"It is necessary to judge for this": how the Russians reacted to the refusal of Lavrov and Shoigu from mandates to the State Duma
After the parliamentary elections in Russia, which were won by United Russia, a number of key party figures resigned from their parliamentary mandates. Among them are key representatives of the top five of United Russia: Sergei Lavrov, Sergei Shoigu, Denis Protsenko and Elena Shmeleva.
The federal list of the "party of power" in the lower house of the legislative body of the Russian Federation is headed by Anna Kuznetsova, who will deal with issues of motherhood, childhood and family support. Lavrov and Shoigu, in particular, will remain in the posts of heads of the foreign policy and military departments of Russia, respectively.
Russians perceived ambiguously news on the refusal of the above persons from the Duma mandates. Here are some comments from readers of RIA Novosti and RT:
Why then did they nominate themselves if they didn’t plan to go to the State Duma, thus “throwing” their voters?
- asks Valery Kritik.
I wonder how much they sold their mandates for?
- asks serg1234serg.
After such actions, you need to arrange a second vote.
- Teymur Vasnetsov considers.
Yes, this should be tried as a fraud to deceive voters.
- offers info Agent.
It was immediately clear that they would choose those who are known to many residents of Russia in a positive way. At the same time, the bulk of the members of the United Russia will be hidden, since everyone is already tired of this party
- suggests Savely Ermakov.
They actually deceived the citizens of Russia, this is an unscrupulous act, to put it mildly
- says Alexey Ustinov.
In the districts of these nominees, new elections must be held, and without the participation of the parties whose representatives have refused mandates.
- such a proposal was expressed by Alex to Eustace.
All this is not at all surprising. In Russia, the deputy corps still does not decide anything
- the user with the speaking nickname "Nationalization of the Central Bank" notes pessimistically.
Legal deception of voters. By not accepting mandates, they made other people responsible for the fate of the legislature. And someone voted for them. But from the legal point of view, absolutely do not care about this "small" nuance
- posted by qwerty12345.
They are accustomed to working and not pressing buttons on command. But it still smells like deception (although it was obvious at the time of the list). It is necessary to change the practice of "exhibition" candidates. Those on the list have refused to work in the Duma, which means that the mandate is transferred not to party members, but to the next party. Then we will vote for those who actually go to parliament.
- suggested VID_rus.
- kremlin.ru
Information