important object. But the Americans still have a speed limit of Mach 5-6. And this is their ceiling. The laws of physics are not subject to them, because they do not have their own Herbert Efremov. Let's sympathize with them. When and if they nevertheless create their own hypersound, we will already have a missile defense system based on the S-550 against it. And again they will be unarmed against us.

Western experts also note that the Avangard UBB, in addition to the Sarmat ICBM, can be installed on medium or short-range missiles, from which, upon reaching a given speed, the UBB can be separated to attack a target protected by strong missile defense systems. Also, the strategic stealth bomber "Messenger" (aka PAK DA) is supposed to be the data carrier of the gliders. Therefore, the cost of investing in Avangard technology was distributed between the Sarmat ICBM projects and the strategic aviation re-equipment program. This is the fundamental difference between the Russian project and Chinese and American hypersonic vehicles capable of launching only from ICBMs.

Ending to be continued. There we will look at what else Putin scares Biden and finally present his main reinforced concrete argument, after which the US President made a deal with the Kremlin (no one knows how it will end, but definitely not a war in Ukraine).
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

155 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. -6
    26 January 2022 20: 54
    everything that the author has put together can be fit into one phrase "I myself do not know anything." Just like in a cheap TV series - he inflated, inflated the intrigue, and as a result, zilch
    1. +7
      26 January 2022 21: 03
      guessing the Kremlin’s plans is for Globa, I just analyze and brush aside all unsuitable
      I will offer my version of the development of the plot in the 3rd part
      do you want me to write at the beginning of the 1st part how everything will end in the 3rd? Then why was it necessary to escalate the intrigue? it was possible to meet two sentences - Putin will arrange a training and demonstrative flogging of the United States (the place is still being specified, but not Ukraine, presumably SAR)
      plan B - wait for Biden to refuse and then alga!
      plan A - Biden gives the go-ahead and then the cancellation of plan B

      On Wednesday evening, January 26, US Ambassador to Russia John Sullivan brought to the Foreign Office a written response from Washington to Moscow's demands for security guarantees.

      everyone is on the low end!
  2. +4
    26 January 2022 21: 19
    Quote: Volkonsky
    Putin will arrange a training and demonstrative whipping of the USA (the place is still being specified, but not Ukraine, presumably SAR)

    Well, before he goes to Xi for the opening of the Olympiad, he definitely needs to flog the West, otherwise their meeting will be boring and the PindoSs will be pacified so that they don’t kick in Ukraine while VVP will watch the show at the stadium with Xi laughing
    1. +5
      26 January 2022 21: 26
      no, Valera, at first February 4 to Xi, and then you can already teach someone a lesson so that the brains fall into place, they don’t understand in a good way, although if there was an agreement between Biden and VVP, then we are all participants in the performance, or rather spectators , they are participants, but if there is no agreement, then after the office. refusal - we are waiting for a small victorious war in the SAR, otherwise the Yankees will not understand anything, public humiliation is required here
      1. -3
        26 January 2022 22: 32
        Dear author, Russian-Japanese, WWI, Afghan and many others were thought of as small victorious wars. Are you not afraid that the war may turn out to be not small, and even less victorious?
        1. +3
          26 January 2022 22: 34
          I'm not afraid! if only the Kremlin did not change their minds
      2. 0
        26 January 2022 22: 48
        Quote: Volkonsky
        we are waiting for a small victorious war in the SAR

        then there will be a call to the opponent with a message that the Poseidons promised by 2027 have been put on combat duty, and maybe even before the SAR .... I think they are already being put.
        1. +1
          26 January 2022 23: 24
          no, this year the last text tests will begin, and then this is a doomsday weapon, they don’t blackmail with it, they bury it
          1. +2
            27 January 2022 13: 03
            Quote: Volkonsky
            text test,

            Probably still TEST, not text. No one teaches you to "read" the Canyon, well, with the exception of topographic maps of the seabed. bully
            1. 0
              27 January 2022 19: 05
              ochipatka! thx for being observant
              about the canyon did not understand? it's about the strait to them. Sakharov?
              1. 0
                28 January 2022 17: 35
                Quote: Volkonsky
                about the canyon did not understand?

                The States stubbornly call our Poseidon the Canyon on the subject of R&D. And for the first time NPA appeared in the press under the name "Status-6". He became Poseidon after flirting with public opinion about how best to call a new mallet ... For me, it would be better to remain a 2M39 product in general - short and clear.
                AHA.
                1. +1
                  28 January 2022 18: 53
                  And they seem to already know.

                  On November 27, 2016, Russian sailors successfully tested the Status-6 unmanned nuclear submarine. It is capable of carrying a multi-megaton nuclear charge, writes Washington Free Beacon columnist Bill Hertz. - The special-purpose submarine B-90 took part in the tests.

                  We ourselves deliberately allowed a leak so that the partners would not bury themselves. The project became famous after the “accidental” show on Russian TV on November 10, 2015 of the project’s presentation page in a report on the meeting of representatives of the Defense Ministry and the military-industrial complex with Putin. And a year later, American intelligence already confirmed the test of an underwater drone with a nuclear power plant, launched from the B-90 Sarov special-purpose submarine. American intelligence expected the first such working prototype to appear no earlier than 2019. And therefore, the high readiness of the drone, already capable of launching and moving from the mother submarine, caused panic in the Pentagon. Well, what can I say, friends? We are working ... This year, Poseidon will accept the Russian Navy into the fleet, they will probably attribute it to the GUGI
      3. +2
        26 January 2022 22: 50
        In Syria, there is no one to nightmare wunderwaffles. There is nowhere for hypersound to accelerate. In Idlib, volume-detonating gifts will be enough.
        But then again, guessing this to Globa, I agree.
        Something on something still has to bang. Something Russian on something American, covered up by American. Moreover, everyone should see this, and it should be obvious to everyone how liquidly the penguins are trimmed.
        Wangyu, Biden telegraphs Putin something like: “Vova, I see that under these conditions you can smear us on a saucer. But understand, this will lead to a new redistribution of the whole world, everyone who was afraid to raise their heads will raise their heads, starting with the Mexican cartels and ending with the devil bald, the massacre will be terrible, the whole planet will plunge into the holy 90s, do you need it? but what do you care about these sanctions, you’ve pulled out a lot.”
        I'm looking forward to something like this. But, of course, I'm not Globa, we'll see.
        1. +1
          26 January 2022 23: 27
          even the SAR is not a fact yet, plan A has not yet been canceled, there are still 14 days until the Yermak and the Cossack agree, Kiev is in this situation for us, he doesn’t smile at all to fight with the Russian Federation, he’s not a suicide
          1. +1
            27 January 2022 17: 58
            Zelya will just do everything, up to suicide, that Washington orders him. It is important here that Fashington come out of the drug frenzy and take a sober look at the situation ...
            1. +1
              27 January 2022 19: 01
              but no! Trust me, I know the 404 situation better because I live in it, damn it! Zelya is already uncontrollable, but there is no one to change and there is no time
      4. -1
        26 January 2022 23: 50
        It seems to me that Russia will not overshadow the Olympic truce. There will be precisely a peaceful action - something like a strategic partnership with China forever.
        1. -12
          27 January 2022 08: 47
          Like small punks from the boys in the area, to the big uncles. So we are to the PRC. Which is the main trading partner of the United States. And he really appreciates this partnership.
          1. 0
            27 January 2022 13: 06
            You're talking nonsense again. And here the boys and where does the PRC. It’s better to lie about the MF KR, or whatever you cut there))))).
            1. -8
              27 January 2022 13: 10
              There will be precisely a peaceful action - something like a strategic partnership with China forever.

