Why Russia has no right to leave Kazakhstan


The dramatic events in Kazakhstan and the decision of Moscow to send peacekeepers through the CSTO caused a different attitude in Russian society. Representatives of the liberal community condemn the Kremlin for interfering in the internal Kazakhstan conflict, believing that this is not our business at all, let them figure it out themselves. But let's imagine that Russia, as in 2014 with Ukraine, remained on the sidelines, and in a neighboring still friendly country, activists of the pro-Western opposition came to power through blood.


The consequences, negative, will not be long in coming. The transformation of Kazakhstan from a friend and partner into a direct open enemy promises Russia colossal problems. Let's list the main pain points, which will undoubtedly be hit. Let's start in ascending order.

At first, the prospects for Russian business will be bleak. Over the past 20 years, about $ 40 billion has been invested in Kazakhstan. For example, the metallurgical giant Rusal acquired 50% of the shares of the largest open-pit mine, Bogatyr Komir. Lukoil, Rosneft and Gazprom have stakes in oil and gas projects. The Russian Beeline owns the local cellular operator Kar-Tel. Domestic car manufacturer KAMAZ has an assembly plant and an after-sales service network in Kazakhstan.

It is customary to speak of a broad expansion of Chinese capital, but in fact there are more Russian-Kazakh joint ventures in the country than Sino-Kazakh ones. Before the pandemic, trade reached $ 20 billion a year. Russian products went to Kazakhstan, Kazakh goods to Russia. Nur-Sultan is Moscow's largest and most important business partner.

If we focus on the sad Ukrainian experience, then with the victory of the "gas Maidan" all these business ties would be severed, and the multibillion-dollar Russian investments "burned out." The assets would change their owners, passing into the hands of local comprador elites oriented towards the West and Turkey.

Secondly, in a separate line it is necessary to take out Russia's dependence on uranium supplies. In 2020, the endless and barren steppes of Kazakhstan accounted for about 41% of the total world production of uranium ore, of which the share of Russia is about 40%. Uranium is critically necessary for the domestic nuclear industry, and without uranium supplies, our "nuclear triad" may face big problems in the future. With just this targeted strike, the United States can seriously undermine the position of Rosatom and the capabilities of the RF Ministry of Defense.

Note that the internal political crisis in Kazakhstan has already led to a noticeable increase in world prices for uranium ore. The importance of this country for the economic development and national security of Russia can hardly be overestimated.

Thirdly, breaking ties with Nur-Sultan would automatically entail Moscow's inability to use Baikonur. Yes, we have been building an alternative Vostochny cosmodrome for a long time and at a high price, but it is still far from complete readiness. The decision to provide an independent "gateway to space" was undoubtedly the right decision, but its implementation raises a lot of questions. The dependence of Roscosmos on the infrastructure of Baikonur will remain for many years to come.

Fourthly, Kazakhstan is objectively also our “gateway to Central Asia”. The length of the common border between our borders is 7,5 thousand kilometers. And this will enable the Russophobic post-Maidan authorities to create a lot of problems for Moscow.

On the one hand, Nur-Sultan could physically cut Russia off from other former Soviet republics - Kyrgyzstan, Uzbekistan and Tajikistan. Only with Turkmenistan would we be able to keep in touch by sea, across the Caspian. This means the destruction of all supply chains, the de facto isolation of Central Asia from Russia.

On the other hand, as a result of the radicalization of sentiments in Kazakhstani society, it itself may pose a threat to our country. It is simply unrealistic to close and defend such a long border, because Islamist terrorists, if they wish, will be able to freely penetrate into neighboring Russian regions and then return.

Fifthlyapart from terrorist, Russophobic post-Maidan Kazakhstan will pose a colossal military threat. There is even no doubt that US Air Force bases will immediately appear there, ostensibly to control the events in Afghanistan, but in fact to control Russia and China. But these will only be flowers. It is much worse if, under the pretext of containing "Russian aggression", elements of the American Aegis missile defense system are deployed on the territory of Kazakhstan. As you know, it is dual-use, and instead of anti-aircraft interceptor missiles, Tomahawk attack cruise missiles, including those with nuclear warheads, may appear in the launch cells.

From Poland, Tomahawks may well finish off to the Urals now, which is a huge headache for the RF Ministry of Defense. But just imagine how much the picture will change if similar missiles appear in Kazakhstan, right under the Southern Urals. Our entire country will be shot from there, and the existing missile defense system is not tailored for this, which will open up the opportunity for the Pentagon for a truly effective disarming strike.

