Is the emergence of a Russian military base in Venezuela possible?

29

The process of the steady expansion of NATO to the east, which has come close to the Russian borders, and the continuous military exercises near them by the Americans and their allies, are forcing Moscow to take retaliatory measures. Just sitting on the defensive is futile, so the most rational answer would be to locate our military bases near the United States itself. But where? And who will agree to take over the facilities of the RF Ministry of Defense without fear of the wrath of Washington?

Cuba?


The first country that automatically comes to mind is Cuba. Under the USSR, Moscow and Havana were such great friends that Freedom Island allowed them to host Soviet medium-range nuclear missiles. When the Americans found out about this, the infamous Cuban Missile Crisis almost ended in World War III. Nevertheless, in Cuba, until 2001, we retained a radio-electronic center in Lourdes, which provided the RF Ministry of Defense with valuable intelligence data. The decision to close it was made by President Putin at a time of warming in Russian-American relations. Then we left the Vietnamese Cam Ranh.



Is Havana ready to re-host our military facilities? Is not a fact. Under President Obama, the United States and Cuba began a noticeable "thaw", however, interrupted under Trump. But after leaving the power of the "old guard" in the person of the Castro brothers, it is hardly worth expecting that the Island of Liberty will want a sharp aggravation of relations with the United States. Probably, Russia could have achieved the placement of infrastructure facilities of the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation as payment for the 30-billion-dollar debt of the Soviet period, but in 2014 for some reason we voluntarily wrote it off to Havana. Now, apart from words of persuasion, there are no special arguments left. So let's forget about the Island of Freedom for now, which we seem to have lost as a site for a military base.

Venezuela?


Venezuela looks like a slightly more realistic option. The regime of President Nicholas Maduro is in tough "contradiction" with the United States, and his predecessor, Hugo Chavez, even offered Russia to place a military base on one of his islands. Several years ago, our strategic bombers Tu-160 and Tu-95 flew in to this Latin American country, entering the Caribbean. At first glance, it all looks pretty tempting.

About 100 nautical miles from Caracas, there is an islet with an area of ​​about 40 square kilometers called La Orchila (La Orchila or Orchila), which President Chavez once mentioned. It already has a fairly developed infrastructure of naval aviation of the Venezuelan Navy, an airfield and a radar station. Fighters, anti-submarine aircraft and helicopters are based there. The length of the runway, which was previously 3000 meters, has been lengthened, lengthened and widened, which has led military experts to different thoughts.


It would seem that this is the optimal solution. It is enough to place Tu-22M3M missile carriers there, as well as Su-30SM fighters together with Su-34 bombers on a permanent basis. "White Swans" and "Bears" of Long-Range Aviation could use the runway as a jump airfield. To place on the island tanker aircraft, own anti-submarine aircraft and helicopters of the Naval Aviation of the Russian Navy. To protect this entire economy from air attacks with several S-300VM divisions, place the Sunflower surface wave ZGRLS, and put the Bal and Bastion missile systems on the shore. You can't legally deploy nuclear weapons in Venezuela, but who knows what the Tu-160 will have with them if they land on Orchila Island during some aggravation of relations with the United States and NATO. Tempting?

Yes, that sounds good. Russian Maritime and Long-Range Aviation could theoretically patrol the Caribbean, targeting US Daggers and their military infrastructure in the region. Anti-submarine aircraft and helicopters would be able to track US Navy nuclear submarines off our coast, right next to their Heartland. However, things are not as simple as we would like.

At firstIf you are serious about settling on Orchil, such a base will require huge financial investments. We will have to rebuild the existing infrastructure, build hangars, fuel storage and ammunition storage depots, which are adapted to the hot, humid Venezuelan climate.

SecondlyIf we place at least 12-16 Tu-22M3 missile carriers there, they will need 3 times more escort fighters, moreover, the most modern ones. To cover all this, as well as the strategically important Sunflower, from the air, an echeloned air defense system will be needed: S-400, S-300, Buki, Torah, Pantsiri. This means the need to accommodate several thousand military personnel, to build a separate town for them. If it is assumed that nuclear weapons may be there even temporarily, everything becomes even more serious and expensive.

Thirdly, for the supply and protection of such a grouping, a navy is needed, and with large surface ships capable of rotating service in the Caribbean Sea, we now have a shortage. Note that the Russian base on Orchila Island will immediately become the subject of increased attention of the Pentagon, which will use 1-2 AUG of the US Navy with its "unnecessary" aircraft carriers to stop its offensive potential.

