Is Syria worth it for Russia to fight Turkey for its sake?

40

In the north of Syria, preparations are underway for the next military operation of Ankara against the Kurds. The Turkish military is throwing leaflets with demoralizing messages, threatening reprisals for those who refuse to cooperate with them. In response, the Russian Aerospace Forces scattered "letters of happiness" over the territories occupied by the Turks with an unequivocal warning that it would be better for the "Sultan" not to contemplate anything like that. Is a piece of desolate Syrian territory and the Kurds with their problems worth it for Russia to start direct hostilities against Turkey for them?

The question is very interesting. To answer it, you need to think about whether President Erdogan will stop expanding, having received what he wants in the SAR, or not? Will we not grow ourselves policies "Appeasement" of the next geopolitician with a mustache?



Has the revision of the results of the Second World War begun?


We have repeatedly argued that the Turkish president is clearly trying to reconsider the results of not only World War II, but also World War I, after which the Ottoman Empire disappeared from the map. This is evidenced by his real steps: the intervention in Syria, the "throw" into Libya, Azerbaijan's support against Armenia in Nagorno-Karabakh, as well as the "standing" of the Turkish military at the Kabul airport, the integration project of the "Great Turan" in Central Asia, where there were The resplendent Porta was not noticed.

But now these ambitions have been officially confirmed. Speaking in the Algerian parliament, President Erdogan openly challenged the post-war world order:

The fate of humanity cannot and should not be left at the mercy of a handful of victorious countries in World War II.

“A handful of countries” are the USA, Russia as the successor to the USSR, Great Britain, France and China. The "Sultan" is convinced that the UN Security Council, which includes these five, should be reformed by adding new members to it. Look where you swung!

In World War I, Turkey was among the losers, and in World War II it prudently formally adhered to neutrality, declaring war on the Hitlerite coalition only when its defeat became obvious and inevitable. True, many Russian historians believe that the Turks seriously considered the possibility of joining the Axis Countries and attacking the USSR, if things had gone differently at Stalingrad.

Such political initiatives of the "Sultan" must be taken extremely seriously. Quantitative changes in the composition of the UN Security Council will very symbolically change its quality. Especially if Turkey or, for example, Japan will be in its new composition. This is the first and very significant step towards a possible subsequent revision of the results of the Second World War. You look, then they will get to the First World War, and then Ankara will remember which territories were once part of the Ottoman Empire.

Syria


Right now, the Turks are preparing to crush one of the last Kurdish strongholds in their borderlands, the city of Tell Rifat. In doing so, they refer to the 1998 Adana Treaty. Previously, this agreement between Ankara and Damascus was used as a legal pretext to justify the first two interventions.

Recall that the SAR once supported the Kurds, allowing them to use their territory for the basing and training of militants. This was done to put pressure on neighboring Turkey. As a result, Ankara in 1998 began to prepare a full-scale military operation against Syria. Damascus responded by pulling its troops to the border. Only thanks to the intervention and mediation of Iran and Egypt was it possible to de-escalate the conflict and reconcile the parties who signed the agreement in the city of Adana. In accordance with it, Syria pledged to expel the Kurdish leader Orzhalan, close all their camps on its territory and withdraw their support. The most painful and controversial was the clause giving the Turks the right to "pursue terrorists to a depth of 5 kilometers" in the SAR and take measures to protect national security.

5 kilometers, Karl! And now let's see how deep the Turkish occupation zone will go inside Syria if Ankara captures the city of Tell Rifat. The "Sultan" clearly claims that it is not entitled to any agreements. This is a direct takeover, Anschluss, whatever you call it. Sudetenland? I don’t want to draw such parallels, but it somehow works out by itself. Recall that the former corporal quickly grew bolder, since his revanchism did not meet with a proper rebuff. And here we again return to the original question. Are the desert territories of northern Syria worth fighting with Turkey for?

