Whirlwind vs. Focus. How Zhukov and Khrushchev nearly surrendered Eastern Europe to the United States


In connection with the 65th anniversary of the tragic events in Hungary, many Western and domestic liberal publications are likely to have tearfully pretentious articles, the authors of which will generously mourn the "anti-Stalinist people's democratic revolution crushed by Soviet tanks" and its "heroes" - "freedom fighters and independence ", who fought against the" brutal interventionists ". In this regard, it is necessary to remember the truth about the bloody days of 1956 and their true essence. The fact that there was no "popular uprising" there at all. The USSR and its allies in the Warsaw Pact Organization faced one of the first truly large-scale and successful special operations of the US CIA, supported by the unfinished Hungarian fascists and other rabble.


Alas, at the same time it will be necessary to admit a very unpleasant truth: the then leadership of the Soviet Union in this most difficult situation behaved with unprofessionalism and indecision, directly bordering on betrayal of state interests. But what are the state ones: a little more and the entire "socialist camp" could have collapsed already then, and not in 1991. In order to understand this, it is necessary to analyze thoughtfully not only the alarming November 1956 itself, but the whole chain of the most complex prerequisites and hidden events that preceded it. Let's try to do this.

Russians in Budapest: the third coming


Beginning to objectively and impartially understand the extremely complicated and ambiguous history of Russia's relations with the countries of Eastern Europe, one inevitably asks the question: “But where are the“ fraternal Slavic peoples ”here ?! Where did this clumsy formulation, to put it mildly, irrelevant to reality come from? " Where are the "brothers"? Poles who have raved about the seizure of Moscow for centuries? Bulgarians, who in all world wars found themselves in the camp of our enemies? With Hungary, at least, everything was, so to speak, more honest and frank. The first time Russian troops entered Pest was in 1849 - in the process of suppressing the Hungarian revolution, for the defeat of which Emperor Nicholas I was later nicknamed "the gendarme of Europe".

During the First World War, the Austro-Hungarian Empire was a fierce enemy of the Russian. Well, and even more loyal, loyal and consistent allies of the Third Reich than Horthy Hungary was still to look for. She declared war on the Soviet Union just four days later than Germany and participated in it in the most active way - until April 12, 1945. The stubborn Magyars, who served the Fuehrer not for fear, but conscientiously, did not want to "change their shoes", like the same Bulgarians and to be members of the anti-Hitler coalition at least for a few months. The famous order of General Vatutin: "Do not take Hungarians prisoner!" with all the desire can not be attributed to the soldier's tales and exaggerations. The definition of "unheard-of atrocities of the Hungarian lackeys of the Nazi occupiers" is a quote not from newspaper editorials of Pravda or Krasnaya Zvezda, but from quite official reports received by the Main Political Directorate of the Red Army from parts of the Voronezh Front.

According to some researchers of the Great Patriotic War, the Magyar thugs in their monstrous cruelty towards the civilian population and prisoners were inferior only to the most "frostbitten" punitive SS Einsatzgroups, and even that is not a fact. They destroyed Soviet citizens in whole settlements, leaving behind a particularly terrible memory in the Voronezh, Bryansk, Kursk regions, as well as in Belarus and Ukraine. By the way, at least four SS divisions were formed entirely from the Hungarians. In total, no less than 200 thousand Hungarians are considered to be killed in battles with the Red Army. For comparison, the losses of the Red Army during the liberation of Hungary from the Nazi evil spirits amounted to about 100 thousand people only killed. General exceeded 400 thousand people. Why all this historical excursion? Moreover, on the one hand, too many Hungarians by 1956 had a long-standing and secret hatred of our country and the army, on the other hand ...

Personally, I believe that after all that these non-humans have done on our land, the Soviet soldiers who entered Budapest and other "rebellious" Hungarian cities then had the complete moral right to do absolutely whatever they please with the fascist underdogs who took up arms again and their remnants. However, let us note that they did not use this right - neither in 1945, nor a decade later. However, we will get to this point with you. In the meantime, let's talk about where the bloody “people's revolution” actually "grew" from. It will be harmless to remember who her “fathers” and “prominent figures” were, what their true goals were and what the consequences of the Hungarian rebellion could have turned out for Europe and the whole world as a whole.

The first of the "color revolutions"?