              Someone said this. Although Chinese society is outraged by the anti-Russian rhetoric of Kiev, Washington. The Chinese hate the United States like Japan. But their sales market for China is more attractive than the Russian one. Unpredictable.
              1. 0
                27 January 2022 13: 17
                Don't talk about markets. All that you can say about the market, like Ukrainian ragul, is only about the Kuev market, where they mainly sell late and glass washing. You are definitely an expert on this. But here it is not interesting.
                1. -6
                  27 January 2022 13: 40
                  There is no way without markets. Because of them, wars begin. We need investments. And to strengthen the ruble, among other things.
                  1. 0
                    27 January 2022 13: 52
                    Listen, is Mr. Ukrainian or, more precisely, Mr. Ukrainian? So, pan Ukrainian, don’t try to coo here about the redistribution of sales markets, most of the members of the forum, I’m sure, perfectly understand what it is and where it is). And it’s not for you to accurately analyze them, your previous posts are a guarantee for this. I'm telling you with a direct message, it's not about sales markets, but about the lack of intelligence of the one who writes about them. Understand? You write about them, but you don’t have enough of what I said in a sentence earlier, and as a result, you get a complete mess in your posts, just like in your Ukraine.
                    As for investments... what am I talking about... I understand you like the word. Yes, capacious). And that's where the investment ends). Tell us better how much is moonshine in Kiev on the market?
                    1. -5
                      27 January 2022 16: 36
                      You will not rush to this vile settlement to sip swill. There must be some kind of pride.
                      1. The comment was deleted.
                      2. The comment was deleted.
                      3. The comment was deleted.
          2. 0
            27 January 2022 18: 02
            What were you so worried about? Onaliteg. Russia has no problems with China, but there are pindos. So do not confuse warm with soft here.
            1. -6
              27 January 2022 20: 17
              Now it’s quiet with the PRC. But it’s not known how it will be tomorrow. The PRC has not concluded an allied military treaty with anyone. The United States is a long-time and desirable trading partner. It is also mutually beneficial. The Central Committee of the CPC remembers 1978. And where did the money come from in the PRC.
      5. -1
        27 January 2022 23: 54
        I thought - they’ll take BB and C and give up SWIFT - that’s going to be a joke!))) What’s not the answer !?)
  3. -13
    26 January 2022 21: 28
    There may be weapons, but there are no testicles. Not from the word at all. There is television bravado, there is a macho in front of young Western journalists, there is an Altai mushroom picker (or what are they doing there in the taiga with Shoigu?). There is no man with those notorious iron testicles in the Kremlin!
    1. +9
      26 January 2022 21: 30
      and you want to zababahat avant-gardes in the White House? not an option! the highest aerobatics - to achieve your goal without a single shot, as in the Crimea
      1. +6
        26 January 2022 22: 53
        I agree. There are so many militant commentators here, after one every second trampled on tarpaulin on long trips at combat exits, if anything, they can repeat it.
        But few people can repeat this in front of the dugs in Moscow, oddly enough.
        It is best to resolve issues without blood and broads.
        1. -1
          27 January 2022 13: 18
          Not militant, but decisive. Need to understand.
        2. -5
          27 January 2022 16: 39
          The bravest plastic AK did not hold in their hands. And at night they are afraid of a trident or a beard with a turban. laughing
          Just kidding. Brave guys. When necessary, they will go to enemy tanks with a grenade without a fuse.
    2. +4
      26 January 2022 22: 26
      Well, after such an ultimatum, you need to beat and moreover, beat the knockout differently, we were all young and participated in street fights, he said and didn’t answer for words, it’s more shameful than just fighting and losing. I didn’t and don’t think Putin is stupid and that he doesn’t understand that after such a shame he will never wash off and all the jackals-vassals of the USA will wipe their feet on Russia. Well, soon everything will become clear and there, as they say, let's look at whose ... the fly will sit down.
      1. 0
        26 January 2022 22: 29
        If a fight is inevitable, then you must strike first!
        what if it's avoidable?
        1. +1
          26 January 2022 22: 32
          If it is unavoidable, then you can kick your ears, like Mironov in a diamond hand, so that everyone can see and disrespectfully.
        2. 0
          27 January 2022 09: 55
          Then you don't have to hit!
        3. 0
          27 January 2022 13: 21
          But it's better not to get into a fight. Russia has arguments (including those indicated by you), you just need to correctly apply them theoretically, so to speak, and if something ... then it’s not a sin to remind you what happens when they (arguments) are used in practice. Perhaps it won’t come to a fight .
        4. -1
          27 January 2022 16: 31
          Hitler hit first and bent first.
      2. -1
        26 January 2022 23: 03
        Quote: Valera75
        you have to beat

        It is not necessary to beat or kill, it is a sin .... There is a truth "Knowledge multiplies sorrows" that is enough.
        1. 0
          26 January 2022 23: 31
          here! right! they laid out the cards, checked who has more, who has more, he will bank! more in GDP, the states just want to crawl beautifully, without humiliation
    3. 0
      27 January 2022 18: 07
      Apparently you have. Even your brain is in them. Otherwise, you would evaluate the statement of the President of Russia differently.
  4. -4
    26 January 2022 21: 46
    No need for the White House. You strain at least Ukraine and Moldova for spitting in the direction of Russia. Not your level? Well then, wipe yourself off.
    1. +5
      26 January 2022 21: 50
      somehow you swim shallowly, you need to hit the decision-making centers, then they themselves will scatter on the ground, they will still tear their shirt on themselves, proving that they have always loved the Russian Federation
    2. -1
      27 January 2022 18: 08
      Ay, Bug, to know she is strong, if she barks at an elephant ...
  5. +3
    26 January 2022 21: 58
    It looks like "Alga"!
    1. +1
      27 January 2022 23: 34
      noeeee..it's too early...I feel that BB has prepared something...or was there a plan to unleash the hands..they say lose your offense at your mother.scho such a slow-witted freaked out..
  6. -9
    26 January 2022 22: 02
    Legally, after a written refusal to provide security guarantees, it has the right to ensure its own protection by any means available to it.

    Of course, I am not an international lawyer, but before this refusal, the Russian Federation was not in the right to "ensure its own protection by any means available to it"?

    They have not yet forgotten October 2015, when just on Putin’s birthday, 26 winged Calibers took off in one gulp from some inflatable mattresses in the Caspian Sea, flying 1,5 thousand km

    It is very doubtful that they could have been impressed by a rocket developed in the 80s of the last century, which did not differ much in performance from the Tomahawk.

    Everyone has already noticed that Putin does not throw words into the wind.

    I noticed this most of all in the pension reform.

    We are developing new strategic complexes that no one else in the world has. They will operate on hypersonic, change direction along the course and height. Virtually invulnerable to missile defense.

    Here one old man advises not to overestimate the capabilities of hypersonic weapons.
    https://iz.ru/695749/sergei-valchenko/massovogo-giperzvukovogo-oruzhiia-ne-stoit-ozhidat

    I don’t even know what name they will come up with for Sarmat, but considering that it will be equipped in its warhead with the Avangard air-stratospheric complex, capable of moving in dense layers of the atmosphere at hypersonic speeds exceeding the speed of sound by 20 times, which makes it inaccessible to enemy missile defense systems, then most likely it will be "Invisible Satan".

    Don't tell anyone, but still such a wunderwaffe as the V-2 moved in the dense layers of the atmosphere at hypersonic speeds.
    It is hard to believe that four blocks installed on a Soviet-made rocket can greatly impress the Americans.

    This was the main problem. We even stood a step away from closing the program, since we did not have a technical solution for controlling objects at speeds exceeding Mach 10.

    Well, that's not entirely true. More precisely, not at all. Buran and Shatal could be controlled at such speeds.
    1. +5
      27 January 2022 00: 00
      You are now talking about Buran and such shuttles .... How to say politically correct... Frozen, in short.
      Well, for the rest of the text ... physics, obviously, is not your forte.
      Mach 5-6 was not a problem before and now. In our case, we know for sure about Mach 15. This is a fundamentally different story. On the topic of controllability of the V2 - well ... formally yes, controllable :) the level of maneuverability was completely different (and therefore the stability of the system was much higher, although what am I talking about, you are not in the subject). It would be better if you were an "international lawyer", alas ....
      1. -9
        27 January 2022 00: 48
        Quote from Charisma
        You are now talking about Buran and such shuttles .... How to say politically correct... Frozen, in short.

