Russia is provided with oil only for the next 30 years

November 29, 2021 44

In connection with the fuel crisis currently observed in Europe and other regions of the world, discussions about green energy and its possibilities to provide the world with inexpensive and stable energy supplies have intensified. But, as recent events show, one cannot discount fossil fuels, the reserves of which on the planet are limited.

So, according to Deputy Prime Minister Alexander Novak, Russia will be provided with oil for another 30 years, gas - for 50 years. At the same time, the country, most likely, will not experience problems with the sale of energy resources, since they will be in great demand on world markets. Novak shared his thoughts on this topic with the guests of the Russian-Chinese Energy Forum.

The term of use of fossil resources can be extended by conducting geological exploration on the sea shelf. This point of view was expressed by the General Director of JSC "Rosgeologia" Sergei Gorkov. Recently, in Russia, practically no large oil fields have been found, and the shelf reserves of "black gold" at a depth of more than 500 m are poorly studied. Awareness of the fossil fuel deposits that the oceans harbor is still only 10 percent.

At the same time, according to the head of Rosneft, Igor Sechin, in the coming decades the price of oil will grow, since by 2050 its consumption will double due to the growth of demand in India. Oil-producing countries must now prepare for these processes.

As for renewable energy sources, in Sechin's opinion, they are not able to cover the world's basic energy needs even in the long term. This point of view was expressed by the top manager at the end of October at the Eurasian Economic Forum in Italy.

Information

Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.

Dukhskrepny

+2

29 November 2021 18: 26

The taiga is large and there will be enough firewood for a long time.
1. gorenina91
  
  -10
  
  29 November 2021 18: 44
  
  The taiga is large and there will be enough firewood for a long time.
  
  - Well, yes ... - A couple of extensive fires - and you will have to admire the "lunar landscape" ... - And even for refueling with firewood - fire extinguishing means (helicopters, airplanes, cars) - there is not enough forest ... - We will have to heat the boiler houses with dollars. ..
  1. Alexndr p
    
    -1
    
    30 November 2021 14: 05
    
    - Well, yes ... - A couple of extensive fires - and it will remain to admire the "lunar landscape"
    
    well of wisdom
    GoreNina, the Great Siberian Fire of 1915 did not finish off the taiga, so Putin and the oligarchs will finish it off! 11! 11! .... 1
    So it works in your head, Comrade Warrant Officer?
    
    We need the expert opinion of a drunken vodka steelmaker to consolidate the opinion of members of the forum about the inevitable tragedy
    
    Novak had to say that gas and oil remained for 10 years - so that the markets howl) And SP-2 quickly recaptured its value
Stanislav Bykov

+2

29 November 2021 18: 41

Russia claims that there are oil and gas reserves on its Arctic shelf, which may be enough for the country not for decades, but for centuries, writes the American Internet publication OilPrice.

In our country, almost 80% of all gas production is carried out in the Arctic territories. <…> There is a huge potential in the Arctic zone that can be used. <...> If we talk not about reserves (potential), but about resources only in the Arctic water area, then we have about 15 billion tons of oil and about 100 trillion cubic meters of gas, that is, this is for tens, hundreds of years, if you suddenly need to use and it is economically feasible

- said the Deputy Prime Minister of the Russian Federation Alexander Novak during the educational marathon "New Knowledge" in Moscow on September 2.

At the same time, the Russian functionary clarified that these resources are now very expensive to develop, but noted that the government in any case plans to encourage production on the Arctic shelf. He added that activities in the Arctic require subsidies, so the government stimulates business by cutting some taxes on offshore projects to zero. The Deputy Prime Minister stressed that large-scale development of the Arctic shelf will be carried out only if there is a real need for it, for example, when other regions of the huge country run out of similar resources.

In any case, it is necessary to develop knowledge-intensive industries in order to generate income no less than gas and oil.
1. gunnerminer
  
  -6
  
  29 November 2021 19: 06
  
  In any case, it is necessary to develop knowledge-intensive industries in order to generate income no less than gas and oil.
  
