Will the "Summit of Democracies" be a step towards World War III


In less than a month, on December 9-10 this year, an event should take place that initially claims the status, if not "historical", then at least of great importance for the entire "collective West". We are talking about the "Summit of Democracies" scheduled for these days (in another interpretation - "Summit for Democracy"). Its participants firmly intend, first of all, to draw a certain clear and unambiguous line, indicating where the "free society" ends and the dense "authoritarian regimes" begin. Well, and, of course, "dissociate" from them in the most decisive way.


At first glance, the organizers of this event are driven by the most good and bright motives - "to consolidate all the" healthy forces of the world "so that they stand together to defend such fundamental values ​​as democracy, human rights, fair elections ... , and, as they say, further down the list. At the same time, there are serious fears that in fact the summit will not promote unification and mutual understanding at all, but, on the contrary, will become the next (and rather dangerous) division into different camps of states existing on our planet. Where do such assumptions come from and what in reality could be the consequences of these "democratic gatherings"? Let's try to figure it out.

PR Biden and "revenge" for Afghanistan


According to the data available today, the first round of intimate communication of "democratic leaders" will take place in a virtual format that has become familiar to everyone during the coronavirus pandemic. However, the trouble is the beginning - if the matter goes well, in a year or so the participants of the "constituent" conference, you see, will come to the point of embracing each other in a real democratic embrace. Be that as it may, the main thing is not whether the conversation will take place "in real life" or online. It is important who will talk and what exactly. It should be borne in mind that the initiator and main initiator of the "summit" is quite expectedly the United States. Or rather, even specifically their current president, Joe Biden. For the first time this idea, already in the status of the head of state, he voiced, if memory serves, at the beginning of this year, that is, in fact, immediately after the election and inauguration.

To the grateful listeners from among the employees of the State Department, who anxiously listened to the new owner of the White House, who presented to them his own view of the external policies countries, all this was served under the sauce of "the need to correct the most dangerous blunders and strategic miscalculations" made in this field by Donald Trump. Well, you know - "America is back" and so on blah blah blah in the same spirit. If you want to “score points” in politics, spit on your predecessor, this is the basics. According to old Joe, it is precisely such a loud, pretentious and global event that will allow Washington to furnish its own "return" as effectively as possible. And at the same time, by the way, it will remind all the overseas “clever guys” who relaxed a lot in the Trump times that the leader, standard-bearer, lead singer and, in general, the center of the “free world” are only the United States and no one else.

Moreover, originally conceived as an international PR event for Biden and his political forces, the summit eventually turned into a truly urgent need for the United States. Everything turned out to be painfully bad with the drape from Afghanistan, where the Americans (contrary to their own statements made later) came just to "establish democracy" and defend it from the bearded mujahideen. Themselves neither ear nor snout did not cope, the Afghans who naively trusted them were framed, as they say, "throughout the program", and even NATO allies, let's face it, "thrown", without even informing the Taliban about the impending surrender of the country. In short, they suffered reputational losses, the scale of which is difficult even to assess. The most unpleasant thing is that some people, glancing sideways in the direction of the United States, began to indulge in doubts like: "Are they definitely the coolest or not?" This kind of "confusion and vacillation", extremely dangerous for the image of the "world hegemon", should dispel the forthcoming summit.

However, its "sacred meaning", of course, is not only this. Carrying around with an obsession with the "offensive of totalitarianism" that threatens the "world community" and specifically American interests, Biden wants to "send a decisive signal" to the unbelted "forces of evil." Well, along the way, once again divide the whole world into "lambs" and "goats", "righteous" and "sinful", "bad guys" and "good" opposing them. All as in the basis of the American, sorry for the expression, the culture of black and white comics. But the real world is not a "universe" born by the artist's pencil, and everything in it is far from simple and unambiguous.

Will it come to a new "civilizational rift"?