Oh yes, the most important thing should be mentioned here. According to the Constitution of Venezuela, the deployment of foreign military bases on its territory is prohibited. Everything, have you dreamed and that's enough?

Seriously though, such a facility of the Russian Defense Ministry would be very appropriate in the Caribbean as a symmetrical response to NATO's approach to our borders. But, as we can see, it requires a readiness for serious investments and the conduct of certain hostilities in a very distant theater of operations. We need a modern navy. We need a developed anti-submarine aviation. It is necessary to be able to allocate several thousand highly qualified specialists to serve in another part of the world and supply them without interruption. As for the constitutional ban on the deployment of a foreign military base in Venezuela, it is not a fact that this provision will always remain unchanged.

For example, for the transitional period it would be quite enough to open a joint training center of the Russian Aerospace Forces and the Venezuelan Air Force, as we have done with Belarus. Russian planes and pilots will be able to stay in Orchil on a permanent basis, in fact, patrolling the airspace over the Caribbean Sea and searching for American nuclear submarines, without violating anything. The presence of our military in Venezuela could provide additional insurance for President Nicolas Maduro. As we already have established, Russia is not yet in a position to carry out a large-scale military operation to save his regime in the event of a coup d'etat. Therefore, it is worthwhile to ensure the presence of the RF Ministry of Defense in this Latin American country in advance.
29 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +1
    11 November 2021 15: 40
    It is possible to put a base in Nicaragua with Iskander
    1. 0
      12 November 2021 08: 07
      Does Nicaragua need it?
      1. -1
        13 November 2021 01: 43
        Does the Russian Federation need it?
        1. 0
          15 November 2021 07: 00
          As a symmetrical response to the deployment of NATO bases near Russian borders, yes.
          Do you think otherwise? To understand and to forgive?
          1. -3
            15 November 2021 11: 41
            Ahhh ... this is purely to neigh, in the sense of demonstrating that we can too. It's just that, militarily, there is no special sense in such a base. It will not allow doing anything that cannot be done with existing means from the territory of the Russian Federation. In the event of a global conflict, the time of its existence will be calculated in minutes. Only gigantic spending on its construction and maintenance. Especially in a country with an unstable regime.
            You are not an agent of the State Department? Either at least three aircraft carriers, or costly bases abroad. Do you want to ruin the Russian Federation?
      2. -2
        17 November 2021 19: 08
        Need a long time!
  2. +2
    11 November 2021 17: 18
    For example, "White Swans" were already hostages in Ukraine after the collapse of the USSR, some of which were destroyed there. Madura is not eternal, is it worth again stepping on the same rake. In my opinion, UAVs can be deployed in Venezuela for reconnaissance purposes along the US borders, as the Pentagon is doing in the Black Sea.
    Probably in Nicaragua, you can place a full-fledged military base of the Russian Federation, it is more convenient for ships to go there and by sea.
  3. +1
    11 November 2021 17: 27
    Quote: Rusa
    For example, "White Swans" were already hostages in Ukraine after the collapse of the USSR, some of which were destroyed there. Madura is not eternal, is it worth again to step on the same rake.

    Such authoritarian regimes always strive for a "transit" of power to their successor. The presence of a military base in the country gives some leverage to defend Russia's interests in Venezuela, don't you think? For example, if something goes wrong in Operation Successor.
    Well, the Swans will not just be there, but under the protection of the Russian military, at the island base. Rather, they will fly there, and on an ongoing basis there will be simpler planes.
    If I will, of course.
    1. 0
      11 November 2021 17: 56
      Support from the sea will not hurt the "island base" either, as in Syria, and Venezuela can only be reached through the Panama Canal, which is clearly under US control.
      1. +1
        11 November 2021 18: 01
        Support from the sea is not only desirable, it is required.
        Where are you going to sail to Venezuela through the Panama Canal? From Kamchatka or what? There are no simpler ways?
        As for the control over the channels, all this with foreign bases will work normally only in peacetime.
        1. -1
          11 November 2021 18: 05
          It is possible from Kamchatka or from the Sea of ​​Okhotsk, through the Black Sea and the Mediterranean, there are many obstacles.
          1. -1
            11 November 2021 18: 07
            In a real war, everything will be blocked for us. These bases are only for peacetime as a kind of missile threat in the underbelly of the United States.
            We have nothing to uncork the straits, because we don't need our own AUG in FIG, we are the smartest.
  4. 0
    11 November 2021 18: 08
    The stump is clear, impossible. just for the reasons given
  5. +2
    11 November 2021 20: 16
    The military base described by the author is essentially not a base, but a whole fortified area.
    Sending a huge amount of military equipment with experienced personnel to the opposite end of the world, when NATO is rattling at the very borders of Russia, is not the best option.
    Russia has the ability to launch an instant missile strike anywhere in the world, so why build fortifications in Asia or South America?
    Roughly the same as building aircraft carriers. It is better to spend this mass of money on the development of intercontinental air tankers and PAK DA with miniature high-precision missiles.
    1. -1
      12 November 2021 02: 17
      In general, everything is so, but the jump airfield on the aforementioned Orchila island would certainly not hurt us !!!
    2. -1
      12 November 2021 05: 06
      Sending a huge amount of military equipment with experienced personnel to the opposite end of the world, when NATO is rattling at the very borders of Russia, is not the best option.