  They've been talking about this for 30 years.
  1. Stanislav Bykov
    
    +3
    
    29 November 2021 19: 13
    
    What 30 years? 30 years ago, the country collapsed, there was no time for science
  2. zenion
    
    -4
    
    29 November 2021 21: 46
    
    So they expected a war and said that it would not be. Do not be too brash, Stalin is now gone and the USSR is gone!
gunnerminer

-9

29 November 2021 19: 06

Pictures of Vas Lozhkin. Oil Mother and Gas Father.
Bakht

+2

29 November 2021 20: 24
The artist who paints oil

http://regionplus.az/ru/articles/view/3448
Sofa division

+7

29 November 2021 21: 18

Russia is provided with oil only for the next 30 years

the geography teacher told us so 20 years ago
1. Bulanov
  
  0
  
  30 November 2021 14: 26
  
  Geography teachers talked about this back in the USSR!
zenion

-7

29 November 2021 21: 45

Politics! After us, even a flood! They were talking balakals, rozyyshlys wept!
DV tam 25

+1

30 November 2021 04: 33

Oil will not end in 30 years. And it won't end in 300 years. And in 3000 years it will be full. In fact, there will always be oil. As well as gas. But as long as there are humans, they will always come up with ways to sell resources at a higher price. The horror story that oil will run out is very conducive to speculation. Apparently, oil (gas) is a renewable resource, and with a step of no more than 100 years. True, scientists do not approve of this. Especially the British ones.)
1. Bakht
  
  +2
  
  30 November 2021 08: 09
  
  “Apparently” is a strong argument. Especially in the scientific community. Facts are stubborn things. Some deposits have been developed for over 100 years. And they are exhausted. For some reason, oil in them has not been renewed.
  1. DV tam 25
    
    -1
    
    30 November 2021 11: 49
    
    Resumed. Learn materiel.
    1. Bakht
      
      0
      
      30 November 2021 13: 02
      
      Does anyone here know the materiel?
      Let's say the Balakhanskoye field. Oil has been pumping for over 100 years. Oil has NOT recovered ...
      Or the fields of the North Sea. Brent oil. Will it recover in 70 years?
      The Rockefellers have been pumping oil in Texas for over 100 years. For some reason, oil is NOT recovering.
      
      You do not need to teach materiel. With you it is necessary to carry out an educational program (liquidation of illiteracy).
      1. DV tam 25
        
        -2
        
        30 November 2021 13: 09
        
        Someone here does not know the materiel. It's funny about the educational program. Beware of warming).
        
        Bakht
        
        0
        
        30 November 2021 13: 12
        
        Empty words don't interest me. Have you seen the 10 km seismic section?
        
        Bakht
        
        +1
        
        30 November 2021 13: 26
        
        I've been sorting out old photos and screenshots for a day.
        This is a Brute Stack up to about 6-7 km. Longitudinal waves. In the area of a mud volcano. Can you find at least one clear seismic boundary at a depth of 5 km?
        
        And this is the release of gas from an underwater mud volcano. Screen from the echo sounder. The sea is almost 250 meters deep.
        
        Take up educational program. It won't hurt you.
        
        DV tam 25
        
        -3
        
        30 November 2021 13: 38
        
        Why do you need a 10 km seismic section? What will you do with it?) And what will you see there? Oil? So they don't look for her like that. In short, start your motorized sofa with a seismic echo sounder and drive it straight into the cut, look for ... well, what do you usually look for there). This is a great resource - just filled with various "experts". You are, as I understand it, an expert in mining? Moreover, you see well-deserved). Enchanting.
        Such a moment. When an unsuccessful joke is repeated twice (about an educational program), this speaks of the stupidity of the repeater.
        
        DV tam 25
        
        -1
        
        30 November 2021 13: 44
        
        I would tell you a lot of interesting things about oil. But ... I don't like stupid ones. You don't have to teach the materiel. Uselessly.
        
        Bakht
        
        +2
        
        30 November 2021 13: 47
        
        Do you know how to search for oil? Teach me. I have been doing this for 30 years already. "Seismic echo sounder" is enchanting. I understand that you combined two photos with sarcasm. But it turned out unsuccessfully.
        So do you know how to look for oil? Except for seismic exploration methods - nothing. It would be nice to have gravity data in addition to it. But this has not been practiced lately. It's a pity. By the way, in the 80s we carried out gravimetric work in the north of the Caspian Sea. They connected the sea structure with the land one. Just by gravimetric methods. The result is the Kashagan field.
        Brut Stack is primary processing. Held directly on board. Then a cube is built. And the final processing on land in the VC. A full-fledged section is being built there and only there.
        
        When a person does not listen to smart advice for the second time, this speaks of his stupidity.
        
        DV tam 25
        
        -2
        
        30 November 2021 14: 03
        
        There is no need to give advice when not asked for it. Smart advice is even more so, because they are not smart at all, from the outside it is better to know). The fact that you swept floors in the north of the Caspian suggests that you only swept floors in the north of the Caspian). And that's all.
        Once again, I do not like and do not listen to fools. But I like to troll them. So-so occupation, of course. But cool. Maybe you, perhaps, are not a fool, but as if you have nothing to do with mining and did not have, so, maybe, as already written, you are just a loader or a handyman.
        Where were you trained in mining? You do not have to answer, as you can see from your writing - n and where. And I am not going to teach you. Instead of an interesting dialogue about an interesting topic - the renewability of oil fields, you dumped everything in an ordinary bazaar. Are you from Ukraine? Got it. If not, then ... read above.
        
