"If the Russians came to your house ..." A quick return of the CSTO troops "casts a shadow" on the United States

A couple of days ago, in connection with the introduction of the CSTO peacekeeping forces in Kazakhstan, US Secretary of State Anthony Blinken uttered his next loud and stupid phrase, which was even described by the Russian Foreign Ministry as rudeness:

If Russians come to your house, then it is then very difficult to get rid of them.

If translated from English, then it sounded something like this. In response, the Russian representative Maria Zakharova very specifically reminded the American of what happens where his armed compatriots come - "... it is very difficult to stay alive, not to be raped, robbed ..." and so on. Who is following policies, they know this story. Well, they've already got it back to normal, so it seems like once again the American representative publicly screwed up, sorry, and ... it's okay - they won't notice their own or pretend they don't care, but they don't give a damn about the rest, in general.

But then suddenly the very same phrase of Blinken was taken and repeated almost word for word by the head of European diplomacy Josep Borrell. Previously, European leaders were considered to be a little more educated and cultured, or something, in contrast to the "cowboys from the Wild West", accustomed to shoot from the hip, and then think. There were, however, and from them some "pearls". The heads of the military departments who never held weapons in their hands and who did not smell gunpowder especially sinned with stupid belligerent statements about the Russian Federation. For example, Germany, Britain or NATO Secretary General Stoltenberg. But these, it seems, the "military" position obliges to speak out harshly, and these nonsense are their own and their own. Such is the new elite in Europe today - stupid. With Borrell, things are much worse. Personally, it hurt my ear. He is, firstly, a diplomat, and secondly, he is not at all from a new generation of politicians, and the phrase is not his. And this is the most important thing. Somehow I immediately imagined a little white shaggy lapdog, with frank dog servility licking the sweaty and smelly feet of its owner, who returned home after a working day.

To what extent should Europe be lowered? Here, in my opinion, even some talk about some kind of independence of the Old Continent no longer makes sense. If according to Putin, then the jackal Tabaki after Sherkhan at least repeated "smart" things, such as "... and we will go to the north", here even every shameful nonsense foolishly soaked by the owner is relayed here. It seems to me that further comments are superfluous. As well as any phrases against the background of ongoing negotiations such as “do not decide about us without us,” and so on. - everything has already been decided for you, lapdogs. They will say to sit - you will sit down, they will say to lie down - you will lie down, and if not - with a newspaper in the face! So it is with NATO, and with gas pipelines, and with "green" energy and many others. It is a pity for old Europe, but, apparently, "it's too late to drink Borjomi" in this case, as the classics said.

But this is all, though foreign policy, but all the same lyrics. In reality, Blinken gave this very idiotic phrase in all seriousness when describing the introduction of the CSTO peacekeeping contingent into Kazakhstan. Let me stress - according to the statement of the legitimate leadership of Kazakhstan itself, which is a member of this organization. And the troops were led not only by Russian, but also by other members of the organization - Armenia, Belarus, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan.

And literally today (January 11), the Kazakh president announced that the peacekeepers had successfully completed their mission - they had prevented the coup that had begun and ... would be withdrawn over the next few days. And I personally have no doubt that they will indeed be withdrawn. And a more abrupt answer to the blatant and boorish lies from the United States and the pushing of their European jackals, probably, cannot be.
The CSTO troops, in which, and this is undoubtedly true, the leading role is of course played by the RF Armed Forces, were delivered to a neighboring country engulfed in riots so clearly and with lightning speed that Western observers once again simply “dropped their jaws”. And the local and not so "revolutionaries" obviously immediately lost the desire to continue playing the revolution on the territory of Kazakhstan.

Something tells me that these forces will be withdrawn in such a way that many years later it will be considered in military educational institutions around the world as an ideal example of how such operations should be carried out in general. And this, undoubtedly, is in stark contrast to the recently also observed by the entire world community literally live on air, the "withdrawal" of US troops from Afghanistan. Although all this shame, chaos and horror can hardly be called a "withdrawal of troops." It is also necessary to add that the CSTO operation under the command of the RF Armed Forces in Kazakhstan lasted a couple of days and achieved the set task. The United States was in Afghanistan for 20 years, the country during this time was completely ruined, and after the shameful flight of the American military, it was precisely those against whom the States were fighting there all this time came to power. The previous "mission" of the Americans in Vietnam ended, which is typical, in the same way - two decades of bloody carnage, a devastated country, the defeat of the United States and a shameful chaotic flight. Apparently, something similar is already outlined in Iraq ...

Strikingly different from all this, the withdrawal of Soviet troops from Afghanistan in 1989: order, slender columns equipment, fluttering banners, etc. What happened next was a slightly different conversation and a lot of pain. But then we went out on our own, voluntarily and in an organized manner, no one kicked us out and we were left with the government we had established, which held out in the most difficult conditions for several more years, during which, by the way, the Soviet Union itself was gone.