      Truth? But what about the symmetrical response and the creation of a threat to the enemy near his own borders?

      Russia has the ability to launch an instant missile strike anywhere in the world, so why build fortifications in Asia or South America?

      our military doctrine kind of forbids us, do not forget

      Roughly the same as building aircraft carriers. It is better to spend this mass of money on the development of intercontinental air tankers and PAK DA with miniature high-precision missiles.

      Everything you fantasize hi And then these intercontinental tankers of yours hit right at the airfields with a preemptive nuclear strike from American nuclear submarines, with which there is practically nothing to fight. Because people like you suggested investing in fantasies, and not in the really necessary hardware for the fleet.
      1. -2
        13 November 2021 16: 38
        Dear author, this is the 21st century. Russia has the necessary technology to inflict unacceptable damage from its territory.
        1. 0
          15 November 2021 07: 01
          What are you talking about. The United States has more of these capabilities than ours. So why would they surround Russia with a fence from military bases?
          Maybe everything is not as simple as you are trying to naively portray here?
          Or, perhaps, hostilities are possible in other formats, except for the exchange of ICBM strikes? No?
          From your comments, I see that you live in the world of pink elephants, where everything is decided by Russian rockets. Wake up already.
          1. 0
            15 November 2021 13: 14
            These pink elephants have brought the globalists to heartburn. But your world, where everything is decided by wagons of dollars, is much more fantastic. From some of your articles, I clearly see that you stayed in the 20th century. And you have wars from there.
            And yes, ICBMs are deciding. If we did not have them, the western pack of jackals would have pounced on us long ago.
  6. 0
    12 November 2021 00: 38
    Hundreds of us are closing small airports designed to transport the population of Russia. Are there funds for Venezuela?
    1. 0
      12 November 2021 02: 14
      If a war breaks out, then after that we won't need any airports at all, we need to think about the interests of national security, and not just about internal problems !!!
      1. -1
        17 November 2021 00: 03
        Who is driving this nonsense into your head?
        Have you seen enough TV?
        The president's grandson lives in Holland.
        The daughter of his spokesman in Paris.
        Senators are walking on the Cote d'Azur.
        Children of State Duma deputies live in Florida.
        Half of government officials hold a European Residence Permit
        Who will they fight with - their families in the United States and Europe?
    2. -1
      12 November 2021 05: 08
      Well, no one seems to be offering to invest in Venezuela's civil infrastructure. We are talking about one military airfield.
      By the way, to Venezuela already drunk immeasurably billions of dollars. In the event of a coup, they will simply burn out. Keep in mind.
  7. +1
    12 November 2021 02: 11
    An excellent option, but words alone are not enough, you need to get down to business and start acting, Americans, for example, speak little but act very decisively !!!
  8. -1
    12 November 2021 03: 17
    The author thinks logically.
    Uncle Vova is already preparing for retirement.
  9. -1
    12 November 2021 09: 25
    Why is it all so rested on airplanes? Enough to start a nuclear submarine base in Cuba. And about the debt, you can both remember and block the previous decision by the State Duma, as unreasonable. As a last resort, you can create something similar on the described island.
    1. -1
      12 November 2021 15: 08
      The plane can be quickly lifted into the air and struck.
      What's the point in a submarine base in Cuba? To just stand there? So it will be easier to destroy them.
      This means that they will have to conduct patrols, but this will have to be done in the "aspen nest" itself, where the nuclear submarine can easily be detected by American anti-submarine forces.
      In other words, a submarine base will not hurt, but there will be more real benefit from an air base.
      IMHO
  10. 0
    12 November 2021 12: 31
    Quote: Sergey Zemskov
    Hundreds of us are closing small airports designed to transport the population of Russia. Are there funds for Venezuela?

    Please name the first hundred airports needed by the population that have closed
  11. -2
    13 November 2021 01: 39
    The Russian base in Venezuela will be at about the same time as Ukraine joins NATO. That is, almost never.