Is it any wonder that the Kremlin did not begin to "pull the horse" for a well-known place and with amazing speed adopted and implemented the decision to transfer peacekeepers to Kazakhstan? The loss of this country can lead to the collapse of Russian statehood, no matter how pathetic it sounds. And we no longer have the right to leave Kazakhstan with all due respect to its people. There is too much at stake.
41 comment
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. steelmaker Offline steelmaker
    steelmaker 9 January 2022 09: 29
    +2
    That's it. You cannot withdraw troops! If Putin withdraws his troops, he will simply prove his mediocrity as a politician. Do not give a damn about decency, the interests of the country and citizens should be above and above all !! Yes, and it is necessary to get even with the nationalists, for Russian blood!
    1. gunnerminer Offline gunnerminer
      gunnerminer (gunner miner) 9 January 2022 12: 24
      -8
      The second Syrian bridgehead. Only with logistics will it be easier. The common border, there is no need to inform third countries ahead of time about the passage of ships, about the passage of the aircraft. But the common border creates opportunities for sabotage groups to penetrate into the territory of Russia. In the Omsk regions there are many citizens of the Republic of Kazakhstan, Russian citizens of Kazakh origin. In Yekaterinburg there is a society of Kazakhs. There is a small Kazakh community in both Russian capitals.
      1. Alexander Zinoviev (Alexander Zinoviev) 10 January 2022 07: 06
        0
        And the border is long. Only outposts need to be built, or brought, not less than fifty! And border guards at least one person per kilometer!
        But we are not talking about that - in Kazakhstan, either Tokayev or, what is better, Nazarvaev had to fly in with people and solve everything with them! No, they have driven them to murder!
    2. Alexander Zinoviev (Alexander Zinoviev) 10 January 2022 07: 02
      0
      And there it is - I SHOOT! And Baikonur! And also our very old Russians, who came to raise the country as students by assignment! Generally make the COUNTRY!
      But, excuse me - the soldiers are someone's children! Would you RISK with your own people for the sake of Kazakhstan?
      With Crimea, everything was completely clear! The people, the people themselves, chose Russia. The majority.
      And all the countries of ASIA are clans and bai! And nothing but this - GOLD - they can’t eat! I do not know Tokayev personally.
    3. Pavel Zheleznyak (Pavel Zheleznyak) 18 January 2022 12: 47
      0
      What do you mean it can't be output? The Chinese comrades said get out of the zone of our interests, and the CSTO fulfilled it.
  2. Xuli (o) Tebenado 9 January 2022 09: 48
    +5
    Nur-Sultan could physically cut Russia off from other former Soviet republics - Kyrgyzstan, Uzbekistan and Tajikistan. Only with Turkmenistan would we be able to keep in touch by sea, across the Caspian. This means the destruction of all supply chains, the de facto isolation of Central Asia from Russia.

    No, Kazakhstan cannot be lost.
    All "logistic chains" pass through it:
    A great deal of what is sold in Russian stores, markets and markets is coming from China in a powerful stream. If this is blocked, it turns out that Russia will not be able to sew pants for itself, but if it can, it will be too expensive for an average Russian pocket. What about household appliances? What about computers, laptops, smartphones?
    Also, along these "logistic chains", streams of Afghan drugs go to the Russian expanses (hello to the Taliban!).