Judging by the way the Syrian government troops are pulling together, with the support of the Russian Aerospace Forces ready to stop the Turks, it's worth it. It may even be advisable to push them back to the 5-kilometer zone.
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

40 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +1
    19 October 2021 17: 31
    Was Syria worth it to fight for it instead of Ukraine?
    1. +4
      20 October 2021 09: 28
      In my opinion, switching attention to ATS instead solving the problem of Ukraine was a big strategic mistake
      1. +3
        20 October 2021 11: 22
        do not flap, trshch, Syria is a training ground for the Russian army, which will have to drive OTAN to the English Channel! And in Syria, she gets invaluable military experience !! It would be nice to train the Navy in the same way!
        1. -1
          21 October 2021 11: 39
          All OTAN bought popcorn, is watching the process and is building its structures in Ukraine.
          1. +2
            21 October 2021 18: 45
            All OTAN bought popcorn, is watching the process and is building its structures in Ukraine.

            They built and built in Afghanistan.
            And finally they built it.
            Abdullah, take it ... smile
            1. 0
              21 October 2021 19: 59
              It is in vain that you build parallels between Ukraine and practically medieval Afghanistan.
              In the formation of Ukraine, Russian politicians have played not the last violin. Therefore, in terms of the situation and geographic location, it is easier to pull it up to Poland. So "Take Abdullah" simply won't work.
              Sooner or later, the Ukrainians will cope with the Natsiks, but they will not come close to Russia before. The complete and already established "success" of the activities of Yeltsin's reformers and statists.
              1. +1
                22 October 2021 23: 37
                It is in vain that you build parallels between Ukraine and practically medieval Afghanistan.

                Ukrainian official propaganda is transforming Ukraine into a European Afghanistan by leaps and bounds.
                The only question is the mentality of the population inhabiting Ukraine.
                In both countries, smart people are fleeing the country.

                In the formation of Ukraine, Russian politicians have played not the last violin. Therefore, in terms of the situation and geographical location, it is easier to pull it up to Poland.

                Poland in distant enough past colonized the lands of present-day Ukraine.
                Polish claims to Ukrainian lands now are possible only after its break with the European Union.

                And yes, the Russian politicum (along with the Soviet one, I will note), created the present-day Ukraine within its borders.
                Without him, she is incapacitated and doomed.

                Sooner or later, the Ukrainians will cope with the Natsiks, but they will not come close to Russia before.

                It is foolish to expect from several generations brought up on Russophobia, the question of survival and pragmatism.
                In Ukraine, I do not see in the near future a force capable of dealing with the Ukrainian Nazis.
                Only a military defeat with occupation and debanderization in the distant future. Very distant.
                I would like to be wrong in my personal forecast.

                The complete and already consolidated "success" of the activities of Yeltsin's reformers and statists.

                The logical result of the "Leninist nationality policy"
                The mine was laid even during the creation of the USSR.
                As soon as the central government weakened, the process of disintegration of the "united Soviet people" began.

                PS Ukraine is doomed to degradation and decentralization, the only question is whether we can handle another suitcase without a handle .. winked
                1. 0
                  23 October 2021 15: 57
                  Lenin's policy is no sideways here, in a similar way you can find "bombs" in many states. The problem was that "up there" at one time they divorced nepotism, familiarity and some kind of immunity before the laws, and at the right time there was no one who could just do their job.
                  The USSR was being torn apart hastily, hastily and without regard for losses. The ghoul left only after he was fully convinced of the irreversibility of the processes launched by him. In Ukraine, everything went as it should, divide and conquer. That divided the people, good gentlemen. Now, wherever you look around the perimeter, everywhere there are suitcases without handles. Oh well. negative
                  1. 0
                    24 October 2021 00: 36
                    The problem was that "up there" at one time they divorced nepotism, familiarity and some kind of immunity before the laws, and at the right time there was no one who could just do their job.

                    Uh-huh.
                    I wonder where these guys were looking?

                    The Party Control Commission (CPC) is a special department of internal party control of a judicial and investigative type under the Communist Party of the Soviet Union.

