Britain learned about the deal between Russia and China on the "Power of Siberia-2"

January 4 2022 65

Russian President Vladimir Putin agreed with Chinese President Xi Jinping to lay the Power of Siberia-2 pipeline, which beat Europe. Anthony Ashkenazy, a columnist for the British newspaper Daily Express, reported this in his article.

Moscow wants to supply European consumers with more "blue fuel". However, certification of the completed and ready-to-operate Nord Stream-2 gas pipeline with a capacity of 55 billion cubic meters. m of gas per year now suspendedand at a time when Europe itself is experiencing an energy crisis.

Therefore, Russia wants to continue diversifying the supply of its energy raw materials, and now it is close to concluding another gas transportation deal with Beijing. According to preliminary data, volumes of "blue fuel" comparable to the capacity of the Nord Stream-2 pipeline running along the bottom of the Baltic will be pumped through the new gas pipeline.

The agreement will double exports to China, annually transporting up to 50 billion cubic meters. m of gas through the new Power of Siberia-2 gas pipeline

- the author specified.

We remind you that in mid-December 2021, the Russian leader, following a meeting with Mongolian President Ukhnaagiin Khurelsukh, announced that a technicaleconomic feasibility study for a gas pipeline project from Russia to China through Mongolian territory. The highway can become a backup to the Power of Siberia and a continuation of Power of Siberia-2, its optimal route and length have been determined.

Information

Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.

gunnerminer

-16

4 January 2022 17: 14

Something like something just the EU and the US have beaten ours. Something dear Anthony Ashkenazi does not finish speaking, he is cunning. The transportation route for the Power of Siberia-2 is quite long. Wholesale consumers in China will have to work hard on the distribution system to their final points. Methane from the Chayandinskoye and Kovykta fields is not for the EU. He, the EU, does not care about these deposits, which were not really developed to the design capacity. What is his (EU) loss, is unknown. And both of these two fields are still to be developed and developed. The Chinese pay only for methane, and for the infrastructure - from the Russian treasury. They talk about methane without stopping. Fanfare about oil exports has subsided. The population in Zamkadia is definitely not in gain. The increase in gasoline prices, and gas is inevitable.
1. Fourth Horseman
  
  +2
  
  4 January 2022 17: 22
  
  #HowScaryLive!
  # WeFseUmryom !!!
  1. Oyo Sarkazmi
    
    0
    
    6 January 2022 11: 12
    
    But not at once. We'll have a bite of cognac, sniff a chocolate bar, take a look and listen to Solovyov - and only then!
2. Bakht
  
  +15
  
  4 January 2022 17: 55
  
  The power of Siberia-2 does not in any way use either the Chayadinskoye or the Kovykta fields. The resource base for Power of Siberia-2 is the Yamal fields and the link between the Eastern and Western parts of Russia. The whole point of this gas pipeline is to diversify supplies. After its construction, if Europe decides to play a fool with different energy packages, then Yamal gas will go to China.
  The second (and possibly the first) task of this gas pipeline is gas supply to the regions of Russia. Now I don’t remember exactly, but it seems that 14 regions will be able to receive gas from Yamal. It's not hard to guess who will get the least. That's right, Europe.
  
  The Russian government plans to fully gasify the country from 2020 to 2030. To implement the national project, it is planned to launch the Power of Siberia-2 project - the additional pipeline will not only support the capacities of the first flow of the Power of Siberia, but also create an opportunity to supply gas to remote regions of Russia. The gasification program for 2021–2025 has already been agreed with the authorities of 14 regions of the Russian Federation, which indicates the imminent development of the internal gas market.
  
  http://www.ngv.ru/magazines/article/vtoroy-gazoprovod-v-chem-sila-sibiri/
  
  The Power of Siberia-2 is even more important than the Power of Siberia-1 or SP-2. This is a gasification project for the country. Which even the USSR could not do. It was difficult to get the required 1,6 (some write 2,0) trillion rubles. But thank you very much to the Stockholm Arbitration and the EU Energy Charter.
  