        Bakht
        
        +2
        
        30 November 2021 14: 15
        
        The question is - where did you study mining?
        My diploma is a mining geophysical engineer. Specialty "geophysical methods of prospecting for mineral deposits". Graduated from AzInefteKhim. This is in Baku. He worked as an operator, senior shift on helicopters (north of the Caspian Sea). It was an experimental airborne gravimetric crew. Then on the ships in Schlumberger as senior shifts. Shift-leader in English.
        I consider my father, a professor of oil field exploitation, to be my teachers. Fifty copyright certificates. Head of the department of a scientific institute. And academician Mirzajanzadeh (have you heard of this?). He taught at the Gubkinsky oil industry. He also worked at the Academy of Sciences on the topic of the deep properties of ophiolites. It is related to renewable oil sources. True, there I was smashed to smithereens by Academician Mehdiyev.
        The topic is really interesting, if you could give at least one reasonable argument. By the way, I am a supporter of the abiogenic origin of oil. And she is recovering. But this is not a question for hundreds of years. And not even a thousand. And the "oil window" is located at a depth of more than 10 km. But there is nothing to talk about with you until you show at least one reasonable argument.
        So, the first question. Where did you study mining and who did you work with?
        
        Bakht
        
        +1
        
        30 November 2021 13: 50
        
        And now for more details. A 10 km section is needed to confirm your idea of oil renewability. The first time I was very surprised when BP wanted a single profile with a 12 km hodograph. I had to make a recording length of 15 seconds. But this does not mean anything to you. As I understand it, they wanted to open the roots of mud volcanoes to confirm your idea of oil renewability. That is, an abiogenic hypothesis. They didn't do such things anymore. At this stage in the development of technology and the resolution of the equipment, nothing happened.
        
        DV tam 25
        
        -2
        
        30 November 2021 14: 12
        
        What wild nonsense. Do you even read on the Internet how to find oil.
        
        Bakht
        
        +1
        
        30 November 2021 14: 17
        
        I do not need it. I know this in practice.
        
        DV tam 25
        
        -2
        
        30 November 2021 14: 25
        
        It can be seen.
        
        Bakht
        
        0
        
        30 November 2021 14: 28
        
        I didn’t see the answer to my question. How many years have you been personally involved in geological exploration?
        
        DV tam 25
        
        -2
        
        30 November 2021 14: 40
        
        I didn’t work in exploration. I worked in a specialized design institute as well. Oil is not really my specialty. But its production was studied in detail, even in great detail. I am more of coal, opener and surveyor. Was. Once upon a time). So are you done? Nothing?)
        
        Bakht
        
        +1
        
        30 November 2021 14: 43
        
        That is, you do not know how to search for oil. And what is connected with its renewal. Extraction is not a search. And oil is searched for by geophysical methods. First of all - seismic exploration.
        The first thing you should know. Oil fields (according to the western classification, this is called locus of accumulation) may (!!!) be renewed. But this has not been proven. There is simply such a hypothesis. And this is a process for thousands of years. Many thousands of years. That is, at this stage, for us personally, it is non-renewable resource.
        If you also say what is the basis for the resumption of oil, then you can safely say.
        
        DV tam 25
        
        -2
        
        30 November 2021 15: 09
        
        Well what can I say ... if without your turnover, then oil is a renewable resource. And the fact that you are telling about some insignificant episodes from your kindergarten practice suggests that, although you (possibly) graduated and or at least attended the buffet of this educational institution (almost legendary, it was natural before), but in general do not understand the picture. This is the difference between the work of a loader or a land digger or whoever you were there and a scientist. I will not explain hypotheses, practical examples and the physics of processes to you, including a quote with aplomb "what is the basis for the renewal of oil" (with an emphasis on navErnoe?)). If you know, then it makes no sense, if not, then don't care). Therefore, I am glad that there are still people interested in such, one might say, fundamental questions, although they are too stubborn. But stubbornness is from ignorance! Find out more!
        
        Bakht
        
        0
        
        30 November 2021 15: 14
        
        In general, you did not say anything interesting. And you don’t know. In vain they rubbed their trousers in their institution. The conversation is useless. Stupidity is limitless. And the inability to argue their position.
        
