Shows the dynamics of the deployment of Russian forces near the border of Ukraine


The American media report on the buildup of the forces of the 144th MOB garrison in Yelnya (Smolensk region). From September 20, military equipment, armored vehicles and vehicles will arrive there. Dynamic survey of the terrain is carried out by the European radar satellite Sentinel-1.


According to the satellite, significant changes took place at this military facility from October 26 to 31. Twitter channels circulated photos of what is happening on the territory of the garrison, which show the expansion of the parking zone of armored vehicles up to 900 meters in length (on October 25, the area of ​​this zone was 700 by 150 meters). According to some experts, this indicates a serious concentration of Russian units near the borders of Ukraine.




Meanwhile, on Monday, November 1, Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov, on the air of the Russia-24 TV channel, expressed the point of view that Kiev is provoking Moscow to take active steps in the Donbass. Lavrov considers the data on the use of the Ukrainian Armed Forces of the Turkish Bayraktars in eastern Ukraine to be a "mysterious story", since there are contradictions in the words of the commander of the Ukrainian Armed Forces and the Minister of Defense. The first insists on using a drone, the other denies this fact.

Earlier, the media reported on the use of a combat unmanned aerial vehicle "Bayraktar" by Ukrainian servicemen on October 26 against militia units in the village of Granitnoye, Donetsk region. The artillery battery of the Donbass defenders was attacked from a distance of 15 km.
19 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Guest throat bone 1 November 2021 17: 42
    +11
    Let's start earlier, let's end this fascist lair earlier.
  2. volk.bosiy Offline volk.bosiy
    volk.bosiy (Volk Bosiy) 1 November 2021 18: 04
    +3
    and no longer remove equipment from there ...
  3. oderih Offline oderih
    oderih (Alex) 1 November 2021 18: 07
    +7
    In general, the Smolensk region is more likely a Moscow region and does not border on khokhloreykh. And America should "shut up and be silent."
    1. isv000 Offline isv000
      isv000 2 November 2021 13: 20
      0
      Quote: oderih
      In general, the Smolensk region is more likely a Moscow region and does not border on khokhloreykh. And America should "shut up and be silent."

      Actually, you can shove the author on the back of the neck - pictures and described events from 2018 ...
  4. What are they showing us? some muddy lights on a black background! Do they think we are fools that we will lead to this dregs?
    1. isofat Offline isofat
      isofat (isofat) 1 November 2021 20: 52
      +1
      Free Smart Machine, or is it possible that they are simply afraid of us? After all, it has long been known that fear has large eyes! wink
      1. but Russia does not threaten anyone! We sit quietly, like mice in a mink!
  5. Abakan Offline Abakan
    Abakan 1 November 2021 20: 07
    -12
    American media report a build-up ...

    Americans can see everything from one of their 3000+ satellites, and that's just from the US government, plus the US company Starlink will soon have over 10000 satellites that the US government can use when needed. We only have 150 satellites of lower quality :(
    1. Ulysses Offline Ulysses
      Ulysses (Alexey) 1 November 2021 23: 15
      +5
      Americans can see everything from one of their 3000+ satellites, and that's just from the US government, plus the US company Starlink will soon have over 10000 satellites that the US government can use when needed. We only have 150 satellites of lower quality :(

      The latest images from "3000+ satellites" leave no doubts ..


      PS After the Afghan disgrace, the United States can shove its companions into a known place.
    2. Georgy Soloviev Offline Georgy Soloviev
      Georgy Soloviev (Georgy Soloviev) 2 November 2021 08: 06
      +4
      Abakan, what do you have satellites in ukroreykh? And as much as 150?
  6. The comment was deleted.
    1. The comment was deleted.
  7. Abakan Offline Abakan
    Abakan 2 November 2021 03: 50
    -4
    Quote: Ulysses
    PS After the Afghan disgrace, the United States can shove its companions into a known place.