  Net profit will reach its maximum value for the entire period of the company's existence, exceeding 2 trillion rubles. At the same time, the net profit for the first nine months of 2021 has already amounted to 1550 billion rubles, which exceeds the results of any previous calendar year!
  
  https://www.gazprom.ru/press/news/reports/2021/record-results/
  
  Where will Gazprom get funds for Power of Siberia-2? From the profit. Part will go to dividends, but 1,5 trillion rubles will go to infrastructure.
  So it took too long for Britain to understand what everyone had known for a long time.
  1. gunnerminer
    
    -15
    
    4 January 2022 19: 09
    
    The resource base for Power of Siberia-2 is the Yamal fields and the link between the Eastern and Western parts of Russia. The whole point of this gas pipeline is to diversify supplies.
    
    There is nowhere else to get methane for the SS Bovanenkovskoye, they set up for SP-2, the whole point of this gas pipeline is to create a reserve for the economy of the PRC. The gains from Gazprom are not so great. The losses are considerable.
    1. Bakht
      
      +5
      
      4 January 2022 20: 22
      
      Profits from Gazprom are not so great
      
      2 trillion rubles is not very much, as I understand it .... 26,6 billion dollars is a NET PROFIT. I don’t know how much it means to you - a lot?
      1. gunnerminer
        
        -13
        
        4 January 2022 20: 25
        
        The expenses are about the same scale. SP-2 is idle and does not bring any profit. Expenses for the fields continue, the barge Akademik Chersky ran to Sakhalin.
        
        Bakht
        
        +6
        
        4 January 2022 20: 25
        
        Do you understand the words "NET PROFIT"? This means that the costs have been taken into account.
        From Wikipedia
        
        Net profit is a part of the company's balance sheet profit that remains at its disposal after taxes, fees, deductions and other obligatory payments to the budget. Net profit is used to increase the working capital of the enterprise, the formation of funds and reserves, and reinvestment in production.
        
        boriz
        
        +3
        
        4 January 2022 21: 23
        
        SP-2 is idle and does not bring profit.
        
        Who said he doesn't bring it? Now, if it starts to work, then gas prices will fall, and the cost of SP2 will increase. So, let it be better.
        
        gunnerminer
        
        -13
        
        4 January 2022 22: 42
        
        SP-2 without commercial gas flowing to customers. No profit.
        
        boriz
        
        +2
        
        5 January 2022 02: 28
        
        Nobody is interested in the profit of specific pipes SP2. The total profit of Gazprom and its subsidiaries is interesting. If JV2 is launched right now, the price of gas and Gazprom's profits will plummet.
        
        Specifically, the advertising actions of companies are also a net loss, however, everyone does not forget about advertising.
        
        gunnerminer
        
        -8
        
        5 January 2022 12: 15
        
        Gazprom's subsidiaries are far from being the main supplier.
      2. Pishenkov
        
        +9
        
        4 January 2022 21: 42
        
        Bakhtiyar, do not strain - it is useless to argue. He is such a great specialist in almost all areas that neither you, nor me, nor everyone else who thinks that they know anything at all, can’t even reach his spot!
        In the General Staff and the State Planning Commission (or something like that), as well as in the presidential apparatus, he has not yet been hired simply because, in comparison with his genius, all the others there seem to be just complete dullards and ignoramuses.
        Recently, on a mass of data obtained from nowhere, but undoubtedly "indisputable", I have been proving for a long time (until I got tired of it) that the state of the RF Armed Forces in the 90s was much better than today.
        Although 99,9% did not serve in the army, and I saw gas at home in a stove or in a lighter at best ...
        
        gunnerminer
        
        -16
        
        4 January 2022 22: 54
        
        Prepare carefully. The forces in the 90s were not reduced to the limit. Officers, warrant officers, midshipmen, sergeants, foremen, privates and seamen of contract service were not driven into civilian life by tens of thousands. The ships in the factories did not burn. During the Syrian campaign there was a high accident rate of the military aviation. , with dozens of deaths. The Russian Navy lost a detachment of auxiliary vessels and hydrography, reconnaissance and strike aviation. Strategic aviation, a component of the Strategic Nuclear Forces, ceased to exist. Its miserable remnants were transferred last year to the Long-Range Aviation. Offenses in the Armed Forces, compared to the 90s. increased greatly, and so on.
        