Roughly the same, solely on their own initiative, voluntarily and in an organized way, Russian troops left Eastern Europe, where the army of the USSR, and then the Russian Federation was located practically from the moment of the end of World War II until the early nineties. And then there were problems too, but these were already our problems with our troops on our territory.

And in the same organized and voluntary way, we left Cuba, Vietnam and somewhere else, just when for some reason we believed that we were now friends with the West and we no longer needed troops abroad ...

But the Americans during all this time did not voluntarily come out of nowhere. If they were somewhere, and now they are not there, it means that they were kicked out in shame and in no other way. But such places on planet Earth, unfortunately, are still very few. And after all this, some people still open their mouths to say something about "Russians at your home"!

Nevertheless, it is worth proceeding from the fact that the whole world and its elites do not consist only of the weak-minded and stuck in their own infallibility Blinkins, Borrels, Stoltenbergs and others like them. The world is much wider. It has many different states with different problems. And people in all these states at a very different level, thanks to modern media technologies, are sitting right now and looking at all this happening literally in front of their eyes. And they inevitably draw conclusions. Someone like these conclusions, some do not. But these conclusions can be interpreted absolutely unambiguously: Russia is strong, even unexpectedly very strong, Russia can help and do it quickly and effectively, the Russian armed forces at the moment are clearly the best and most highly organized in the world, which has been clearly demonstrated recently. and if you call the Russians for help, then ... this does not mean at all that you will pay for this help with many years of occupation, chaos, rivers of blood, etc. etc. as is the case with the USA. This is exactly what has now been demonstrated to the entire world community clearly, visually and intelligibly. And everyone knows that it is better to see once with your own eyes than to hear a hundred times. So they look, and so they see ... And they probably draw conclusions.

Therefore, I am absolutely sure that after the exemplary entry of troops into Kazakhstan and the lightning-fast resolution of the current situation, which in itself was a strong blow to the image of the West in general and the United States in particular, the same clear and orderly withdrawal of these forces will be an even stronger blow. After which it will be extremely difficult to recover.

The entire theory of American superiority is based mainly on the image of this very superiority. And it is he who at the moment is crumbling into dust in front of everyone's eyes. And the stupid and self-confident statements of those who consider themselves the political elite there only give this whole picture a wonderful contrasting frame. So that the picture itself stands out even more. Well, as they say, "make the fool pray to God, he will break his forehead ..."

And we certainly do not feel sorry for their foreheads. Quite the opposite.
21 comment
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Sofa division Offline Sofa division
    Sofa division (Maksim) 11 January 2022 19: 44
    But I'm afraid no one will draw any conclusions, as usual. And kindness is again perceived as weakness.
    1. Pishenkov Offline Pishenkov
      Pishenkov (Alexey) 11 January 2022 20: 01
      ... you will have to draw conclusions, since everything demonstrated just does not recall either kindness or weakness. But strength, rigidity and absolute self-confidence are just yes.
    2. 1max Offline 1max
      1max (Max) 12 January 2022 07: 25
      Well no. Blinkin, however, said that when Russia entered it, it wouldn’t come out, but today (12.01) there was a meeting with NATO. So - this is a huge nail on the TV in Europe and the United States. We went in, did it quickly and efficiently and left.
  2. nikolaj1703 Offline nikolaj1703
    nikolaj1703 (Nikolai) 12 January 2022 00: 22
    Do not hope that once using the weakness of Russia, you will receive dividends forever. Russians always come for their money. And when they come - do not rely on the Jesuit agreements that you have signed, supposedly justifying you. They are not worth the paper on which they are written. Therefore, it is worth playing with the Russians honestly, or not at all.

