"Ukrainian demarche" of Croatia can start the collapse of NATO

16

On January 25, a tectonic shift took place in the structure of European security. Croatia has announced its intention to withdraw all its troops from NATO forces in Eastern Europe in the event of a conflict in Ukraine. The statement was made personally by the country's President Zoran Milanovic on national television.

I, the commander-in-chief of the Croatian army, am watching the statements according to which NATO - not a separate state, not the USA - is increasing its presence and sending some reconnaissance ships. We have nothing to do with this and will not have anything, I guarantee it

- stressed the president.



Not only will Croatia not send, but in the event of an escalation it will recall everyone, to the last Croatian soldier. Until the last!

Milanovic threatened.

It is practically impossible to regard such a statement coming from the head of state, otherwise than as an open declaration of renunciation of the obligations assumed in the framework of Croatia's participation in NATO, and in fact the country's withdrawal from the Alliance.

A split in a noble family


In short, what happened can be described in one word: it began. The North Atlantic Alliance, already looking like an archaic relic of the Cold War, is facing the first open demarche of its own member in recent history. And even though the official Zagreb has so far only announced a vote of no confidence in the aggressive policy NATO, even the most pro-Western analyst is unlikely to deny that Croatia set the clockwork under the foundation of the North Atlantic Alliance with this statement alone.

At the same time, it is important to note that the Croatian initiative, paradoxically, is not connected with the situation around Ukraine. According to Milanovic, such a drastic decision is primarily dictated by "the dynamics of American domestic politics, namely Joe Biden and his administration." That is, dissatisfaction with the aggressive policy of NATO has matured for a long time. It is no coincidence that the same head of Croatia stressed: "In matters of international security (on the part of Washington), I see inconsistency and, in fact, dangerous behavior." The dangerous policy of the United States, preparing the ground for a full-scale war in Europe, predictably cannot but excite the leader of one of the Balkan republics. Someone who, and Croats, unlike prosperous Western Europeans and well-fed Americans, perfectly remember what pitch hell war is, knocking on the window with rockets and bombs. So the reluctance to lose the lives of their soldiers in a foreign conflict that satisfies exclusively the imperialist interests of the United States is quite understandable. The slogan "Yankee go home" is becoming more and more relevant in Europe of the XXI century.

American calculation


Nevertheless, one should not expect that the aforementioned maxim, read between the lines of the situation developing in Europe, has become for the United States news. Such a long occupation of the Old World, entangled in a web of American military bases and all sorts of agents of influence in power circles, would in principle be impossible if the case was run by ignorant people. So, someone else, and American military analysts, are well aware of the degree of unpopularity of Washington's actions to escalate tensions in Europe and the unwillingness of the Europeans themselves to become victims of other people's ambitions. That is why the toggle switch of American information propaganda is now turned to the maximum.

In recent weeks, the United States has been intensively beating the “drum of war”, trying to compensate for the fact that, apart from the Anglo-Saxons and the Balts who joined them, no one in Europe seeks to fight for them at the expense of the loudness of political statements through the State Department and the fake “white noise” of biased media. Moreover, the determination and combat effectiveness of the latter is still a big question. After all, throwing out loud Russophobic statements and playing the role of an anti-Russian pack in the European Parliament is one thing. Sending your own citizens to die for American interests in a real war is quite another.

Although, apparently, the American curators guessed this for a long time and did everything in advance in order to mentally prepare the Baltic population for the need for a heroic death in the war being prepared by the United States. Take, for example, the full-scale military exercises of NATO with shooting, which took place right in the center of Riga last year. Of course, they scared the civilians of the city and took them by surprise. However, it seems that this is what they intended. It is not difficult to calculate the train of thought of the Pentagon representatives: let the Balts "sniff the gunpowder" of at least blank cartridges, maybe they will be more willing to go to war. Moreover, the US Army is now extremely advantageous for the maximum presence of foreign “cannon fodder”. On the one hand, this somehow legitimizes Washington's actions: they say, look, this is a collective decision of the entire North Atlantic Alliance, and not the United States. On the other hand, given the amount of monetary compensation and posthumous payments, the death of a Baltic soldier will objectively cost much less than an American one. As they say, nothing personal - just business.

Thus, the process of delimitation of spheres of influence in Europe, which is rapidly developing this year, instantly highlighted all the weaknesses of NATO. Even a few weeks of tension along the diplomatic line turned out to be enough for the seemingly unshakable North Atlantic Alliance to begin to fall apart right before our eyes. And there is no doubt that Croatia will become only the “first sign” even now. The level of disagreement between NATO members is too high.