    How can you lose it all? Yes, it is like death! That is why, in my opinion, Kazakhstan, Tajikistan and Kyrgyzstan instantly joined all these CSTO-EurAsECs: caravans of trucks, each of which is imposed with tribute, tribal squabbles, the instability of their position ... push the descendants of nomadic shepherds into the arms of their older sister, all kinds of " the bodies "which also have billions of dollars of profit from all these" supply chains ".
    1. Marzhecki Offline Marzhecki
      Marzhecki (Sergei) 9 January 2022 09: 57
      -2
      Well, who about what, and each about his own.
      With the arrival of the Americans in Afghanistan, the production of all kinds of "stupidity" there has grown exponentially, by the way. Do you want Kazakhstan to become a new center of drug production?
      And how are you going to close the absent border with the now hostile Kazakhstan? 7,5 thousand kilometers.
      From China, Russia can receive products not only through Kazakhstan.
      1. Xuli (o) Tebenado 9 January 2022 12: 45
        +5
        Indeed, each about his own.
        Why do you remember all the Americans there? They have already left. Did the Taliban eradicate drug cultivation and production?
        Kazakhstan does not need to compete in "drug production". Kazakhs get richer from transit through their steppes. This is enough for them above the roof.
        Russia will not have enough troops to close all borders with its neighbors.
        1. gunnerminer Offline gunnerminer
          gunnerminer (gunner miner) 9 January 2022 12: 59
          -6
          Law enforcement agencies of the Republic of Kazakhstan and aviation have been involved in drug trafficking up to the tonsils. The Taliban are only increasing the cultivation of poppy. And production in Pakistan. Nobody is going to self-collect such gigantic funds.
  3. Valentine Offline Valentine
    Valentine (Valentin) 9 January 2022 09: 57
    +2
    Everything, guys, "staked out" Kazakhstan, and not a step back, otherwise "a holy place is never empty", we need a border neighbor loyal to us, and there will now begin a guerrilla war with the Basmachi, which are fed by both Turkey and the United States, so we soon we will be at war on all fronts, and our "partners" will not leave us alone.
    1. gunnerminer Offline gunnerminer
      gunnerminer (gunner miner) 9 January 2022 11: 21
      -7
      Turkey and the United States are in an advantageous position. Ordinating acts of counteraction, muddy the waters, and disrupting construction is much easier operationally, and not as costly as building and building infrastructure.
      The transfer of units to the Republic of Kazakhstan showed that it was necessary to use all 70 combat-ready aircrafts BTA. We considered the issue of preparing the restoration of the decommissioned An-12 and Il-76. But what is characteristic did not even dare to try to mobilize air transport from civil carriers. Probably objectively assess the state of the mobsystem. a negative result, during the "sudden" check of the combat readiness of the Eastern Military District. When at several airport terminals it was not possible to obtain fuel, lubricants, aircraft, or space for military aircraft.
      1. Valentine Offline Valentine
        Valentine (Valentin) 9 January 2022 13: 25
        +3
        Quote: gunnerminer
        all 70 combat-ready aircraft

        Now the Russian Aerospace Forces has operating IL-76 "transport workers" 109 aircraft and about 40 units. at the assembly in the shops. And you don’t get tired of pouring out your bile on this resource in your hatred of Russia.
        1. gunnerminer Offline gunnerminer
          gunnerminer (gunner miner) 9 January 2022 16: 16
          -9
          109 is all of all LAs, including those lying on their belly under the sky, rattled. At assembly in the workshops, not aircraft, but empty fuselages, without planes. The production rate of the Ulyanovsk residents is three aircraft per year. Snail.
          1. Dart2027 Offline Dart2027
            Dart2027 9 January 2022 21: 40
            -1
            Quote: gunnerminer
            109 is all of all LAs, including those lying on their belly under the sky, unkempt.

            Will there be a source?
            1. gunnerminer Offline gunnerminer
              gunnerminer (gunner miner) 9 January 2022 21: 53
              -5
              Sources: Krasnaya Zvezda newspaper, Vremya on First program. Watch them more often, listen carefully, read, trying to see beyond the text. Before 1991, the transfer of an airborne division, without reinforcement, without MTO units, was beyond the power of the Soviet military transport aviation. Since 2018, funding for repair, preventive work, and the supply of spare parts to the VTF of the Russian Aerospace Forces has been cut several times, and is currently about 30% of the required amount.

              For example, about 76 percent of the D-50KP engines have worn out about 30 percent of the D-76KP engines of the most popular Il-2021 aircraft from which the "winged infantry" is parachuted. R&D work is underway to modernize the main aircraft VTA Il-2022. The completion date was promised - 76. But already 90 has come. And from the side of the KLA and the UEC there is silence. On the Il-2MD-98A, the development work “Kuznetsk-90” continues, as well as on the promising Il-2023M-XNUMXA refueling tanker. The term is up to XNUMX.

              https://vpk-news.ru/articles/59169
              But the pace of delivery of this aircraft, as it has already been repeatedly, is snail-like.
              1. Dart2027 Offline Dart2027
                Dart2027 9 January 2022 23: 25
                -1
                Quote: gunnerminer
                Sources newspaper Krasnaya Zvezda, Vremya on First program. Watch them more often, listen carefully, read, trying to see beyond the text.