    (Otto von Bismarck)
  3. Balin Offline Balin
    Balin 12 January 2022 04: 04
    it's time to invite Argentina, Panama and Viniswella with Cuba to the CSTO.
  4. Stanislav Rumba Offline Stanislav Rumba
    Stanislav Rumba (Stanislav Rumba) 12 January 2022 08: 40
    A small pot of charcoal under the nose of the American Shirkhan will quickly turn him into an affectionate, charred cat .. !!)
  5. viktortarianik Offline viktortarianik
    viktortarianik (Victor) 12 January 2022 10: 34
    They introduced the CSTO forces almost instantly and in an organized manner, showed the world what we can do. We will also deduce skillfully (did you hear Blinken?) And without stopping. But judging by the appointments to the government of Kazakhstan (today), the Russophobic policy remains a priority. So have the conclusions been drawn?
    1. Pishenkov Offline Pishenkov
      Pishenkov (Alexey) 12 January 2022 11: 05
      ... there, unfortunately, for 30 years a certain elite has already been raised, another is not, so who to put? But, as practice shows, the "forged communists" are quickly reforged - who destroyed the USSR, weren't they themselves? Who became the dramatically "super successful" businessmen? - the same people.
      People are people. Someone can be remade, someone will have to be removed ...
      1. Bulanov Offline Bulanov
        Bulanov (Vladimir) 12 January 2022 14: 10
        The main thing is that it does not happen that after a while the Kazakhs will again ask for help from Russia. This is when the bearded uncles from Afgan will come there with their orders. What, then run again, rescue and immediately run away? If they scream many times - wolves, wolves ...
        1. Pishenkov Offline Pishenkov
          Pishenkov (Alexey) 12 January 2022 18: 16
          ... I personally (emphasize) think that this is all done just so that after a certain time, either we come there and no longer go out at all, or so that they themselves are asked to return to us wink
        2. Essex62 Offline Essex62
          Essex62 (Alexander) 12 January 2022 20: 14
          Rapid reaction forces exist for this. The Kremlin's bourgeois faith does not allow the Kremlin to accept Kazakhstan into the Russian Federation so that it does not run every time. Imposed on us 30 years ago, the same, in fact, a flower. Liberals and Democrats are sitting there.
      2. Essex62 Offline Essex62
        Essex62 (Alexander) 12 January 2022 20: 08
        Well, I do not. These communists were not, by definition. By conviction, they were already bourgeois, they really wanted to be. And it was impossible to change the formation without dismantling the USSR brick by brick.
        There is no such thing as an elite. The grain is elite, the bulls are producers. It will not be difficult to find people with a non-Russophobic position, even in Kazakhstan or in Alaska. Only now the rich have the power, and they are sharpened to the owner, the primary source of green paper.
    2. shinobi Offline shinobi
      shinobi (Yuri) 12 January 2022 16: 54
      Those who need it have already made all the appropriate conclusions. The main one is that while everything is limited to the verbiage of the media and politicians, Russia spits on them. But for an attempt to direct damage, the answer will be instantaneous and very painful for them. 90s in the past. 2008, the West is only busy with this verbiage.
  6. shinobi Offline shinobi
    shinobi (Yuri) 12 January 2022 17: 09
    The CSTO and, in particular, Russia, held a clear demonstration of their capabilities to quickly and radically resolve the issues of color revolutions. Judging by the panic of the West, they could not imagine such a thing. Rude from confusion, trying to look tough and tough in a lost game. The West was shown their limited capabilities, it infuriates them. I think further they will try to win back the Ukrainian trump card. They will cause a hot phase in the Donbas with the subsequent introduction of NATO peacekeepers at the "request" of the Skakuas government. But NATO may not be in time. It is not for nothing that they are so "concerned" about our forces on the border with the kakla.
    1. Essex62 Offline Essex62
      Essex62 (Alexander) 12 January 2022 20: 16
      Yes? And head-on, head-on, don't you consider NATO? They are already there, and we still have to get there.
      1. Ksv Offline Ksv
        Ksv (Sergei) 14 January 2022 02: 05
        They are not there :-), and we are already at the border. Head-to-head, they themselves do not want to go far for us. No one is going to fight for Ukraine in principle ...
      2. shinobi Offline shinobi
        shinobi (Yuri) 16 January 2022 04: 02
        I’m considering. NATO / the United States is not interested in solving the problems of Ukraine with Russia. That’s not why it created them. They need a constant sluggish conflict. Again, the United States clearly and clearly said that they would not fight for the skakuas. the combined forces of NATO are not enough for military operations against the Russian Armed Forces. The talking head of Stoltenberg can carry his nonsense as much as he likes, the current generals of the alliance are well aware of their capabilities. They do not even consider a head-on collision with conventional forces. 5 minute reach to Moscow.
        1. Essex62 Offline Essex62
          Essex62 (Alexander) 1 February 2022 13: 31
          Everything starts small. Although, of course, it makes no sense to shove the war on the Russian Federation to the West. They already have everything from it, having planted in the Kremlin, 30 years ago, an occupational administration.
          There is no difference between launching from the territory of Poland or tribalts, members of the alliance and the outskirts, in terms of flight time. What is there to dance?
          1. shinobi Offline shinobi
            shinobi (Yuri) 2 February 2022 17: 42
            Don’t tell me. The whole difference is where they will fly. I don’t consider the European part of Russia by default, there will be ashes there. Immediately. a very important factor. The active section of the ICBM is 4-7 minutes, it is no longer possible to intercept it. A war with NATO / the USA is inevitable, but what kind of war will it be?
            1. Essex62 Offline Essex62
              Essex62 (Alexander) 8 February 2022 09: 02
              Intercept is fantasy. When they shoot with several volleys, with short pauses and very massively. In addition, they get the KR from the water to Siberia, and they riveted thousands of them. "Overheat" any missile defense.
  7. antibi0tikk Offline antibi0tikk
    antibi0tikk (Sergei) 13 January 2022 00: 30
    Why are we talking only about Kazakhstan? We did a great job in Syria too!