        Pishenkov
        
        +5
        
        4 January 2022 23: 16
        
        Prepare carefully
        
        - sorry, I was somehow not warned about the exams! I will definitely complain to the admin!
        
        Bakht
        
        +10
        
        4 January 2022 23: 37
        
        The complex of usefulness is incurable
        
        Memo for a psychiatrist.
        
        Sergey is not Astakhov at all
        
        +5
        
        5 January 2022 09: 42
        
        Dear Pishenkov, I agree with you 100%, yap he is of the first order and there is a plug in every hole!)))
    2. boriz
      
      +1
      
      4 January 2022 20: 41
      
      https://vg-news.ru/n/149849 Почитайте.
      And what do you all call GHG methane?
      1. gunnerminer
        
        -11
        
        4 January 2022 22: 44
        
        Natural gas (also called fossil gas; sometimes just gas) is a natural hydrocarbon gas mixture consisting primarily of methane, but usually containing varying amounts of other higher alkanes, and sometimes small percentages of carbon dioxide, nitrogen, hydrogen sulfide, or helium. The energy that plants originally received from the sun is stored as chemical bonds in the gas Chemical formula CH4. Chemistry course 7th grade.
        
        Bakht
        
        +4
        
        4 January 2022 23: 33
        
        Natural gas (also called fossil gas; sometimes just gas) is a natural hydrocarbon gas mixture consisting primarily of methane, but usually containing varying amounts of other higher alkanes, and sometimes small percentages of carbon dioxide, nitrogen, hydrogen sulfide, or helium. The energy that plants originally received from the sun is stored as chemical bonds in the gas. The energy that plants originally received from the sun is stored in the gas as chemical bonds. Chemical formula CH4. Chemistry course 7th grade.
        
        Compare text
        
        Natural gas (also called fossil gas; sometimes just gas) is a natural hydrocarbon gas mixture consisting mainly of methane, but usually containing varying amounts of other higher alkanes, and sometimes small amounts of percentages of carbon dioxide, nitrogen, hydrogen sulfide, or helium ...
        
        The energy that plants originally received from the sun is stored in the gas in the form of chemical bonds.
        Wikipedia site: livepcwiki.ru
        
        The only thing you added was the phrase "Chemical formula CH4". And here they made a mistake. CH4 is the formula for methane, not natural gas.
        
        gunnerminer
        
        -8
        
        5 January 2022 12: 18
        
        Natural gas, mainly composed of methane, is transported by LNG carriers. Liquid natural gas. The chief officers of LNG carriers use the CH4 formula to calculate the cargo (gas phase).
        
        Bakht
        
        +2
        
        5 January 2022 12: 21
        
        We talked about the Power of Siberia-2 (pipeline gas) or liquefied in gas carriers?
        Through the Power of Siberia - 1, already purified gas is supplied to China. As for the Power of Siberia - 2, there seems to be no such information.
        
        gunnerminer
        
        -7
        
        5 January 2022 12: 27
        
        Using the example of calculating the cargo on a LNG gas carrier, I explained to you what natural gas is.
        
        Bakht
        
        0
        
        5 January 2022 12: 57
        
        They themselves wrote that gas carriers do not carry natural gas. This is the first thing.
        Second. I didn’t work on gas carriers, but as far as I know, the chief executives NEVER dealt with cargo.
        Keep shaking your "knowledge".
        
        gunnerminer
        
        -6
        
        5 January 2022 13: 28
        
        LNG is written on board each LNG carrier, for example Christophe de Margerie, SCF, under the flag of Trinidad and Tobago. Senior assistants not only on gas carriers are responsible for cargo operations. At one time, the second were involved in cargo operations in Soviet shipping companies. assistants. Now they are responsible for navigation and communication. For an educational program, visit the Sailor website. There you will learn about gas carriers, about the duties of senior assistants.
        
        boriz
        
        0
        
        5 January 2022 18: 17
        
        Natural gas is mainly composed of methane and is transported by LNG carriers.
        