                    Created on the initiative of J.V. Stalin at the 1934th Congress of the CPSU (b), in February 16 as a result of the transformation of the Central Control Commission. The CPC consisted of a central apparatus (XNUMX departments), party boards and representatives in the republics, territories and regions, which had broad powers and were strictly controlled by the center. The tasks of the CPC included control over the implementation of the decisions of the Central Committee of the All-Union Communist Party of Bolsheviks at the local level, bringing to justice those responsible for violating party discipline, ethics and the charter of the All-Union Communist Party (Bolsheviks), establishing the level of "political reliability" of the communists.
                    belay

                    Without massive party purges (if you know what it is), the CPSU quickly turned into a 20-million swamp, not much different from the modern United Russia.

                    The USSR was torn apart hastily, hastily and without regard for losses.

                    It is impossible in a short time to "hastily, hastily" destroy a viable system.
                    She will actively resist.
                    1. 0
                      24 October 2021 13: 29
                      Impossible in a short time "hastily,

                      The closest example in recent history, the entire "carve-up" was very well organized from above. Because the party functionaries suddenly, besides eating deliciously and sleeping sweetly, wanted something more.

                      She will actively resist.

                      So she resisted, the telegraph, the station and the printing house were practically occupied by enemies who came to power on the wave of an artificially created social crisis. The scoundrels who came to power said and promised one thing, but did what they "needed". Today's reversal of those in power to the people is explained by the fact that they were simply not accepted into their club by the "same" crumpled partners, otherwise the Yeltsin cart would still be there. No one at the top had any interest in investing at their "home", "there" in civilization everything was already ready for a long time. Buy, check in, live and use. If you check, then probably most of the Yeltsin's and Gorbachev's were humming already on "well-deserved" pensions and live somewhere in Italy, Spain and Florida, but not in Khabarovsk, Novorossiysk or some sort of Tikhvin. Although they can be quite comfortable at home ..
                      But this is probably not entirely politically correct, as it indirectly casts a shadow on today's appointees.
                      1. 0
                        28 October 2021 21: 12
                        The closest example in recent history, the entire "carve-up" was very well organized from above. Because the party functionaries suddenly, besides eating deliciously and sleeping sweetly, wanted something more.

                        You forget about the common Soviet people.
                        Great-grandfathers sincerely believed in communism.
                        Grandfathers that children will live well, a terrible war behind our backs.
                        The fathers were promised communism in the 80s, but it was hard to believe, because life did not correspond to the declared slogans.
                        Children (my generation) fucked up a great country, but what could we believe in?

                        Try to answer a tricky question.
      2. 0
        20 October 2021 12: 14
        You're right. I still remember the general bewilderment on this matter. In the end, they believed the President, and so did I.
        I assumed that this was some kind of urgent move, and Ukraine would definitely follow.
        Because Syria instead of Ukraine is nonsense!
        Now in Ukraine, in all, NATO bases are being built.
        To do what everyone expected of him is getting harder and harder.
        It doesn't look like a mistake. Rather, a concession to external pressure.
        Only now the compelling circumstances are hidden from us.
        As a result, the bewilderment about the President did not go away.
        And as I understand it - I'm not the only one
      3. +1
        20 October 2021 15: 48
        Or, rather, it is the fulfillment of the terms of the next deal with the States.
        Then it turns out that the President no longer considers the country capable of fully resisting the West, and conducts trade with it.
        "Buys" time for the country and the people.
        And for her big capital.
        Hence the "relaxation" and formality of domestic and foreign policy.
        It just doesn't count.
        Trade then naturally proceeds at the expense of metered concessions to the West.
        If this is true, then, as doctors say, the prognosis for the country is unfavorable
      4. +2
        20 October 2021 23: 46
        In my opinion, switching attention to the SAR instead of solving the problem of Ukraine was a big strategic mistake.