It is not without reason that the idea of ​​a “democratic summit” was perceived in our country not only with hostility, but with the utmost caution and concern. Sergei Lavrov, for example, saw in it Washington's intentions, at least, to “belittle the importance” of the United Nations, or even try to create a kind of surrogate replacement for the UN. The head of the Russian Foreign Ministry in his hearts called the planned gathering of "democrats" a "segregation" undertaking in the worst traditions of the "cold war". It is difficult to argue with him at this moment - after all, the initiators of the summit will indeed “independently determine which country is democratic and which is not,” being guided by some, only they know and know criteria.

As far as we know (and the alleged “list of invitees” has already appeared on the Politico website), not only, say, the Swedes with the French, but also, for example, Iraq, Pakistan, the Philippines, were registered as “democrats”. Particularly touching is the presence in the list of "lights of the free world" of such states that have achieved truly outstanding successes in the democratic field, such as the Congo and Ukraine. Yes, and Taiwan is there too. But there are no Hungary, Turkey, Vietnam, Egypt and many other states that are not officially considered "dictatorships". The fact that the virtual "doors" of the summit will be shut tightly for Russia, China, Turkey, Belarus is not at all surprising. Otherwise, without an already formed and drawn up list of "enemies of democracy", why was it necessary to fence in the garden? At least, the answer to the sacramental question: "Against whom will we be friends?" I'm ready now. This is what is annoying. Too much the "Summit of Democracies" in such a context looks like a medieval conclave assembled to announce the next crusade.

Recent doubts about the not peaceful intentions of the United States dispel the revelations of the same Biden. Just the other day, the American president suddenly began to recall how both Vladimir Putin and Xi Jinping almost unanimously convinced him that "autocracies will win", because "in the XNUMXst century, democracies are ineffective" because of their "clumsiness "Caused by" the long time it takes to reach a consensus. " Whether something like this happened in reality is difficult to say - given, speaking delicately, the specific state of the psyche of the current head of the White House. However, the direction of his intentions can be seen quite clearly in connection with what has been said. Alas, most likely, they boil down to the typical for Americans: "Here we show them!" One of the three main points around which, as stated, the agenda of the summit will “revolve”, in addition to the quite expected “protection of human rights” and the “fight against corruption” that the US pokes where it is necessary and not necessary, will also be “protection from authoritarianism”.

From this place, you know, I would like to learn more. How will you defend yourself, gentlemen democrats ?! There is reason to believe that the main answer to this question is the recent creation of the AUCUS military bloc by the United States, Britain and Australia. I can argue that further "protection" will be built in just this vein. In fact, such a "high assembly" can indeed subsequently be used to legitimize certain global actions against states officially recognized by its participants as "authoritarian". That is, they are hostile and a priori not deserving of the attitude that "democracies" can claim.

In favor of such, far from optimistic forecasts, first of all, the presence of Taiwan and Ukraine among the participants in the summit is evidenced. This is not just an open challenge to both Beijing and Moscow. Leaving Taiwan aside, let me say that calling a “democratic country” a “non-profit” (especially in its current state) can be either a complete blind man or a hardened cynic and scoundrel. The main value of both of the above "partners" for Washington is that they are its springboards for confronting Russia and China. And, what is much more important, in those places where this confrontation may well develop into an armed conflict. That is, calling things by their proper names, in the Third World War.

Could such be the "great battle of democracies against authoritarian evil"? Why not? The more terrible the plan is, the more the loud and beautiful words are chosen to justify and justify it. The course of the United States towards our country is literally changing before our very eyes from a policy of "soft confrontation" to extremely arrogant, defiant and openly provocative behavior. The signing of the "renewed charter on strategic partnership" between Washington and Kiev, which took place just the day before, is simply another step in the same direction, but a very significant step. US Secretary of State Anthony Blinken, who signed this document, announced some "provocations" emanating exclusively from our country, and expressed full readiness to "put pressure" on it.