        Do not disgrace
        https://buran.ru/htm/shuland.htm
        Shuttal enters the atmosphere at 24M and begins maneuvering almost immediately.
        V2 ballistic missile, but you seem to be off topic.
        1. +5
          27 January 2022 10: 04
          Shame on you, and the further - the more. I don't need to throw popular science "links", my knowledge allows me to discuss with you without the help of Google. The shuttle, when entering the atmosphere, is practically uncontrollable, cannot maneuver and is not controllable from the ground at all, it essentially “plans”, slowing down on the atmosphere, adjusting its trajectory only by aerodynamics, changing the angles of attack and pitch - this is all available to it at the time of hypersound " control". At the same time, the radio signal from the earth does not pass at this wonderful moment. Thus, the shuttle has no connection with the ground at the time of hypersound (there is a little, due to the plasma cloud reduction technology, but it is very unstable). Ballistic missiles (V2 for example) also fly in hypersound, but that's the question - they fly only along a ballistic trajectory, and are uncontrollable from the ground for the same reason. The radio signal does not pass. And therefore they fly evenly and only to a given point. They have their own control system (guidance) - but they cannot be controlled from the ground while in flight.
          Russia's new hypersonic weapon, by "absurd coincidence," maneuvers in hypersound (that is, it does not use a ballistic trajectory). And it can change the target. And this means that the problem of the radio signal has somehow been solved. This follows from the published performance characteristics. HOW ours were able to achieve this at such speeds is a complex and most likely well-guarded question. Reasoning on this issue is definitely not for your level of knowledge, so it is pointless to conduct further discussion.
          1. 0
            27 January 2022 10: 56
            will the Americans be able to plant a "hard nut" kamikaze in a warhead so that he controls it? Well, as in the shuttle :)
          2. +1
            27 January 2022 19: 33
            Madam, I take off my hat! Yuri Borisov shed light on the boy, how they (gliders) do it - starting from the dense layers of the atmosphere.

            Russian Deputy Prime Minister Yury Borisov, in turn, noted that the Avangard strategic missile system with a hypersonic warhead devalues ​​all the US efforts spent by them on creating their own missile defense system. The reason is the ability of the planning unit to push off from the dense layers of the atmosphere, maneuver due to special technologies and become invulnerable to missile defense systems. According to experts from the Russian Ministry of Defense, at least 50 SM-3 interceptor missiles are required to defeat the Avangard UBB, which, in fact, makes the US missile defense system meaningless. Now do you see why Putin can afford to talk to Biden from a position of strength?

            the editor threw something out, maybe a military secret? but once I unearthed, then it's no longer a secret
            1. +1
              28 January 2022 08: 36
              Quote: Volkonsky
              Madam, I take off my hat! Yuri Borisov shed light on the boy, how they (gliders) do it - starting from the dense layers of the atmosphere.

              Merci for the compliment. In fact, nothing special, I am an aviation engineer by basic education (on-board armament of aircraft), at the dawn of my youth I managed to work at GosNIIAS (aviation systems). Something that remains in the memory from those times.
          3. -1
            28 January 2022 01: 17
            Quote from Charisma
            Shame on you, and the further - the more.

            While only you

            Quote from Charisma
            The shuttle, when entering the atmosphere, is practically uncontrollable, cannot maneuver and is not controllable from the ground at all, it essentially “plans”, slowing down on the atmosphere, adjusting its trajectory only by aerodynamics, changing the angles of attack and pitch - this is all available to it at the time of hypersound " control".

            Can you, as a non-specialist, explain to me the difference between the angle of attack and pitch? If the angle of attack changes, what happens to the pitch angle?

            Quote from Charisma
            At the same time, the radio signal from the earth does not pass at this wonderful moment. Thus, the shuttle has no connection with the ground at the time of hypersound (there is a little, due to the plasma cloud reduction technology, but it is very unstable).

            So what?

            Quote from Charisma
            Ballistic missiles (V2 for example) also fly in hypersound, but that's the question - they fly only along a ballistic trajectory, and are uncontrollable from the ground for the same reason. The radio signal does not pass.

            Yes, what are you? Who would have thought? And I thought modern (and not very, the same V1 and 2) have their own guidance systems without control from the ground. And it's like that. You opened my eyes.

            Quote from Charisma
            Russia's new hypersonic weapon, by "absurd coincidence," maneuvers in hypersound (that is, it does not use a ballistic trajectory). And it can change the target.

            It’s hard for me to imagine why the Vanguard should change the goal, especially since by this time most likely those who might think of changing the goal will no longer be alive. But I think for Vanguard the control problems in the upper atmosphere are not much different from those for Buran with the Shuttle.

            Buran flew 8270 km from the moment of entry into the atmosphere to the runway. A deviation of 1 degree at such a distance gives 150 kilometers. Plus or minus. And he had to go to the energy dissipation cylinder with a diameter of about 50 km with a certain course, speed and height. Tell me that this is done with a purely ballistic apparatus and you can end the discussion.
            1. 0
              28 January 2022 08: 25
              Quote: Oleg Rambover
              Can you, as a non-specialist, explain to me the difference between the angle of attack and pitch? If the angle of attack changes, what happens to the pitch angle?

              I can, but for a lot of extra money. Aerodynamics textbook to help you. To begin with, you can answer my question - how to measure the pitch angle of a shuttle in outer space? There lies the answer to the question, what is the difference between attack and pitch.

              Quote: Oleg Rambover
              Yes, what are you? Who would have thought? And I thought modern (and not very, the same V1 and 2) have their own guidance systems without control from the ground. And it's like that. You opened my eyes.

              Yes, they have their own guidance systems (where did I write otherwise?), which, by the way, are also very different in quality. You don't need to "get" a lot of mind. It is much more difficult to change an already laid trajectory with a signal from the ground. I understand that you are already biting your lips with resentment, but I advised you not to go where you don’t understand anything at all.

              The rest of your text is just empty demagoguery.
              At the moment when the shuttle's skin begins to "burn" - that same plasma cloud is formed - it glides with the engines OFF, and it has no connection with the MCC.
              1. +2
                28 January 2022 19: 01
                comrade suffers from sophistry and he has obvious linguistic problems (I sent him to ignore after some stupid discussions and don’t notice anymore, I advise you to join too), for him the pitch and yaw of the words are incomprehensible, he needs to write left and right and up and down, or in height and in front. Madam, your fans already write to me in a personal, you quickly got used to it, however
              2. -1
                29 January 2022 02: 39
                Quote from Charisma
                I can, but for a lot of extra money.

                I have reason to strongly doubt the effectiveness of such costs.

                Quote from Charisma
                how to measure the pitch angle of a shuttle in outer space? There lies the answer to the question, what is the difference between attack and pitch.

                Probably like an airplane, with the help of gyroscopes. Although it is possible with the help of the sun or stars. I hope you understand that "changing angles of attack and pitch" oil is oily.

                Quote from Charisma
                Yes, they have their own guidance systems (where did I write otherwise?), which, by the way, are also very different in quality. You don't need to "get" a lot of mind. It is much more difficult to change an already laid trajectory with a signal from the ground.

                But for some reason you are focusing on control from the ground. The same Buran in automatic mode at the descent stage controlled the angle of attack and roll, and at the landing stage the LRE controls were turned off and he landed on the plane.
                Well, I don’t know, the landing command is given to the same unions from the ground and they can theoretically land anywhere in their orbit.

                Quote from Charisma
                I understand that you are already biting your lips with resentment, but I advised you not to go where you don’t understand anything at all.

                Oh don't worry. It is a pleasure to discuss with such a non-specialist as I, with such a "specialist" as you. Self-esteem rises.

                Quote from Charisma
                At the moment when the shuttle's skin begins to "burn" - that same plasma cloud is formed - it glides with the engines OFF, and it has no connection with the MCC.

                Don't tell anyone, but both Shuttal and Buran can't turn off the engine, since they don't have engines to fly in the atmosphere. They land without engines, like a glider. They have control engines for pitch and roll control, but they just turn off just before landing. At the stage of descent, they work.
                As, by the way, the "avant-garde" does not have an engine, it is also a glider.
                You are again with this connection. That she gave you so much. As far as I understand, the avant-garde bounces off the atmosphere several times, during such bounces the connection works.
  7. -1
    26 January 2022 22: 03
    The longest journey begins with the first step.
    To begin with, rein in all the jackals directly around Russia. After that, maybe there will be no need for the White House.
    1. +9
      26 January 2022 22: 26
      you can’t rein in any stubborn idiots on your website, what do you want from Putin?

