Research: Russia was in 1st place in reducing life expectancy in a pandemic

The Russian Federation was in 1st place in the world in reducing the life expectancy of the population due to the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020. At the same time, the country has the highest mortality rate among people under 65 years of age. An international group of researchers informed about this, having published their report in the British weekly peer-reviewed scientific (medical) journal The BMJ.

Previous observations have already shown a decrease in life expectancy from a dangerous infection in the United States, Great Britain, Spain and other countries. But a group of scientists, which also includes specialists from the Russian Higher School economics (HSE) decided to check the data more closely, as the accuracy and completeness of previous studies was questioned in many countries.

The researchers explained that after the emergence of COVID-19, countries reacted differently to the dangerous infection, taking certain protective measures, which ultimately affected the results. Experts have found that the impact of the pandemic and the associated response measures affect overall mortality.

The report talks about mortality in 37 countries, including the Russian Federation, and compares life expectancy in 2020 with the expected, calculated on the basis of historical data from 2005-2019 (it increased for women and men in all these countries).

In 2020, the largest decrease in life expectancy was observed in the Russian Federation (-2,33 years for men and -2,14 for women), the USA (-2,27 years for men and -1,61 for women) and Bulgaria (-1,96 , 1,37 years for men and -XNUMX for women). In addition, the loss of potential life years, i. E. years that a person would have lived if he had not died ahead of time.

In 2020, the largest number of life years per 100 thousand people was lost in the Russian Federation (7020 for men and 4760 for women), Bulgaria (7260 for men and 3730 for women) and Lithuania (5430 for men and 2640 for women). In most of the countries considered in the study, the surplus of lost years of life was formed at the expense of elderly people. But in Russia, Bulgaria, Lithuania and the United States, deaths of people under the age of 65 made a significant contribution to this - over 2000 "under-lived" years per 100 thousand inhabitants. Moreover, during the flu epidemic in 2015 in the Russian Federation, there was no increase in the number of years of life lost.

Our results provide compelling evidence of the need for a finer estimate of years of life lost, in addition to excess mortality.

- are approved in the document.

Scientists are convinced that increasing the resilience of the health system in all countries can be a major factor in the victory over the COVID-19 pandemic and possible epidemics in the future. At the same time, a quantitative assessment of how specific measures affect mortality will make it possible to determine which of them are truly important, the researchers concluded.

Note that Russia is implementing a pension reform (2019-2028), which provides for a gradual increase in the retirement age from 55 to 60 for women and from 60 to 65 for men. Taking into account the above study, which, among other things, concerned the life expectancy of Russians, it may be worthwhile to suspend the reform or even return the previous retirement age to the Russian Federation.
  • Photos used:
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. 123 Offline 123
    123 (123) 4 November 2021 23: 01
    I am not saying that everything is all right with us, but I definitely don’t trust such amateurs of a "finer assessment" from the Higher School of Economics. sad
    As I understand it, has Bulgarian medicine made a big step forward this year? Is it all about the percentage of vacancies? For a change, I took Ukrainian statistics so that a more subtle estimate could not be found smile According to their data, fully vaccinated:
    Russia - 33,01%
    Bulgaria - 22,37%
    Ukraine - 18,58%

    In general, what is the matter here and how correct the data is, I don’t know, but the fact that the topic is again used in politics is rather annoying. I'm tired of it. sad
  2. Sergey Latyshev Offline Sergey Latyshev
    Sergey Latyshev (Serge) 4 November 2021 23: 21
    One of 2.
    or anti-Russian bullshit.
    Or the truth.

    After all, until recently there was an "unprecedented" increase in wages and life expectancy "
    1. goncharov.62 Offline goncharov.62
      goncharov.62 (Andrei) 5 November 2021 12: 58
      The analysis of the HSE is already annoying.
  3. Ivan Semenov Offline Ivan Semenov
    Ivan Semenov (Ivan Semenov) 5 November 2021 14: 47
    The main question is: who finances these so-called. research. If the same ones who created the virus and launched it to weed out the world's population, then the result of the research is quite predictable.
  4. Miffer Offline Miffer
    Miffer (Sam Miffers) 5 November 2021 20: 43
    And somehow I'm not surprised.
    In the opinion of many scientists, vaccination during an epidemic is criminal and only breeds new, more dangerous variations of the virus.
    At least 3 weeks should elapse between the first and second vaccinations. As a result of the first vaccination, a person receives a small portion of the infection and continues to live a normal life for the next 3 weeks, while infecting everyone around him. I have not heard of people who live in complete isolation during these 3 weeks between vaccinations.
    This is how the infection spreads, but at the same time, the developers and sellers of all these vaccines, PCR tests, masks and
    other things, not to mention the (private) clinics.
    1. Adler77 Offline Adler77
      Adler77 (Denis) 6 November 2021 22: 11
      Hospadi, again you, homebrew expert!
      Well, what are you talking about, you are an amateur and a provocateur!
      What portion of the infection? What are you talking about?
      Or teach the mat part of a schoolboy.
  5. The comment was deleted.