Judging by these words, and by the Pentagon's boastful rhetoric about its intentions to act wherever it pleases without the slightest regard for Russia's national security interests, we cannot expect anything positive from overseas. Consequently, any American global initiatives that have a clear anti-Russian orientation should, willy-nilly, be taken seriously, without attributing them to the "whim" of the elderly president or the banal desire of the United States to raise its own reputation. It is difficult to say whether the upcoming summit will serve the benefit of "world democracy", but for our country it definitely poses a real threat.
52 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. steelmaker Offline steelmaker
    steelmaker 12 November 2021 11: 49
    -3
    Will the "Summit of Democracies" be a step towards World War III

    Why do they start wars? Conquer-capture-destroy. The USSR was destroyed, Russia was captured and conquered. If everything in Russia belongs to foreign companies. What else to call it? If this policy continues, in 20-30 years, the population in Russia will decrease to 90-100 million people. And this, officially, we do not have a war! In Russia, there will be no economic prosperity, a quiet life, while some sweetly devour and blatantly lie, so that others pay for all this "feast during the plague" out of their own pockets, trying to figure out how to live one more day. The wild social inequality in Russia is not seen only by the blind, very stupid or very cunning.
    All these Western gatherings are led by the United States, and they are going to keep everything as it is. All these provocations are military and are created so that there is tension, so that the current mediocre government remains unchangeable.
    Putin's Russia is a guarantee of stable growth: prices, tariffs, corruption, poverty, retirement age, mortality. Why does the West and the United States need war? They are already skimming the cream out of this whole mess !! This is all for a common man in the street - do not let the "dear father" !!!
  2. Jacques sekavar Offline Jacques sekavar
    Jacques sekavar (Jacques Sekavar) 12 November 2021 13: 31
    +2
    Not a harbinger of war, but the first step towards creating an alternative to the UN, which Trump spoke about and his predecessors dreamed of dictating their terms to the whole world and which is greatly hindered by the presence of China and Russia in the UN Security Council.
  3. Cyril Offline Cyril
    Cyril (Kirill) 12 November 2021 14: 57
    -6
    All as in the basis of the American, sorry for the expression, the culture of black and white comics.

    That's all you need to know about Necropny's knowledge of US culture :) Fitzejarld, Twain, Bierce, Jefferson, King, London, Orson Welles, Faulkner, Steinbeck, Dreiser, Hemingway, Hitchcock, Hawthorne - but who needs them :) The main thing is that Necropic has mastered American comics. Finally. At least them.

    Everything turned out to be painfully bad with the drape from Afghanistan, where the Americans (contrary to their own statements made later) came just to "establish democracy" and defend it from the bearded mujahideen. Themselves neither ear nor snout did not cope, the Afghans who naively trusted them were framed, as they say, "throughout the program", and even the NATO allies, let's face it, "thrown", without even informing the Taliban about the impending surrender of the country.

    Weird. The Americans who "flew" from Afghanistan lost 11 people during the "drap", and the Soviet troops leaving the "victorious march with the banners raised" lost more than 500 people.

    considering, speaking delicately, the specific state of the psyche of the current head of the White House.

    Biden, even with total dementia, if he ever has one, the author of this opus, in terms of intelligence, will do it once or twice.
    1. AND Offline AND
      AND 12 November 2021 16: 32
      +2
      Hi Navalny! Please tell us more about dementia and Biden's intellect. I see you know a lot ...
      1. Cyril Offline Cyril
        Cyril (Kirill) 12 November 2021 16: 38
        -3
        About dementia

        This is not a question for me, but for Necropny - he was there something about Biden's "specific state of mind"

        Biden's intellect

        What can I say? He is an experienced US government official who started his career a long time ago. With intelligence, everything is fine.
        1. AND Offline AND
          AND 12 November 2021 16: 57
          +3
          Everyone says that the grandfather forgets a lot, falls and spoils the air often. Soros is also old and your time is running out, you need a new king. Very funny to read ...
          1. Cyril Offline Cyril
            Cyril (Kirill) 12 November 2021 17: 25
            -6
            Everyone says that the grandfather forgets a lot, falls and spoils the air often.