      Well, that's not entirely true. More precisely, not at all. Buran and Shatal could be controlled at such speeds.

      here is an example of stupidity! and after all, the uncle does not know that Buran flew in space, and not in the dense layers of the atmosphere, where, due to the Faraday cloud caused by high temperatures, the signal does not pass. When entering the atmosphere at a speed of Mach 25, Buran became uncontrollable, flew along a ballistic trajectory, laid down in advance in the descent program

      It is very doubtful that they could have been impressed by a rocket developed in the 80s of the last century, which did not differ much in performance from the Tomogawk.

      I'm not talking about grammatical errors - TomAgavki is written with A, but distances of 300 km and 4,5 thousand km will impress anyone you like, not just our mattress pad
      1. -2
        28 January 2022 22: 13
        Quote: Volkonsky
        after all, uncle does not know that Buran flew in space, and not in dense layers of the atmosphere, where, due to the Faraday cloud caused by high temperatures, the signal does not pass.

        I will not tire of quoting a respected isofatAnd, I simply in delighted from his foresight.

        Quote: isofat
        the dumber a person is, the faster he condescends to insults.

        It seems to you that this is not obvious, but Buran and the Shuttle need to return from space to the sinful Earth. I don’t remember for Buran, but the Shuttle entered the atmosphere at the speed of M24 and out of 7070 km traveled in the atmosphere 6800 km planned at hypersonic speed. The signal does not pass, is called radio silence. So what? Volkonsky invented a new scientific term "Faraday clouds". Congratulations.
        The respected author does not understand why Buran had wings attached, for him it is a ballistic object ... Well, well, it happens. I hint, wings, atmosphere, lift.

        Quote: Volkonsky
        I'm not talking about grammatical errors - TomAgavki is written with A, but distances of 300 km and 4,5 thousand km will impress anyone you like, not just our mattress pad

        Well, after your "existential threat" I would be ashamed of literacy if I were you.
        TomAhawk in the usual version 1250, in the nuclear version 2500
        Normal caliber 2000, nuclear caliber 2500
        https://ria.ru/20151024/1307467551.html
        Of course, the Caliber is better, but the difference between them is several decades.
        And about the mattress pad ... this again speaks of your bad manners. I wish my country peace and prosperity, in my opinion, the current course of the country does not lead it to these goals. You wish your country war and death by inviting a foreign army to your territory. Do you consider it honorable to be a citizen of Ukraine as a fellow traveller?

        Quote: Volkonsky
        you can’t rein in any stubborn idiots on your website, what do you want from Putin?

        You are in command in Ukraine.
        ¡No pasarán!
        Your fascism will not work in Russia.
  8. +6
    26 January 2022 22: 19
    Quote: Teacher
    To begin with, rein in all the jackals directly around Russia. After that, maybe there will be no need for the White House

    Maybe it’s better to rein in the puppeteers and then the ropes will be untied from their hands and, lo and behold, one of the puppets will even see the light and kindle in love for Russia)))
  9. -12
    26 January 2022 22: 25
    ... the author revealed the topic))) - he only writes cheap scripts. Nothing new, rewriting of well-known facts, the text is written in some kind of inert language, but teenagers would probably like it.
    1. +13
      26 January 2022 22: 31
      Here is a paper - write better! and sell it to someone
      I'm not dragging anyone here by force! don't like it - out there! just don't slam the doors
      1. -9
        26 January 2022 22: 53
        ... why be offended by objective and balanced criticism. Of course, I can throw links to serious articles where the topic is disclosed, the facts are presented, and without this, here is your stamp from the talk show "here you will find out in the third part" - like, you also need to read the second part - some kind of baby talk.
        1. +4
          26 January 2022 23: 42
          did you read the title of the article?

          The weapon that allowed Putin to speak to the US from a position of strength

          topic uncovered? your expectations are your problems! I explained everything in the first three paragraphs, the situation is in development, if there are people who know how Putin will respond, then I think they will be paid dearly for this in Washington, let them know, maybe you will get it. The whole trick is that even the General Staff of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation do not know this, they submitted their options to the table of the GDP, only he will make the decision. So all your analysts are fighting over the riddle of the Kremlin. Throw here a link to a serious analysis, where everything is said, how the Kremlin will act, and we will laugh together. If only Biden didn't cry
          But, to be honest, I'm still not sure that the agreement between him and VVP did not take place, and all this is just a performance for the American audience so that Grandpa Joe is not kicked hard
          there are definitely 2 more weeks to tell fortunes over this mystery, until that moment there will be nothing, and the CAP is not the final version yet, so thinking out loud
    2. -1
      27 January 2022 08: 07
      I recently wrote about our hypersound. Everything is not so obvious.
      1. -6
        27 January 2022 08: 19
        Read the opus and laughed. The author write escho about how the Russians are "all the world" and "Omerika is already afraid" of the "ultimatum".
        1. -5
          27 January 2022 08: 23
          I'm not laughing. It's just a shame that instead of the weapons we really need, we rush about with what we can't use yet. Hypersound has its niche, but it's definitely not a wunderwaffe. IMHO.
  10. +2
    26 January 2022 22: 41
    Giving developers names is dangerous. In the 90s, the CIA knocked out Russian nuclear scientists. Not so long ago, Mossad destroyed an Iranian nuclear scientist.
    Not for nothing that under Stalin, many defense scientists worked in prisons. Only in this way, apparently, it was possible to ensure their safety.
    These people are not only worth their weight in gold, they are actually priceless. I would not disclose their names, unless, of course, they are not in the public domain.
    1. +1
      27 January 2022 18: 16
      Do not worry in vain, apparently this surname can be called ...
  11. +3
    26 January 2022 22: 50
    Wolf, as usual, cool and interesting. One complaint - well, why did you call the beautiful small rocket ships air mattresses?
    By the way, no one has such "mattresses" with such abilities either ...
    1. +2
      26 January 2022 23: 51
      hello, lesh, I still don’t know exactly how to spell it - mattresses or mattresses
      there, in the 2nd part, you will learn one idea about these RTOs, although, I think that this will already be too much, it will be enough to endow our diesel-electric submarines with this option and life will not seem like a fairy tale to Biden. Although their scientists are digging the earth to do something similar, but the trouble is - they don’t have their own Herbert Efremov and Chelomey, finally there was a legend man! on its developments right now GDP and creeps out
      but there is silence on the main mystery, no one knows how it will all end, if plan A does not take place, then one cannot do without a demonstrative flogging, where it will be is a mystery, but there should be only one addressee - the USA
      1. +5
        27 January 2022 00: 07
        Our Chelomei is Chuvash. I'm fucking proud of this. Once I was traveling from Cheboksary to Moscow by train, a neighbor was a rocket developer, so he told me about Chelomey.
      2. 0
        27 January 2022 18: 32
        ...about the mattress(es) wink do not worry - we have with you the Russian language is already outdated. Now I don’t really know how and in what form it is now correct to write the word COFFEE or body (s) to ... laughing
        I already wrote to someone here that in our time, apparently, it is easier to rewrite dictionaries and rules than to teach people literacy ...
  12. +2
    26 January 2022 23: 04
    It still seems to me that somehow everyone forgot about the laser weapon and it got into service so imperceptibly. But it works in a straight line, which a priori means that any straight line that is not released into the ground moves away from it. Therefore, I will assume that this can be the purest weapon for / against space objects - suitable for neutralizing the "eyes and ears" of modern troops and they lose control and goal setting
    1. 0
      26 January 2022 23: 44
      The beam of light scatters with distance. Plus atmospheric phenomena influence. I will be very surprised if it turns out that the laser is effective at 10 km.
    2. +4
      26 January 2022 23: 53
      that's right, a direct strike weapon, but in space, nizya is a belli incident
      overexposure has long been in the army
  13. -3
    26 January 2022 23: 07
    Wah! Telepaths again. They have already told everything about Putin's thoughts and plans. The Supreme Commander-in-Chief and the FSB, however, did not react in any way.
    Now Biden and the chiefs of all 17 of his special services have been taken on. They talk about their thoughts and his nightmares, (which they telepathically saw through) But it is clear again that the CIA and the FSB will ignore such wonderful telepaths ..