In fact, the United States has only two "nuclear" allies (read vassals) in Europe. The first is the UK with Brexit, seemingly finally resigned to its status as an American servant. The second is the Baltic republics, which even the three of them can hardly pass for a full-fledged American ally. All other NATO members today are potential exit candidates. Starting from the objectively pacifist-minded Germany and ending with the free-thinking France, which had already left the military structure of the bloc under General de Gaulle. The Alliance's house of cards is really ready to crumble, and today the final disintegration of NATO looks like a matter of the very near future.
16 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. 0
    26 January 2022 10: 21
    Did Napoleon know that his phrase is "A people who do not want to feed their own army will soon be forced to feed someone else's." will in 200 years also apply to his native country? In fact, a 2% tax on all NATO members is feeding the military-industrial complex and the US army.
    These are the most freedom-loving countries and they want to throw off the American yoke from their necks.
    The Yugoslavs did not participate in the Warsaw Pact, but here they allowed themselves to be dragged into another military bloc and be there on errands.
    1. -1
      26 January 2022 10: 59
      2% is the cost of our own armed forces.
      Oh May Year! Yugoslavia in NATO?
      1. 0
        26 January 2022 11: 17
        2% is the cost of our own armed forces.

        Do the "members" actually have them? (for example, compared to 1990)
      2. 0
        26 January 2022 11: 37
        Croatia is part of Yugoslavia. Broz Tito was a Croat.
        1. 0
          26 January 2022 12: 58
          Quote: Bulanov
          Broz Tito was a Croat.

          So what? Stalin was Georgian, so the USSR is alive?
          Yugoslavia has not officially existed since 2006, actually since 1991.
      3. +1
        26 January 2022 15: 31
        And American weapons. That is, 2% of Europe's GDP, in fact, is transported to the United States.
        1. -1
          26 January 2022 15: 37
          American weapons are not a big part of the military spending structure. More salary. In addition, many European countries produce their own weapons. Some still operate the Soviet one and buy spare parts in the Russian Federation or Ukraine. And this is all from the same 2%.
    2. -5
      26 January 2022 20: 08
      Look around. Did the peoples of the CIS dream about this, after 70 years of victory over fascism?
    3. +2
      27 January 2022 08: 01
      Did Napoleon know that his phrase is "A people who do not want to feed their own army will soon be forced to feed someone else's."

      The statement, allegedly belonging to Napoleon, can be found not only on numerous quote sites, but also on social networks - for example, on VKontakte, Twitter and Facebook. The phrase is also popular among high-ranking officials. It was mentioned, in particular, by Vladimir Putin during a big press conference in 2017, and two years earlier, Vladimir Medinsky, then Minister of Culture, published an article entitled “Who does not feed his culture will feed someone else’s army.” However, in the last two cases, the expression is mentioned without any connection with the French emperor.

      Despite the popularity of this quote on the Russian-speaking Internet, it was not possible to find its mention along with a reference to Napoleon in French or English. The quote closest in meaning, also sometimes attributed to the French emperor, is “the army marches on its belly,” however, apparently, its authorship does not belong to Napoleon either. As The Quote Investigator found out, it was first attributed to Bonaparte only in 1862 by a small American newspaper, although four years earlier the historian Thomas Carlisle put the same phrase into the mouth of the Prussian king Frederick II the Great, who lived in the XNUMXth century.
  2. -2
    26 January 2022 10: 26
    Right
  3. +1
    26 January 2022 10: 34
    Croatia is in splendid isolation: no one supported it.
    As much as we would not like it, but: "The rumors about the death of NATO are greatly exaggerated"!
  4. 0
    26 January 2022 12: 05
    The statement was made personally by the country's President Zoran Milanovic on national television.

    - Yes, be that as it may - but this president Zoran Milanovic is worthy of respect !!!
    - This is not the President of Serbia - A. Vučić; which all the way - "both yours and ours"
    (they say - "I'm for you; but I can't support you - but I'm your friend...") - And such a "duality" will never lead to anything good...
    1. -4
      26 January 2022 20: 10
      Serbia annually receives 750 million euros from the EU free of charge. It strives to join the EU. It is completely surrounded by NATO countries.
  5. 0
    26 January 2022 14: 49
    Not even a day has passed

    The Croatian Prime Minister said that Milanovic's words had nothing to do with the government's position and asked for forgiveness from Ukraine. He added that he thought it was a Russian official who said it.

    Croatian policy is to reduce tensions, prevent possible conflict and support the territorial integrity of Ukraine. This is our principled position,” Plenkovic stressed.
  6. 0
    26 January 2022 19: 42
    Quote: Oleg Rambover
    2% is the cost of our own armed forces.
    Oh May Year! Yugoslavia in NATO?

    Oh, your year, but you don’t need to arm the army? Or do they have their own military-industrial complex?
  7. -2
    3 February 2022 17: 49
    Quote: Igor Pavlovich
    Croatian policy is to reduce tensions, prevent possible conflict and support the territorial integrity of Ukraine. This is our principled position,” Plenkovic stressed.

    All right. Well done.