            Who's everyone"? "everyone" smelled the air spoiled by the "grandfather"? Then you should think about the mental health of "everyone".
            1. AND Offline AND
              AND 12 November 2021 17: 41
              +3
              The British media found a reason to laugh at US President Joe Biden, who recently visited the UK at the summit on global climate change. During a small talk at a reception with the Duchess of Cornwall, the 78-year-old American president "blew the wind", causing the wife of Prince Charles to blush.

              "The COP26 Summit in Glasgow was supposed to aim to cut emissions, but when President Joe Biden produced some of his own natural gas at the summit, it was heard enough to make the Duchess of Cornwall blush." This is how the Mail on Sunday described the embarrassing situation in which the American president found himself.

              “It was long and loud and it was impossible to ignore it. Camilla did not stop talking about it, "- quotes the informant of the Daily Mail.

              Is it good to sit in a vacuum? All the same, how is your Soros doing now? Have you closed the school yet?
              1. Cyril Offline Cyril
                Cyril (Kirill) 12 November 2021 18: 01
                -7
                The British newspaper Daily Mail is "jaundice", in comparison with which even NTV and Ren-TV seem to be examples of high journalism. This "incident" is not reported by any other publication. The fact that this is a low-demand fake is evidenced by at least the fact that the Duchess of Cornwall, a member of the British Royal family, would never have discussed with journalists, and even more so "talk about it all evening" (especially not with her family, but at official receptions) such an incident, if it really happened.

                Is it good to sit in a vacuum?

                I don't sit in a vacuum, I just have a brain that allows me to distinguish low-demand fake from facts. I am sorry that you do not possess such an organ.
                1. isofat Offline isofat
                  isofat (isofat) 12 November 2021 18: 55
                  -2
                  Kirill, if you still have a brain, then he is not friends with you! laughing


                  The rating is not bad, take a look yourself.
                  1. Cyril Offline Cyril
                    Cyril (Kirill) 12 November 2021 19: 04
                    -5
                    And what did you send me for the screen from Wikipedia? Isofat, you haven't studied journalism, have you? Didn't study. And for me, journalism itself and the history of journalism were included in the compulsory course in my profile specialty.

                    In order not to be unfounded - here's a fact for you:

                    https://vc.ru/flood/21861-wiki-bans-daily-mail

                    The Wikipedia editors' board voted to remove the Daily Mail from the list of sources for information for the encyclopedia, as they considered the news of the publication "generally unreliable." This is an extremely unusual step for an online encyclopedia, which rarely puts a ban on the use of sources and on the transition to them through links, The Guardian notes.

                    Wikipedia editors explained their decision "Poor fact-checking" by the Daily Mail; and "sensationalism and outright fabrication".

                    So you like to sit in a puddle every time ... are you all right? Strange inclinations are simple.
                    1. isofat Offline isofat
                      isofat (isofat) 12 November 2021 19: 21
                      -4
                      The newspaper published an article on the topic - a big "bunch" of Biden, it's a fact!

                      And in order for the described event to get into the encyclopedia, an additional check is needed. This is always the case with encyclopedias. laughing
                      1. Cyril Offline Cyril
                        Cyril (Kirill) 12 November 2021 19: 25
                        -4
                        The newspaper published an article on the topic - Biden's big bunch, that's a fact!

                        That the newspaper published an article on the topic is a fact.

                        That the "bunch" actually happened - there is no evidence other than the unnamed "words of a trusted source".

                        Other print media also did not publish their own material on this terrible incident.

                        With a probability of 99,9 to the 10th power, this is a common fake, for which the Daily Mail was noticed more than once or twice.

                        But with people like you, her fakes are completely rolled, so the newspaper is flourishing :)
                      2. Cyril Offline Cyril
                        Cyril (Kirill) 12 November 2021 19: 26
                        -4
                        And in order for the described event to get into the encyclopedia, a check is needed. It's always like this with encyclopedias.