    Or maybe they will breathe a sigh of relief.

    And the invincibility of all these our missile blocks was declared long before the "avant-garde". Perhaps the State Department even rejoiced. Instead of 4-8 inexpensive indestructible warheads, the Russians began to install 1-2 expensive indestructible vanguards. There is a win. (Except for the development of technology)
    The military probably also liked the renaming of the 1st space in hyper27s. How can you pull money out of Congress now!

    But they stopped jabbing at the barmaley without intelligible air defense, with expensive calibers. Tested, and hare
    It’s not enough by ourselves, and it’s expensive to spend on bearded men.
    1. +5
      26 January 2022 23: 49
      Read Volkonsky's article "Putin's departure: how to prevent the collapse of Russia's foreign policy" in 19, where he outlined the steps that Putin is implementing today. Perhaps Putin reads Volkonsky.
      1. -3
        27 January 2022 00: 07
        In fact, this is an early version of the same article.

        All the same Caliber, all the same "opponents ... from the night they queued up in Putin's waiting room in the hope of an audience" (Amerov's presidents and their advisers). Agent Trump is crawling somewhere on his knees...

        Only telepathy is noticeably less, and instead of the Vanguard - Zircon.
    2. +2
      26 January 2022 23: 56
      let's zhahnem in your shed, if you feel sorry for the barmaley, you had to show the Yankees the power of our weapons somewhere, so you're on the trail. just offer your barn so that we don’t have to swim so far, at the same time you will save on housing and communal services
      1. -4
        27 January 2022 13: 42
        You are late. Or you
        You told them all Putin's thoughts and laid out

        You directly confirm the anecdote in your own words: "let's go to Voronezh," since our oligarchs sail on yachts off the coast of the West, just in these holidays ...
        1. 0
          27 January 2022 19: 38
          Late

          sho enemies already burn their own hut?
          1. 0
            27 January 2022 21: 50
            Your telepathy failed you...
  14. +3
    26 January 2022 23: 41
    Home "a weapon that allowed Putin to talk to the United States from a position of strength" is the American debt in 30 trillion, which is kaput in all respects!
  15. 0
    27 January 2022 00: 09
    "And hello again" (c). I agree about ATS, I am also waiting for “gifts” there. The avant-garde at the current moment cannot be sewn to the point. It's past, for my ladies' taste. In our country, apparently, Belgorod with Poseidons and Loshariks (who called them that) is already in full swing somewhere, what's the point of scaring someone with Vanguards now.
    1. +1
      27 January 2022 00: 38
      charisma, next time you write under my answers, otherwise I may not notice
      with regards to Putin's gifts, this is just to complete the topic of blackmail, it is clear that they don’t scare them, they bury them, there will be one thing in the 2nd part that caused this commotion, but we can’t use it either - so put on the table, think! so they became thoughtful, I do not exclude that plan A is possible - an agreement, and all that we are now observing is an information cover operation, moreover, on the Amer side, we have nothing to cover, we play openly, as Putin loves, the cards have been dealt, they have been revealed , believed who has an older suit? we have! please shave!
      and if you don’t want to shave, then plan B is peace enforcement, 6 large landing ships, accompanied by a reconnaissance ship, are giving me peace, heading south, very heavily loaded, what are they carrying? mystery! but BDKs are not the ships that decide the outcome of the battle at sea, so we are looking at the land, what do we have there? we think...
      Poseidons, loshariki - this is finally not there, these are the weapons of Doomsday, they don’t rattle them, they bury them
      loshariki are finally not a weapon, details are here
      https://topcor.ru/10039-gibel-jekipazha-as-31-rossija-poterjala-unikalnyh-specov.html
      1. +2
        27 January 2022 10: 07
        I know what Loshariki are ... Well, not all the weapons that shoot :)) Considering what "strategic tasks" at the bottom they can perform ....
        And I also closely follow our BDK. Here we agree with you.
  16. +9
    27 January 2022 00: 43
    Dear Vladimir, thank you for your analysis. In the mid-80s, I graduated with honors from the Moscow Aviation Motor-Building Technical School. S.K. Tumansky, at the Salyut plant on Budyonny Avenue, with a degree in Mechanical Technician for Aircraft Engines, and already at that time we were taught a lot of what you said in your article, therefore, I can at least indirectly confirm your words that already in the mid-80s we were developing in full growth on this topic, moreover, after graduating from a technical school, as an excellent student, I was sent to NIID (Scientific Research Institute of the Engine), I was like that in Moscow, and by distribution I got to the design bureau, where at that moment the engines for today's SU-shek and cruise missiles were being finalized, and he personally worked on these topics. Everything that you wrote about was already practically in experimental models, though not with the same characteristics as now, but still. Over the past 30 years, of course, new materials and new concepts have appeared, and everything that you have indicated here is absolutely real and exists. Moreover, I know that many ideas are really brought to life, I then worked not only in the design bureau, but also as a tester (at the stand, of course) for AD, and conducted bench tests of prototypes of these devices .. So, everything stated from the technical point of view, the absolute truth, with regard to the conclusions on the political actions of our leadership, well, here it is, time will tell in the near future. Thank you.
    1. -11
      27 January 2022 08: 56
      There were, and are, ideas and models. With implementation, it’s getting worse and worse. There are no such capable excellent students. Even in a nightmare you could not have imagined in those years that useless monsters Rostec, KRET, UAC, USC, UEC would appear.
  17. The comment was deleted.
    1. The comment was deleted.
  18. -3
    27 January 2022 01: 48
    you continue to focus on the military direction, completely forgetting the technical part, namely:
    1. America will never go to war, they don’t need a military conflict, this is for the narrow-minded
    2. The USA and the West will put pressure on them economically, and here we have no answer
    3. We use their microelement base in our missiles, what will happen if they hit us not with an army, but for example with a ban on high technologies?
    I'm not talking about the fact that there will be a shortage - computers and other electronics will be blocked, and our own industry is ruined by liberal reformers.
    Of course, it's great to have weapons, but they shouldn't rattle
    1. +4
      27 January 2022 02: 10
      the answer is already there, in 2014 we were not ready for this, but right now - the time has come to put the hegemon in its place, we do not rattle, we politely hint
      1. +2
        27 January 2022 02: 43
        it is clear that you don’t have an answer, but you can play with words as much as you like, the essence does not change from this.
        Russia has two allies - the Army and Navy
        And you need to show your capabilities ... my opinion is that Putin has been cornered and you have to react
        You write bravura speeches and pathos, but there is nothing to rejoice at all.
        In part, of course, it's nice to read that we are creating such weapons - I'm pleased.
        But inside the country, the economy is breathing its last, even the controllers in the pipes for pumping gas are foreign - once they stop working. And then there are none of their own - and there will be no need to fight. A third of budget revenues minus
        The United States, they are cowards - they only beat the weak. And the remnants of the mind did not lose at all. Destabilization along the borders of Russia - will you shoot terrorists with calibers or what? rocket. will not be enough. That's what they will put pressure on us. Control over information, loosening the situation, economic and technological blockade
        1. +1
          27 January 2022 18: 30
          ... That's how they will crush us. Control over information, loosening the situation, economic and technological blockade ...