    Afghanistan was bad for both countries, we lost 15000 in 10 years (average 1500 per year) and the US lost 2400 in 20 years (average 120 per year)
    1. The comment was deleted.
    2. oracul Offline oracul
      oracul (leonid) 2 November 2021 07: 03
      +4
      The problem for us was that the United States and its allies were behind the Mujahideen, helping them with weapons and finances. When the United States came on their own, they sat out at their bases and bombed everything, including weddings.
    3. Uncle Vanya Susanin (Ivan) 2 November 2021 08: 57
      +3
      They lost so much of the armed forces, and now add to this 200 from the number of American PMCs, of which there were no less than the official military!
    4. akarfoxhound Offline akarfoxhound
      akarfoxhound 2 November 2021 11: 05
      +4
      2400 casualties in 20 years, unlike us, not fighting ?! Of course, this is an indicator of the ability of minke whales to wage war - sitting in a warm home copter and do it like that! good
      In Vietnam, for example, where your idols really fought, and did not sit in closed bases, as in Afghanistan, they lost 10 helicopters in 3000 years, and ours lost 333 in the same 10 years. Why isn't this statistic given by an example, it's inconvenient? wink
  8. Abakan Offline Abakan
    Abakan 2 November 2021 17: 36
    -2
    Quote: akarfoxhound
    2400 casualties in 20 years, unlike us, not fighting ?! Of course, this is an indicator of the ability of minke whales to wage war - sitting in a warm home copter and do it like that! good
    In Vietnam, for example, where your idols really fought, and did not sit in closed bases, as in Afghanistan, they lost 10 helicopters in 3000 years, and ours lost 333 in the same 10 years. Why isn't this statistic given by an example, it's inconvenient? wink

    I only compared wars against the same enemy, we both fought in Afghanistan, we both did not fight in Vietnam. I will compare another war in which we both fought against the same enemy, World War II: we lost 9 million soldiers, the US lost 300 soldiers.
    good
    1. Physio Misio Offline Physio Misio
      Physio Misio (Physio Misio) 5 November 2021 15: 46
      0
      Invalid comparison.
      With Japan, the Americans fought the whole of World War II and could not win. However, in 2 we defeated the early rebels in a few days.
  9. General Black Offline General Black
    General Black (Gennady) 2 November 2021 19: 17
    0
    Is this Sentinel-1 satellite capable of distinguishing inflatable dummies from real military equipment? Here will be the number, while the democratic community squints in one direction, the actual tryndets to the sharovarniki will come from the other side.
  10. Netyn Offline Netyn
    Netyn (Netyn) 2 November 2021 22: 06
    0
    Quote: Abakan
    World War II: We lost 9 million soldiers, the US lost 300 soldiers.

    What a stupid lie
    You named the losses of the USSR in World War II and in the Great Patriotic War together.
    Did the United States participate in the Great Patriotic War?
    And yes
    "The United States lost 418 people in World War II and 000 were injured. Also 671 Americans were considered prisoners of war" (c)
  11. Abakan Offline Abakan
    Abakan 6 November 2021 09: 35
    0
    Quote: Physio Misio
    Invalid comparison.
    With Japan, the Americans fought the whole of World War II and could not win. However, in 2 we defeated the early rebels in a few days.

    Quote: Netyn
    What a stupid lie

    Pokryshkin about his "American" aircraft P-39 "Airacobra". Memories of the war.




    American planes attack the Japanese




    Here is Japan surrendering to the US General



    Here is Germany surrendering to the generals of the USA, Great Britain and the USSR



    Americans liberate concentration camps




    American planes attack the Germans




    The Americans sank the largest warships of the Yamato class, and the entire Japanese fleet (retribution for Tsushima 1905)



    American in the service of the USSR



    The United States destroyed Japan, Yamato, Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Japan was as strong as Germany in World War II, Germany had the best army, but Japan had the best navy.

    The United States was the only country during World War II to fight on three continents, Europe since 1941 (U.S. warships and submarines have sunk thousands of German ships and submarines), Africa since 1942 (General Rommel's army was defeated by the U.S. Army), and Asia against Japan since 1941, all Japanese warships, submarines and aircraft were destroyed by the United States. The United States also helped the USSR with Lend-Lease, remember that the United States had a nuclear bomb to drop it on Germany if necessary, the United States occupied 70% of the territory of Germany (West Germany) in May 1945, and today the United States still has its own army in Germany and Japan.