                        It is precisely that many of the Daily Mail's publications do not stand up to this test.
                  2. Cyril Offline Cyril
                    Cyril (Kirill) 12 November 2021 19: 06
                    -4
                    Well, and, as it were, read the section "Criticism" in the article you have opened on Wikipedia. I understand that you usually do not master beyond the first paragraph, but still try. It will be helpful.
                    1. isofat Offline isofat
                      isofat (isofat) 12 November 2021 19: 32
                      -2
                      There is, there is evidence! laughing
                      1. Cyril Offline Cyril
                        Cyril (Kirill) 12 November 2021 19: 36
                        -7
                        Where? Show. Were you also among those who personally sniffed Biden's gases? Exclusive information?
                      2. AND Offline AND
                        AND 12 November 2021 19: 57
                        +2
                        We have moved away from the topic a little ... So how is Soros doing? Where is he now? How do I enroll in your courses? I really want to go to your school, so bitchy ...
                      3. The comment was deleted.
                      4. The comment was deleted.
                      5. The comment was deleted.
                      6. The comment was deleted.
                      7. The comment was deleted.
            2. isofat Offline isofat
              isofat (isofat) 12 November 2021 20: 12
              -3
              Quote: Cyril
              Where? Show.

              To "see" circumstantial evidence in favor of such a version, you need to get acquainted with Logic. laughing
            3. Cyril Offline Cyril
              Cyril (Kirill) 12 November 2021 20: 13
              -5
              you need to get acquainted with Logic.

              I know her much better than you.

              To "see" circumstantial evidence

              That is, you cannot provide anything concrete as evidence? It's clear.
            4. isofat Offline isofat
              isofat (isofat) 12 November 2021 20: 23
              -3
              Today you learned that evidence is circumstantial, but your brain has not yet learned to use this concept. laughing
            5. Cyril Offline Cyril
              Cyril (Kirill) 12 November 2021 20: 25
              -4
              that evidence is circumstantial,

              So you did not provide any circumstantial evidence :)

              You see, Isofat, an article in a jaundiced tabloid that refers to the words of some "unnamed source" can be neither direct nor indirect evidence :)

              And you would know that if you were really familiar with logic.
            6. isofat Offline isofat
              isofat (isofat) 12 November 2021 20: 37
              -5
              And human physiology, can it be an indirect proof of such an event? She, physiology, is not as categorical as you.
            7. Cyril Offline Cyril
              Cyril (Kirill) 12 November 2021 20: 48
              -3
              And human physiology can be indirect evidence of such an event?

              No, it cannot :) Human physiology only admits such a probability for any person, but it does not at all prove that this happened to Biden at the event under discussion.
            8. isofat Offline isofat
              isofat (isofat) 12 November 2021 21: 04
              -5
              You have heard one circumstantial evidence. Let's sound the second, this is Biden's sleepiness. Do you know that the sleeping person is not in control of himself? laughing
            9. Cyril Offline Cyril
              Cyril (Kirill) 12 November 2021 21: 07
              -3
              You have heard one circumstantial evidence.

              No :) You have not been able to provide any proof.

              Let's sound the second, this is Biden's sleepiness. Do you know that the sleeping person is not in control of himself?

              Did he sleep at the meeting?

              In the quoted AND fake it is said that Biden "blew the wind" during small talk with the Duchess :)

              Isophat, you are already entangled in your own fakes. However, this is not surprising to you.
            10. isofat Offline isofat
              isofat (isofat) 12 November 2021 21: 10
              -6
              I say that Biden himself poorly controlling, haven't you seen how Biden sleeps sweetly? It was shown.
            11. Cyril Offline Cyril
              Cyril (Kirill) 12 November 2021 21: 16
              -3
              I say that Biden is not in control of himself, haven't you seen how Biden sleeps sweetly? It was shown.

              Pffff, half of politicians of all ages sleep at events. Enjoy this selection :)

              https://www.peoples.ru/friday/sleeping_global_policy.html

              But Medvedev also slept at events - does he also "poorly control himself and farts"?)