          The United States cannot crush North Korea and Iran in any way, and even more so Russia and China ... China will help us both economically and technologically. Or do you think that the Chinese are so stupid as to withdraw themselves ...
          1. 0
            29 January 2022 10: 28
            Of course he will help, only in a brotherly way he will ask for good concessions for himself. I understand that people with a certain attitude have gathered here on the site, but still look more broadly - large-scale foreign companies hang out in China and their technologies are just that. Yes, China itself can do a lot, but high technologies are not transferred to them - yes, something will come from China, but prices will go up this time and we will become dependent on China :)))
            Understand already - YOU SHOULD HAVE YOUR
    2. -1
      27 January 2022 03: 54
      We have the element base and we also have it in China. It's not a problem! As long as we are strong (and God allowed it), we must not let the Almighty down, but slam into critical places for the production and testing of future hypersonic missiles in the tank! At the same time, incinerate the White House, the Pentagon, the Capitol and the Senate.
      1. -10
        27 January 2022 09: 06
        Already today, on Channel One, in the News at 09:00, there was a report about the blockade of Leningrad. About the famine. They are already gradually preparing the population of Russia for difficulties.
        1. +3
          27 January 2022 13: 10
          Grind again. Not tired? You even denigrate such holy dates. You are a rotten Ukrainian.
          1. The comment was deleted.
            1. The comment was deleted.
      2. -3
        27 January 2022 15: 29
        Quote: Seas Boreas
        As long as we are strong (and God allowed it), we must not let the Almighty down, but slam into critical places for the production and testing of future hypersonic missiles in the tank! At the same time, incinerate the White House, the Pentagon, the Capitol and the Senate.

        And how will God look at the answer that will incinerate Moscow, St. Petersburg, Yekaterinburg, etc. ?
      3. -2
        27 January 2022 18: 54
        Quote: Seas Boreas
        As long as we are strong (and God allowed it), we must not let the Almighty down, but slam into critical places for the production and testing of future hypersonic missiles in the tank!

        Such thoughts as to slap someone, only SATAN can whisper.
        Repent before it's too late.
        1. 0
          29 January 2022 10: 30
          The author has no strategic vision
      4. +1
        27 January 2022 19: 03
        No need to get hot. Any bad peace is better than any good quarrel. You have to have endurance. Either Lao Tzu or Confucius said, I can’t vouch for the literalness: “If you sit long and patiently on the bank of the river, you can see how the corpse of your enemy floats along it.” Everything will be in time...
    3. -8
      27 January 2022 08: 59
      You are right. Their most effective response is success in the information war. And following this, a sharp decrease in the level of consumption of Russians to the level of the late 70s. Especially food. Queues, cards, speculation, theft. The fifth and sixth columns to help them.
      1. +1
        27 January 2022 19: 23
        And you are apparently too young and obviously still that expert ... I remember the end of the 70s as a time of abundance, there were only queues at factories for free housing (and even then, this issue was resolved), but the end of the 80s, when the "top" that rotted and sold to the West staged sabotage and devastation in the USSR, yes - this is a time of shortages, queues, well, liberals, as you put it "the fifth and sixth columns", some out of stupidity, and some finished off the USSR for money.
        1. -7
          27 January 2022 20: 27
          There was a time of abundance in the capital. With sausage trains from regional settlements. The black market in the USSR was inflated to cosmic proportions. rating. And the Voice of America, the Air Force, the Deutsche Welle, in the evening voices explained to the population who is to blame for the lack of consumer goods. Now the propaganda of Simonyansha, Nightingale, Kiselyov is even more straightforward and oaky. It does a disservice. If the day comes when the authorities are forced to cut off the Internet, the broadcasts of the programs of the mentioned radio stations will resume.
  19. +2
    27 January 2022 02: 46
    America was unable to hypersound, but the hungry North Korea was able to, either Kim is bluffing or hypersound is a bluff.
  20. 0
    27 January 2022 03: 47
    I thank the author for such a convincing alignment! God bless us! Glory to our scientists and designers! Special thanks from me personally and from the Peoples of Russia to Comrade G. A. Efremov!
    I turn all the rest of the yelling of the ill-wishers of this alignment against them. Let them rest .... if they do not agree with me. We don't care about them!
    USA IS CRUSHING. ®️2014
  21. 0
    27 January 2022 04: 59
    The US military calls Sarmat "Satan-2", already met several times in articles.
  22. -1
    27 January 2022 05: 47
    Putin needs a legal document certifying that the West refuses to provide security guarantees to Russia and why. After that, Russia's hands become untied. Legally, after a written refusal to provide security guarantees, it has the right to ensure its protection by any means available to it.

    There will be no such document. There will be an answer, but there will be no direct and unequivocal refusal.
    It would be naive to hope that the US will issue such a document. No court will confirm the untied hands of Russia, except perhaps the Russian court, which does not change the legal essence.
  23. +1
    27 January 2022 06: 15
    I do not think that something will be decided in Syria.
    First, it is not at all clear what Russia is striving for in Syria.
    Secondly, all these dances about terrible weapons are in no way applicable to Syria.
    Thirdly, Syria is now on the outskirts of media interests.
    Even if Russia achieves some success there, it will have little effect on NATO.

    I do not think that with the help of formidable weapons, something will be decided.
    All these missiles and nuclear bombs are needed for the peace of our own population - they say that now they will not risk destroying us by military methods.

    I do not think that we need to compete in the economic struggle with the West. We will lose this war.
    Not in three days, but for several years. But then we will be destroyed by military means.

    That is, Russia can influence the West only by military means. Or capitulate.
    The purpose of such an impact can only be to improve our security, which will allow us to win some time in the hope of changing the political situation.

    It is now possible to improve the situation only in Ukraine. By making the territories of the former Ukraine inaccessible to NATO and by installing our missiles in Transnistria and the Odessa region.
    This signal will be clear to the European elite.

    In the struggle for the independence of Russia and for the lives of our population, we can now rely only on military force.
    The alternative is several states on the territory of present-day Russia, without armed forces, with a total population of 15-20 million people. This is exactly how much is needed for the extraction and transportation of minerals to the countries of the conditional West. However, given the progress, perhaps this figure is too high.
    I think that many guests will come to this feast (the capitulation of Russia), who will not disdain the territories.
    1. -9
      27 January 2022 09: 09
      Instead of a real strengthening of Russia's security, chimeras like Poseidon, Dagger, Vanguard, Zircon, Burevestnik are offered.
  24. -2
    27 January 2022 06: 45
    More than once I read about the analogy with cards. Like, the opponents will lay out the cards on the table and it will become clear who is who. This analogy is not correct. Because everything is simple with cards - an ace is better than a six, and a king covers a lady. And the trump cards are known.

    In the case of weapons, there is complete uncertainty. Politicians consult generals, who in most cases rely on the opinion of experts. And we all know what these estimates of iksperds are worth.

    Weapons are tested in combat conditions. The strength of a weapon can be judged after its repeated use in combat conditions. What can we say about how air defense will work during a massive strike? How many missiles can reach the target and hit it? This will become known only after a big war with the use of all these weapons.

    Now everyone is playing with assumptions. There is absolutely no definition of who is stronger and who is weaker. Bluff can be stronger than the available weapons. Experts' mistakes are inevitable, the question is how many of them. Mental beliefs may be more important than reality.
    1. -2
      27 January 2022 15: 34
      Quote: Expert_Analyst_Forecaster
      What can we say about how air defense will work during a massive strike? How many missiles can reach the target and hit it?

      If you are talking about missile defense, then we can say with confidence that not one of the parties has missile defense capable of repelling a massive blow from the opposite side.
      1. -2
        27 January 2022 15: 39
        Yes, I'm talking about PRO).
  25. 0
    27 January 2022 06: 54
    Maybe Putin has something that can turn off his eyes (US satellites) and then turn them back on. Maybe something else will confuse all the indicated targets in missiles and they stupidly won’t take off or take off but don’t know where they will fly. Damn, I’m already wondering what Putin will do, but what he said with an ultimatum that the wait is not long is good.
    1. -1
      27 January 2022 15: 37
      No, inertial missile guidance systems cannot be damaged by electronic warfare.
  26. -1
    27 January 2022 06: 58
    Quote: alex178
    Of course, it's great to have weapons, but they shouldn't rattle

    It follows from your comment that Russia needs to comply with all the requirements of the West.
    This position is well known and has the right to life. For 15 years Russia has repented and blamed the West, taking upon itself all the sins, starting with the crucifixion of Jesus. But she did not become her own among Poland and Latvia. The more we make concessions, the more they demand from us. If it were not for nuclear weapons, Serbia, Libya, Iraq and Syria would have been bombed long ago.