        LNG transported by gas carriers contains nothing but methane. For purely technical reasons.
        Try to master this text. https://cont.ws/@boriz56/1562903
        A couple of years ago, I got tired of Marzhetsky's stories about how American LNG would kick Gazprom out of the European market, and I wrote this text. It didn’t work out here, but it’s on Conte.
        It is written accessible, even for you.
        And pay less attention to what is written on different surfaces for the entertainment of the public.
        They write all sorts of things on the fences, but the fence does not cease to be a fence because of this.
        
        gunnerminer
        
        -8
        
        5 January 2022 19: 37
        
        Shale gas will be kicked out by Gazprom from the European market. Marzhetskiy wrote correctly. They wrote about the readiness of the SP-2 since last year. But it is worth it, and does not bring profit.
        
        boriz
        
        0
        
        5 January 2022 19: 41
        
        Ha ha.
        Show the dynamics of production.
        Besides, you again did not understand anything. The chemical industry does not need methane to make plastics, rubber, varnishes, paints, etc. Businesses will stop immediately.
        In addition, any LNG is sold only at prices above $ 1 per 300 cubic meters. Shale oil - especially since its cost is higher.
        
        gunnerminer
        
        -7
        
        5 January 2022 19: 45
        
        The dynamics can change rapidly. And the State Department's administrative resource and politics are still in effect. The price of shale gas does not stop its buyers.
        
        boriz
        
        0
        
        5 January 2022 19: 47
        
        About nothing. Who is not stopping? At what price? How much? What resource?
        As for the dynamics, banks do not lend to shale producers. And there is no way without loans.
        
        gunnerminer
        
        -8
        
        5 January 2022 19: 51
        
        If shale producers were not credited, there would be no flow of LNG carriers to China.
        
        boriz
        
        0
        
        5 January 2022 19: 52
        
        They have enough ordinary gas.
        Do you have production dynamics?
        
        gunnerminer
        
        -5
        
        6 January 2022 13: 00
        
        I was somewhere. We must search.
        
        Archon
        
        0
        
        6 January 2022 13: 42
        
        Why are you saying?
        
        Quote: boriz
        The chemical industry does not need methane to make plastics, rubber, varnishes, paints, etc. Businesses will stop immediately.
        
        Methane can be converted to synthesis gas and longer chains of hydrocarbons can be synthesized using the Fischer-Tropsch process. It is possible to create both gasoline and diesel from synthesis gas, as well as monomers from which plastics, varnishes and rubbers can be made. Paints have a more complex structure, but their synthesis has long been studied and mastered.
        
        boriz
        
        0
        
        6 January 2022 14: 53
        
        Below I wrote:
        
        Create plastics, rubbers, varnishes, paints, etc. from methane it is theoretically possible, but terribly expensive.
        
        In the laboratory, small quantities can be done quickly.
        But technologies with low costs are chosen for industrial production.
        And if we have a proven technology, complex specialized equipment, then the change of raw materials is impossible.
        Theoretically, gasoline can be made from diesel fuel (due to the cracking process). Still, it is better not to pour diesel fuel into the tank of a car with a carburetor engine.
        
        Archon
        
        0
        
        6 January 2022 20: 09
        
        If you are not lazy, please read about UZBEKISTAN GTL. This is just a new plant for the production of synthetic fuels and raw materials from gas for further polymer production. If they are building, it means they are counting on profit.
        And at the expense of cracking - after cracking, separation by distillation takes place and the fuel is obtained by further mixing the obtained fractions. Therefore, the situation with the filling of diesel fuel into a gasoline engine is excluded. But I can reveal a nuance. From the tank farm, fuel is transported in tank trucks and the driver can mix it up like a person and pour gasoline into the diesel and vice versa. And when you decide to file a complaint, then a new portion of fuel can be added to the tank several times and, due to dilution, the fuel will again become normal in all parameters. You can easily check if there is any admixture of gasoline in diesel fuel: pour diesel into a small cup and bring a burning match. If there is an admixture of gasoline, there will be a flash on the surface. If there is no impurity, the diesel will not ignite, and the match will smoke. If the fuel catches on fire, close the cup with a lid, shut off the oxygen.
        
        boriz
        
        +1
        
        6 January 2022 20: 24
        
        Where is the technology described?
        