                That is, they are not. Or will there be something specific?

                Quote: gunnerminer
                In the days before 1991, the transfer of an airborne division, without reinforcement, without parts of the logistics, was beyond the capabilities of the Soviet military transport aviation.

                That is, they could not have done this in the USSR? And what does "this power" have to do with it?

                Quote: gunnerminer
                And on the part of the KLA and the UEC, they are silent.

                And how do you then know about this, if everyone is silent?
                1. gunnerminer Offline gunnerminer
                  gunnerminer (gunner miner) 10 January 2022 00: 56
                  -4
                  The sources are specific. Use it. And this government is trying to rub in the glasses. I know, because I visit exhibitions, I do not neglect reading the foreign press. For many years I have grown accustomed to trusting it on military-technical topics. I do not neglect communication with military representatives, with military personnel.
                  1. Dart2027 Offline Dart2027
                    Dart2027 10 January 2022 19: 44
                    -1
                    Quote: gunnerminer
                    Sources are specific. Use.

                    That is, somewhere out there I do not know where.

                    Quote: gunnerminer
                    I know because I visit

                    I also visit and communicate. What's next?
              2. Alexander Zinoviev (Alexander Zinoviev) 10 January 2022 07: 10
                +1
                And if we didn't know THIS - We know! Anxiety is overwhelming! Moreover, our CHILDREN are sitting inside these cars, and not God knows who!
    2. Xuli (o) Tebenado 9 January 2022 12: 50
      +2
      Everything, guys, "staked out" Kazakhstan, and not a step back,

      Yeah, there is a Dubosekovo junction near Alma-Ata. The Kazakh steppes are wide, and there is nowhere to retreat - behind Moscow with Lyubertsy and Khimki.
      1. Valentine Offline Valentine
        Valentine (Valentin) 9 January 2022 13: 29
        +1
        And you are doing Xulio here, you would go to Butusov for "No censor", there would be no price for you.
      2. gunnerminer Offline gunnerminer
        gunnerminer (gunner miner) 9 January 2022 17: 48
        -4
        They talked about Afghanistan as well. OKSVA will leave Afghanistan, and the Pentagon will deliver the Pershing.
  4. yo yo Offline yo yo
    yo yo (Vasya Vasin) 9 January 2022 10: 50
    0
    Once again, the United States has done well.
    1. gunnerminer Offline gunnerminer
      gunnerminer (gunner miner) 9 January 2022 11: 14
      -7
      The Russian ruling circles followed the path of the late USSR. Then they constantly outplayed the United States tactically in the Middle East, Africa, the Far East, and Central Asia. And then this entire Soviet structure collapsed sharply. Russia does not have such industrial and mobilization capabilities as the Brezhnev USSR. Problems with sea (most economically advantageous) transport, with air transport.
      1. Dart2027 Offline Dart2027
        Dart2027 9 January 2022 21: 42
        0
        Quote: gunnerminer
        And then all this Soviet structure collapsed sharply. Russia does not have such industrial and mobilization capabilities as the Brezhnev USSR.

        Yes, yes, yes, and we also have no idea. Everything fell apart thanks to the total betrayal of the USSR leadership, and not some transport problems.
        1. gunnerminer Offline gunnerminer
          gunnerminer (gunner miner) 9 January 2022 22: 01
          -5
          The Soviet leadership has been gone for more than 30 years. There is no small aircraft. There is a problem with military transport aviation. And it is the main mode of transport of the Russian Armed Forces, given the size of the country. Il-112V kirdyk, Il-76MD-90A are barely produced, as well as Il-78MD-90A, design and development work for the modernization of Il-76MD-90A leg by leg. The Russian engine is not ready for the An-124. There are no high-speed trains like in the PRC. In Japan, high-speed trains were built 50 years ago. There is no Russian merchant fleet. Instead, 20 year old river-sea toad-press barges.
          1. Dart2027 Offline Dart2027
            Dart2027 9 January 2022 23: 13
            0
            Quote: gunnerminer
            The Soviet leadership has passed away for more than 30 years.

            the consequences of the collapse have to be raked up to this day.

            Quote: gunnerminer
            There is a problem with military transport aviation. And she is the main mode of transport of the Russian Armed Forces, given the size of the country

            Generally speaking, the main type of transportation is railway, simply because it can be used to translate more.