    I agree with you that saber-rattling is not worth it. Weapons must be used as long as they are competitive. And don't wait until it becomes obsolete. Alas, we have only two trump cards in the fight against competitors - the armed forces and a large territory with all the necessary resources.
    You propose to refuse these advantages, but I propose to use them immediately, until the carriage has turned into a pumpkin.
  27. -2
    27 January 2022 07: 52
    The article is about nothing - a collection of all sorts of propaganda slogans, collected in a heap, typed from TV screens and all sorts of other marginal news media and media resources .. It seems that part of our society thinks that in our other part there are simply no smart, thinking people, not cut off from reality by a flurry, bacchanalia of a political show! I really want to keep the heads of a simple "chewing-going" stratum of society busy with something .. Just to think about "this", but not pay attention to "this" .. What kind of war, what kind of Europe, NATO, Ukraine that is advancing on us ?? ? It was 3 years ago and 5 and 10 years ago .. Our glorious liberal business is working in Russia, exporting money to the West, 50 tons of greenery last year - you write about it !!! Who will fight with whom! Everything is subordinated to the interests of money and their owners! Why do they need some kind of war with Russia ..?! Even 10 years ago, we had enough weapons to kill everyone! But they didn't scream! Now what?! Time to PR, who? What is the cunning "political will" anyway?! It seems that we are like sleeping with a girl - we don’t want to sleep, we want it, it’s sweet, but what about later .. In fact, we are falling further and further economically .. We don’t know who to bow to, either China, or Europe, then whether Asia .. The Morgenstein generation and the "children from London" will ruin the country without any war, give it time ..
    1. +3
      27 January 2022 19: 51
      people who do not want to feed their own army will feed someone else's!

      people sometimes write with the intellect of Pavlov's dog - they turned on the light, which means they brought grub - everything is fine, they did not turn it on - everything is bad, Putin is to blame. They measure their lives by the thickness of a layer of oil, if there is oil - well, no - why did they spend everything on guns? And the brains are not enough to understand that without guns there will be no oil. I just want to tell them - they don’t like it, welcome to my place in Ukraine, you will get fat with oil, so much so that you will have to change the lace panties.
  28. -8
    27 January 2022 08: 44
    Fantastic. It is impossible to threaten what is not.
  29. 0
    27 January 2022 08: 44
    It is necessary to launch something, fly over the territory of the United States, and blow it up in neutral waters.
  30. 0
    27 January 2022 09: 08
    Requirements for the leader - the ability, on the basis of existing and constantly updated knowledge, to determine and implement the only correct decision, to develop foresight. To have maximum diligence and attract subordinates with the same abilities, work with the principle of do no harm.
    Military and military technical counter-sanctions, such thoughts are possible?
  31. -3
    27 January 2022 09: 30
    Quote: gunnerminer
    Instead of a real strengthening of Russia's security, chimeras are proposed

    Can you reasonably prove that there is NO real strengthening of Russia's security?
    Do you have the ability to determine whether real strengthening is taking place or not?
    In addition to manuals for the fifth column, do you have any serious sources of information?
    What do you think should be done to strengthen Russia's security? Do not offer surrender.
  32. +4
    27 January 2022 09: 46
    I follow the author's publications with interest. Guessing what Putin and Shoigu will do is a difficult task, I agree. But it's exciting!
    Personally, it's hard for me to imagine that there will be some kind of armed conflict. You are positioning Putin as a skillful strategist, but here such rude actions. Not comme il faut!
    Though in Syria, at least somewhere else. But my "guessing" preferences are electronic warfare equipment and non-conventional weapons. No bloodshed or explosions. Subtle and efficient!
    The supply of weapons to the Donbass? It's true! What are they asking for? Electronic warfare equipment against drones, and weapons to cover them. Right, but not only. Did the Russians shoot down their old satellite? And they can disable a new alien! ... And he, they say, corrected the possible shooting at Russian instructors. Those who help to master electronic warfare. Why are you dismissing the deployment of such complexes in Serbia? If you believe their statements, then Serbia is not even against it. She and the price of gas can throw off. Electronic warfare in Syria, Serbia, Kaliningrad, Belarus, Crimea, Donbass - cover all of Europe and the Middle East with their caps. We are no longer talking about those on the territory of Russia.
    What can these electronic warfare equipment do? But this is a good question! We have not seen them in action, in combat use - why reveal the potential before a fight? But it can be assumed that the NATO "birds" will either not take off, or will immediately land. And the ships won't sail! And they don’t have wired field telephones in their units. Paralysis guaranteed. (And their press will finish everything on its own: it will sow such a panic that it will intimidate you to death. They can do it!) What kind of coordination is there in NATO then? It is quite possible to immobilize modern technology (yes, even an entire country) without combat contact.
    I had a chance to read materials where the Americans are considering a possible interception of control of a passenger Boeing by ground services - and Boeing supposedly has such an option - and directing them to a ram with military facilities in Russia. Well, this is already a bust and a nightmare! I do not want to think that people are capable of this!
    In addition, I have already written about electromagnetic bombs. Even the threat of using something like this can cause panic and collapse in financial and economic centers. Even a threat! But without a real demonstration - it's just a horror story. This means that there are clear steps to take! But again without the blood of the victims. No, of course, there will be victims, but indirect ones. Accidents, stopping pacemakers.
    What about cyber attacks? This is also an effective weapon - paralyzing entire cities, and even countries. The West fears him more than just missiles and bombs.
    What about America's electronics industry? It is strongly tied to the supply of components from Taiwan. Most processors or memory chips marked "Made in USA" are made there, in Taiwan. After the Olympics, China might get serious about resolving the issues with Taiwan. Not even capturing it, but simply pulling forces for a naval blockade. US exports are very high in software, computers, smartphones and related services. And within the US itself, too. They can become very sour!
    And if North Korea is involved and it will create a threat to the South? They also make parts there. Given that Russia is able to offer a lot to the DPRK, she can willingly meet halfway. What about South Korea then? Will investors and companies flee from there? Everything can be...
    We should not fall into hatred, but if such small countries as the DPRK and Iran resist the pressure of the Americans... Yes, they have big problems and difficulties. But if Russia turns around to meet them - realizing that friendship with America will not work - then they can become noticeably stronger. Of course, everyone is friends as long as it suits them. This is clear! But, at this stage, their enmity with the US is obvious and must be taken into account.
    There are many more possible scenarios for the development of events, but for now, this will suffice. Only now the saying comes to mind: they beat the cat - a hint to the owner.
    Maybe we should take on the Baltic cats? ...
    1. BSN
      +1
      27 January 2022 13: 07
      Big RESPECT to all. It was very interesting to read everything written above. I'll give my opinion:
      To be honest, I read everything with interest, but no more. But Alexey, I was hooked by the coincidence of the direction of some thoughts. Yes, our country has effective electronic warfare equipment, and there may be something (other) that works effectively in this direction, possibly coded signals for the self-destruction of launched missiles (of course, Uncle Sam). Anything is possible, but I think VV, how far from being a stupid person - he just didn’t go to an ultimatum. The stakes are too high and the risk is simply enormous. As for all the nimble missiles there. then there is a doubt that there is too little time for our (super) resources - to produce in sufficient quantities to perform such super complex tasks - nimble missiles. Although, as VV says, the people who worked with him (studied, fought, worked), I think you understand who I'm talking about. In his words, they are one team of deeply patriotic like-minded people. Based on this, a directed (common fund) can be created, concentrated on a single goal. The result of which was the Ultimatum. Remember how; VV rushed around the defense industry factories, being the Prime Minister during the (presidency) of Dimon. And blackmail (Sema), as in the 60s of Cuba, will not work now. But I think BB has an "ARGUMENT" for (Sam).
      1. The comment was deleted.
    2. -7
      27 January 2022 13: 39
      Guessing what Putin and Shoigu will do is a difficult task, I agree. But it's exciting!