In a very simplistic and brief way, the opportunity to start a truly global anti-Soviet subversive activity in front of the Western intelligence services was opened by the coup d'état committed by Nikita Khrushchev and his accomplices in 1953 and the horrific pogrom of the state security organs (including counterintelligence agencies) that followed. structures). Well, and it was over later organized by the same gang, a vile sabbath called "XX Congress of the CPSU." This event provided the enemies of our country with such ideological "trump cards" that they could not even dream of, at the same time sowing confusion, confusion and vacillation throughout the "socialist camp". The Americans were the first to be sensitive to the change in the situation. It should be noted that a special group (Operations Coordinating Board) under the leadership of one of the deputy directors of the CIA, William Harding, whose main goal was to undermine the socialist countries, was created under the US National Security Council just after the twentieth congress, not by nightfall.

However, another structure, which had exactly the same tasks - the Free Europe Committee, was established under the US State Department back in 1949. Prepared in advance. It was this very committee that played a decisive, moreover, a very sinister role in the Hungarian events of 1956. Literally in its first month, a report prepared by military intelligence, in which Hungary was named as the most successful springboard for organizing "active resistance to communism", lay on the tables of the leaders of the United States. The masters of the secret war were convinced that the situation in the country was so tense that it would take only a small external influence, the notorious "match brought up to the heat", for everything to flare up there. Alas, they did not sin against the truth.

The conditions for this, sadly, were created by the then unfortunate leaders of the USSR. Matthias Rakosi, who ruled the country (and kept it in an "iron grip") until 1953, was not without reason called "the best student of Stalin." It is clear that at the time of bald nonentity, such a person could not hold on to power, and was removed from the post of head of government, although he retained the party leadership, which was subsequently taken away from him. Moscow, looking for a counterbalance to the “Stalinists”, began to flirt with the local “moderates”, whose main representative was Imre Nagy, who, despite belonging to the cohort of “old Bolsheviks,” was a figure not only with low social responsibility, but with a complete absence of it. Throwing began in the country, abrupt changes in both political and economic course, intra-party confrontation, and bickering in power. In a word, it was a complete mess, which for some reason they looked at from Moscow with almost affection. But the Americans did not sit idly by. An unprecedented information war was launched against the socialist government of Budapest. I will give just one example: from the territory of Austria and Germany in the direction of Hungary, not tens, not even hundreds - thousands of balloons stuffed with anti-Soviet leaflets were released. On July 19, 1956, their dominance in the sky even caused the accident of a civilian plane ...

A huge role in "rocking" the situation, spreading the most ridiculous rumors was played by the radio stations "Free Europe" and "Voice of America" ​​(recognized in Russia by foreign agents), controlled from Langley. These horns poured poison into the ears of the Hungarians, like ravings about the impending ban on baking white bread "which proletarians should not eat," which led to panic buying up of flour by the population and its artificial shortage. Or "accurate information" about the export of coal from the country - while the trains with it went to Hungary from the USSR. It must be said that poisonous information "grains" fell on quite fertile soil.

And "Focus" failed ...


The Americans themselves are not particularly trying to deny that the events of October-November 1956 in Hungary were the result of Operation Focus carried out by the US special services. And it would be difficult to do this - given the amount of evidence and witnesses, as well as documentary evidence that there is. At the meeting of the students of the Budapest Polytechnic Institute (with the demonstration of which, in fact, everything began), at least two representatives of the US Embassy were present. Apparently, it was under their dictation that the famous "14 demands" were written, which for some reason included not only calls for the withdrawal of Soviet troops from the country, but also the clause on "stopping the export of Hungarian uranium to the USSR" (which, by the way, , in reality it was not). Well, who, tell me, at that moment could benefit from something like that, besides Washington? The answer is clear.

Much more can be said about the "oddities", secrets and other "white spots" of the Hungarian rebellion - like the fact that every single armed clash that took place in its first days began with the actions of some "provocateurs", whose personalities and nationalities were remained unclear. Or about the cars of the "Red Cross", which transported from all the same Austria and Germany for some reason not bandages and medicines, but grenades, rifles and cartridges for them. The participation of the West (and, first of all, the USA and the FRG) in the organization of the anti-Soviet armed coup was, I repeat, so clear that it is simply impossible to hide it. However, with all this, much more interest, in my opinion, is the question of how all this was allowed by the leadership of the USSR. Despite the complete collapse that reigned in counterintelligence, the structure as a whole continued to work. The most detailed reports that "Hungary is about to blaze" were sent to the Kremlin by Soviet Ambassador Yuri Andropov (yes, the same one), KGB Chairman Ivan Serov, and intelligence officers from various stations in Budapest. And what? And absolutely nothing!