            Quote: gunnerminer
            IL-112V kirdyk

            Let's remember how many planes fought in the USSR.

            Quote: gunnerminer
            Il-76MD-90A is barely in production

            New production line ALREADY launched
            https:/военное.рф/2021/%D0%90%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B0%D1%86%D0%B8%D1%8F28/

            Quote: gunnerminer
            There are no high-speed trains like in the PRC. In Japan, high-speed trains were built 50 years ago.

            Why didn't the USSR build them? And by the way, they are already walking.

            Quote: gunnerminer
            There is no Russian merchant fleet. Instead, 20 year old river-sea toad-press barges

            https://sdelanounas.ru/ Сделайте выборку про сухогрузы, танкеры, рыболовов и т.д.
            1. gunnerminer Offline gunnerminer
              gunnerminer (gunner miner) 10 January 2022 00: 53
              -4
              30 years is enough to clear up the consequences and finish building a new one. The most budgetary transport is sea. Especially tankers and large container ships. Taking into account the Russian geographic conditions, the railway is optimal. But approximately the same as in the PRC, in Japan, in the FRG, in France. And we have access to high-speed railway transport as to the Moon on a donkey. In threatened and operational periods, all hope is for transport aviation. unhappy and stunted by the standards of peacetime. The USSR could not build them because it tried to fight with the whole world. Like Russia is trying now.
              The site is made to lie. Relying on those who delve into the details. At Far East Zvezda, they assemble ships from parts made in South Korea, from local metal, equip them with imported equipment. They build river-sea toad pads at Russian shipyards, for example, in the Nizhny Novgorod region, passing them off as dry-cargo ships and tankers. river cruisers. Meteors with German MAN diesels. Icebreakers with Finnish diesel generators. Icebreakers for Rosmorport were ordered in Turkey, and the floating dock is also from the Turks. Fishing vessels with imported equipment, at a snail pace. On Pella, such a vessel was overturned.
              1. Dart2027 Offline Dart2027
                Dart2027 10 January 2022 19: 42
                -1
                Quote: gunnerminer
                30 years is enough to clear up the consequences and finish building a new one.

                thirty? Since 30, less has passed, and then at first there was no time for restoration.

                Quote: gunnerminer
                In threatened and operational periods

                If a war starts in the spirit of 80 years ago? Calm down, no tank armada will trample on our borders, but the air defense and missile defense systems have been surrendering for a long time ahead of schedule.

                Quote: gunnerminer
                The USSR could not build them because it was trying to fight the whole world, much like Russia is trying now.

                Yes, with the whole world. Something imperceptible that the same Europe would want to fight with us, like China.

                Quote: gunnerminer
                The site is made of a lie, counting on those who delve into the details.

                Really "delving into".

                Quote: gunnerminer
                At Far East Star, ships are assembled from parts

                It was written about this quite openly - first the assembly, then a gradual increase in the share of what was built at home, and starting from 10 it seems like too lazy to look, everything will be its own.

                Quote: gunnerminer
                They build at Russian shipyards, for example, in the Nizhny Novgorod region, river-sea toad-press, passing them off as dry-cargo ships and tankers

                And what is this class of ships of such a frogman? And the fact that goods are transported not only by sea, but also by rivers is unknown to you?

                Quote: gunnerminer
                Icebreakers with Finnish diesel generators. Icebreakers for Rosmorport were ordered in Turkey.

                Are these also Project 22220 icebreakers?
  5. gunnerminer Offline gunnerminer
    gunnerminer (gunner miner) 9 January 2022 12: 01
    -7
    The Kazakh ambassador to Moscow said there was no outside invasion.

    “At the diplomatic level, I cannot say that there is obvious interference, as such, there is none ... Officially, nothing like this happens at the state level,” said the Ambassador of Kazakhstan in Moscow, Ermek Kosherbayev, on the Soloviev Live Youtube channel.