        DV tam 25
        
        0
        
        30 November 2021 15: 20
        
        Like you. I haven’t even spoken to you. Your stupidity is your problem. Or, more precisely, the problem).
        
        Bakht
        
        -1
        
        30 November 2021 15: 26
        
        The complex of usefulness is incurable. Your stupidity is clearly visible. Name at least one deposit that has been restored.
        
        DV tam 25
        
        -3
        
        30 November 2021 15: 46
        
        I made it clear to you - no one talked to you. Having spoken a bunch of, as it seems to you, clever words, do you think that you have made some kind of impression? They did, of course, but not the one about which you burst out, but even quite the opposite. Once again, just because you are telling delusional episodes from your drunken practice does not mean that they mean anything. Where are you going without even the slightest idea of what you are writing, how can you, some sailor, understand about scientific research, analysis and methods? So, I will repeat no conversations with you.
        
        Bakht
        
        0
        
        30 November 2021 15: 54
        
        Everybody talks to everybody here. But your level is below the plinth. You have absolutely no idea about the subject of the conversation.
        Do you understand the word - ABSOLUTELY?
        So your business is to be silent and listen to what you are told. Maybe you will grow wiser.
        
        The comment was deleted.
        
        The comment was deleted.
        
        The comment was deleted.
        
        The comment was deleted.
        
        Bakht
        
        0
        
        30 November 2021 14: 44
        
        You are not reading carefully. I graduated from AzInefteKhim. That is, the Azerbaijan Institute of Oil and Chemistry.
Potapov

0

30 November 2021 10: 03

There will be geologists, geophysicists / instead of accountants and managers /, there will be oil and everything else that happens ...
1. Bakht
  
  -1
  
  30 November 2021 13: 04
  
  There will be oil, of course. There will be no CHEAP oil.
BoBot Robot - Free Thinking Machine

+1

30 November 2021 12: 25

provided by Russia
oil only for
thirty years!
What can we do, help!
all the people are crying
Bakht

0

30 November 2021 14: 06

The term of use of fossil resources can be extended by conducting geological exploration on the sea shelf.

I can only add. We need colossal funds for geological exploration onshore. It's not just big money. This is a lot of money. And frames. First of all, people.
It's good that I didn't do much on land. It's a little easier at sea

On land it's just creepy
gorenina91

-5

30 November 2021 18: 13

-Not so long ago, our guarantor very authoritatively stated:

I instruct from January 1, 2022 to introduce a complete ban on the export from Russia of unprocessed or rough, only for the type of processed timber of coniferous and valuable hardwood

- Well, now already

Moscow. November 30th. INTERFAX.RU - From January 2 to December 31, 2022, the government will expand restrictions on the export of timber by introducing protective export duties on certain types of timber with a moisture content of more than 22% and a thickness and width of more than 10 cm, the government's press service reported.

For softwoods, export duties are set at 200 euros per cubic meter, for valuable hardwoods (oak, beech, ash) - from 1 to 250 euros per cubic meter. Officials expect that this will limit the export of unprocessed wood under the guise of sawn timber. ...

Now the rate for such timber for conifers and oak is 10%, but not less than 13 and 15 euros per cubic meter, respectively, for beech and ash - also 10%, but not less than 50 euros per cubic meter.

- Ha ... - Well, as it were - the ban and the introduction of duties (and they used to be) - these are two big differences ...
- In short:

-Under the wing of the plane, the Green Sea of the Taiga is singing about something
AND

+1

1 December 2021 14: 55

Quote: gorenina91
-Not so long ago, our guarantor very authoritatively stated:

I instruct from January 1, 2022 to introduce a complete ban on the export from Russia of unprocessed or rough, only for the type of processed timber of coniferous and valuable hardwood

- Well, now already

Moscow. November 30th. INTERFAX.RU - From January 2 to December 31, 2022, the government will expand restrictions on the export of timber by introducing protective export duties on certain types of timber with a moisture content of more than 22% and a thickness and width of more than 10 cm, the government's press service reported.

For softwoods, export duties are set at 200 euros per cubic meter, for valuable hardwoods (oak, beech, ash) - from 1 to 250 euros per cubic meter. Officials expect that this will limit the export of unprocessed wood under the guise of sawn timber. ...

Now the rate for such timber for conifers and oak is 10%, but not less than 13 and 15 euros per cubic meter, respectively, for beech and ash - also 10%, but not less than 50 euros per cubic meter.

- Ha ... - Well, as it were - the ban and the introduction of duties (and they used to be) - these are two big differences ...
- In short:

-Under the wing of the plane, the Green Sea of the Taiga is singing about something

Write to Europe with your favorites. The president, without your help, will decide what will be best for the Russian Federation.