        If Russia had not entered Syria, now there would be an expanding chaos of terror that would reach our borders. If ISIS could shorten the US, then a gas pipeline from Qatar, along the southern coast of the Persian Gulf, through Turkey to Europe would pass through this territory. And its power would not be a toy, like TAP / TANAP. Do we need it?
        In general, a simple alignment: + terrorists, + US bases (in Tartus and Khmeimim), + complete loss of control over the Mediterranean Sea and the region, - gas export, - authority, - weapons testing ground,.
        And in 404 Russia would have a big hemorrhoid, no better than Afghanistan. Some cons.
        1. 0
          21 October 2021 15: 21
          You modestly "forgot" about Ukraine in your commentary.
          It is clear that it would be nice both there and there.
          But no!
          Do you really support the choice of Syria INSTEAD of Ukraine?
          Come on, justify it
          1. +1
            21 October 2021 17: 01
            I have already written about this many times. If it is intelligible, then you need to write a lot, not the format of a comment.
            In Ukraine, for now, the people, for the most part, do not want to live as part of Russia. Recently, Strana.UA conducted a survey of the population of the Kherson region (on camera, ordinary, real people), as they support the water blockade of Crimea. If we had adopted the use of force against Ukraine, we would have been dealing with a hostile mass of the population. Even in Donbass for the first time (at least six months, or even a year) there was a problem to recruit people to the front. Well, then Poroshenko carried out political and educational work ...
            The population of Russia is also not eager to see Ukraine as a national entity within the Russian Federation. From the word "absolutely".
            If the Russian economy had not been ruled by liberals, it would have been more freewheeling with finances. And so, even the Crimea and Donbass responded very noticeably to pensioners and low-paid categories by repairing roads after 2014. did not study for a long time. 5 years for sure. Well, the sanctions.
            Ukraine, as of 2014, the Russian economy would definitely not stand it. For Donbass and Crimea, the people still agreed to be patient for a while. But to put the bulk of non-brothers on their necks again (all the more so, dissatisfied with the deprivation of independence) - in no case, indignation would begin in the Russian Federation. And craftsmen, such as Navalny, would ride the protests and take them to the same place as Maidown.
            And they would have to invest in full. The non-brothers would brazenly begin to demand that the "aggressor" restore everything that was destroyed and plundered. And they would have got them with maydauns and maydaunchiks of all formats.
            People who are engaged in geopolitics consider the rule 3 times 3 to 1 as conditions for annexing a territory.
            1. The army of the joining side must exceed the army of the joining side as 3 to 1. Everything is fine with us.
            2. The population of the affiliated party must support the affiliation by at least 75%.
            3. The population of the acceding side - too, 75% must support the accession.
            That is, also, not less than 3 to 1.
            But with points 2 and 3 - nothing at all. According to public opinion polls, in both cases - no, and 20%. And in the case of Ukraine, not even 10%.
            In early spring, Dzhangirov cited statistics from surveys of neutral firms. He often gives good overviews of statistics. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y0FyueyJxuM
            That is, we would have overstrained the economy, protests by the population in both countries, and tougher sanctions.
            In general, this is exactly what Navalny lacked for the Russian version of Maidown.
            Therefore, you have to wait for 75%. At least from the Ukrainian side. When Santa Claus begins to educate, an empty refrigerator, and the example of the LPNR (and this is the case), the non-brothers themselves will massively ask to go to the Russian Federation. And they will no longer care when they are connected only as the population is ready, they fulfill the conditions of Russia and, of course, certain regions. You will have to forget about Ukraine.
            1. 0
              21 October 2021 17: 57
              Well, let's say this is so with all of Ukraine. Then why not do it with the LPR and DPR? The rule given by you on p. 2, 3 regarding them is STRICTLY fulfilled.
              And there is no need to speak here about the burden on the budget.
              The construction of NATO bases in Ukraine will now cost us a lot of money.
              1. +2
                21 October 2021 20: 29
                It is necessary to talk about the load on the budget. Now, without advertising their actions in the Russian Federation, the leadership of the Russian Federation (well, of course, Putin's group), has begun to gradually bring the living standards of the LDNR to the level of the Rostov region. We are talking about the infusion of 900 billion rubles in 3 years. It is clear that inside the Russian Federation they are silent so as not to annoy pensioners once again. The thing is necessary, but the patience of people is not unlimited. Plus, the reduction of unnecessary costs, that is, in the end - the unification of the LPR and DPR. Just the other day, the customs between the republics were removed. Pensions have been raised for a long time. The minimum is already higher than in Ukraine. Teachers also began to receive more than in Ukraine. Actually, it's better to listen here.