It should also be mentioned that the events of the so-called “Poznan Uprising” in Poland, which were mass riots suppressed by the local police and army in the summer of 1956, were the “prelude” to the Hungarian rebellion, which inspired its instigators and participants. However, in the end, the participants in the pogroms there escaped with a slight fright, and the USSR, despite the presence of a group of troops in Poland, did not "interfere in the internal affairs of Warsaw." This was perceived as a manifestation of weakness by those who were already preparing the putsch in Hungary. With all the desire, it is impossible to find intelligible answers to the questions about why the Soviet troops, introduced on the second day of the riots, October 24, in the revolted Budapest, instead of the decisive assault on the rebel nest planned for October 28, stupidly stamped on the spot, suffering losses. On October 30, they were given the strictest order: "Do not open fire in any case!", Followed by a new directive on the complete withdrawal of troops.

It's hard to believe it, but "Victory Marshal" Georgy Zhukov, during a meeting of the Presidium of the Central Committee of the CPSU, pitifully bleated that the troops "must be withdrawn not only from Budapest, but also from Hungary in general" and carried some kind of gil about "military-political lesson ". Indeed, Zhukov before 1945 and he after (starting with the "trophy case") are like two different people. The "late version" of the once great commander is absolutely incapable of evoking any feelings other than anger and disgust. However, the collective madness engulfed the entire Kremlin - on October 31, the official press published the Declaration of the Soviet government "on the new foundations of relations with the socialist countries." One of the points in this was an expression of readiness to withdraw our troops from all the states of Eastern Europe, where they would not want to be seen ...

There was nowhere to go further. The fate of not only the Warsaw Pact Organization, but the entire socialist camp hung literally by a thread. 1991, with its complete collapse, could have come much earlier. They saved the situation ... the British and the French, in the company of Israel, soaked the number that went down in history as the "Suez Crisis". A nuclear war between the Soviet Union and NATO (and the matter was going exactly to its beginning) was completely unnecessary for the United States - at least at that moment and according to this scenario. Washington made it clear that they would not interfere in the establishment of order in Hungary. Khrushchev cheered up, "changed his shoes" and on November 4, Operation Whirlwind began, during which it took less than five days for the complete and final defeat of the rebels. The Hungarian army habitually surrendered in rows and columns, and the bandit groups could not effectively resist tanks and artillery. Nevertheless, about 700 of our soldiers and officers gave their lives in the process of suppressing the rebellion. Hungarians? Yes, according to official figures, during the events of the fall of 1956, about 2700 inhabitants of this country were killed. However, according to many historians, almost half of this number (perhaps more) are communists and law enforcement officers - victims of the savage terror unleashed by the "rebels", during which people were exterminated in the most brutal and sadistic ways imaginable.

Imre Nagy finished with a well-deserved noose. Georgy Zhukov received the fourth Star of the Hero for Operation Whirlwind. After the defeat of the putschists and the coming to power of Janos Kadar, Hungary became almost the most prosperous and free country of the "socialist camp".
24 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Alexey Davydov Offline Alexey Davydov
    Alexey Davydov (Alexey) 7 November 2021 08: 37
    0
    What was not done then, and began to do in 1991, continues to this day.
    The government and the people are disunited. Hence - the indecision and weakness of the authorities.
  2. boriz Offline boriz
    boriz (boriz) 7 November 2021 11: 59
    -2
    Indeed, Zhukov before 1945 and he after (starting with the "trophy case") are like two different people.

    Is it okay that Zhukov bears the lion's share of the responsibility for the disastrous start of the war? At least, just like the head of the General Staff. According to Mikoyan's recollections, when (in one of the first days of the war) Stalin with some members of the PB came to the General Staff to understand what was happening, they began to demand to explain the situation, Zhukov "burst into tears like a woman" (C).
    And during the war, he proved himself as an outstanding master of pulling the blanket over himself.
    In the stories with the 33rd Army and the transfer of the combat site to Rokossovsky in the Sukhinichi area, Zhukov behaved, to put it mildly, suspiciously. Foul-smelling shoals happened to him until the end of the war.
    1. Xuli (o) Tebenado 7 November 2021 20: 38
      0
      You spread gossip here, for sure

      like a woman "
      1. boriz Offline boriz
        boriz (boriz) 7 November 2021 20: 47
        -3
        This quote. Mikoyan has:

        ... this courageous man burst into tears like a woman

        This quote is often quoted in modern literature. The situation was stressful: the chief of the General Staff had no connection with the troops (namely, he was responsible for it) and was not able to clearly state what was happening in the troops and where the Germans had reached. It got to insanity, the advancement of the Germans was clarified by calls to civilian telephones: the station, administrative offices, post office, etc.
        Another case of sobbing Zhukov is noted in history, when he left in 1940. for the operation to liberate Bessarabia and Moldova.
        I will not go deeper, my attitude to Zhukov, to put it mildly, is not good.
        1. Dan Offline Dan
          Dan (Daniel) 7 November 2021 21: 18
          0
          Quote: boriz
          I will not go deeper, my attitude to Zhukov, to put it mildly, is not good.

