Alexander Rahr spoke about the successes of Russian diplomacy since the beginning of the year

January 4 2022 14

Russian diplomacy began 2022 with certain successes. German political scientist Alexander Rahr wrote about this on January 3 on his Telegram channel.

He noted that all five permanent members of the UN Security Council, with the right of veto, made a joint major statement. It concerned the non-proliferation of nuclear weapons and the "impossibility" (inadmissibility) of an atomic war. In his opinion, this was the answer to those madmen who have recently been talking about victory in a local nuclear conflict.

Rahr stressed that the next step towards rapprochement of the main planetary five countries could be an impetus to the formation of a new multipolar world order, which was previously voiced by Russian President Vladimir Putin. He added that such a moment should not be missed.

The initiative of the "world government" - who are the permanent members of the Security Council, the winners in World War II - can contribute to de-escalation around Ukraine

- he specified.

Second good news Rahr called the desire of German Chancellor Olaf Scholz to hold a personal meeting with the Russian President in the near future. And even before talking face-to-face with his American colleague Joe Biden. The political scientist believes that Berlin has decided to improve relations with Moscow and this is a very encouraging signal.

Some of the liberal elites in the West are furious. Are angry with their superiors. Instead of "punishing" Russia, Western leaders are preparing for a dialogue with Russia

He summed up.

Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

VK Zen Telegram

Information

Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.

Alexey Davydov

-5

4 January 2022 09: 13

Of course, the countries dependent on nuclear powers, which have suffered through fear in recent days, are now experiencing euphoria.
Plus the champagne you drink.
However, everything is simpler. China does not need problems because Russia has allowed the United States to drive itself into a corner with its "concerns".
This is her problem. China will not allow it to be solved at the expense of the security of others, and of itself in the first place.
Shataty, Britain and France are satisfied with this position of China.
The path to a new Cuban missile crisis, whatever it promises to Russia, is closed.
It, with its demands for guarantees, will have to proceed from the threats of conventional weapons, but even here, probably, no one will give a chance to start a world war. Thus, it has no real levers to achieve guarantees. You can dream.
But ...
If Rahr says this from a parallel reality, I would like to move there.
gunnerminer

-5

4 January 2022 09: 42

The year has just begun; it is better to speak gop at the end of December 2022.

According to him, the situation in Russian-American relations is indeed tense. Even in Germany, high-ranking generals are offering to listen to Moscow's proposals on security guarantees, Rahr said. However, not a single European media outlets write about this, the expert concluded.

Rahr wrote this on December 18, 2021. A little over a couple of weeks have passed, and already there has been success.
1. Pandiurin
  
  +1
  
  4 January 2022 11: 32
  
  Quote: gunnerminer
  The year has just begun; it is better to speak gop at the end of December 2022.
  
  According to him, the situation in Russian-American relations is indeed tense. Even in Germany, high-ranking generals are offering to listen to Moscow's proposals on security guarantees, Rahr said. However, not a single European media outlets write about this, the expert concluded.
  
  Rahr wrote this on December 18, 2021. A little over a couple of weeks have passed, and already there has been success.
  
  Rahr has been saying roughly the same thing lately.
  
  What worried him and what has not changed is the hysteria in the Western media about the "hostility" of Russia, the unacceptability of demands for ensuring its own security, this is with regard to the officialdom directed at EU citizens through the media and general public statements of many EU leaders (not all , but many).
  As for the unofficial reaction, we see that the situation is somewhat different, there is no refusal to dialogue, statements to the UN, etc.
  Now it is too early to say how all this will end (there have been no negotiations yet, in mid-January), but there are those who do not decide anything, such as the Tribaltik with their screeching, that there is nothing to talk about. And there are more serious countries who are ready to discuss.
  
  For example, it could have been otherwise, as, for example, with the Republic of Belarus, the EU categorically refuses to conduct a dialogue. Stoldenberg screamed at first that there was nothing to talk about then shut up and changed the record.
  
  Rahr is right that there is hysteria in the West, but there is also a willingness to negotiate (the second is just diplomacy).
  1. gunnerminer
    
    -2
    
    4 January 2022 12: 16
    
    Rahr is right in many ways, but he does not hold positions of responsibility. And the screeching Stoltenberg is the NATO Secretary General. RB is an economic and military dwarf, with 9 million population. By no means rallied around Lukashenka. Moreover, with 14 thousand Kurdish refugees, hanged around their necks completely voluntarily. One of their daily feeding is worth something.
    1. Pandiurin
      
      +1
      
      4 January 2022 12: 28
      
      Quote: gunnerminer
      Rahr is right in many ways, but he does not hold positions of responsibility. And the screeching Stoltenberg is the NATO Secretary General. RB is an economic and military dwarf, with 9 million population. By no means rallied around Lukashenka. Moreover, with 14 thousand Kurdish refugees, hanged around their necks completely voluntarily. One of their daily feeding is worth something.
      
      Then why were there any accusations that the comments of the political observer Rahr were incorrect?
      And what does it have to do with the fact that he is not an official person, he makes his own review and he has a good understanding of the situation.
      
      The bottom line is that despite the screeching in the Western media, those who really decide go to negotiations. And this is diplomatic progress. We will see the result later, but at this stage it is.
      
      This is broadly in line with what Rahr has said before and now. There are no contradictions.
      