                It also costs money.
                The LDNR has not been recognized until now because it would be a unilateral withdrawal of the Russian Federation from the Minsk agreements. And it would cost us too much, in every sense.
                Now, in fact, trade is taking place, under what conditions the United States will hand over Ukraine to Russia. Who will restore everything? The US must get out of there completely. Well, etc. For this, Nuland came. And the visit and rhetoric of the head of the Pentagon are for internal use. Show inside the United States that the allies are surrendering, after all, not all in a row and not every day. In general, everything is moving towards recognizing the Donbass, and then joining it.
                Perhaps they want to coincide with the collapse of the economies. And it will be easier with the money and everyone will have no time for us.
                1. +1
                  21 October 2021 20: 52
                  Now, in fact, trade is taking place, under what conditions the United States will hand over Ukraine to Russia. Who will restore everything? The US must get out of there completely. Well, etc. For this, Nuland came.

                  I read such a legend for internal use.
                  For the United States to surrender to us such a successful, practically ready foothold? Which cost them so much time and effort?
                  A chess player in a game before a mating situation voluntarily sacrifices a key piece in this combination?
                  Did they abandon plans for us at once?
                  Boris, who do you take me for?
                  As Stanislavsky used to say - I don’t believe!
                  And why then your own words about the budget?
                  Discrepancies and discrepancies
                  1. 0
                    21 October 2021 21: 01
                    The world is already being cut into currency zones, zones of influence. The rules within the zone will be determined by the head of the zone. Ukraine is in the Russian zone.
                    Biden (collective) was convinced by the spring that the United States had long been unable to control the world. A lot more will go to the Russian zone.
                    Now the boundaries of the zones and the rules of relations between the zones are being clarified. As well as the conditions under which the United States surrenders regions that find themselves in foreign zones.
                    The US has problems with the economy and they want to rent it cheaper. But Putin is also not interested in shoveling the United States out. He wants financial participation from international organizations. In the end, France, Germany and Poland brought the junta to power in Ukraine. Signatures were put and guaranteed to Yanukovych certain things. The USA also tried there for almost 30 years. And, of course, without the land, which Zelensky is now selling to just about anyone, Putin does not need Ukraine either. The earth will have to turn backwards. How can Biden do this? Problems. It is not for nothing that Poroshenko (for all his greedy and meanness) did not dare to sell the land. He made it to the end.
                    So, if you compare it with chess, it is not the United States that is preparing to checkmate.
                    Didn't the drain of Afghanistan tell you anything? This is a signal to everyone who is used to feeding on the United States and hiding behind their backs. The freebie is over, then - yourself.
                  2. -1
                    21 October 2021 22: 42
                    And why then your own words about the budget?

                    Donbass must be raised now, without waiting for what the United States and others will be able to achieve.
                    But the rest of Ukraine will take too much. Again, educate non-brothers. Therefore, they will have to sink to the bottom in order to stop showing off and silently do what they say.

                    As Stanislavsky used to say - I don’t believe!