              Isophat, you are, of course, funny, but do not disappoint me with your childish attempts at argumentation. With them to AND - he will definitely bite :)
            12. isofat Offline isofat
              isofat (isofat) 12 November 2021 21: 31
              -6
              You don't understand what circumstantial evidence is. I have long ago refuted your statement that no no evidence. There are indirect ones.

              Quote: Cyril
              That the "bunch" actually happened - no there is no evidence other than the unnamed "words of a trusted source".

              I believe the source who posted this information. With a high probability. You also believe, but with very little. laughing

              Pay more attention to Logic. hi
            13. Cyril Offline Cyril
              Cyril (Kirill) 12 November 2021 22: 09
              -4
              I have long ago refuted your claim that there is no evidence.

              No, they did not refute it - and with the example of VVP, which experienced pleasant sensations at a meeting with Merkel, I showed you the viciousness of your "argumentation" :)

              The potential for an event does not in any way, either indirectly or directly, prove that the event actually happened.

              I believe the source who posted this information. With a high probability.

              So I say - the Daily Mail blossomed on people like you :)

              You also believe, but with very little. laughing

              Personally, I don't believe this source at all. 100%. Due to the rather tarnished reputation of the source itself and the lack of at least some evidence of the incident under discussion.

              Pay more attention to Logic.

              I always do this, unlike you :)
  4. Fourth Offline Fourth
    Fourth (Fourth) 12 November 2021 23: 39
    -2
    A true gentleman Biden "otmazil" the Duchess and took the "blame" on himself. You can be proud of your president. Is it easier for you?
  • AND Offline AND
    AND 12 November 2021 20: 24
    +1
    Quote: isofat
    Quote: Cyril
    Where? Show.

    To "see" circumstantial evidence in favor of such a version, you need to get acquainted with Logic. laughing

    He needs to personally clarify with Prince Charles and Duchess of Cornwall Camilla, the prince's wife ... He is a completely shameless man.
    1. Cyril Offline Cyril
      Cyril (Kirill) 12 November 2021 20: 28
      -3
      He needs to personally clarify with Prince Charles and Duchess of Cornwall Camilla, the prince's wife ... He is a completely shameless man.

      Oh, you have your first sane thought all evening! Indeed, their words as direct participants in the alleged event would be weighty evidence. But neither Prince Charles nor the Duchess of Cornwall said anything about it :)
  • The comment was deleted.
  • The comment was deleted.
  • AND Offline AND
    AND 12 November 2021 20: 36
    +1
    Quote: Cyril
    He needs to personally clarify with Prince Charles and Duchess of Cornwall Camilla, the prince's wife ... He is a completely shameless man.

    Oh, you have your first sane thought all evening! Indeed, their words as direct participants in the alleged event would be weighty evidence. But neither Prince Charles nor the Duchess of Cornwall said anything about it :)

    Please sources please that neither Prince Charles nor the Duchess of Cornwall said anything about this. And then they deceive everyone around, all the newspapers, the Internet, TV. Poor Biden. And in America, the secret services are cleaning up behind Biden, now all the TV is talking. Ay yay someone is probably lying.
    1. Cyril Offline Cyril
      Cyril (Kirill) 12 November 2021 20: 50
      -4
      Please sources please that neither Prince Charles nor the Duchess of Cornwall said anything about this.

      laughing laughing

      Boy, it is you who must prove that Prince Charles and his wife said that, and not me the opposite :) The burden of proof lies with the approver. You assert, not me.
  • AND Offline AND
    AND 12 November 2021 21: 01
    +1
    Quote: Cyril
    Please sources please that neither Prince Charles nor the Duchess of Cornwall said anything about this.

    laughing laughing

    Boy, it is you who must prove that Prince Charles and his wife said that, and not me the opposite :) The burden of proof lies with the approver. You assert, not me.

    Actor? Everybody approves, including newspapers and all the media. Probably you have information through space. Since you are sitting here, it will probably not be difficult for you to type on the Internet, "Did Biden fart. (Or, with such success, you can also believe in that children's propaganda and nonsense that you write here?)
    1. Cyril Offline Cyril
      Cyril (Kirill) 12 November 2021 21: 09
      -5
      Everyone approves, including newspapers and all mass media.