          What operation did you yourself supervise? Have you reached the rank of corporal? You obviously cannot understand the motives and emotions of the people who made history and felt their personal responsibility for the country's insufficient readiness for such a test. There is a known case of Chernyakhovsky crying on Vasilevsky's chest near Kursk. So what? They are all human. Moreover, in those days they were simply extremely overloaded both emotionally and informationally. Many strong-willed military leaders who had already fought from such overloads simply fired a bullet in their temples. Many, having overcome psychological crises, found the strength to develop and implement optimal solutions. And you sit in the warmth and try to arrogantly evaluate those who are not suitable for dust under their feet. "I'm .... not good." I would like to ask, but who are you yourself in order to make assessments to people of this caliber? They quoted Mikoyan, who managed to serve all the general secretaries of those times ... "It was a pity to bleat ..." ..... Have you looked yourself in the mirror for a long time?
          1. boriz Offline boriz
            boriz (boriz) 7 November 2021 22: 13
            -4
            I have nothing against Chernyakhovsky and Vasilevsky (and many others).
            Zhukov never answered for anything.
            I expressed my opinion. Didn't ask yours.
            1. Dan Offline Dan
              Dan (Daniel) 9 November 2021 14: 35
              0
              Quote: boriz
              I expressed my opinion. Didn't ask yours.

              You have posted your opinion in a public discussion. Please, get an answer. I express my opinion to you - you are trying to assert yourself by humiliating the Great Commander who cannot answer you. Not pretty.
              1. Fourth Offline Fourth
                Fourth (Fourth) 9 November 2021 15: 02
                -3
                I would not be surprised at all if boriz were right.
        2. Xuli (o) Tebenado 7 November 2021 21: 18
          +2
          Is it okay that Zhukov bears the lion's share of the responsibility for the disastrous start of the war? At least, just like the head of the General Staff.

          Did you decide that Zhukov bears "the lion's share of the responsibility"? General Pavlov and some others were shot. There were negotiations between Zhukov and Pavlov. Zhukov's words are known, Pavlov's words are classified in the archives. And while the archives are closed, it will be impossible to establish the truth.
          Mikoyan? There were jokes about Mikoyan that he was in power "from Ilyich to Ilyich without prison and paralysis." Believe Mikoyan? Memoirs are generally a very subjective genre that requires a thorough check.
          If “the situation was stressful,” who and what can you blame? How would you personally behave in that position? Didn't you think?
          Therefore, there is no need to judge. You were not given that time to survive, and there is no need to blame anyone here. "Whoever is without sin, let him throw a stone at her ".

          for the operation to liberate Bessarabia and Moldova

          Do you somehow distinguish between Bessarabia and Moldavia? In my opinion, "horses and people" have finally got lost.
          1. boriz Offline boriz
            boriz (boriz) 7 November 2021 22: 10
            -4
            Actually, Bessarabia is a part of the Odessa region between Moldova and the Black Sea.

            Zhukov's words are known,

            From whom, from Zhukov? There is definitely no faith in his memoirs.
            1. Xuli (o) Tebenado 7 November 2021 22: 59
              +1
              Actually, Bessarabia is a part of the Odessa region between Moldova and the Black Sea.