                    Well, that's whatever you like.
                    When I wrote about the zones and the last crisis of capitalism 2 years ago, no one believed me, people laughed. Nowadays, few people doubt it.
                    Smart people have been working on this theory for more than 20 years. So far, everything has come true and continues to come true.
                    1. +1
                      22 October 2021 09: 52
                      I don't know if you yourself believe in what you write. And for what purpose are you doing it.
                      There can be no public information about the circumstances of the still pending deal with the United States.
                      All other information - either speculation (including yours) or "deza".
                      For speculation about the global surrender of positions by the Anglo-Saxons, the example of Afghanistan is clearly weak.
                      I could humorously say that “I'm taking your noodles off my ears,” but you might be right.
                      The opponent can indeed give up the key piece in the pre-mate situation, but only in order to guarantee himself a checkmate later, but in less risky conditions.
                      I'm talking about China, of course.
                      Nuland really could have come for such a deal.
                      If you have heard rumors that we are considering the terms of handing over Ukraine to us, then our business is TOBACCO. This will be a checkmate in two moves.
                      This deal will give us some time to live, but it will guarantee our subsequent death. After the United States has dealt with China. Or during this showdown.
                      An alliance with China is indeed our chance for life. Including in the more distant future.
    2. The comment was deleted.
  2. 0
    19 October 2021 18: 51
    If this devil is not stopped, then he and the Kuchuk-Kainadzhirsky agreement will want to revise. am
    1. +1
      20 October 2021 23: 52
      This "devil" will wither himself. In the next elections, it will fly by. Turkey has already (somehow imperceptibly) flew out of the TOP-20 economies of the world. The G-20 will no longer be called, but he twitches in the UN Security Council ...
      During the years of his presidency (from 28 Aug 2014), the lira fell from $ 0,46 to $ 0,12.
      He would have to sit out until the end of the current term. Big talk is not a substitute for a good economy.
  3. +1
    19 October 2021 20: 23
    Muslim Turks are eternal enemies and traitors.
  4. +3
    19 October 2021 20: 24
    Constantinople
  5. The comment was deleted.
  6. +4
    19 October 2021 20: 59
    Better to break off in Syria than in the Crimea ...
  7. 0
    19 October 2021 21: 02
    Of course it's better when it's worth it! But it's also good when it hangs tight.
  8. -2
    19 October 2021 22: 02
    Some kind of garbage. On the news, everything is exactly the opposite.

    Just now the news was that the Turks promised to buy more Russian weapons if the Americans did not sell them F16.

    So these are "partners", there are almost no our troops there (that is, there is no war), and something can fall on the Kurds from the Aerospace Forces by accident. To calm down the terrorist Endogan, he also bought weapons, spent gas, and developed the atom ...

    And the Syrians, (under the article) still did not fulfill the old agreements, did not remove the Kurdish terrorists
  9. 0
    20 October 2021 09: 27
    Quote: Sergey Latyshev
    And the Syrians, (under the article) still did not fulfill the old agreements, did not remove the Kurdish terrorists

    Do not confuse the Kurds as the population of Syria and the Kurdish terrorists from the respective banned organizations.
  10. 0
    20 October 2021 12: 47
    History shows that a war with the Ottomans is inevitable, as well as the fact that it will not be possible to prevent it from the current leadership, well, they have no brains for this, Stalin had, he did not flirt with this scum ... in general, we were in for two wars , with the Georgians and the Turks, we just won one by accident, I emphasize - by accident, and the rest is waiting for us ahead, we won't be able to throw Turks with hats ...
    1. +1
      21 October 2021 19: 07
      History shows that war with the Ottomans is inevitable,

      History shows that we last fought with the Turks over a hundred years ago ..
      And the geopolitical situation has changed dramatically during this time.
      Turkey will no longer be able to set against Russia for the sake of European interests.
      And Europe will not support Turkey's claims in the region.
  11. +1
    20 October 2021 14: 23
    The Turks should be put in place wherever possible. We must also drive them from Central Asia. And they can leave only in one case, when somewhere they hit them so that they run from everywhere.
  12. Eli
    -3
    20 October 2021 19: 00
    Azerbaijan's support against Armenia in Nagorno-Karabakh