        Archon
        
        0
        
        7 January 2022 05: 40
        
        The licensor is Sasol.
        
        Sasol has developed world-class GTL projects on two continents.
        In particular, the company is engaged in the production of diesel fuel and liquefied gas based on the Fischer-Tropsch synthesis.
        
        Archon
        
        0
        
        7 January 2022 06: 11
        
        https://www.topsoe.com/processes/synthetic-fuels/methane-rich-gas-to-diesel-and-jet-fuels
        
        This company is a supplier of technology for the production of syngas from methane and the production of gasoline, rocket fuel and diesel fuel based on syngas. You can check out their set of catalysts.
        And here the production technology is described.
        
        https://www.topsoe.com/ru/processes/gasoline-synthesis/tigas
        
        boriz
        
        0
        
        6 January 2022 20: 32
        
        In terms of its scale, the UzGTL synthetic liquid fuel plant is one of the largest investment projects not only in Uzbekistan, but also in the CIS countries. The project is aimed at expanding the capacity of Uzbekistan for deep processing of natural gas, drastically reducing imports of hydrocarbon raw materials, as well as strengthening the energy independence of the republic.
        
        It is important that as of raw materials, a part of the purified commercial gas processed at the Shurtan Gas Chemical Complex (MCC), which produces a range of polymer products obtained by extracting components such as ethane, propane, butane, etc. from natural gas, will be used.
        
        Actually, I wrote about this. We pulled out high-molecular fractions from PG and will do what we need out of them. Cars use a butane / propane mixture.
        Anywhere plastics or rubbers are made from methane?
        
        Archon
        
        0
        
        7 January 2022 05: 28
        
        Yes. Methane reacts with water to produce a mixture of carbon monoxide and hydrogen in different ratios under different conditions. This is synthesis gas. Subsequently, this synthesis gas can be transferred to longer hydrocarbon chains.
        https://www.google.com/amp/s/neftegaz.ru/amp/news/Gazohimija/674983-uzbekistan-vvedet-v-ekspluatatsiyu-gtl-zavod-v-avguste-2021-g/
        The link explicitly states that the plant will produce synthetic fuels from methane.
        
        Uzbekistan GTL, a subsidiary of Uzbekneftegaz, plans to commission a plant for the production of synthetic fuel GTL (gas to liquid) in the Kashkadarya region in southern Uzbekistan in August 2021.
        This was announced by Uzbekneftegaz.
        
        Phased commissioning plans:
        April 2021 - equipment for the production of synthesis gas,
        May 2021 - installations for the production of finished products,
        June 2021 - air separation unit,
        August 2021 - Start of production.
        Uzbekneftegaz began construction in early 2017.
        In August 2020, Uzbekneftegaz began construction of a gas pipeline to supply gas to Uzbekistan GTL.
        Its launch was slated for early 2021, but the timing has been adjusted due to the COVID-19 coronavirus pandemic.
        The processing capacity of the GTL plant is 3,6 billion m3 / year of gas.
        Range and quantity of products:
        diesel fuel - 724 thousand tons / year,
        aviation kerosene - 307 thousand tons / year,
        naphtha - 437 thousand tons / year,
        53 thousand tons / year - liquefied petroleum gas (LPG).
        EPC - the contract was signed with the South Korean Hyundai Engineering & Construction.
        The product licensor is South African Sasol.
        The supplier of the synthesis gas production technology is the Danish Haldor Topsoe.
        The cost of the project is USD 3,6 billion.
        Investors:
        Uzbekneftegaz - in the amount of USD 1,3 billion;
        an international financial consortium, which, among others, included Gazprombank, Roseximbank and the Russian Agency for Export Credit and Investment Insurance, - USD 2,3 billion.
        GTL-plant Uzbekistan GTL will become the largest in the region.
        Its capacity exceeds a similar plant in Turkmenistan, which was commissioned in June 2019.
        For comparison, the parameters of the Turkmen GTL plant:
        processing capacity - 1,785 billion m3 / year of gas;
        range of products: 600 thousand tons / year of Eco-93 gasoline, 12 thousand tons / year of diesel fuel, 115 thousand tons / year of LPG.
        Uzbekistan, experiencing a shortage of motor fuel, intends to build another GTL plant to solve this problem.
        In October 2018, a new project for the production of gasoline from methanol was announced.
        Production capacity - 104,3 thousand tons / year of gasoline, 14,4 thousand tons / year of propane-butane mixture.
        Licensor - not announced.
        EPC - contractor - South Korean company GS Engineering & Construction Corporation.
        Project participants - Uzkhimprom, Navoiazot, GS E & CC.
        The cost of the project is USD 200 million.
        Commissioning date - December 2022.
        