    Tokayev's appeal to the CSTO for external help was the result of extreme haste in making a decision in the face of time pressure and doubts about the reliability of local security officials. After all, multiple signals about their crossing to the side of the street have already been received. It is possible that he will soon regret this act. Even the impoverished ruling group in Kyrgyzstan did not stoop to such a step.
    In the near future, all participants in the riots who fell into the hands of law enforcement agencies should be certified as militants associated with foreign terrorist centers. The investigation is obliged by all means to substantiate Tokayev's appeal to the CSTO. For this role, foreign citizens (preferably Arabs) caught up in a riot in Kazakhstan are quite suitable.
  6. General Black Offline General Black
    General Black (Gennady) 9 January 2022 12: 49
    +2
    And sixth. China will not reach the Caspian Sea.
  7. gunnerminer Offline gunnerminer
    gunnerminer (gunner miner) 9 January 2022 12: 55
    -6
    From Poland, Tomahawks may well be hitting the Urals right now, which is a huge headache for the RF Ministry of Defense.

    For the Tomahawk cruise missile, not everything is so simple with the areas of primary and secondary trajectory correction over the territory of Russia. The RGM / UGM-109E Tactical Tomahawk cruise missile is planned to be made the most massive. Due to the lightness and cost reduction of the design. According to the Raytheon website celebrates the military milestone already in 2014- m year, 3000 of these missiles were delivered. All subsequent years this type was produced. Consequently, most of the fleet's missiles are represented by the Tactical Tomahawk. The range of destruction of this missile is 500 km. When flying on a straight trajectory. And with a conventional "snake", with rounding around the air defense areas, even less.
    Instead of spending on equipping areas in the Republic of Kazakhstan, instead of spending on transporting reconnaissance and strike complexes, for security, it is easier to use areas in the Arctic uncontrolled by the Russian Navy.
    1. General Black Offline General Black
      General Black (Gennady) 9 January 2022 13: 09
      +3
      Cadet Bigler! And to whom are you writing here about the Tomahawks? Is it about them? Oh, cadet? Do you all want the defeat of Russia? Yes, and these Tomahawks of yours Gunya - Cast iron, to tell the truth.
    2. Marzhecki Offline Marzhecki
      Marzhecki (Sergei) 10 January 2022 11: 46
      -1
      Tomahawks are different
  8. Valery Vinokurov (valery vinokurov) 9 January 2022 14: 23
    +1
    well, if everything is so difficult, add it, although before I thought only of Ukraine and Belarus as Russian peoples
    1. gunnerminer Offline gunnerminer
      gunnerminer (gunner miner) 9 January 2022 20: 08
      -5
      Well, they annexed South Ossetia, Abkhazia. There is no order there. As in Dagestan. There is no in the North Caucasus. Corruption, theft, unemployment, especially among draft youth. Corrupt, Bai, tribal, clan-specific, narcotic Kazakhstan will be added to them. Kazakhstan has never been, and will not be in the foreseeable future of democracy.
  9. baltika3 Offline baltika3
    baltika3 (baltika3) 9 January 2022 18: 56
    -1
    Transformation of Kazakhstan from a friend and partner into a direct open enemy

    An enemy, therefore, direct and open, such as Hitler ("can lead to the collapse of Russian statehood"). If the author is right, and everything is really that bad, then in such a large country it is necessary to keep an occupation corps of tens of thousands of people, to be ready for a guerrilla war for many years, for hundreds and thousands of killed soldiers. Or, as an option, to immediately destroy all disloyal, how many there are, it is better with a margin. In the article, the author did not finish one paragraph - I added it approximately. If everything is so trendy.
    1. Dart2027 Offline Dart2027
      Dart2027 9 January 2022 21: 44
      +1
      Quote: baltika3
      If the author is right, and everything is really that bad, then in such a large country it is necessary to keep

      A couple of military bases and a well-developed intelligence network. There is no need to prepare for past wars.
      1. baltika3 Offline baltika3
        baltika3 (baltika3) 9 January 2022 21: 59
        -2
        A couple of military bases and a well-developed intelligence network

        This is not our method. If they didn’t see, as they themselves admit, 20 terrorists, what kind of intelligence network could there be, where would it come from? No, just stupid terror.
        1. Dart2027 Offline Dart2027
          Dart2027 9 January 2022 23: 26
          0
          Quote: baltika3
          This is not our method. If they did not see at close range, as they themselves admit, 20 terrorists, then what kind of intelligence network could there be,

          Why haven't you seen? Nazarbayev openly flirted with nationalists, and that's the result.
  10. Pavel Zheleznyak (Pavel Zheleznyak) 18 January 2022 12: 45
    0
    Everything that is written in the article is absolutely not important. Something else is important here. Comrade Xi demanded to remove the CSTO from Kazakhstan and his order was executed as clearly as possible ...