Russia and the EU are heading confidently towards a trade war

13

On September 30, the authoritative business publication Vedomosti, citing sources, reported on the proposal of the Ministry of Economic Development of the Russian Federation to raise duties on a number of goods imported from the European Union. It is planned to impose additional taxes on alcoholic beverages (wine, beer), as well as perfumes and decorative cosmetics imported from the EU.

Despite the fact that the exact size of the new duties has not yet been determined, sources "Sheets" talk about rates "up to prohibitive".



Such innovations are primarily considered as a response to the restrictions imposed by the EU on the import of metallurgical products in 2018 and extended this summer by a decision of the European Commission until June 30, 2024.

Simply put, realizing that the EU is not going to abolish the protective duties adopted three years ago in relation to, among other things, the Russian metallurgy, Moscow decided to take retaliatory measures. In essence, this means that a trade war begins between the EU and Russia.

American prerequisites for European duties


Admittedly, Moscow did not want to aggravate for a long time. Not because the EU structures are friendly and open to cooperation with Russia (especially since this is far from being the case), but because the Kremlin was well aware of what exactly caused the protectionist measures taken by Brussels in 2018. Then, in the midst of the trade wars initiated by Donald Trump, the United States unilaterally imposed protective duties on the import of metal into its country. And on the EU countries, these measures were to affect almost the most strongly. As one might expect, the natural response of the European Union was the imposition of customs duties on a number of items of American products. The mirror measure is quite logical and understandable, which was supposed to equalize the state of affairs on both sides of the Atlantic.

Still further development economic The situation showed that 25% duties on jeans, motorcycles and whiskey from the United States have absolutely no effect on the situation on the European market for rolled metal products.

As a result, the European bureaucrats quickly realized that the only way to protect their producers, who had lost a significant part of the American sales market, was to reduce metal imports into the European Union itself. It was this fact that determined the restrictions on the import of metallurgical products into the territory of the Union adopted by Brussels in 2018. As a result, the increase in customs duties on metal supplied in excess of strictly limited quotas stabilized the situation on the European market and strengthened the competitive position of local producers.

Thus, the only response that the EU could give to American protectionism was European protectionism.

Nevertheless, paradoxical as it may seem, Russian producers hardly suffered from European duties at that time. Although the quotas were strict in terms of the impossibility of bypassing them, the volumes set by them were practically not exceeded by the Russian metal suppliers.

Reasons for exacerbation


It would seem, why then Russia now, three years after the introduction of the EU barrage measures, to introduce retaliatory measures? It is obvious from common sense that this is the result of several factors.

First, the market conditions have changed. Today, demand in the ferrous and non-ferrous metallurgy sectors has reached record highs since the start of the pandemic. Prices for the same steel, for example, increased not even by tens of percent, but several times. To be more precise - about twice as compared to the average historical values.

It is obvious that the demand for rolled metal products now, including on the European market, is going through the roof. And the quotas, the sizes of which were determined earlier, are no longer enough for Russian producers. Tariffs in the amount of a quarter of the value of the supplied products kill any hope of profitable deliveries above the norm.

That is, in fact, for all three years that the new EU customs regulations will be in effect, Russian manufacturers, and therefore the budget of the Russian Federation, will lose money. And it is obvious that this is already impossible to put up with.

Secondly, the primary reason for the introduction of duties by the EU is that American protectionist measures may be canceled in the near future. At the US-EU summit held in June 2021, the parties have already agreed to freeze customs duties for five years on products totaling $ 11,5 billion a year. Moreover, Washington and Brussels have officially announced their intention to end the trade war in the supply of steel and aluminum, for which a separate working group will be created.

Thus, a paradoxical situation arises. In 2018, the EU introduced duties, including on Russian rolled metal products, due to the trade war unleashed by the United States. Today, in 2021, Americans and Europeans agree to remove "metal" duties against each other. Logically, in this case, the EU would have to abolish the import duties on metal that affect Russia. But what do we see? That's right, the extension of these same duties for three years at once - until mid-2024. Obviously, Brussels officials played with protectionism and liked it.

Thirdly, relations between Russia and the EU countries are governed not only by mutual agreements and customs legislation of each of the parties, but also by the norms of the World Trade Organization, which Russia joined in 2012.
So you can't just take and impose any duties on the EU. It is important that the response is WTO compliant, i.e. were detailed in accordance with its rules. This is also why Russia was in no hurry to introduce duties in 2018. The process was too long and the benefit was too unobvious, given that the quotas were quite enough for Russian companies at that time. Today the situation has changed radically, and it is time for Moscow to act.

Means war


Thus, the bottom line is that the Russian Federation and the EU are indeed entering a new phase of confrontation, this time not for political, but on an economic basis. This time, the root cause is not sanctions, but duties. However, what both these cases have in common is the obvious provocative influence on the part of the United States. It was Washington that set the trend for trade wars and protectionism in the 2014st century, it was Washington that convinced the EU to adopt anti-Russian sanctions in XNUMX, and, finally, it was Washington in recent years that has persistently sought to drive a wedge between Brussels and Moscow.