              Bessarabia - the interfluve of the Prut and Dniester rivers + part of the Odessa region.
              Try to remember this.
              1. boriz Offline boriz
                boriz (boriz) 7 November 2021 23: 08
                -4
                I've seen so many old maps that you can't imagine.
                I threw a couple of links in a personal.
                And you can print your instructions on good thick paper, roll up into a tube ...
                Well, then you know.
                1. Xuli (o) Tebenado 7 November 2021 23: 46
                  +1
                  You've seen the maps. And a lot of things "understood".
                  1. boriz Offline boriz
                    boriz (boriz) 7 November 2021 23: 49
                    -4
                    This is from another post.
                  2. The comment was deleted.
              2. boriz Offline boriz
                boriz (boriz) 7 November 2021 23: 41
                -3
                In general, this territory has never historically belonged to Moldova.
                At first it was part of Bulgaria (up to present-day Odessa). Then there was the Budjak horde.
                Also subordinate to Bulgaria (as part of Turkey), then the Crimean Khanate. Already in the 19th century, she went from hand to hand. Either the entire territory of Bessarabia and Moldavia was called Bessarabia, or vice versa, Moldavia (for convenience, do not get confused with the two names). And the west of historical Moldova remained in Romania. As well as the seaside part of Bulgaria. Wallachia (then - Romania) had no access to the sea.
                In general, this is not the name of a state entity, but the geographical name of the territory. Like Ukraine. On the map Volynia and Podolia, and across - Oukraina (so on the map). And nearby, on the territory of Russia - Outskirts on the territory of the Ryazan and Vorotynsky principalities.
                1. Xuli (o) Tebenado 7 November 2021 23: 48
                  +2
                  This is not all the topic - continuous chatter, designed to blur your ignorance of elementary history.
                  1. boriz Offline boriz
                    boriz (boriz) 7 November 2021 23: 50
                    -4
                    Calm down, drink some water and go to bed.
  3. zenion Offline zenion
    zenion (zinovy) 7 November 2021 17: 33
    -2
    The neighbor in the stairwell was Ivan Horvat. Sometimes after drinking, and when he did not drink, his tongue loosened and he talked about the Hungarian events in such a way that we did not believe him. His last name was Horvat, but the name Istvan and who he was no one knew. He looked like a young man who had a huge house in the village and received an elephant's pension. When they began to build houses with all the amenities, he received a three-room apartment next to ours. He had the Hungarian wine "Volovye Heart". As strong as liqueur. When he began to say such things in his stories that we could not believe, his wife came out, took her by the arm and said - it's time to bain. He never contradicted her. Once she said, if not for me, then Istvan would not have been there already at that time. Apparently he remembered this to himself, even when he was passed out. But surprisingly, and what they keep quiet about, the Hungarians began to exterminate Jews during this hipish. The Americans immediately abandoned these revolutionaries.
  4. Xuli (o) Tebenado 7 November 2021 20: 31
    +3
    Like Zhukov and Khrushchev almost passed USA Eastern ....

    "Slightly" doesn't count. We didn’t pass it. And the point.

    Russians in Budapest: the third coming

    For the third time, not "Russians" came to Budapest, but "Soviet" ones.
    1. boriz Offline boriz
      boriz (boriz) 7 November 2021 20: 59
      -3
      For the third time, not "Russians" came to Budapest, but "Soviet" ones.

      And in the second?
      As I understand it, three are: 1849, 1945, and 1956.
      1. Xuli (o) Tebenado 7 November 2021 21: 23
        +2
        I also somehow learned to count to three.
        The adjectives "Russian" and "Soviet" must be distinguished.
        1. boriz Offline boriz
          boriz (boriz) 7 November 2021 22: 00
          -4
          I just mean that the second time was also Soviet.
  5. boriz Offline boriz
    boriz (boriz) 7 November 2021 21: 55
    -3
    In fact, the Hungarian events were planned as a distraction of the USSR from the impending war between Israel and Egypt.
    July 26, 1956 Egypt nationalized the Suez Canal, which belonged to the World Bank and France. Egypt has banned the passage of Israel's ships through the canal.
    The planning of the war in the Middle East and the active work of the "Petofi Circle" in Hungary began.
    On October 23, 200 people took to the streets in Budapest. At night, the entry of Soviet troops began. Zhukov and Khrushchev took a strange position, paralyzing the actions of the army.
    On the night of October 28, Israel shot down a plane with a military delegation returning from negotiations from Syria. By pure coincidence, the beginning. The General Staff of Egypt flew another plane, which took off later. 18 officers were killed.
    On October 29, Israel launched military action against Egypt.
    On October 30, the United States proposed a UN Security Council resolution obliging Israel to cease hostilities and withdraw troops 30 kilometers from the Suez Canal. The WB and France blocked it with their vetoes.
    On October 31, the WB and France began bombing Egyptian targets.
    On October 31, Khrushchev decided to re-enter troops in Budapest and start a showdown like an adult.
    "Coincidence? I don't think so!" (WITH)
    The calculation was that the USSR would not have enough resources and the will to get involved in two conflicts at the same time.
    But then the Soviet Army was on the edge (the war had just ended), not only Khrushchev was in the Politburo, but also people with steel Faberges.
    France, the World Bank and Israel were promised an atomic bomb with free shipping and they handed it back (at the command of the United States).
  6. Breard Offline Breard
    Breard (Serg) 9 November 2021 03: 04
    0
    How tired of ... lies!