      The Trinity is needed! The colossal talent and managerial experience of Anatoly Borisovich Chubais was not used in vain. He is strong in the economy. Recently, after organizing a successful NANO project, he was nominated for the prestigious position of mediator in the most difficult negotiation with the United States!
      1. BSN
        0
        27 January 2022 15: 58
        Respected there .... Gorbachev and Chubais, the Americans need to be sent to the moon, let them announce publicity on it and begin to privatize. There should be no place for them here, and our people will be much more happy than Gagarin's flight. Provided - forever.
        1. -6
          27 January 2022 16: 16
          They are awarded by the Government. You and I will not be given such an award. If it weren’t for Mikhail Gorabachev, who would Antaly Chubais be? Or Dmitry Medvedev? Would he rumble to students about the advantage of socialist legality? from the defeat of the fascist hordes.
          1. BSN
            +1
            27 January 2022 18: 09
            Probably our share. Our people have not lived well at all times. And the root of evil is in the territory. It is huge, they are constantly coveting it and hoping to tear some lands away from us. Therefore, wars have been and are coming. If it were not for constant wars, our population could be more than 600 million and the question would not now be how to increase population growth. As for the vast territories, it takes tens of trillions of rubles a year only for the length of our roads, half is stolen, the easiest money laundering.
            With regards to the fact that we have an interesting mentality - a broad nature, an open soul. Strange as it may seem, it is also from vast territories. When there is a lot of everything (forests, fields and rivers), nothing is a pity - they broke, threw, sawed, gave. Almost all the rulers have always done the same with the people - this is with us to this day. Why do we need the territory of Ukraine and do we need to kill people on both sides for this? Of course not, we protect our own!
            So if we value them and need people in our vast territory, let's evacuate them from there if they don't need them and there won't be blood. And if we allow the (capture) of these territories, we will have to restore everything there - why?
            1. -5
              27 January 2022 20: 18
              It is hard to disagree with you.
    3. The comment was deleted.
    4. +1
      27 January 2022 19: 33
      Here are sensible, well-founded reflections on the topic. Agree on all 100.
  33. -2
    27 January 2022 10: 57
    The United States understands that Russia will not start a big war. and therefore, no one is particularly afraid of this weapon, which is why they got a kick in the ass in response. The bluff has failed so far. Will there be action? We are waiting!
  34. -2
    27 January 2022 12: 03
    Quote: kriten
    The bluff has failed so far. Will there be action? We are waiting!

    Strange set of words. It's too early to talk about bluff. Now, if there are no military actions in the next month, then it will be possible to reasonably talk about a bluff. For now, we're just waiting.
    1. +1
      28 January 2022 00: 15
      Quote: Expert_Analyst_Forecaster
      Now, if there are no hostilities in the next month

      apparently we are all wrong or rushing things .. VV apparently conceived something else .. for 5-6 years like this ... or a crisis is coming for the USA .. which can be pushed a little bit .. and then !!!!! .. ....
  35. -3
    27 January 2022 12: 48
    All the same, it is not clear what the weapon has to do with it if "they" have all the accounts and assets in the west. How can they position power under such circumstances?
    1. +1
      27 January 2022 15: 03
      We are already tired of your manuals about accounts in the West. What, they didn't come up with anything new? It's like with Serdyukov's "thefts", which were a cover for the modernization of the army.
      1. 0
        27 January 2022 16: 34
        I do not use any manuals, can you essentially answer? The truth is interesting.
        1. -2
          27 January 2022 17: 02
          Can you tell who you mean?
          Who has accounts and assets in the West. Name, what, how much and source of information? If this is a training manual for the 5th column, write so)).
          1. -1
            27 January 2022 17: 21
            I mean our elite - the oligarchs and high officials. Real estate in London, Miami, etc. It's probably stupid to ask me for account numbers. I operate only with publicly known information.
            1. +1
              28 January 2022 14: 31
              And what about the oligarchs? The decision to use weapons (see your comment) is not made by the oligarchs. But about the major officials who have real estate in London or Miami, write. It is interesting. And indicate the source so that you can assess how reliable this information is.
              And just accusing is called slander.
              So I'm waiting for information from you on major officials who break the law by owning real estate in London and Paris. Let their names become known to the people)).
            2. 0
              29 January 2022 21: 52
              Yes, how many years the billions of Putin have been looking for, they have not found it. As a result, their "experts" from Bloomberg simply said - Putin's assets are all of Russia)))
  36. 0
    27 January 2022 13: 42
    Quote: Volkonsky
    somehow you swim shallowly, you need to hit the decision-making centers, then they will scatter on the ground

    There will be strikes on decision-making centers when there are no other options left.
    Because this is a world nuclear war.
    So they offer quite reasonable things to themselves - to kick a barking mongrel. Any.
    A little benefit, an example for the rest of the mongrels, and just to make many of our people feel good.
  37. 0
    27 January 2022 14: 17
    Quote: rotkiv04
    everything that the author has put together can be fit into one phrase "I myself do not know anything." Just like in a cheap TV series - he inflated, inflated the intrigue, and as a result, zilch

    Put on something that makes at least some sense, a couple of words longer than this frankly stupid comment, it will be a well-deserved +, but as it is ... MINUS.
  38. The comment was deleted.
  39. The comment was deleted.
  40. 0
    27 January 2022 15: 32
    Complete nonsense, because. the concepts of strategic parity and a solution to the crisis in Ukraine, which can lead to negative consequences not only for Russia, but also for Europe, are confused. Does the author seriously think that if the United States refused on all points of our ultimatum, Putin would start a nuclear war. Moreover, it is clear to everyone that the United States will not enter the war between Ukraine and Russia if we protect our citizens in the DPR and LPR, or even decide to occupy Kiev (which, of course, is madness) in order to prevent Ukraine from joining NATO.
    1. BSN
      +1
      27 January 2022 23: 02
      You can forget about the times of Parities, China entered the strategic arena and the Americans can be understood, not the time when only the Union was a thunderstorm. I see the answer to NATO only in the China and Russia bloc, and the same of those who the Americans do not allow to breathe (Iran, for example). And this goal is the collapse of NATO, to squeeze out the Yankees from a continent that is alien to them. But these are words, of course, in fact there should be a strategically thought-out work. There is no particular sympathy for China, but mutual difficulties should bring them closer. The Yankees love to make house everywhere - especially with the wrong hands. They need to be deprived of this, like interest in Europe, let them only care about their ass; which they can start to fidget well. And their British henchmen with six Poles, not to mention the Balts, will press their tail and begin to do nasty things on the quiet. (they cannot live otherwise), there is such rot in them. And war is the last thing, those who walked on bullets will understand that there is nothing but blood and dirt in it, romance disappears very quickly. And who didn’t go, in a nutshell: imagine yourself in Russian roulette, probably not pleasant? But there’s nothing to give vouchers to the boys there, but in a different scenario, we can all fly.
  41. a67
    +1
    27 January 2022 16: 18
    weapons are a good thing ... it just seems to me that no one will fight ... they will choke them with finances and wait for the 5th column to activate ...
  42. 0
    27 January 2022 17: 20
    Everything according to the laws of physics. An interfering plasma cloud may well be both an emitter and a receiver.
  43. 0
    27 January 2022 17: 34
    The moment of truth is approaching.
  44. +1
    27 January 2022 18: 24
    It's probably time to turn on the EWs to the fullest both in the Crimea and in Kaliningrad and in other places. NATO ships and aircraft pose a threat to Russia's national security. Since we were sent, let them drown, fall, etc.
  45. 0
    27 January 2022 22: 01
    A smart, intelligible overview of our capabilities. Respect to the author. Well, if Biden, looking at night, read you! Maybe you could be smarter!
  46. 0
    27 January 2022 23: 15
    What is scary is not the weapon that Putin advertises, but the scary one that is not talked about anywhere at all!
  47. The comment was deleted.
  48. -1
    29 January 2022 09: 50
    Very well written and interesting article..!
    I take my hat off to the author.
  49. 0
    29 January 2022 13: 34
    It is not clear how the Russian Federation can pinch the tail of mattresses in Syria. IMHO Syria for this, just the most inappropriate place.
  50. +2
    30 January 2022 14: 22
    A strange property today among writing authors. Previously, they wrote what they knew for sure, confirming it with facts. Today they have taken the fashion from the Americans to assume without confirming anything. Those. today, as it were, a journalist, he is, as it were, a designer, and a performer, and a military man. In fact, little is educated in the cases he describes. It is sad.
    1. -1
      2 February 2022 17: 41
      Now the article contains the opinion of the author. An author who draws "information" from the Internet.
      But fast and inexpensive.