Alas, in this situation, Russia simply has no choice but to introduce restrictive measures itself. It is clear that the EU is more likely to follow the lead of its overseas partner, but this does not make it easier for Russian metal suppliers. In the end, it was the EU countermeasures that forced the US to sit down at the negotiating table and begin lifting tariffs. So it turns out that the most correct step for the Russian Federation in this situation will be active involvement in the trade war. It was not Russia that untied it, but let's hope that it is she who will finish it.
13 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +1
    1 October 2021 10: 28
    There were just articles that Russian metallurgists had been sold to the west so far that the government was thinking of introducing new duties on their super-profits ...

    And suddenly, in essence, the opposite ..
    1. 0
      5 October 2021 01: 07
      Not the opposite. At the ESs, the light did not converge like a wedge (metallurgists have where to make money), but it is necessary to answer to rudeness.
  2. +4
    1 October 2021 11: 17
    Geyropa was, is and always will be an enemy of Russia, and on this basis a policy should be built towards them!
  3. -3
    1 October 2021 18: 57
    Russia entered the WTO on enslaving terms. Most of the competent specialists and economists were against the WTO. But if Putin surrounded himself with mediocre people, who voluntarily gave their families and finances to the EU hostage, will he listen to a different opinion. Therefore, the Kremlin will not declare any war, "show-off" is all! The war is when the main stakes in our enterprises will belong to Russia. When in our Duma there will be citizens of Russia, and not representatives of other countries. When the president and the government will fulfill the desire of their people, and not the wishes of the EU and the United States. And these desires, every year, Putin receives on the air.
    1. 0
      1 October 2021 23: 55
      Representatives of which countries are sitting in the Duma?
      1. -1
        3 October 2021 07: 41
        Representatives with dual citizenship, who by the way violate the constitution by this
  4. -2
    1 October 2021 19: 21
    So it turns out that the most correct step for the Russian Federation in this situation will be active involvement in the trade war. It was not Russia that untied it, but let's hope that it is she who will finish it.

    - Yes, exactly - the inclusion of Russia in the trade war ... - And the war is waged in different ways ...
    - Russia, for example, could buy scrap metal from ... from ... from Ukraine ... - From Ukraine, which today is so carried away by the export of scrap metal that it is already "not enough" in Ukraine ...
    - By doing this, Russia would have killed several birds with one stone ... - Turkey would have perplexed very much; which got into the habit of buying up all the Ukrainian scrap metal on the vine ... - and avoiding many restrictions from the EU ... - And also - by this very much to limit the Ukrainian metallurgy, which is a serious competitor to the Russian metallurgy (along with Japan, South Korea, India ... etc)...
    - And in this "war" ... - The EU itself would be the first to ask for a "truce" from Russia ... - and a "joint war" (between the EU and Russia) against Russian duties would begin ...
    1. 0
      5 October 2021 01: 11
      Why should we limit Ur-ina, if its metallurgy will be bent down without energy (gas, coal, atom)?
  5. 0
    1 October 2021 20: 41
    Apparently, Brussels officials played with protectionism and liked it.

    After a rapidly developing story with gas supplies, the Brussels theater of the absurd is hardly capable of surprising me with anything. smile

    These commissars in dusty helmets are unable to calculate the situation further than E2-E4 ..
  6. +1
    1 October 2021 20: 42
    Our retaliatory sanctions target foreign consumer goods. Those. common people will pay for our metallurgists. Perfect solution.
    1. +1
      2 October 2021 08: 41
      Well, "Russian metallurgists" have shamelessly raised the price of their products within the Russian Federation by two or three times since the end of last year, which led to a rise in prices in construction, etc. Have pity on them, unfortunate ones. Yes. Yes
    2. 0
      5 October 2021 01: 16
      Those. common people will pay for our metallurgists

      Another guardian for the common people.
      How bored you are!
      Common people have been buying Asian goods, South American, etc. for a long time.
      On your geyropeytsy and pi-sakh, the light did not converge like a wedge.

      The world, you know, is great and diverse.
  7. +2
    3 October 2021 19: 04
    With the current shortage of electricity, gas and coal in Europe, and in the next six months the deficit will remain, we will see what remains of the metallurgical industry in Europe, as one of the most energy-intensive industries.
    If the Europeans again stumble, as with gas, and do not abolish duties on the import of metals, then they will face a shortage of metals and, as a consequence, a rise in prices.
    And our metallurgists, even with the preservation of quotas, will receive a significant increase in profits from trading in metals with Europe. At the same time, our domestic prices for gas and coal, as raw materials for metallurgists, do not change significantly.
    So we are waiting for the spring-summer of next year, preparing for the reports of metallurgists on trillion-dollar revenues in 2022.