        Archon
        
        0
        
        7 January 2022 05: 59
        
        It means the following:
        
        The project was aimed at the production of synthetic liquid fuel based on purified methane from the Shurtan Gas Chemical Complex.
        
        That is, the Shurtan Gas Chemical Complex is doing what you are writing about - it pulls out higher molecular weight fractions and produces polyethylene. A purified He sends methane without impurities to UZgtl, where naphtha (pre-gasoline), diesel fuel and other products will be made from it.
        That is, you are right that natural gas is purified and used for synthesis, but purified methane is also used for synthesis. And this technology in general is over a hundred years old.
        
        boriz
        
        +4
        
        5 January 2022 02: 31
        
        Natural gas (also called fossil gas; sometimes just gas) is a natural hydrocarbon gas mixture consisting primarily of methane, but usually containing varying amounts of other higher alkanes, and sometimes small percentages of carbon dioxide, nitrogen, hydrogen sulfide, or helium. The energy that plants originally received from the sun is stored as chemical bonds in the gas Chemical formula CH4. Chemistry course 7th grade.
        
        Your outlook is narrow.
        Your amazing knowledge will in no way console most of the chemical enterprises in Germany, France and other countries (including Russia).
        They need high molecular weight compounds. Their technology is geared towards ethane, propane, butane, etc. Create plastics, rubbers, varnishes, paints, etc. from methane it is theoretically possible, but terribly expensive.
        That is why LNG (and there is definitely one methane) will never replace pipe gas. The size of the molecules matters.
        It is bad when knowledge is limited to the 7th grade of high school.
        What to talk to you about?
        
        gunnerminer
        
        -9
        
        5 January 2022 12: 20
        
        Russia will not be able to handle the processing and production of macromolecular compounds. Its niche is the export of primary raw materials, at best, processing. There is no pipe gas in nature. There is natural gas, there is chemical, there is oil.
        
        boriz
        
        +3
        
        5 January 2022 17: 36
        
        Russia will not be able to handle the processing and production of high molecular weight compounds.
        
        The problem is that Russia does not know about it. Builds gas processing facilities in Ust Luga. The Amur gas processing plant has already been built on the Power of Siberia. And they will build on CC2. Naked methane will go to China, while helium and high-molecular compounds will remain with us.
        
        There is no pipe gas in nature.
        
        Natural (including associated petroleum) gas that flows from the well to the consumer through the pipe is pipe gas.
        
        Its niche is the export of primary raw materials, at best, processing.
        
        Even the President of Uzbekistan has set the task of not exporting a single cube of unprocessed gas. He's working hard on it. And we help him in this.
        And the niche of Russia, fortunately, is not for you to define.
        You have a larva's horizons.
        
        gunnerminer
        
        -7
        
        5 January 2022 17: 56
        
        Natural (including associated petroleum) gas that flows from the well to the consumer through the pipe is pipe gas. The Amur gas processing plant has already been built on the Power of Siberia.
        