    - the author, if you please, explain, the seizure of the territories of Azerbaijan by Armenia in 1991-1994, are these the results of the First or Second World War ?? The article is very biased, the accents are placed absolutely incorrectly, and even more so the submitted conclusions and conclusions !!!! Erdogan is at his borders, for him Idlib, Aleppo and the North of Syria, where 250-300 Turkomans (Turks) live, is the same as for Russia Donbas and Crimea. Russia defends its "Russian world" in Ukraine, defends the right of its people to speak Russian, so why can't Erdogan do this ?? among other things, the war is going on at its very borders, imagine the situation that the Syrian army will begin to clean up the North of Syria, this is about 000 million refugees will rush to Turkey, where the camps are already crammed with refugees ,, Bashar al-Assad, like his corrupt father, for the sake of his kovrik are ready to destroy and exterminate the entire population of Syria, to betray all their allies, yesterday's friends and patrons !! As soon as Assad had something wrong with the Kremlin, he immediately sent his representatives to Washington ??? what is it anyway ?? what is it called ?? for whom and what is Russia fighting there ?? for the sake of Assad Bashar ?? Yes, he will be the first to hand it over, how his father handed over to the USSR, and what is the Russian army doing there? Erdogan will not leave Syria, he will not leave the Turkomans to be torn apart by Assad, the Kremlin clearly understands this !!!
    1. The comment was deleted.
  13. AND
    +1
    20 October 2021 21: 04
    Quote: Eli
    Azerbaijan's support against Armenia in Nagorno-Karabakh

    - the author, if you please, explain, the seizure of the territories of Azerbaijan by Armenia in 1991-1994, are these the results of the First or Second World War ?? The article is very biased, the accents are placed absolutely incorrectly, and even more so the submitted conclusions and conclusions !!!! Erdogan is at his borders, for him Idlib, Aleppo and the North of Syria, where 250-300 Turkomans (Turks) live, is the same as for Russia Donbas and Crimea. Russia defends its "Russian world" in Ukraine, defends the right of its people to speak Russian, so why can't Erdogan do this ?? among other things, the war is going on at its very borders, imagine the situation that the Syrian army will begin to clean up the North of Syria, this is about 000 million refugees will rush to Turkey, where the camps are already crammed with refugees ,, Bashar al-Assad, like his corrupt father, for the sake of his kovrik are ready to destroy and exterminate the entire population of Syria, to betray all their allies, yesterday's friends and patrons !! As soon as Assad had something wrong with the Kremlin, he immediately sent his representatives to Washington ??? what is it anyway ?? what is it called ?? for whom and what is Russia fighting there ?? for the sake of Assad Bashar ?? Yes, he will be the first to hand it over, how his father handed over to the USSR, and what is the Russian army doing there? Erdogan will not leave Syria, he will not leave the Turkomans to be torn apart by Assad, the Kremlin clearly understands this !!!

    and what is the Russian army doing there?
    Study the mat part, the Russian military was invited by the legally elected President of Syria. On what basis and what is Turkey doing there?
    1. Eli
      -3
      21 October 2021 18: 52
      who told you such nonsense that Assad, the legally elected ???? who considers him as such ??? Turkomans of Syria, Assad, the murderer of 350 people, do not consider their President !!!
  14. 0
    20 October 2021 23: 06
    It is high time for them to hang without Syria, yesterday !!!
  15. -1
    21 October 2021 19: 04
    The Barmaley left Syria. For whom do we spend budget money there - that everything has become so good in the country and life is so good?
  16. AND
    +1
    21 October 2021 22: 14
    Quote: Eli
    who told you such nonsense that Assad, the legally elected ???? who considers him as such ??? Turkomans of Syria, Assad, the murderer of 350 people, do not consider their President !!!

    This is nonsense you are pushing here. Does the American pointer interfere? Assad was the chosen one of his people. The killers of the people of Syria are Americans, NATO, Israel, England, Turkey and ... The creators of igils, bandits of all stripes. Iraq witnessed this with Uncle Powell's test tube. Iran was next to fall, but Russia broke the loop of the anaconda. The highlight of this poker is that behind the scenes, one of the most important players, China, is quietly awaiting its release.
  17. 0
    29 October 2021 11: 28
    Even without Syria, the Turks must be contained on all fronts. Erdogan is getting impudent every hour.