      Since you are sitting here, it probably won't be difficult for you to type on the Internet whether Biden farted.

      Exactly boy, this is exactly what I did - and in the SERP everything the results refer to a single article from the Daily Mail - a newspaper that has had the status of an icteric fakecomet for many decades :)
  • AND Offline AND
    AND 12 November 2021 22: 09
    +2
    Quote: Cyril
    Everyone approves, including newspapers and all mass media.

    Since you are sitting here, it probably won't be difficult for you to type on the Internet whether Biden farted.

    Exactly boy, this is exactly what I did - and in the SERP everything the results refer to a single article from the Daily Mail - a newspaper that has had the status of an icteric fakecomet for many decades :)

    Boy? You need to envy in silence grandfather. How so, there is only one article? Is Grandpa also blind? I threw two articles here in a minute. Senile sclerosis again? Definitely dementia. You are just like that fish in water, after three seconds you forgot what happened.
    1. Cyril Offline Cyril
      Cyril (Kirill) 13 November 2021 03: 40
      -4
      Boy?

      Judging by the level of your argumentation, you are generally a baby, I flatter you that :)

      How so, there is only one article? Is Grandpa also blind? I threw two articles here in a minute.

      Both of your articles link to one (See the Daily Mail article :) Are you getting it now?)
      1. isofat Offline isofat
        isofat (isofat) 13 November 2021 12: 08
        -4


        Kirill! To be fair, videos about Biden's fart began filming back in 2020. laughing

        You asked to show the reaction of other foreign information sources to this event.
        https://nypost.com/2021/11/07/camilla-parker-bowles-keeps-talking-about-biden-fart-at-cop26/
        1. Cyril Offline Cyril
          Cyril (Kirill) 13 November 2021 17: 14
          -2
          Are you seriously using a video with outhouse humor and a superimposed sound of intestinal gases as an argument? Isophat, here you even surpassed yourself - or, more precisely, broke through your own bottom. However, this is your level, yes.

          You asked to show the reaction of other foreign information sources to this event.

          Isophat, well, you at least read your own "evidence":

          The pair were making small talk at the global climate change gathering in Scotland last week when the president broke wind, according to an informed source who spoke to the Mail on Sunday.

          If your English is bad, then I will translate:

          The couple were making small talk at a meeting on global climate change in Scotland last week when the president calmed down, according to an informed source who spoke to the Mail of Sunday.

          Mail of Sunday is the Sunday edition of the same Daily Mail

          Thus, you showed not the original material about the "incident" received by other media from their own sources, but just another reprint of the same fake published in the Daily Mail /
          1. isofat Offline isofat
            isofat (isofat) 13 November 2021 17: 45
            -6
            Kirill, you are a very naive person, who proves something to you? And also a journalist. The circle of persons who could be the source of this information and dispel our doubts is limited. Which of them fart? We will learn this from their memoirs, it will take a long time. The source of the information pointed to Biden. Readers vote for Biden. Or maybe everything is simpler, and Great Britain is offended by the old one? They will become ... laughing
            1. Cyril Offline Cyril
              Cyril (Kirill) 13 November 2021 21: 36
              -1
              you are a very naive person, who proves something to you?

              So you are trying to prove :) True, you get it through one place, so now you turn on the back one and try to make a good face with a bad game :)

              The circle of persons who could be the source of this information and dispel our doubts is limited. Which of them fart? We will learn this from their memoirs, it will take a long time. The source of the information pointed to Biden. Readers vote for Biden. Or maybe everything is simpler, and Great Britain is offended by the old one? They will become ... laughing

              Everything is really simpler, Isophat is a British newspaper that exists at the expense of readers like you who are greedy for cheap sensations, fakes and hoaxes, fed them with fakes, and you and your ilk happily smeared themselves and ask for more :) Everyone is happy.
              1. The comment was deleted.
                1. The comment was deleted.
                  1. isofat Offline isofat
                    isofat (isofat) 13 November 2021 22: 30
                    -5
                    And you tell me why the conjunction is too tough for you? I'll listen. laughing
                    1. Cyril Offline Cyril
                      Cyril (Kirill) 14 November 2021 03: 59
                      -1
                      And you tell me why the conjunction is too tough for you?