        Nobel Prize for you. And urgently. The Amur plant is still very far from the completion of construction.
        
        boriz
        
        +1
        
        5 January 2022 18: 07
        
        Today, in the teleconference mode, a solemn ceremony of launching the first technological line of the Amur Gas Processing Plant (GPP), one of the most powerful in the world, took place.
        
        https://www.gazprom.ru/press/news/2021/june/article530765/
        
        As the gas pumping grows, the following lines will be put into operation, and facilities for further gas processing are being built nearby.
        The story will be the same in Ust Luga. Unrefined gas will be sent in small doses to obedient boys for good behavior.
        
        gunnerminer
        
        -8
        
        5 January 2022 19: 35
        
        The release does not define the actual state of the enterprise. Then the same release will report the stop. The ubiquitous words "will be" on a long journey to completion.
        
        boriz
        
        +2
        
        5 January 2022 19: 37
        
        These are your wishes. Envy is a bad feeling. The plant started to work.
  2. sharp-lad
    
    +3
    
    5 January 2022 01: 25
    
    And Russia honestly warned the Eurobolots about this several years ago!
3. maiman61
  
  +2
  
  4 January 2022 20: 31
  
  The population of Zamkadia, would like to see you with a pasta gait.
Pilot

0

4 January 2022 17: 31

"Power of Siberia-2" is the one that will be laid through Mongolia past the Kazakhs?
Sergey Latyshev

-6

4 January 2022 18: 21

It turns out that for any news one can say: "Putin ... beat Europe"

Roscosmos is going to launch a rocket every 5 days

too ..... beat Evropu "
1. gunnerminer
  
  -13
  
  4 January 2022 19: 09
  
  It is very good that we are very bad.
  1. AND
    
    +3
    
    4 January 2022 22: 30
    
    Quote: gunnerminer
    It is very good that we are very bad.
    
    You often miss. Nothing to beat the Euro-patriot?
    Do you understand the words "NET PROFIT"? This means that the costs have been taken into account.
    1. gunnerminer
      
      -11
      
      4 January 2022 22: 39
      
      Of course they are taken into account. For a long memory.
  2. shvn
    
    +5
    
    4 January 2022 23: 13
    
    Yes, you feel bad))) And this is good for us.
The comment was deleted.
AND

+4

4 January 2022 22: 40

Quote: Sergey Latyshev
It turns out that for any news one can say: "Putin ... beat Europe"

Roscosmos is going to launch a rocket every 5 days

too ..... beat Evropu "

Judging by your usual writings, everything good in Russia is bad for you.
AND

+2

4 January 2022 23: 04

Quote: gunnerminer Euro-patriot
Of course they are taken into account. For a long memory.

You do not work well for your Euro-uncle. Many words, little sense ... We try very hard, I only see you very much to the west ... Such (smart), just like Lyoshka Navalny was ..
mister-red

+1

5 January 2022 00: 35

Quote: Sergey Latyshev
It turns out that for any news one can say: "Putin ... beat Europe"

Roscosmos is going to launch a rocket every 5 days

too ..... beat Evropu "

And Roscosmos is still beating Europe, they have very few launches In 2021, the score is 24: 6
Hot Dyusha

-1

5 January 2022 12: 55

So gas has nowhere to go, that as much as half of the country sitting on the wood. And Vova has so much gas that he has nowhere to spend the night. It's dumb to read this when, within a radius of 30 km from large settlements, people secretly clean the shelves so as not to freeze in winter
1. Monster_Fat
  
  -2
  
  5 January 2022 16: 47
  
  My brother wrote that last year, his neighbor near St. Petersburg sold "free" Putin's gas for ... 250000 rubles, although the pipe passed nearby ... And the other was refused completely, like the capacity was exhausted. This is a kind of "free" gasification in Putin's style.
Vladest

-4

5 January 2022 13: 23

The speed of information dissemination in the world is surprising. Only Britain and the Reporter learned about the deal! The author of the post has one hundred likes for creating jokes !!!
1. General Black
  
  +3
  
  5 January 2022 15: 41
  
  Do they not know in Estonia yet?
Vladest

-5

5 January 2022 17: 10

Quote: General Black
Do they not know in Estonia yet?

You definitely do not know the art of making logical conclusions ... Or did I write here about the Papuans? The infa is trash, perhaps because you started discussing me, not her .. As an ordinary troll does.