      Therefore, the scolding about the article is incomprehensible.
      1. gunnerminer
        
        -2
        
        4 January 2022 14: 15
        
        Rara and Kedmi are most often quoted by the Russian media as they do not occupy any positions. Probably because of their knowledge of the Russian language. They are known to the Russian public inside the Moscow Ring Road, but hardly outside the Moscow Ring Road and in the EU.
Pandiurin

0

4 January 2022 14: 45

Quote: gunnerminer
Rara and Kedmi are most often quoted by the Russian media as they do not occupy any positions. Probably because of their knowledge of the Russian language. They are known to the Russian public inside the Moscow Ring Road, but hardly outside the Moscow Ring Road and in the EU.

I won't say about Kedmi, but Rahr is really interesting. His view of the political system is quite close to us, at the same time he is well aware of the internal moods and the political situation in the EU and Germany.

Therefore, it can explain such paradoxes as exorbitant gas prices and Germany's reluctance to be certified by SP2. Rahr can explain this intelligibly and clearly, seemingly a situation devoid of logic.
If you listen to Scholz or Burbbock, you will hear a streamlined official position that Russia is behaving incorrectly, about aggression, violation of human rights, sanctions, etc.
The official position is understandable, they are digging into us on some left-wing reasons, but what is the deep reason you will never hear from EU officials.

Therefore, the opinion of the columnist Rahr is interesting, we can say that it is an expert, a person well versed in the topic.
1. gunnerminer
  
  -1
  
  4 January 2022 15: 38
  
  If you listen to Scholz or Burbbock, you will hear a streamlined official position that Russia is behaving incorrectly, about aggression, violation of human rights, sanctions, etc.
  
  These are politicians and responsible officials who have just taken their posts. If Rahr blurts out something, he will not bear administrative responsibility for his words.
  
  The official position is understandable, they are digging into us on some left-wing reasons, but what is the deep reason you will never hear from EU officials.
  
  It would be extravagant if it were the other way around. From Russian officials, too, such revelations, even on internal problems, have not been heard, and we will not hear.
  1. Pandiurin
    
    0
    
    4 January 2022 16: 22
    
    Quote: gunnerminer
    If you listen to Scholz or Burbbock, you will hear a streamlined official position that Russia is behaving incorrectly, about aggression, violation of human rights, sanctions, etc.
    
    These are politicians and responsible officials who have just taken their posts. If Rahr blurts out something, he will not bear administrative responsibility for his words.
    
    What's the difference new or not, and by the way you are mistaken in politics, they are not newcomers, you think Merkel and Macron will explain this, no.
    The point here is not only that they cannot say as politicians, but that the West uses a certain liberal vocabulary of terms. In order to explain the essence of the West's pretense to Russia, the set of concepts and words in this dictionary is not sufficient, and some terms are prohibited there, not welcome.
    So it turns out that SP2 is bad because LGBT people or something like Greta Thunberg are oppressed in Russia.
    
    In fact, the EU, Germany and most Germans adhere to a certain ideology as acceptable.
    
    Let's call it "liberal fascism"
    The bottom line is that they consider themselves, the nations of Western democracy professing liberal values, standing above other countries / nations that do not share this ideology. They deny other countries the right to decide and make their own choices. They believe that they, the countries of the West, can indicate and force the "wrong countries" to forcibly make a choice in the direction of Western liberalism. Well, as always, this is their mission, the rest must obey.
    
    This is the idea of the superiority of European nations over subhumans, Russians, who have no right to decide how they should live.
    
    The provision of such coercion is the economic power of the West, the means of propaganda of liberal progressive ideology, the military might of NATO, and is morally right. Western democracy, Western liberalism, the only other correct principles that they did not come up with is criminal.
    
    Are you waiting for the Western leader to come out and say that he is a liberal fascist)?
    1. gunnerminer
      
      -3
      
      4 January 2022 16: 35
      
      You are waiting for the Western leader to come out and say that he is a liberal fascist)
      
      If they are like that, according to your personal opinion, then who are our Russians! Three thousand Russians die every day.
      1. Pandiurin
        
        0
        
        4 January 2022 16: 39
        
        Quote: gunnerminer
        You are waiting for the Western leader to come out and say that he is a liberal fascist)
        
        If they are like that, according to your personal opinion, then who are our Russians! Three thousand Russians die every day.
        
        Perhaps Rahr is to blame for this?
        
        I saw very few interviews with his participation, unfortunately.
        But one thing I really liked, for a long time I did not fully understand the essence of the EU and Germany's claims against Russia, it seemed that their behavior was devoid of logic. I listened to how Rahr sees it from the inside who knows German society and their politics, many points became much clearer for me, about Germany and partly the EU
        
        Monster_Fat
        
        -1
        
        4 January 2022 17: 06
        
        Another Jewish "expert" who have warmed themselves and wipe themselves off from the Russian mass media. "Success" with him. Yeah.
Jora bayramow

0

5 January 2022 08: 41

A sensible political scientist and journalist with an analytical mind, always assesses the situation fairly, while still carefully smoothing corners so as not to inadvertently offend the parties. And this time, giving a fair assessment of this statement, he is right.
Kapany3

0

5 January 2022 19: 18

Quote: gunnerminer
Rara and Kedmi are most often quoted by the Russian media as they do not occupy any positions. Probably because of their knowledge of the Russian language. They are known to the Russian public inside the Moscow Ring Road, but hardly outside the Moscow Ring Road and in the EU.

Well, is Kedmi like that? Gannerminer doesn't know him ..