                      And where did you use the conjunction, can you show?) Come on, suddenly I was really mistaken.
                      1. isofat Offline isofat
                        isofat (isofat) 14 November 2021 10: 17
                        -5
                        Kirill, a connoisseur of logic and journalist, you AND did! Especially not bothering. And to increase your self-esteem, you have sunk to commonplace insults. request

                        Yes, and an educational program in logic, as always.
                        Quite often, a logical operation called conjunction is denoted AND.

                        You know very well what to do next, I see no point in talking, they will still delete it. Moreover, you should already develop a habit, no? Then get used to it! laughing hi
                      2. Cyril Offline Cyril
                        Cyril (Kirill) 14 November 2021 12: 44
                        -1
                        Pffff, hahaha laughing

                        Well, everyone, leave me, Isophat, well done! Have mastered the notation of logical operations, handsome!

                        It is a pity, however, that the logical operations themselves do not work out for you, but at such a pace, you look, and you will grow :)

                        you AND did! Especially not bothering.

                        AND, like you, really did not bother too much, providing as "evidence" an article in a jaundiced British newspaper, repeatedly caught in a lie. You are really two boots of a pair.

                        You know very well what to do next

                        To dunk you a pug in the truth? Yes, I do it all the time :) True, it’s getting boring lately.
  • The comment was deleted.
    1. The comment was deleted.
  • The comment was deleted.
  • Oleg Valevsky Offline Oleg Valevsky
    Oleg Valevsky 13 November 2021 20: 44
    -3
    to call a "democratic country" "non-profit" (especially in its current state) can be either a complete blind man, or a hardened cynic and scoundrel

    The author did not reveal the topic ..

    The connection between cynical scoundrels and those who believe that there is more democracy in Ukraine than in other neighboring countries is curious.
    Specificity will not be superfluous, and not violent paroxysms.
    1. isofat Offline isofat
      isofat (isofat) 14 November 2021 10: 26
      -5
      Quote: Oleg Valevsky
      The author did not reveal the topic

      Revealed, you do not know how to read. laughing
  • AND Offline AND
    AND 14 November 2021 17: 47
    +1
    Quote: Cyril
    Pffff, hahaha laughing

    Well, everyone, leave me, Isophat, well done! Have mastered the notation of logical operations, handsome!

    It is a pity, however, that the logical operations themselves do not work out for you, but at such a pace, you look, and you will grow :)

    you AND did! Especially not bothering.

    AND, like you, really did not bother too much, providing as "evidence" an article in a jaundiced British newspaper, repeatedly caught in a lie. You are really two boots of a pair.

    You know very well what to do next

    To dunk you a pug in the truth? Yes, I do it all the time :) True, it’s getting boring lately.

    You can always see a person who helps his country. Your truth is here alone, Russian successes are like a lump in your throat. Oh, how he smacks a mile away ("patriot").
    1. isofat Offline isofat
      isofat (isofat) 14 November 2021 18: 01
      -5
      ANDWhen Kirill tells how me, virtual, is dipped somewhere, it becomes easier for him. At the same time, the "journalist" is not embarrassed that there are witnesses of his behavior. laughing

      He is now trying to recoup others and assert himself. Weak! laughing
  • AND Offline AND
    AND 14 November 2021 20: 22
    0
    Quote: isofat
    ANDWhen Kirill tells how me, virtual, is dipped somewhere, it becomes easier for him. At the same time, the "journalist" is not embarrassed that there are witnesses of his behavior. laughing

    He is now trying to recoup others and assert himself. Weak! laughing

    Isofat is not a wimp he is. He is a smart man, only he is not yet friends with his homeland at all, and the teachers taught him something else.